Today, dear reader, I am posting a speech delivered to participants at a roundtable discussion, with stakeholders, by the managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Ms. Christine Largade, at the Eko Hotel, Lagos, Nigeria, on December 20, 2011. Please read on:
"Good morning. It is a privilege to be here with you today. My thanks goes to the Nigerian Government for arranging this event, and to you all for taking the time to join us.
I would also like to express my gratitude to Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the Coordinating Minister for the Economy and Minister of Finance, and Central Bank Governor Sanusi Lamido Sanusi. Both have been instrumental in pursuing Nigeria’s economic transformation.
This is my first official visit to Nigeria — indeed my first visit to Africa — as IMF Managing Director. I can think of no better place to begin my discussions with the region and to work toward a stronger partnership.
To borrow some words from Ngozi:
This is the Africa of opportunity... the Africa where people take charge of their own futures... the Africa where people are looking for partnerships…
Nigeria — with its abundant resources, its wealth of people, and its vast potential — embodies this spirit of opportunity and Africa leadership.
Yet, these are challenging times for the global economy. The dark clouds of risk are gathering, and Nigeria and others in Africa will need to watch them carefully.
So, let me talk about four things today:
• First, the state of the global economy and the policies needed by countries at the heart of the crisis.
• Second, the growing risks for Nigeria and the region.
• Third, the importance of pursuing Nigeria’s Transformation Agenda both to guard against these risks and to promote shared growth for all Nigerians.
• And, fourth, how the IMF can help Nigeria and Africa face these challenges.
1. Global Outlook and Policies
As I have said many times, the world economy has been poised in a dangerous phase. In our last forecast, we still saw global growth at 4 percent for this year and next. But, today, the growth outlook is much dimmer. And, worse, there are severe downside risks.
A collective crisis of confidence is at the heart of the problem.
Adverse developments in the real economy and the financial sector keep feeding off each other, propelling each other down. And, as we have seen in Europe, there has been a loss of market confidence in both governments and banks.
Governments have been adjusting — in some cases with the help of IMF programs — but some not convincingly enough to regain market confidence. On top of this, unemployment remains unacceptably high in too many countries.
What does this mean for the policy path forward?
The advanced countries, especially those in the Euro Area, are at the center of the crisis. And they must be at the center of any solution.
In recent months, eurozone leaders have started to outline the key pillars of a solution. But, what is needed now is implementation.
Policies also need to focus on the bigger picture — the need to restore stability and growth, lasting growth.
The advanced economies need to strike an appropriate balance between fiscal and monetary policy to promote growth and stability. It means forging ahead with structural policies that focus squarely on boosting competitiveness, growth, and jobs. And, it means strengthening financial sector regulation to ensure a safer and more stable financial sector that is better able to support growth.
While these problems might seem a world away, without action, the world economy could be swept into a downward spiral of collapsing confidence, weaker growth, and fewer jobs.
And in today’s interconnected global economy, no country and no region is immune to these risks.
2. Implications for Nigeria and the Region
This brings me to my second point: how might these escalating global risks affect Africa and Nigeria?
Let me first acknowledge the progress in Sub-Saharan Africa, and here in Nigeria, over the past decade. Naturally, challenges remain. But the starting point for our discussion has shifted — shifted for the better.
Good economic policies have provided a platform: for higher growth, for more investment, for less poverty. Growth across the region averaged 5-6 percent or more over the past decade and, although it varies from country to country, this is significant. And the poverty rate declined from nearly 60 percent to just over 50 percent in the 10 years up to 2005.
That’s not to say the crisis didn’t hurt. The food and fuel crisis of 2008, and the global financial crisis that followed, took a toll on efforts to reduce poverty.
But, when the crisis hit, policymakers responded effectively. Most countries were able to maintain critical spending on health, education and infrastructure. And we saw countries in the region recover quickly, with growth rates now returning to levels enjoyed in the mid-2000s.
This is a testament to the hard work and dedication of policymakers and people across the region. Before the crisis, they reduced budget deficits and public debt; they brought down inflation, and built up foreign exchange reserves. In short, they put their economies on a fundamentally stronger footing.
Nigeria is no exception. Reforms initiated 6-7 years ago helped mitigate the impact of the global crisis. Nigeria’s economy continued to grow by 6 percent despite the crisis — and above the current regional average.
Growth looks set to continue at a healthy pace into next year. But, spillovers from the advanced economies threaten that outlook. Nigeria’s resilience is being tested again.
The trade and financial links, so critical to moving the economy forward in good times — ironically — become the interconnections that carry today’s escalating economic risks.
A sustained slowdown in advanced countries will dampen demand for Africa’s exports. And, together with continued financial market uncertainty, this will likely inhibit private financing flows, remittances, and concessional financing.
The potential for greater volatility in commodity markets could cause further disruptions, with winners and losers within the region. The risk of a drop in world oil prices if global demand weakens is the key watch point for Nigeria.
Faced with these risks, my main worry is that many countries do not have as much capacity to absorb shocks as they did three years ago. Added to that, the global slowdown could be more pronounced this time around.
Policies need to tread a fine line between defending against the global slowdown in the near-term, while also preserving fiscal resources for investment in much-needed infrastructure that will help promote employment and growth.
But, for the main part, policymakers need to focus on restoring the fiscal buffers that served the continent and Nigeria so well during the last downturn. It will be important to be prepared.
As Ben Okri, the Booker Prize-winning Nigerian novelist and poet, once said: “Life throws stones at you, but your love and your dream change those stones into the flowers of discovery.”
With the right vision, the right actions, today’s global risks need not become Nigeria’s reality.
3. Nigeria’s Transformation Agenda
Which brings me to my third point: how reforms underway in Nigeria are the key to guarding against risks, and securing more inclusive and lasting economic growth. At the outset, let me say that I am confident that Nigeria is on the right track.
Earlier this year, President Goodluck Jonathan described the goals of the government’s Transformation Agenda: “Nigeria needs to build a more inclusive society where every Nigerian would have equal access to economic and developmental opportunities.”
These echo the goals for many other countries in the region.
Yet this is not an easy task. In addition to growing global risks, the reform agenda also must contend with some serious local challenges.
Infrastructure gaps, particularly in the power sector, are also holding Nigeria back from its full growth potential. Nigeria’s electricity generation capacity, for example, is just 10 percent that of South Africa’s, while Nigeria’s population is more than 3 times greater.
And high unemployment is also a critical economic and social issue. This is especially true for Nigeria’s young people for whom the rate of unemployment is over 35 percent.
So, economic growth alone will not suffice. Job creation will be critical to ensuring that growth is both economically and socially sustainable.
There are three aspects of the government’s agenda that I see as crucial to this endeavor.
One, better managing Nigeria’s vast natural resource wealth.
Establishing the Sovereign Wealth Fund and emphasizing the use of oil revenues for stabilization and investment are important advancements. Pressing ahead with these reforms is particularly important given the external environment — namely, the need to rebuild fiscal buffers.
It will also help ensure that natural resource revenues are channeled more effectively toward the infrastructure investment needed for growth and jobs.
But, prudent management of natural resource revenues will also create room for other critical public spending. Given the distance still to go to reach the Millennium Development Goals, increasing the resources available to build stronger social safety nets is particularly important, including in areas such as maternal and child care.
Two, structural transformation.
Promoting a more diversified economy will help Nigeria better withstand shocks. It will also provide for more broad-based growth, with opportunities and jobs for the entire population.
There is huge, untapped potential here. Nigeria is an enormous market for investors. A market where telecommunications grew, with the explosion of mobile phone subscribers, from 60,000 in 2000 to 125 million today.
But much could still be done to improve Nigeria’s business environment. This will require investment to address infrastructure bottlenecks, to raise education levels, and to help development the agricultural sector.
It also means more reliable policies that can help promote macroeconomic stability and investor confidence.
Three, financial sector reform.
Nigeria’s banking system experienced a severe crisis in 2009, as over one third of banks became insolvent or seriously undercapitalized. But there has been an impressive record of reform. And actions to resolve the banking crisis are nearly complete.
Looking ahead, continued refinements in regulatory and supervisory practices should focus on preserving financial stability and improving access to credit.
This is a broad and challenging agenda. And, perhaps, what is most impressive is that it is an agenda for Nigeria, driven by Nigerians.
4. Role of the Fund
The IMF is here to support you and be a better partner for you. This is my final point.
I am committed to a deeper, more fruitful dialogue, with the IMF listening even more carefully to your needs. This will help us serve you even more effectively.
Nigeria is a thought leader in the region. And I am here to listen.
We have also been working hard to reform the IMF’s governance structure so that emerging market and developing countries have a greater voice in the institution. And, so we can be truly representative of our membership.
For those countries that need it, we have boosted our concessional lending capacity and made our lending instruments more flexible, with greater protections for social spending.
We are also redoubling our efforts to provide quality technical advice. The IMF has technical expertise to offer, expertise that can help African countries achieve their social and economic objectives; we have an active program of technical assistance with Nigerian public institutions. We can also play an important role, through our four, and soon to be five, regional technical assistance centers in Africa, of facilitating a sharing of expertise between countries.
Conclusion
Let me conclude with a thought from renowned Nigerian novelist Chinua Achebe. In Things Fall Apart, he wrote: “The sun will shine on those who stand, before it shines on those who kneel under them.”
There are challenges ahead. And this is the time for policymakers to stand up. To turn away from the global economic storm clouds and turn to the sun.
It is a time for action; a time for African leadership, Nigerian leadership. With continued action, Nigeria can be a source of growth, for itself, for the continent, and for the world.
Thank you."
End of Ms. Christine Largarde's speech - delivered to participants at a roundtable discussion at the Eko Hotel, Lagos, Nigeria, on December 20, 2011.
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
Monday, 19 December 2011
MUST ALL THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WATERVILLE/VAMED JUDGEMENT DEBT BE PROSECUTED?
If actually true, the gripping story of the chronology of events, which eventually led up to the GHc 52 millions judgement debt, paid to Mr. Alfred Agbesi Woyome, and the twenty five million Euros (€25m) awarded after arbitration, and paid to Waterville (BVI), as a result of the abrogation, by the Kufuor regime, on August 22, 2005, of a contract awarded to Waterville (BVI) and Vamed Engineering, both companies he was apparently associated with, is a truly fascinating one.
The said contract was apparently awarded to Waterville/Vamed Engineering on August 5, 2005, in accordance with the Public Procurement Act, 2003 (Act 663), by the Central Tender Review Board.
If the Kufuor regime indeed acted in arbitrary fashion, in abrogating the said contract, then, alas, it would appear that the chickens have finally come home to roost, for those who became so power-drunk, during the New Patriotic Party's tenure in office.
The Alfred Woyome story, if true, illustrates perfectly, how some of the most powerful individuals in the Kufuor regime, forgot that they did not actually own the Ghanaian nation-state - and consequently made them fall into the trap, of thinking, that somehow they were invincible: and beyond the long arm of the law.
It was therefore easy for them to make the grave error of judgment, of ignoring the fact that all governments in power at any given point in time, in Ghana's history, are mere tenants of the Ghanaian people at the Osu Castle - with a full-repair lease, subject to renewal once every four years: with a maximum occupation period of eight years.
Why else, dear reader, would such highly intelligent individuals, some with legal backgrounds, apparently choose to ignore perfectly sound advice, from not only one, but from a number of sources, not to proceed along the dangerous path they had decided to trod on - including that allegedly of Mr. Yaw Osafo-Marfo, who warned his cabinet colleagues, of the dire legal consequences, of abrogating a contract duly awarded by the Central Tender Review Board: in a cabinet memo said to have been dated 27th July 2005?
The question is: Did they unilaterally decide to abrogate the Waterville/Vamed Engineering contract, and allegedly give the job to the Shanghai Construction Group, because they stood to personally benefit, either directly, or indirectly, through third parties, from so doing?
Furthermore, who was the well-connected and wealthy Ghanaian "connection man/woman" (or group of individuals) who allegedly brought the Shanghai Construction Group into the picture - who doubtless used clout available to them at the Osu Castle, to obtain the contract through back-door channels?
The financial package said to have been outlined in the Waterville/Vamed Engineering bid offer, was said to be far better value for Ghana, and was clearly superior to that which the Shangai Construction Group eventually leveraged, and was said to have apparently financed the construction of the stadia with.
If so, did Ghana end up having to pay substantially more than it needed to, simply because some powerful and influential individuals, would benefit from that relatively more expensive loan - which in the end the Chinese company is alleged to have utilised, to finance the construction of the stadia?
It is such a pity that those power-drunk individuals ignored those of us, who kept on reminding them, that since no condition is permanent, a time would come when they would finally be turfed out of power - when they would eventually end up having to pay for their crimes against the Ghanaian people.
If they are really guilty of wilfully causing such huge losses to the Ghanaian nation-state, then despite the propaganda of their handsomely-paid hirelings-without-conscience, in the Ghanaian media (who conveniently forget, that Mother Ghana was indeed a gang-rape victim - brutally assaulted many times over, by Kufuor & Co.), this is one case of abuse of office, which the perfidious Kufuor & Co., must not be allowed to wriggle out of, under any circumstances.
Above all, the honest and patriotic individuals in the Mills regime, must ensure that the deliberate and self-serving tactics of inertia and procrastination often employed to kill such cases, by the crooks in the administration of the honest President Mills, are not allowed to be deployed to prevent the prosecution of those in the Kufuor-era, responsible for such egregious examples of: impunity; arbitrary exercise of power; abuse of office and grand corruption, at the highest levels of government.
If the Woyome story is true, then on behalf of the hapless taxpayers of Ghana, the Mills administration must ensure that all those whose actions resulted in the alleged payment of a judgment debt of such magnitude - approximately fifty two million Ghana cedis (Ghc 52m) to Mr. Alfred Agbesi Woyome and over twenty five million Euros (€25m) paid to Waterville (BVI) after arbitration - are prosecuted. Simply put, they will be failing Mother Ghana, if their regime fails to do so. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana, that actually works!):+ 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
The said contract was apparently awarded to Waterville/Vamed Engineering on August 5, 2005, in accordance with the Public Procurement Act, 2003 (Act 663), by the Central Tender Review Board.
If the Kufuor regime indeed acted in arbitrary fashion, in abrogating the said contract, then, alas, it would appear that the chickens have finally come home to roost, for those who became so power-drunk, during the New Patriotic Party's tenure in office.
The Alfred Woyome story, if true, illustrates perfectly, how some of the most powerful individuals in the Kufuor regime, forgot that they did not actually own the Ghanaian nation-state - and consequently made them fall into the trap, of thinking, that somehow they were invincible: and beyond the long arm of the law.
It was therefore easy for them to make the grave error of judgment, of ignoring the fact that all governments in power at any given point in time, in Ghana's history, are mere tenants of the Ghanaian people at the Osu Castle - with a full-repair lease, subject to renewal once every four years: with a maximum occupation period of eight years.
Why else, dear reader, would such highly intelligent individuals, some with legal backgrounds, apparently choose to ignore perfectly sound advice, from not only one, but from a number of sources, not to proceed along the dangerous path they had decided to trod on - including that allegedly of Mr. Yaw Osafo-Marfo, who warned his cabinet colleagues, of the dire legal consequences, of abrogating a contract duly awarded by the Central Tender Review Board: in a cabinet memo said to have been dated 27th July 2005?
The question is: Did they unilaterally decide to abrogate the Waterville/Vamed Engineering contract, and allegedly give the job to the Shanghai Construction Group, because they stood to personally benefit, either directly, or indirectly, through third parties, from so doing?
Furthermore, who was the well-connected and wealthy Ghanaian "connection man/woman" (or group of individuals) who allegedly brought the Shanghai Construction Group into the picture - who doubtless used clout available to them at the Osu Castle, to obtain the contract through back-door channels?
The financial package said to have been outlined in the Waterville/Vamed Engineering bid offer, was said to be far better value for Ghana, and was clearly superior to that which the Shangai Construction Group eventually leveraged, and was said to have apparently financed the construction of the stadia with.
If so, did Ghana end up having to pay substantially more than it needed to, simply because some powerful and influential individuals, would benefit from that relatively more expensive loan - which in the end the Chinese company is alleged to have utilised, to finance the construction of the stadia?
It is such a pity that those power-drunk individuals ignored those of us, who kept on reminding them, that since no condition is permanent, a time would come when they would finally be turfed out of power - when they would eventually end up having to pay for their crimes against the Ghanaian people.
If they are really guilty of wilfully causing such huge losses to the Ghanaian nation-state, then despite the propaganda of their handsomely-paid hirelings-without-conscience, in the Ghanaian media (who conveniently forget, that Mother Ghana was indeed a gang-rape victim - brutally assaulted many times over, by Kufuor & Co.), this is one case of abuse of office, which the perfidious Kufuor & Co., must not be allowed to wriggle out of, under any circumstances.
Above all, the honest and patriotic individuals in the Mills regime, must ensure that the deliberate and self-serving tactics of inertia and procrastination often employed to kill such cases, by the crooks in the administration of the honest President Mills, are not allowed to be deployed to prevent the prosecution of those in the Kufuor-era, responsible for such egregious examples of: impunity; arbitrary exercise of power; abuse of office and grand corruption, at the highest levels of government.
If the Woyome story is true, then on behalf of the hapless taxpayers of Ghana, the Mills administration must ensure that all those whose actions resulted in the alleged payment of a judgment debt of such magnitude - approximately fifty two million Ghana cedis (Ghc 52m) to Mr. Alfred Agbesi Woyome and over twenty five million Euros (€25m) paid to Waterville (BVI) after arbitration - are prosecuted. Simply put, they will be failing Mother Ghana, if their regime fails to do so. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana, that actually works!):+ 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Sunday, 18 December 2011
FOOD FOR THOUGHT FROM THE UK FOR GHANA'S FORMER PRESIDENT RAWLINGS?
When Britain's Queen Elizabeth11, last visited Ghana (7–9 November, 1999), the then elected leader of Ghana, President Rawlings, asked her to help Ghana fight corruption.
From what he is said to have told visitors who accompanied soccer legend, Samuel Osei Kufuor, to pay a courtesy call on him, at his Ridge office recently, he seems to be labouring under the illusion that the Establishments of the wealthy nations of the West, have kept their values intact, and haven't allowed "money" to corrode those values - unlike "present day Ghana". He may be in for a rude shock.
Whiles agreeing with most of Mr. Rawlings' concerns that corrupt elements in our country seem to be escaping from paying for their crimes against Ghana, I will also quote, for the benefit of Mr. Rawlings, the reaction of a wag I know, when he saw a photograph of Mrs. Rawlings dancing (at a K. K. Fosu concert, if I remember correctly!) with President Kufuor, not too long ago.
Former President Kufuor, as we all know, is a man, who Mr. Rawlings used to condemn President Mills strongly, for not prosecuting him - and ensuring that he ended up being jailed for corruption.
That is why, upon seeing that astonishing photograph, the wag I know, asked the rhetorical question: "Kofi, who would be Mrs. Rawlings' dancing partner today - if Mills had gone ahead and prosecuted and jailed Kufuor, as she and her husband had wanted?"
Well, dear reader, I do hope that somehow, someone will draw President Rawlings' attention, to the culled Daily Telegraph article, which I am reproducing below. It was written by the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator, Peter Oborne.
Alas, Mr Rawlings' illusion about the moral values of Britain's politicians, may be shattered for good, after he reads that brilliant piece. As we say in local parlance in Ghana: "Massa, nowhere cool!"
Mr. Rawlings has railed against corruption in Ghana since 1979. He has also ruled our nation for a combined total of over some twenty odd years. He did not bring an end to corruption in Ghana, in all those years he was in office for.
President Mills has only been in office for a little under four years. There are those who will say, that it is totally unrealistic, and most unfair, to expect him to have succeeded in rooting out corruption in the country, within that relatively short period, he has been in office, as Ghana's president.
With respect, Mr. Rawlings must stop undermining President Mills, so - a man of undoubted integrity, respected by all decent and fair-minded Ghanaians. An officer and a gentleman must not be so publicly disloyal to the commander-in-chief of the Ghana Armed Forces - particularly at this critical juncture of our nation's history. Not when there is no real justification for it - and there isn't, if truth be told.
President Mills does not run a military dictatorship - he is an elected executive president, in a nation that, at least, on paper, is a constitutional democracy, with inbuilt checks and balances: which place limitations on his powers. It is important that Mr. Rawlings never forgets that. Period. Please read on:
"This sorry display of self-interest brings shame on the Commons
By Peter Oborne Politics Last updated: December 14th, 2011
Even after the expenses scandal, many of our MPs are still putting greed before duty
I have relatively few political heroes, but one is Elizabeth Filkin, who briefly served as parliamentary commissioner for standards a decade ago. She was appointed to her post in the wake of a wave of notorious financial scandals, mainly involving Conservative politicians. Her job was to clean up politics.
Filkin’s mistake was to take her job description literally. She exposed an appalling pattern of bullying, arrogance and greed at the heart of Westminster. MPs were appalled.
However, instead of punishing the malefactors, they turned their fire on Filkin herself, using threats, malicious gossip and a campaign of media vilification in order to rub her out. It was an all-party effort – the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem whips offices were all gleeful participants – that soon made sure she was out of a job.
In retrospect, Elizabeth Filkin was the canary in the mine – an advance signal that British politicians were bent. Years were to pass before, thanks to the vigilance of The Daily Telegraph, voters learnt the hideous truth about the lies, thievery and moral corruption of so many MPs.
Today, history is repeating itself. Shamed by the expenses scandal, Parliament was forced to create an external body, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), to regulate the payments. From the start, MPs bitterly resented having to submit their claims to it for authorisation, just as a decade ago they hated Filkin.
Their assault on Ipsa, which began within weeks of it starting operations in May last year, has taken place on a number of levels. First, in an echo of the vindictive campaign of character assassination aimed at Mrs Filkin, senior Ipsa personnel have been targeted. Both the chairman, Sir Ian Kennedy – a hard-working and decent man, committed to public service – and his admirable chief executive, Andrew McDonald, have been the subject of vicious attack.
In an especially shameful act, Labour’s Ann Clwyd took advantage of parliamentary privilege to accuse Ipsa’s spokesman of leaking details of MPs’ expenses to the press. Clwyd furnished no evidence of her assertion, which has been convincingly denied, and she must have known that a public official was in no position to answer back. Clwyd has never had the guts to repeat her inflammatory accusation outside the Commons.
Even worse than this flagrant abuse of privilege, however, have been the verbal assaults and bullying aimed at ordinary Ipsa staff. Within days of the opening of Parliament in May last year, MPs were being openly resentful when asked to provide evidence that they incurred expenses, and became verbally aggressive when they were not paid at once. At least one resorted to foul language, reducing the very junior official he was dealing with to tears. While there were teething problems – as with any organisation – this behaviour was unforgivable.
Bad though they were, these venomous assaults played a relatively small part in Parliament’s campaign to discredit Ipsa. In the short time that this tiny quango has existed, it has been obliged to endure no fewer than five external reviews and audits: two from the National Audit Office, separate reviews from the Public Accounts Committee and Office of Government Commerce, and a fifth from the Committee on Members’ Expenses. The second of the NAO examinations was a so-called “value for money” audit. I have found no precedent for such an examination taking place of an organisation that had not even presented its first-year accounts.
It is obvious that something very fishy is going on. The level of attention paid to Ipsa would be appropriate – desirable, even – if it was a major government department. It is a minute quango.
Here is the truth. MPs are deeply interested in how Ipsa works because it affects them in the pocket. They passionately resent its existence, and their real ambition is revealed in a report this week by the Committee on Members’ Expenses. It is a disreputable piece of work, full of errors and inconsistencies. It claims to support independent regulation of MPs’ expenses, but close examination reveals a completely different agenda.
The committee is urging a return to flat-rate allowances, which means effectively no accountability to the taxpayer. Worse still, it demands that administration of expenses should return to the House of Commons, recreating the old Fees Office, which allowed MPs to get away with pretty well anything. These proposals are to be discussed today in a debate that has been called with suspicious speed: normally it takes ages to arrange such an event in the Commons.
Something very sad is going on here. Many backbench MPs and ministers are indeed honest and decent people, dedicated to public service. But a sizeable minority of legislators are in politics for what they can get, as the expenses scandal proved.
Today’s debate is being called at a time of unprecedented national austerity, when the average living standards of ordinary people are being sliced away at a rate unprecedented since the Second World War. As a result, there are many more profound and urgent issues, yet today Parliament is setting aside valuable time to debate the terms and conditions of just 650 fairly well-paid and middle-class people.
The paradox is that Parliament is just beginning to regain the trust of voters after the appalling abuses of recent years, with the recent intake the most public-spirited and brilliant in living memory. So I hope that readers of The Daily Telegraph will take a close look at the Members who gather today.
I daresay they will find that the Commons chamber will be fuller than usual, as public duty takes second place to private gain. This spectacle is disastrous for our politics, and now is surely the moment for the three party leaders to show leadership by bringing this sorry display of self-interest to an end.
The trouble is that David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg are all terrified of their own backbenches. It is worth remembering that the Prime Minister’s initial instinct was to prevent the Committee on Members’ Expenses forming at all, but changed his mind after one of his periodic maulings by the 1922 Committee. Cameron was presumably told by his Whips that one way of buying off angry backbenchers was by holding out the prospect of an improvement in the rations.
It is exactly 100 years since the decision was made to award MPs an annual stipend, then worth some £400 a year. It is still interesting today to read the debate at which the sum was agreed. The dominant assumption that informed this debate (which had been spurred by the election for the first time of Labour MPs, who lacked independent means) was that there exists a firm distinction between private interest and public duty.
The chancellor of the exchequer, David Lloyd George, summed up this mood when he told the Commons the sum was simply an allowance to cover expenses and explicitly not intended to be “a recognition of the magnitude of the service”. Sadly, this sense that the job of an MP was its own reward, measured in honour, has long since vanished. Today’s Commons debate marks a reminder of the tragic abyss which divides so many members of the political class from mainstream standards of decency and restraint."
End of culled article from the Daily Telegraph.
From what he is said to have told visitors who accompanied soccer legend, Samuel Osei Kufuor, to pay a courtesy call on him, at his Ridge office recently, he seems to be labouring under the illusion that the Establishments of the wealthy nations of the West, have kept their values intact, and haven't allowed "money" to corrode those values - unlike "present day Ghana". He may be in for a rude shock.
Whiles agreeing with most of Mr. Rawlings' concerns that corrupt elements in our country seem to be escaping from paying for their crimes against Ghana, I will also quote, for the benefit of Mr. Rawlings, the reaction of a wag I know, when he saw a photograph of Mrs. Rawlings dancing (at a K. K. Fosu concert, if I remember correctly!) with President Kufuor, not too long ago.
Former President Kufuor, as we all know, is a man, who Mr. Rawlings used to condemn President Mills strongly, for not prosecuting him - and ensuring that he ended up being jailed for corruption.
That is why, upon seeing that astonishing photograph, the wag I know, asked the rhetorical question: "Kofi, who would be Mrs. Rawlings' dancing partner today - if Mills had gone ahead and prosecuted and jailed Kufuor, as she and her husband had wanted?"
Well, dear reader, I do hope that somehow, someone will draw President Rawlings' attention, to the culled Daily Telegraph article, which I am reproducing below. It was written by the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator, Peter Oborne.
Alas, Mr Rawlings' illusion about the moral values of Britain's politicians, may be shattered for good, after he reads that brilliant piece. As we say in local parlance in Ghana: "Massa, nowhere cool!"
Mr. Rawlings has railed against corruption in Ghana since 1979. He has also ruled our nation for a combined total of over some twenty odd years. He did not bring an end to corruption in Ghana, in all those years he was in office for.
President Mills has only been in office for a little under four years. There are those who will say, that it is totally unrealistic, and most unfair, to expect him to have succeeded in rooting out corruption in the country, within that relatively short period, he has been in office, as Ghana's president.
With respect, Mr. Rawlings must stop undermining President Mills, so - a man of undoubted integrity, respected by all decent and fair-minded Ghanaians. An officer and a gentleman must not be so publicly disloyal to the commander-in-chief of the Ghana Armed Forces - particularly at this critical juncture of our nation's history. Not when there is no real justification for it - and there isn't, if truth be told.
President Mills does not run a military dictatorship - he is an elected executive president, in a nation that, at least, on paper, is a constitutional democracy, with inbuilt checks and balances: which place limitations on his powers. It is important that Mr. Rawlings never forgets that. Period. Please read on:
"This sorry display of self-interest brings shame on the Commons
By Peter Oborne Politics Last updated: December 14th, 2011
Even after the expenses scandal, many of our MPs are still putting greed before duty
I have relatively few political heroes, but one is Elizabeth Filkin, who briefly served as parliamentary commissioner for standards a decade ago. She was appointed to her post in the wake of a wave of notorious financial scandals, mainly involving Conservative politicians. Her job was to clean up politics.
Filkin’s mistake was to take her job description literally. She exposed an appalling pattern of bullying, arrogance and greed at the heart of Westminster. MPs were appalled.
However, instead of punishing the malefactors, they turned their fire on Filkin herself, using threats, malicious gossip and a campaign of media vilification in order to rub her out. It was an all-party effort – the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem whips offices were all gleeful participants – that soon made sure she was out of a job.
In retrospect, Elizabeth Filkin was the canary in the mine – an advance signal that British politicians were bent. Years were to pass before, thanks to the vigilance of The Daily Telegraph, voters learnt the hideous truth about the lies, thievery and moral corruption of so many MPs.
Today, history is repeating itself. Shamed by the expenses scandal, Parliament was forced to create an external body, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), to regulate the payments. From the start, MPs bitterly resented having to submit their claims to it for authorisation, just as a decade ago they hated Filkin.
Their assault on Ipsa, which began within weeks of it starting operations in May last year, has taken place on a number of levels. First, in an echo of the vindictive campaign of character assassination aimed at Mrs Filkin, senior Ipsa personnel have been targeted. Both the chairman, Sir Ian Kennedy – a hard-working and decent man, committed to public service – and his admirable chief executive, Andrew McDonald, have been the subject of vicious attack.
In an especially shameful act, Labour’s Ann Clwyd took advantage of parliamentary privilege to accuse Ipsa’s spokesman of leaking details of MPs’ expenses to the press. Clwyd furnished no evidence of her assertion, which has been convincingly denied, and she must have known that a public official was in no position to answer back. Clwyd has never had the guts to repeat her inflammatory accusation outside the Commons.
Even worse than this flagrant abuse of privilege, however, have been the verbal assaults and bullying aimed at ordinary Ipsa staff. Within days of the opening of Parliament in May last year, MPs were being openly resentful when asked to provide evidence that they incurred expenses, and became verbally aggressive when they were not paid at once. At least one resorted to foul language, reducing the very junior official he was dealing with to tears. While there were teething problems – as with any organisation – this behaviour was unforgivable.
Bad though they were, these venomous assaults played a relatively small part in Parliament’s campaign to discredit Ipsa. In the short time that this tiny quango has existed, it has been obliged to endure no fewer than five external reviews and audits: two from the National Audit Office, separate reviews from the Public Accounts Committee and Office of Government Commerce, and a fifth from the Committee on Members’ Expenses. The second of the NAO examinations was a so-called “value for money” audit. I have found no precedent for such an examination taking place of an organisation that had not even presented its first-year accounts.
It is obvious that something very fishy is going on. The level of attention paid to Ipsa would be appropriate – desirable, even – if it was a major government department. It is a minute quango.
Here is the truth. MPs are deeply interested in how Ipsa works because it affects them in the pocket. They passionately resent its existence, and their real ambition is revealed in a report this week by the Committee on Members’ Expenses. It is a disreputable piece of work, full of errors and inconsistencies. It claims to support independent regulation of MPs’ expenses, but close examination reveals a completely different agenda.
The committee is urging a return to flat-rate allowances, which means effectively no accountability to the taxpayer. Worse still, it demands that administration of expenses should return to the House of Commons, recreating the old Fees Office, which allowed MPs to get away with pretty well anything. These proposals are to be discussed today in a debate that has been called with suspicious speed: normally it takes ages to arrange such an event in the Commons.
Something very sad is going on here. Many backbench MPs and ministers are indeed honest and decent people, dedicated to public service. But a sizeable minority of legislators are in politics for what they can get, as the expenses scandal proved.
Today’s debate is being called at a time of unprecedented national austerity, when the average living standards of ordinary people are being sliced away at a rate unprecedented since the Second World War. As a result, there are many more profound and urgent issues, yet today Parliament is setting aside valuable time to debate the terms and conditions of just 650 fairly well-paid and middle-class people.
The paradox is that Parliament is just beginning to regain the trust of voters after the appalling abuses of recent years, with the recent intake the most public-spirited and brilliant in living memory. So I hope that readers of The Daily Telegraph will take a close look at the Members who gather today.
I daresay they will find that the Commons chamber will be fuller than usual, as public duty takes second place to private gain. This spectacle is disastrous for our politics, and now is surely the moment for the three party leaders to show leadership by bringing this sorry display of self-interest to an end.
The trouble is that David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg are all terrified of their own backbenches. It is worth remembering that the Prime Minister’s initial instinct was to prevent the Committee on Members’ Expenses forming at all, but changed his mind after one of his periodic maulings by the 1922 Committee. Cameron was presumably told by his Whips that one way of buying off angry backbenchers was by holding out the prospect of an improvement in the rations.
It is exactly 100 years since the decision was made to award MPs an annual stipend, then worth some £400 a year. It is still interesting today to read the debate at which the sum was agreed. The dominant assumption that informed this debate (which had been spurred by the election for the first time of Labour MPs, who lacked independent means) was that there exists a firm distinction between private interest and public duty.
The chancellor of the exchequer, David Lloyd George, summed up this mood when he told the Commons the sum was simply an allowance to cover expenses and explicitly not intended to be “a recognition of the magnitude of the service”. Sadly, this sense that the job of an MP was its own reward, measured in honour, has long since vanished. Today’s Commons debate marks a reminder of the tragic abyss which divides so many members of the political class from mainstream standards of decency and restraint."
End of culled article from the Daily Telegraph.
Friday, 16 December 2011
WHY AN OIL-PRODUCING GHANA IS MUCH MUCH SAFER IN THE HANDS OF PRESIDENT MILLS!
To understand why patriotic and nationalistic Ghanaian voters, in pending elections in one of Africa's newest oil-producing nations, really ought to give President Mills a second term in office, one has to remember a few pertinent Ghanaian oil industry facts.
Fact number one: President Mills rejected a bribe from American oil company executives - not too long after he assumed office. There are few leaders anywhere in the developing world, who would do same, dear reader - and one must therefore commend Mills, for being a man of such unalloyed integrity: and a shining example to political leaders worldwide.
Fact number two: It will be recalled, that a number of American oil company executives paid courtesy calls on the sitting president, during the era of President Mills' predecessor, the perfidious President Kufour.
One wonders whether they made the same offer they made to President Mills, to President Kufuor, too, then - which perhaps is what made them so bold to repeat the offer to Mills, when they subsequently paid a courtesy call on him, at the Osu Castle, not too long after he became president.
Fact number three: Furthermore, it is also a fact that during the Kufuor-era, two private individuals, fellow Ghanaian citizens (both not previously known by either Ghanaian or U.S. tax authorities to be high net worth individuals!), who did not even pay a pesewa upfront, for such valuable assets, eventually ended up owning shares in oil blocs, in Ghanaian oilfields, off our country's shores.
Does it follow, a priori, therefore, from all the above, dear reader, that that is why thus far, under the current administration, we have not seen any private individuals from Ghana, emerging as partners of foreign oil companies, operating in any of the oilfields off our nation's shores - and owning shares in oil blocs in those selfsame oilfields: using special purpose vehicles for the purpose?
And is that why, although under President Kufuor, there was the E. O. Group, under his successor, President Mills, there has not been any such entity, in private Ghanaian hands? Is that why we have so far not heard of the existence of an equivalent of the E. O. Group - which, perhaps, during the tenure of a National Democratic Congress (NDC) government, might be known as the Eyeeh Zuu Zaa Group (the E. Z. Z. Group), for example?
Fact number four: A number of senior New Patriotic Party (NPP) figures, have made promises to wealthy mavericks within their ranks, that they will be given shares in oil blocs - to pacify them and stop them from rocking the MV NPP-boat-of-plenty 11, and possibly losing them the December 2012 elections.
An egregious example, is the offer of an oil bloc (should the NPP be returned to power again after the December 2012 elections - God forbid!), made to silence the maverick tycoon, Mr. Ayisi Boateng.
Some readers will recall, that to keep the selfsame Ayisi Boateng content and quiet, during the tenure of the NPP regime of President Kufuor, he was given a timber concession by those super-rogues, Kufuor & Co. (the tribal-supremacist cabal, which had an iron grip on the NPP, throughout the Kufuor-era), in order to stop him from rocking the MV NPP-boat-of-plenty 1 - and causing it to take in too much water: and sink.
In view of all the above, if the discerning and independent-minded individuals, whose crucial swing-votes now determine which party's candidate becomes Ghana's president, want to protect Ghana's oil revenues, and stop them from ending up in the offshore bank accounts of a few powerful and well-connected individuals, with greedy ambitions, then they must vote en masse for President Mills, in the December 2012 presidential elections.
The fact of the matter, is that an oil-producing Ghana, is far safer, in the very honest hands of President Mills, than those of any other politician, in present-day Ghana. It is therefore in the national interest, and vital for the well-being of ordinary Ghanaians, going forward, that President Mills is re-elected to power again, in December 2012. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Fact number one: President Mills rejected a bribe from American oil company executives - not too long after he assumed office. There are few leaders anywhere in the developing world, who would do same, dear reader - and one must therefore commend Mills, for being a man of such unalloyed integrity: and a shining example to political leaders worldwide.
Fact number two: It will be recalled, that a number of American oil company executives paid courtesy calls on the sitting president, during the era of President Mills' predecessor, the perfidious President Kufour.
One wonders whether they made the same offer they made to President Mills, to President Kufuor, too, then - which perhaps is what made them so bold to repeat the offer to Mills, when they subsequently paid a courtesy call on him, at the Osu Castle, not too long after he became president.
Fact number three: Furthermore, it is also a fact that during the Kufuor-era, two private individuals, fellow Ghanaian citizens (both not previously known by either Ghanaian or U.S. tax authorities to be high net worth individuals!), who did not even pay a pesewa upfront, for such valuable assets, eventually ended up owning shares in oil blocs, in Ghanaian oilfields, off our country's shores.
Does it follow, a priori, therefore, from all the above, dear reader, that that is why thus far, under the current administration, we have not seen any private individuals from Ghana, emerging as partners of foreign oil companies, operating in any of the oilfields off our nation's shores - and owning shares in oil blocs in those selfsame oilfields: using special purpose vehicles for the purpose?
And is that why, although under President Kufuor, there was the E. O. Group, under his successor, President Mills, there has not been any such entity, in private Ghanaian hands? Is that why we have so far not heard of the existence of an equivalent of the E. O. Group - which, perhaps, during the tenure of a National Democratic Congress (NDC) government, might be known as the Eyeeh Zuu Zaa Group (the E. Z. Z. Group), for example?
Fact number four: A number of senior New Patriotic Party (NPP) figures, have made promises to wealthy mavericks within their ranks, that they will be given shares in oil blocs - to pacify them and stop them from rocking the MV NPP-boat-of-plenty 11, and possibly losing them the December 2012 elections.
An egregious example, is the offer of an oil bloc (should the NPP be returned to power again after the December 2012 elections - God forbid!), made to silence the maverick tycoon, Mr. Ayisi Boateng.
Some readers will recall, that to keep the selfsame Ayisi Boateng content and quiet, during the tenure of the NPP regime of President Kufuor, he was given a timber concession by those super-rogues, Kufuor & Co. (the tribal-supremacist cabal, which had an iron grip on the NPP, throughout the Kufuor-era), in order to stop him from rocking the MV NPP-boat-of-plenty 1 - and causing it to take in too much water: and sink.
In view of all the above, if the discerning and independent-minded individuals, whose crucial swing-votes now determine which party's candidate becomes Ghana's president, want to protect Ghana's oil revenues, and stop them from ending up in the offshore bank accounts of a few powerful and well-connected individuals, with greedy ambitions, then they must vote en masse for President Mills, in the December 2012 presidential elections.
The fact of the matter, is that an oil-producing Ghana, is far safer, in the very honest hands of President Mills, than those of any other politician, in present-day Ghana. It is therefore in the national interest, and vital for the well-being of ordinary Ghanaians, going forward, that President Mills is re-elected to power again, in December 2012. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Thursday, 15 December 2011
Ghana's NCA Must Take A Leaf From Britain's Ofcom's Book!
The nonsensical demand for "an independent technical arbiter" made on behalf of the telecommunications companies operating in Ghana, by their well-funded lobbying body, the so-called Telecoms Chamber, is yet another example, of the disrespect shown to our institutions of state, by many foreign investors operating in Ghana.
Would Vodafone Ghana, for example - which, incidentally, did not pay even a pesewa for its valuable 3G license, because of the stupidity and greed of some of our previous rulers - have had the temerity to make such an absurd demand to Ofcom, the UK's independent regulator, and competition authority, for that nation's communications industry's players?
As a wag I know, said to me recently, in a conversation centred on how the telcos operating in Ghana, are getting away with ripping phone users off (both mobile and land-line), with complete impunity: "Kofi, it is precisely because there is no shortage of willing local lackeys (those confounded quislings and stooges for neo-colonialism and imperialism, in our midst, in Nkrumah's Ghana), always happy to do their dirty work for them, that they can behave in such arrogant and disrespectful ways - which they would never dream of doing in their countries of domicile." How very true.
To be charitable to the hapless Kweku Sakyi Addo, whose Telecoms Chamber is actually the industry's paid lobbyist - let us not forget - and in many ways is a really splendid fellow, perhaps the old cynic who made the above observation, was being a tad unfair to him, but it is important that he does not see his handsomely compensated work, simply as making endless excuses for the telcos operating here.
He must rather ask for forbearance on the part of phone users in Ghana, at every opportunity he gets to interact with them, and the Ghanaian media - whiles he gets the crafty telcos to work in assiduous fashion, to overcome their sodden challenges, whatever they are.
Phone users in Ghana just want good quality, world-class service - not endless excuses and smug passing-the-buck PR. That is insulting their intelligence. Period.
Luckily, the current head of the National Communications Authority (NCA), has shown that he is a true patriot and Ghanaian nationalist of the first order - and the result is that unlike the past, the NCA of today, is firmly on the side of consumers in Ghana, who use mobile phones and land-line phones.
Consequently, my humble advice to the NCA, in this matter that is an egregious example of sharp-practice-in-commerce, affecting the welfare of millions of Ghanaian consumers, is simply to take a good look at Ofcom's website, and replicate it (adapting it to suit local conditions where necessary) here quickly - to provide an interactive online platform, through which the general public in Ghana, can fight to get quality service from those perfidious entities: who virtually have a license, literally, to print money in Ghana.
There is nothing quite like online opprobrium, delivered at the click of a computer mouse or the pressing of a mobile device's sent-key by disaffected phone users, to shame even the most thick-skinned executive, in charge of an arrogant and hard-of-hearing telecommunications multinational, operating in an emerging market.
In the light of all the above, therefore, dear reader, an interactive NCA website, just like that of the UK's Ofcom, is precisely what is needed to keep the telco's operating here in check, in a transparent manner - which is why it is vital that the NCA takes a leaf from Ofcom's book, in that regard.
Would Vodafone Ghana, for example - which, incidentally, did not pay even a pesewa for its valuable 3G license, because of the stupidity and greed of some of our previous rulers - have had the temerity to make such an absurd demand to Ofcom, the UK's independent regulator, and competition authority, for that nation's communications industry's players?
As a wag I know, said to me recently, in a conversation centred on how the telcos operating in Ghana, are getting away with ripping phone users off (both mobile and land-line), with complete impunity: "Kofi, it is precisely because there is no shortage of willing local lackeys (those confounded quislings and stooges for neo-colonialism and imperialism, in our midst, in Nkrumah's Ghana), always happy to do their dirty work for them, that they can behave in such arrogant and disrespectful ways - which they would never dream of doing in their countries of domicile." How very true.
To be charitable to the hapless Kweku Sakyi Addo, whose Telecoms Chamber is actually the industry's paid lobbyist - let us not forget - and in many ways is a really splendid fellow, perhaps the old cynic who made the above observation, was being a tad unfair to him, but it is important that he does not see his handsomely compensated work, simply as making endless excuses for the telcos operating here.
He must rather ask for forbearance on the part of phone users in Ghana, at every opportunity he gets to interact with them, and the Ghanaian media - whiles he gets the crafty telcos to work in assiduous fashion, to overcome their sodden challenges, whatever they are.
Phone users in Ghana just want good quality, world-class service - not endless excuses and smug passing-the-buck PR. That is insulting their intelligence. Period.
Luckily, the current head of the National Communications Authority (NCA), has shown that he is a true patriot and Ghanaian nationalist of the first order - and the result is that unlike the past, the NCA of today, is firmly on the side of consumers in Ghana, who use mobile phones and land-line phones.
Consequently, my humble advice to the NCA, in this matter that is an egregious example of sharp-practice-in-commerce, affecting the welfare of millions of Ghanaian consumers, is simply to take a good look at Ofcom's website, and replicate it (adapting it to suit local conditions where necessary) here quickly - to provide an interactive online platform, through which the general public in Ghana, can fight to get quality service from those perfidious entities: who virtually have a license, literally, to print money in Ghana.
There is nothing quite like online opprobrium, delivered at the click of a computer mouse or the pressing of a mobile device's sent-key by disaffected phone users, to shame even the most thick-skinned executive, in charge of an arrogant and hard-of-hearing telecommunications multinational, operating in an emerging market.
In the light of all the above, therefore, dear reader, an interactive NCA website, just like that of the UK's Ofcom, is precisely what is needed to keep the telco's operating here in check, in a transparent manner - which is why it is vital that the NCA takes a leaf from Ofcom's book, in that regard.
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
An Open Letter To The Minister For Lands And Natural Resources
Dear Honourable Minister,
Re: Utilising "Admitted Farm" Inside Atewa Range Forest Reserve for Community-based Carbon Sequestration Project
We are writing to find out whether your ministry could recommend approval by the Forestry Service (FS) of the Forestry Commission (FC), of a change of land use, for our "admitted farm" inside the Atewa Forest Reserve.
We are of the considered view that at a time of global climate change, owners of "admitted farms" inside forest reserves, ought to be permitted to use their farms for community carbon sequestration projects.
That will enable the owners of those "admitted farms" to partner the local fringe forest communities they are members of, in community-based carbon sequestration projects, for their mutual benefit.
Our family acquired a total of 14sq miles of land in the Atewa Range upland evergreen rain forest, between 1921 and 1926 - on a freehold basis.
Shortly after the landholding was consolidated with the purchase of the final parcel of additional land, part of the area was designated a
government forest reserve.
It so happens that part of our property was included in the area designated a government reserve.
It is what is known in Forestry Service jargon as an "admitted farm." The total acreage in question amounts to 99.6 acres.
We wish to utilise it for a community-based carbon sequestration project - and want to find out if that will qualify as a suitable "admitted farm" land-use for the climate-change era.
It will complement a conservation-through-eco-tourism project, to preserve our off-reserve upland evergreen rain forest land - now under threat from illegal gold miners and unlawful logging.
The idea is to turn our off-reserve upland evergreen rain forest land into a community-based eco-tourism destination - with a number of ziplines, a forest canopy walkway and eco-lodges as its centrepiece.
It is a variant of the public private partnership (PPP) business model.
We will be in partnership with the local community (the fringe-forest village of Akim Abuakwa Juaso) and a number of foreign investors - amongst them Greenheart Conservation and Carbon Trading & Trust.
We have included a map of the said "admitted farm" in question, for your perusal.
The portion inside the reserve is triangular-shaped, measuring 2145ft between reserve pillar number 97 and our family's pillar PET. 1., on the western side; and 3432ft on the northern side, between forest-reserve pillars 98 and 97, and on the south it is bordered by the Apotosu stream, between forest-reserve pillar number 98 and our family's pillar PET.1., for a distance of 4092 ft.
We will end here - and hope that your ministry will recommend carbon
sequestration projects, as suitable climate-change era "admitted farm" land-use.
More so, when in our case it is to enable us, as well as our local and foreign partners, to part-fund our community-based eco-tourism project, which is unique, because it will be in an off-reserve upland evergreen
private freehold nature-resource reserve that is spectacularly beautiful.
Finally, we do hope we will be allowed to go ahead and use our "admitted farm" as a community-based carbon sequestration project - for the benefit of our family and its partners, the fringe forest villagers of Akim Abuakwa Juaso, and our foreign partners.
Yours faithfully,
Kofi Thompson.
Cc The Chief Executive,
Forestry Commission,
Accra.
Re: Utilising "Admitted Farm" Inside Atewa Range Forest Reserve for Community-based Carbon Sequestration Project
We are writing to find out whether your ministry could recommend approval by the Forestry Service (FS) of the Forestry Commission (FC), of a change of land use, for our "admitted farm" inside the Atewa Forest Reserve.
We are of the considered view that at a time of global climate change, owners of "admitted farms" inside forest reserves, ought to be permitted to use their farms for community carbon sequestration projects.
That will enable the owners of those "admitted farms" to partner the local fringe forest communities they are members of, in community-based carbon sequestration projects, for their mutual benefit.
Our family acquired a total of 14sq miles of land in the Atewa Range upland evergreen rain forest, between 1921 and 1926 - on a freehold basis.
Shortly after the landholding was consolidated with the purchase of the final parcel of additional land, part of the area was designated a
government forest reserve.
It so happens that part of our property was included in the area designated a government reserve.
It is what is known in Forestry Service jargon as an "admitted farm." The total acreage in question amounts to 99.6 acres.
We wish to utilise it for a community-based carbon sequestration project - and want to find out if that will qualify as a suitable "admitted farm" land-use for the climate-change era.
It will complement a conservation-through-eco-tourism project, to preserve our off-reserve upland evergreen rain forest land - now under threat from illegal gold miners and unlawful logging.
The idea is to turn our off-reserve upland evergreen rain forest land into a community-based eco-tourism destination - with a number of ziplines, a forest canopy walkway and eco-lodges as its centrepiece.
It is a variant of the public private partnership (PPP) business model.
We will be in partnership with the local community (the fringe-forest village of Akim Abuakwa Juaso) and a number of foreign investors - amongst them Greenheart Conservation and Carbon Trading & Trust.
We have included a map of the said "admitted farm" in question, for your perusal.
The portion inside the reserve is triangular-shaped, measuring 2145ft between reserve pillar number 97 and our family's pillar PET. 1., on the western side; and 3432ft on the northern side, between forest-reserve pillars 98 and 97, and on the south it is bordered by the Apotosu stream, between forest-reserve pillar number 98 and our family's pillar PET.1., for a distance of 4092 ft.
We will end here - and hope that your ministry will recommend carbon
sequestration projects, as suitable climate-change era "admitted farm" land-use.
More so, when in our case it is to enable us, as well as our local and foreign partners, to part-fund our community-based eco-tourism project, which is unique, because it will be in an off-reserve upland evergreen
private freehold nature-resource reserve that is spectacularly beautiful.
Finally, we do hope we will be allowed to go ahead and use our "admitted farm" as a community-based carbon sequestration project - for the benefit of our family and its partners, the fringe forest villagers of Akim Abuakwa Juaso, and our foreign partners.
Yours faithfully,
Kofi Thompson.
Cc The Chief Executive,
Forestry Commission,
Accra.
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
THE RUDE AWAKENING AWAITING THE NPP'S OSEI KYEI MENSAH BONSUS IN DECEMBER 2012!
It is so disheartening listening to politicians like the Minority Leader in Ghana's Parliament, the Hon. Osei Kyei Mensah-Bonsu, sometimes. Why do such obviously well-educated and highly-intelligent individuals, insist on playing tribal politics - in 21st Century Africa?
Do they not realise that essentially, we are all one people? It wouldn't surprise me one bit, dear reader, if it emerged, through nationwide research some day, that we share DNA that basically makes us one people. When will these bloody tribal-supremacist clots, finally understand that this is a unitary state of diverse-ethnicity - in which no one tribe is superior or inferior to the other?
The truth of the matter, is that the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus of this world, don't want ordinary Ghanaians to cotton on to the fact that Ghana is a nation that is an unjust society - divided into two: the wealthy "haves" (the elite rip-off merchants who now own virtually all of our country - acquired through abuse of power and corruption!) and the struggling majority, the "have-nots", the Mmoburowaas of Nkrumah's Ghana.
The Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus are scared stiff that the "haves" (the Atiyieas) will permanently lose their grip on power, and miss the opportunity to amass yet more wealth, which controlling the sharing of the national cake, when they are in power, gives them.
So to ensure a set number of followers, sufficient to give them victory in the next elections in 2012, they must make ordinary Akans feel that politics in Ghana, is about ensuring tribal dominance. What antediluvian rubbish.
Well, the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus will have a rude awakening soon, when they discover that ordinary Akans actually know and understand perfectly that we have a system underpinned by elite rip-off. They also don't care where those ordinary fellow citizens they interact with, on a daily basis, hail from.
They are smart enough to know that when the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus were in power, from January 2001 to January 2009, they engaged in unprecedented asset-stripping - transferring most of the Ghanaian nation-state's accumulated wealth, acquired over the years through the blood, sweat and tears of ordinary people, to: themselves; some of their family members; their friends and sundry local and foreign fronts - hiding assets for them in special purpose offshore entities.
Was the attempt to railroad the fraudulent sale and purchase agreement for VALCO, to a non-existent company (grandly called International Aluminium Partners), purported to be jointly-owned by the Norwegian-headquartered Norske Hydro - said to be the world's fourth largest integrated aluminium company - and the mining conglomerate, VALE of Brazil (something they both strenuously denied!), through Parliament, not masterminded by that selfsame tribalistic hypocrite - on behalf of those super-rogues,the tribal-supremacist and amoral Kufuor & Co., I ask, dear reader?
As we speak, how remorseful are some of those shameless individuals (outwardly respectable in appearance - but in reality many of them nothing more than swindlers and thieves), now in court, and completely ignoring the fact that the original owners of the parcel of land that the foreign ministry's International Students Hostel was built on (which was divvied up and given out to them for peanuts), really ought to have been offered the first option of purchasing that land?
Was that land not instead illegally parcelled out to themselves, some family members of the tribal-supremacist cabal, which controlled the New Patriotic Party (NPP) regime between January 2001 and January 2009, as well as the wealthy and well-connected cronies of the perfidious Kufuor & Co. - with Lady Luck smiling on all of them, as a result of the most egregious of examples, of abuse of office, patronage-gone-mad and unparalleled corruption?
The Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus will soon discover, that far from being fools, ordinary Akans, like their compatriots from other ethnic backgrounds, are far smarter than they thought and aren't fools at all - when the next Flt. Lt. Jerry Rawlings steps in to restore order: when the party of the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus, dominated by a small band of ruthless tribal-supremacist swindlers and thieves, disturb the peace and destroy the stability of our homeland Ghana.
They must not think for one moment that they can toy with the destiny of our nation and its people and get away with it. They are sowing the wind with the endless dissimulation of their "Enkoyie" propaganda, and will reap the whirlwind - when the next Flt. Lt. Jerry Rawlings strikes to restore order, were the party of the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus, to unleash widespread violence, leading to chaos and death in Ghana, during the December 2012 elections, and its immediate aftermath. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Do they not realise that essentially, we are all one people? It wouldn't surprise me one bit, dear reader, if it emerged, through nationwide research some day, that we share DNA that basically makes us one people. When will these bloody tribal-supremacist clots, finally understand that this is a unitary state of diverse-ethnicity - in which no one tribe is superior or inferior to the other?
The truth of the matter, is that the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus of this world, don't want ordinary Ghanaians to cotton on to the fact that Ghana is a nation that is an unjust society - divided into two: the wealthy "haves" (the elite rip-off merchants who now own virtually all of our country - acquired through abuse of power and corruption!) and the struggling majority, the "have-nots", the Mmoburowaas of Nkrumah's Ghana.
The Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus are scared stiff that the "haves" (the Atiyieas) will permanently lose their grip on power, and miss the opportunity to amass yet more wealth, which controlling the sharing of the national cake, when they are in power, gives them.
So to ensure a set number of followers, sufficient to give them victory in the next elections in 2012, they must make ordinary Akans feel that politics in Ghana, is about ensuring tribal dominance. What antediluvian rubbish.
Well, the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus will have a rude awakening soon, when they discover that ordinary Akans actually know and understand perfectly that we have a system underpinned by elite rip-off. They also don't care where those ordinary fellow citizens they interact with, on a daily basis, hail from.
They are smart enough to know that when the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus were in power, from January 2001 to January 2009, they engaged in unprecedented asset-stripping - transferring most of the Ghanaian nation-state's accumulated wealth, acquired over the years through the blood, sweat and tears of ordinary people, to: themselves; some of their family members; their friends and sundry local and foreign fronts - hiding assets for them in special purpose offshore entities.
Was the attempt to railroad the fraudulent sale and purchase agreement for VALCO, to a non-existent company (grandly called International Aluminium Partners), purported to be jointly-owned by the Norwegian-headquartered Norske Hydro - said to be the world's fourth largest integrated aluminium company - and the mining conglomerate, VALE of Brazil (something they both strenuously denied!), through Parliament, not masterminded by that selfsame tribalistic hypocrite - on behalf of those super-rogues,the tribal-supremacist and amoral Kufuor & Co., I ask, dear reader?
As we speak, how remorseful are some of those shameless individuals (outwardly respectable in appearance - but in reality many of them nothing more than swindlers and thieves), now in court, and completely ignoring the fact that the original owners of the parcel of land that the foreign ministry's International Students Hostel was built on (which was divvied up and given out to them for peanuts), really ought to have been offered the first option of purchasing that land?
Was that land not instead illegally parcelled out to themselves, some family members of the tribal-supremacist cabal, which controlled the New Patriotic Party (NPP) regime between January 2001 and January 2009, as well as the wealthy and well-connected cronies of the perfidious Kufuor & Co. - with Lady Luck smiling on all of them, as a result of the most egregious of examples, of abuse of office, patronage-gone-mad and unparalleled corruption?
The Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus will soon discover, that far from being fools, ordinary Akans, like their compatriots from other ethnic backgrounds, are far smarter than they thought and aren't fools at all - when the next Flt. Lt. Jerry Rawlings steps in to restore order: when the party of the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus, dominated by a small band of ruthless tribal-supremacist swindlers and thieves, disturb the peace and destroy the stability of our homeland Ghana.
They must not think for one moment that they can toy with the destiny of our nation and its people and get away with it. They are sowing the wind with the endless dissimulation of their "Enkoyie" propaganda, and will reap the whirlwind - when the next Flt. Lt. Jerry Rawlings strikes to restore order, were the party of the Osei Kyei Mensah Bonsus, to unleash widespread violence, leading to chaos and death in Ghana, during the December 2012 elections, and its immediate aftermath. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Friday, 9 December 2011
SHOULD ELECTION VIOLENCE BREAK OUT IN DECEMBER 2012: THE NEXT FLT. LT. RAWLINGS MUST STRIKE - & HOUSE-CLEAN GHANA THOROUGHLY!
If widespread violence were to break out after the December 2012 presidential and parliamentary elections, I confidently predict that the next Flt. Lt. J. J. Rawlings will strike - and win the support of the Ghanaian masses to restore order: and house-clean Ghana thoroughly, following that.
Members of our political class delude themselves, if they think they have succeeded in fooling ordinary people, that what in effect is a plutocracy masquerading as a democracy, and dominated by wealthy oligarchs, ought to be supported and protected by ordinary people - regardless of the fact that the democracy dividend has consistently eluded them, since 1992.
The question is, why should ordinary people continue to support a corrupt system, in which their living standards have plummeted steadily, in inverse proportion to the stratospheric heights the net worth of a powerful, wealthy and ruthless elite, rises?
Ex-President Kufuor's scandalous retirement package, for example, is a classic example of the monkey-dey-work-baboon-dey-chop elite rip-off culture, which underpins the 4th Republic. That is why a 5th Republic must replace it.
That shameless and corrupt rogue, turned the Osu Castle into a kickback reception and distribution centre, and the nerve-centre of a massive patronage hub - slicing up the national cake to share amongst a chosen few.
From the seat of government at the Osu Castle, the award of contract upon contract - to the favourites of the tribal-supremacist cabal that dominated his regime for the 8 long and painful years they exploited our national economy for personal gain at the expense of the Ghanaian nation-state and ordinary people - was masterminded.
That period in our history, when unfathomable greed ruled OK, in Ghana, were the halcyon days of those shameless blackguards. It was an era of grand larceny, cleverly dubbed the golden age of business - by the greedy and amoral Kufuor & Co.
Those indeed were the days of plenty for a privileged few, when the African sun shone brightly on sundry nephews; cousins; crony-capitalist pals; bottom-power girlfriends and an assortment of other favourites, in the family clans of the ruthless tribal-supremacist cabal, which unfortunately dominated our country so completely, at the time.
If widespread violence breaks out, during or after the December 2012 elections, one hopes that a Flt. Lt. J. J. Rawlings (circa 1979) type of house-cleaning exercise, will be carried out by young, patriotic and nationalistic military officers.
Hopefully, that will enable those clever crooks, who once ruled Ghana, to be finally held to account. Naturally, it ought to be done in a manner that will ensure that none of them escapes justice - through the usual manipulation of the legal system.
Under no circumstances must their allies in the judiciary, be allowed to use their privileged positions to protect those swindlers and thieves by stealth - and enable them escape from paying for the brutal gang-rape of Mother Ghana.
So, I say to the next Flt. Lt. J. J. Rawlings: if the acolytes of such monsters unleash violence, which leads to widespread chaos, and loss of life in Ghana, during (or after) the December 2012 elections, do not hesitate to strike - and make all of them pay for their many crimes against the ordinary people of Ghana.
After that, take steps to replace the discredited 4th Republic with the 5th Republic - a new polity in which all will be truly equal before the law, and in which there will be equality of opportunity: a level societal playing field, as it were, which enables all who work hard - regardless of family background - to progress in life, so that Ghana becomes a nation in which honest hard work, always pays.
What ordinary Ghanaians are looking for, is a just society in which nepotism and inherited privilege - the greatest enemies of meritocracy and progress - are absent. That will be sweet revenge indeed, for ordinary people, were that to happen - so use any widespread violence that leads to chaos and death in December 2012, as an opportunity to exact that for them! A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!):+233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Members of our political class delude themselves, if they think they have succeeded in fooling ordinary people, that what in effect is a plutocracy masquerading as a democracy, and dominated by wealthy oligarchs, ought to be supported and protected by ordinary people - regardless of the fact that the democracy dividend has consistently eluded them, since 1992.
The question is, why should ordinary people continue to support a corrupt system, in which their living standards have plummeted steadily, in inverse proportion to the stratospheric heights the net worth of a powerful, wealthy and ruthless elite, rises?
Ex-President Kufuor's scandalous retirement package, for example, is a classic example of the monkey-dey-work-baboon-dey-chop elite rip-off culture, which underpins the 4th Republic. That is why a 5th Republic must replace it.
That shameless and corrupt rogue, turned the Osu Castle into a kickback reception and distribution centre, and the nerve-centre of a massive patronage hub - slicing up the national cake to share amongst a chosen few.
From the seat of government at the Osu Castle, the award of contract upon contract - to the favourites of the tribal-supremacist cabal that dominated his regime for the 8 long and painful years they exploited our national economy for personal gain at the expense of the Ghanaian nation-state and ordinary people - was masterminded.
That period in our history, when unfathomable greed ruled OK, in Ghana, were the halcyon days of those shameless blackguards. It was an era of grand larceny, cleverly dubbed the golden age of business - by the greedy and amoral Kufuor & Co.
Those indeed were the days of plenty for a privileged few, when the African sun shone brightly on sundry nephews; cousins; crony-capitalist pals; bottom-power girlfriends and an assortment of other favourites, in the family clans of the ruthless tribal-supremacist cabal, which unfortunately dominated our country so completely, at the time.
If widespread violence breaks out, during or after the December 2012 elections, one hopes that a Flt. Lt. J. J. Rawlings (circa 1979) type of house-cleaning exercise, will be carried out by young, patriotic and nationalistic military officers.
Hopefully, that will enable those clever crooks, who once ruled Ghana, to be finally held to account. Naturally, it ought to be done in a manner that will ensure that none of them escapes justice - through the usual manipulation of the legal system.
Under no circumstances must their allies in the judiciary, be allowed to use their privileged positions to protect those swindlers and thieves by stealth - and enable them escape from paying for the brutal gang-rape of Mother Ghana.
So, I say to the next Flt. Lt. J. J. Rawlings: if the acolytes of such monsters unleash violence, which leads to widespread chaos, and loss of life in Ghana, during (or after) the December 2012 elections, do not hesitate to strike - and make all of them pay for their many crimes against the ordinary people of Ghana.
After that, take steps to replace the discredited 4th Republic with the 5th Republic - a new polity in which all will be truly equal before the law, and in which there will be equality of opportunity: a level societal playing field, as it were, which enables all who work hard - regardless of family background - to progress in life, so that Ghana becomes a nation in which honest hard work, always pays.
What ordinary Ghanaians are looking for, is a just society in which nepotism and inherited privilege - the greatest enemies of meritocracy and progress - are absent. That will be sweet revenge indeed, for ordinary people, were that to happen - so use any widespread violence that leads to chaos and death in December 2012, as an opportunity to exact that for them! A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!):+233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Thursday, 8 December 2011
EATING LOCALLY PRODUCED RICE HELPS ALLEVIATE POVERTY IN RURAL GHANA!
I couldn't help laughing, when I read an article in the 8th December 2011 general news web-page, of www.ghanaweb.com, entitled: "Food Minister Bites the Dust".
It wasn't quiet clear who wrote it, but it was apparently 'sourced' from a "Sacut Denis". As the humorous old cynic who brought the article to my attention said to me: "Kofi, only heaven knows just how much the rice-importation-lobby forked out for this self-serving piece."
The reason for the mirth, was that the wealthy and powerful rice-importation-lobby (on whose behalf the article was obviously penned!) seemed to think, for some extraordinary reason, that somehow, they could start counting the days to the point when the minister for food and agriculture, the Hon. Kwesi Awhoi, would finally announce his resignation. Some hope.
The fact that climate change is impacting food production in Ghana negatively, obviously having escaped that genius of a 'publicist' for the rice-importation-lobby, Sucat Dennis, I wondered if it had ever occurred to him, and others of his ilk, that the importation of rice is one of the economic activities, through which a great deal of wealth leaves the shores of Ghana, for foreign parts.
In railing against rice importation, the minister of food and agriculture, Mr. Kwesi Awhoi, shows that he clearly understands the nexus between poverty alleviation, and halting the importation of rice - something that only increases the net worth of the mostly crooked and wealthy tax-dodgers, which that particular line of business seems to attract (and in droves!).
Until Ghana becomes self-sufficient in rice production, it is important that every government of the day, at any given point in time, in our history, going forward, makes ordinary people understand clearly that local rice production, helps alleviate rural poverty - and also increases Ghana's GDP substantially.
Eating locally produced rice, must be seen by all, as a means of helping to end poverty in the rice growing areas of our country. And rice, indeed, does well in many parts of our country, luckily.
So, instead of belittling the efforts of the minister of food and agriculture, Mr. Kwesi Awhoi - by mocking him - Sucat Dennis, whoever he really is, and people of his ilk, must rather congratulate him, for being far-sighted in taking positive steps to encourage local rice production in Ghana - which helps alleviate rural poverty: particularly in the three northern regions.
Kwesi Awhoi deserves the Grand Medal, for his high-minded dedication to encouraging local rice production, in Ghana. He is to be congratulated for having the guts to actively discourage the importation of rice - something that, alas, only enables the net worth of a powerful and well-connected wealthy few - most of whom dodge taxes and corrupt customs officials routinely - to rise to stratospheric heights.
It is time discerning and independent-minded Ghanaians, started seeing eating local rice, as a contribution to poverty alleviation in rural Ghana, and the economic empowerment of smallholder farmers countrywide - as well as an act of patriotism by nationalistic individuals. Period. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109
POST SCRIPT:
I am reproducing the said www.ghanaweb.com piece, said to be "sourced" from Sucat Dennis. Please read on:
"Food Minister Bites the Dust
In an interesting development Hon. Kwesi Ahwoi, the Minister of Food and Agriculture in Ghana, was made to bite the dust when he was defeated by Mrs. Queenster Pokuah Sawyer, a real estate developer in the ruling party’s parliamentary primary for the Agona East Constituency.
Although the press reported it as “a shocking moment for both media personnel, party stalwarts and political observers”, I am not surprised by the latest development.
Promises to resign Mr. Kwesi Ahwoi’s defeat must be seen in the light of his family association as well as the promises he has made and changed time and again, and his total disregard to the plight of Ghanaian consumers.
On 23 September 2009the Ahwoi brother in charge of food and agriculture in Ghana publicly vowed to resign within two years “if he fails to deliver on his set goals and targets in the next two years”.
In the first place that deadline has expired, he has not achieved “his set goals and targets” yet no offer to resign has come forward.
In the second place, as representative of the people of Ghana steering such an important sector as food and agriculture - and thus food security - has nothing to do with “his set goals and targets”, but rather about what is required in the best interest of the people of Ghana.
In 2009 his promise was to make Ghana self-sufficient in terms of rice production within two years. The fact is that the self-sufficiency figure might even have decreased further.
In 2009 the Ahwoi brother also promised to engage in fraudulent activities to achieve “his set goals and targets” by stating, “I will bag ‘Made in Ghana Rice’ with ‘Imported from Thailand’ embossed on them for Ghanaians to procure if that is what they want”.
This year Kwesi Ahwoi made yet another promise having realised that he is at risk for being taken up on his 2009 promise. On 26 October 2011 “Minister of agriculture, Kwesi Ahwoi, says he would resign in a year, if he is unable to halve rice importation into the country.”, as reported by TV3.
Anybody and everybody who know what they are talking about in this area know that he will not be able to deliver on his promise, and the question is why he does not do the honourable thing and resign now.
Obsession with rice The “rice wars” in Ghana since Kwesi Ahwoi was appointed as Minister of Food and Agriculture has shown one thing, and one thing only - an obsession by him to destroy rice importers.
In 2010 industry analysts and consumers alike criticised the NDC government for reintroducing a 20 percent import tariff on certain basic foodstuff such as cooking oil and rice. This created a huge tariff differential between Ghana (37%) and the Ivory Coast (12.5%) and led to massive smuggling on Ghana’s Western borders, huge losses in revenue collection by the state and undue hardship for 70 percent of Ghana’s rice consumers.
Kwesi Ahwoi at that stage bluntly said that if rice importers does not accept the situation, they can pack up and leave. At a time when Ghana was only able to produce 30 percent of local demand, such a statement was tantamount to threatening security in Ghana.
Although I have not come to grips with the Minister’s obsession with self-sufficiency of rice production, some anonymous sources claims that there are personal differences between him and some of the rice importing companies.
Even though everybody agrees that a medium to long-term strategy to move towards self-sufficiency is important, all agrees that the short term refusal by the government in general and Mr. Ahwoi specifically to assist Ghanaian consumers to reduce the cost of living is beyond their understanding.
Grabbing at straws In a recent (September 2011) feature published in Ghanaian media Kwame Okoampa-Ahoofe, Jr., Ph.D. made the following statement:
Then there is, of course, Mr. Kwesi Ahwoi, described largely as self-effacing and personable. As Minister of Agriculture under the Mills-Mahama government, Mr. Kwesi Ahwoi once confided to a friend of mine, who is also a good friend of our “Dining-Hall Prefect”, about a year, or so, ago that he was literally grabbing at straws at his new post, and that he could do with just about any kind of managerial assistance that he could get.
I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of this statement in the light of more and more revelations that the performance by MOFA under Kwesi Ahwoi’s leadership is more than questionable.
The food policies adopted by the NDC government, FASDP I (2003) and II (2007), dates back to the times of the NPP, and little or no added value has been provided by MOFA since then.
What has become apparent - as has in fact been acknowledged by the Minister - is that the government has not been able to implement the food and agricultural policies.
Almost every aspect of the policies from promises of mechanisation, fertilisers, credit, youth employment, irrigation systems and you name it has been plagued with problem upon problem.
The fact that the Honourable Minister has suffered a blowing defeat by his own party members is indeed telling. Is this a sign that Ghanaians who are suffering and struggling through a food crisis that is worse than 2007 / 08 with little empathy from the government is starting to say, “Enough is enough!”?
Source: sacut denis"
End of article culled from www.ghanaweb.com
It wasn't quiet clear who wrote it, but it was apparently 'sourced' from a "Sacut Denis". As the humorous old cynic who brought the article to my attention said to me: "Kofi, only heaven knows just how much the rice-importation-lobby forked out for this self-serving piece."
The reason for the mirth, was that the wealthy and powerful rice-importation-lobby (on whose behalf the article was obviously penned!) seemed to think, for some extraordinary reason, that somehow, they could start counting the days to the point when the minister for food and agriculture, the Hon. Kwesi Awhoi, would finally announce his resignation. Some hope.
The fact that climate change is impacting food production in Ghana negatively, obviously having escaped that genius of a 'publicist' for the rice-importation-lobby, Sucat Dennis, I wondered if it had ever occurred to him, and others of his ilk, that the importation of rice is one of the economic activities, through which a great deal of wealth leaves the shores of Ghana, for foreign parts.
In railing against rice importation, the minister of food and agriculture, Mr. Kwesi Awhoi, shows that he clearly understands the nexus between poverty alleviation, and halting the importation of rice - something that only increases the net worth of the mostly crooked and wealthy tax-dodgers, which that particular line of business seems to attract (and in droves!).
Until Ghana becomes self-sufficient in rice production, it is important that every government of the day, at any given point in time, in our history, going forward, makes ordinary people understand clearly that local rice production, helps alleviate rural poverty - and also increases Ghana's GDP substantially.
Eating locally produced rice, must be seen by all, as a means of helping to end poverty in the rice growing areas of our country. And rice, indeed, does well in many parts of our country, luckily.
So, instead of belittling the efforts of the minister of food and agriculture, Mr. Kwesi Awhoi - by mocking him - Sucat Dennis, whoever he really is, and people of his ilk, must rather congratulate him, for being far-sighted in taking positive steps to encourage local rice production in Ghana - which helps alleviate rural poverty: particularly in the three northern regions.
Kwesi Awhoi deserves the Grand Medal, for his high-minded dedication to encouraging local rice production, in Ghana. He is to be congratulated for having the guts to actively discourage the importation of rice - something that, alas, only enables the net worth of a powerful and well-connected wealthy few - most of whom dodge taxes and corrupt customs officials routinely - to rise to stratospheric heights.
It is time discerning and independent-minded Ghanaians, started seeing eating local rice, as a contribution to poverty alleviation in rural Ghana, and the economic empowerment of smallholder farmers countrywide - as well as an act of patriotism by nationalistic individuals. Period. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109
POST SCRIPT:
I am reproducing the said www.ghanaweb.com piece, said to be "sourced" from Sucat Dennis. Please read on:
"Food Minister Bites the Dust
In an interesting development Hon. Kwesi Ahwoi, the Minister of Food and Agriculture in Ghana, was made to bite the dust when he was defeated by Mrs. Queenster Pokuah Sawyer, a real estate developer in the ruling party’s parliamentary primary for the Agona East Constituency.
Although the press reported it as “a shocking moment for both media personnel, party stalwarts and political observers”, I am not surprised by the latest development.
Promises to resign Mr. Kwesi Ahwoi’s defeat must be seen in the light of his family association as well as the promises he has made and changed time and again, and his total disregard to the plight of Ghanaian consumers.
On 23 September 2009the Ahwoi brother in charge of food and agriculture in Ghana publicly vowed to resign within two years “if he fails to deliver on his set goals and targets in the next two years”.
In the first place that deadline has expired, he has not achieved “his set goals and targets” yet no offer to resign has come forward.
In the second place, as representative of the people of Ghana steering such an important sector as food and agriculture - and thus food security - has nothing to do with “his set goals and targets”, but rather about what is required in the best interest of the people of Ghana.
In 2009 his promise was to make Ghana self-sufficient in terms of rice production within two years. The fact is that the self-sufficiency figure might even have decreased further.
In 2009 the Ahwoi brother also promised to engage in fraudulent activities to achieve “his set goals and targets” by stating, “I will bag ‘Made in Ghana Rice’ with ‘Imported from Thailand’ embossed on them for Ghanaians to procure if that is what they want”.
This year Kwesi Ahwoi made yet another promise having realised that he is at risk for being taken up on his 2009 promise. On 26 October 2011 “Minister of agriculture, Kwesi Ahwoi, says he would resign in a year, if he is unable to halve rice importation into the country.”, as reported by TV3.
Anybody and everybody who know what they are talking about in this area know that he will not be able to deliver on his promise, and the question is why he does not do the honourable thing and resign now.
Obsession with rice The “rice wars” in Ghana since Kwesi Ahwoi was appointed as Minister of Food and Agriculture has shown one thing, and one thing only - an obsession by him to destroy rice importers.
In 2010 industry analysts and consumers alike criticised the NDC government for reintroducing a 20 percent import tariff on certain basic foodstuff such as cooking oil and rice. This created a huge tariff differential between Ghana (37%) and the Ivory Coast (12.5%) and led to massive smuggling on Ghana’s Western borders, huge losses in revenue collection by the state and undue hardship for 70 percent of Ghana’s rice consumers.
Kwesi Ahwoi at that stage bluntly said that if rice importers does not accept the situation, they can pack up and leave. At a time when Ghana was only able to produce 30 percent of local demand, such a statement was tantamount to threatening security in Ghana.
Although I have not come to grips with the Minister’s obsession with self-sufficiency of rice production, some anonymous sources claims that there are personal differences between him and some of the rice importing companies.
Even though everybody agrees that a medium to long-term strategy to move towards self-sufficiency is important, all agrees that the short term refusal by the government in general and Mr. Ahwoi specifically to assist Ghanaian consumers to reduce the cost of living is beyond their understanding.
Grabbing at straws In a recent (September 2011) feature published in Ghanaian media Kwame Okoampa-Ahoofe, Jr., Ph.D. made the following statement:
Then there is, of course, Mr. Kwesi Ahwoi, described largely as self-effacing and personable. As Minister of Agriculture under the Mills-Mahama government, Mr. Kwesi Ahwoi once confided to a friend of mine, who is also a good friend of our “Dining-Hall Prefect”, about a year, or so, ago that he was literally grabbing at straws at his new post, and that he could do with just about any kind of managerial assistance that he could get.
I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of this statement in the light of more and more revelations that the performance by MOFA under Kwesi Ahwoi’s leadership is more than questionable.
The food policies adopted by the NDC government, FASDP I (2003) and II (2007), dates back to the times of the NPP, and little or no added value has been provided by MOFA since then.
What has become apparent - as has in fact been acknowledged by the Minister - is that the government has not been able to implement the food and agricultural policies.
Almost every aspect of the policies from promises of mechanisation, fertilisers, credit, youth employment, irrigation systems and you name it has been plagued with problem upon problem.
The fact that the Honourable Minister has suffered a blowing defeat by his own party members is indeed telling. Is this a sign that Ghanaians who are suffering and struggling through a food crisis that is worse than 2007 / 08 with little empathy from the government is starting to say, “Enough is enough!”?
Source: sacut denis"
End of article culled from www.ghanaweb.com
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
WHAT GOLD FIELDS LIMITED DOES WITH ITS GHANAIAN BUSINESS, IS ITS OWN BUSINESS - BUT IT MUST STAY OUT OF OUR POLITICS!
It is most unfortunate that at a time when the price of gold has reached unprecedented levels (and at a time when the government of Ghana, like most governments in the wealthy West, is struggling to reduce its deficit - and conjure some economic growth at the same time, in the non-oil sectors), rather than share its good fortune with Mother Ghana, when asked to contribute more to the national treasury - from whence the bulk of the wherewithal to fund Ghana's development flows - Gold Fields Limited, whose PR people like to say is a good corporate citizen of Ghana, appears rather reluctant to do so.
Instead, it is making not so subtle threats that the increase in taxation by the Ghana government, may necessitate the abandonment of planned expansion projects, said to be worth some US$1billion. Yet, the metal has seen 11 months of back-to-back increases - which have boosted the price 22 percent this year. Yesterday, the metal was down 2.01 percent, closing at US$1709 in London.
Indeed, it wouldn't be far from the truth, if some patriotic citizen were to insist that that statement, is a deliberate attempt to influence Ghanaian voters to vote in a certain direction, in the December 2012 elections.
If the ethical investors, in the nations they are domiciled, whose fund managers invest their cash in companies like Gold Fields Limited, were to become aware of the outrageous one-sided existing agreements between gold mining companies operating here, and the Ghanaian government (the so-called stability agreements), they would immediately demand that those fund managers divest their portfolio of the company's stock.
(Incidentally, at around the same time, Kosmos Energy too, has been doing its bit to stab the Mills administration in the back - claiming that it is worried that Ivorian territorial claims will affect its stake in a number of blocks in the Jubilee oil field.
That statement too, is a calculated attempt to influence voters - and is akin to the military's use of psychological warfare operations.
The Ivory Coast is negotiating with Ghana, and border demarcation is on the cards to define their maritime boundary - and the two sister nations are not about to go to war over it, in any case. Yet we are hearing those ugly noises from Kosmos Energy. Why, I ask? But I digress.)
Obviously, at the end of the day, what Gold Fields Limited does with its Ghanaian operation, is its own business. However, when such attempts are deliberately made to influence the outcome of national elections in Ghana, that is totally unacceptable.
The government must act swiftly to neutralise such indirect interference in our nation's politics - by working with pressure groups like Avaaz, Earthworks and Care2, to mount online campaigns against companies like Gold Fields and Kosmos Energy - in their own backyard: targeting their shareholders with million-plus-signature email petitions. In the internet age, that is the only effective way to deal with these arrogant carpetbaggers.
Finally, whiles what Gold Fields does with its business, is its own business, it must, however, stay out of our nation's politics - if it wants to continue operating here in future. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Instead, it is making not so subtle threats that the increase in taxation by the Ghana government, may necessitate the abandonment of planned expansion projects, said to be worth some US$1billion. Yet, the metal has seen 11 months of back-to-back increases - which have boosted the price 22 percent this year. Yesterday, the metal was down 2.01 percent, closing at US$1709 in London.
Indeed, it wouldn't be far from the truth, if some patriotic citizen were to insist that that statement, is a deliberate attempt to influence Ghanaian voters to vote in a certain direction, in the December 2012 elections.
If the ethical investors, in the nations they are domiciled, whose fund managers invest their cash in companies like Gold Fields Limited, were to become aware of the outrageous one-sided existing agreements between gold mining companies operating here, and the Ghanaian government (the so-called stability agreements), they would immediately demand that those fund managers divest their portfolio of the company's stock.
(Incidentally, at around the same time, Kosmos Energy too, has been doing its bit to stab the Mills administration in the back - claiming that it is worried that Ivorian territorial claims will affect its stake in a number of blocks in the Jubilee oil field.
That statement too, is a calculated attempt to influence voters - and is akin to the military's use of psychological warfare operations.
The Ivory Coast is negotiating with Ghana, and border demarcation is on the cards to define their maritime boundary - and the two sister nations are not about to go to war over it, in any case. Yet we are hearing those ugly noises from Kosmos Energy. Why, I ask? But I digress.)
Obviously, at the end of the day, what Gold Fields Limited does with its Ghanaian operation, is its own business. However, when such attempts are deliberately made to influence the outcome of national elections in Ghana, that is totally unacceptable.
The government must act swiftly to neutralise such indirect interference in our nation's politics - by working with pressure groups like Avaaz, Earthworks and Care2, to mount online campaigns against companies like Gold Fields and Kosmos Energy - in their own backyard: targeting their shareholders with million-plus-signature email petitions. In the internet age, that is the only effective way to deal with these arrogant carpetbaggers.
Finally, whiles what Gold Fields does with its business, is its own business, it must, however, stay out of our nation's politics - if it wants to continue operating here in future. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Tuesday, 6 December 2011
When I’m 67: Renaissance Capital Sees Public Pension Burdens At the Heart of Eurozone Debt Crisis
Moscow, 6 December 2011 - Renaissance Capital, the leading emerging markets investment bank, has issued a groundbreaking report analysing the eurozone crisis and the reasons that prompted it.
When I’m 67, authored by Charles Robertson, Renaissance Capital’s Global Chief Economist, and the Firm’s award-winning global research team, argues that excessive public pension spending (accounting for nearly one-third of tax revenues in Italy, Greece and Japan), worsening demographics and a lack of private pension provision have served as key causes of the present eurozone fiscal crisis.
Three of the governments in most trouble today spend over 10% of GDP on pension provision, notes the report, which also highlights that to bring Italian pension spending down to German spending levels would require pension payments to be cut by one-third. Given the 12mn Italian pensioners (roughly one-quarter of voters), it is little wonder that former-premier Silvio Berlusconi and his allies were so reluctant to address the pension issue, the report says.Since Lennon and McCartney wrote When I’m Sixty-Four, the effective retirement age in France has fallen by nine years, to 59, and by five years in Italy and Greece. Renaissance Capital believes the eurozone crisis has been brought about by a combination of these falls.
Higher retirement ages of at least 67 or higher and less pension provision seem inevitable, Renaissance notes. The Firm expects inter-generational political conflict to replace class conflict in the eurozone; in Italy, analysts believe the large, voting population of pensioners may yet resist southern European reforms, and notes that Germany and Ireland had better demographics when they advanced reforms.
“Emerging market experience tells us that just two years of harsh reforms can make a big difference,” says Charles Robertson. “We need those two years. In the short term, we believe the eurozone has no choice but to try reform in southern Europe, backed by IMF/European Central Bank support.”
Renaissance’s favoured markets today are Russia, Nigeria and South Africa. Anglo-Saxon and Nordic countries are pension (and bond) safe havens in the developed market world, but it will surprise few that Renaissance sees emerging markets as the safest haven of all.
There are exceptions, such as Hungary and Argentina, which have taken significant steps backwards; but, the report notes, there are many more positive examples, such as South Africa and Chile, with private pension funds above 60% of GDP.
Zimbabwe has better private pension provision than Japan, Poland is stronger than Brazil and Nigeria is better than South Korea. Renaissance expects Nigerian pension funds to grow by $13bn by 2015, enough to buy the entire stock market outright at 2011 prices.
Sub-Saharan African pension funds are not only larger than we expected, but with 10-15 workers per pensioner, demographics suggest African GDP growth rates will power past Asia in the coming decades, offering the current generation a better retirement than that offered by low Asian public or private pension provision.
The report sees the best Emerging European story in Kazakhstan, where pension funds could own all the country’s debt and equity assets, and where demographics are excellent. Turkey is also in a strong position, but would do better still if it encouraged more cash into local pension funds.
Russia is in a good position today, as pension spending has only recently risen above that of Japan and Belgium, but is on course to follow the Italian model if more savings are not channelled into local pension funds.
Most emerging market countries are, fortunately, following the Anglo-Saxon/Nordic-private-pension model, rather than the bankrupt Southern European public-pension-provision model, concludes the report.
“When I’m 67 may be a statement of optimism in emerging markets, as it could be for all of us if our pension funds shift assets from 2% US treasuries to higher-growth EM economics,” adds Charles Robertson.
***
About Renaissance Capital (www.rencap.com)Renaissance Capital is a leading investment bank focused on the emerging markets of Russia, the CIS, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa.
The Firm also offers its clients access to these markets through financial centres such as London, New York and Hong Kong. Renaissance Capital has market-leading positions in each of its core businesses - M&A, equity and debt capital markets, securities sales and trading, research, and derivatives.
The Firm is building market-leading practices across emerging markets globally in metals & mining, oil & gas and agriculture. Renaissance Capital is part of Renaissance Group.
When I’m 67, authored by Charles Robertson, Renaissance Capital’s Global Chief Economist, and the Firm’s award-winning global research team, argues that excessive public pension spending (accounting for nearly one-third of tax revenues in Italy, Greece and Japan), worsening demographics and a lack of private pension provision have served as key causes of the present eurozone fiscal crisis.
Three of the governments in most trouble today spend over 10% of GDP on pension provision, notes the report, which also highlights that to bring Italian pension spending down to German spending levels would require pension payments to be cut by one-third. Given the 12mn Italian pensioners (roughly one-quarter of voters), it is little wonder that former-premier Silvio Berlusconi and his allies were so reluctant to address the pension issue, the report says.Since Lennon and McCartney wrote When I’m Sixty-Four, the effective retirement age in France has fallen by nine years, to 59, and by five years in Italy and Greece. Renaissance Capital believes the eurozone crisis has been brought about by a combination of these falls.
Higher retirement ages of at least 67 or higher and less pension provision seem inevitable, Renaissance notes. The Firm expects inter-generational political conflict to replace class conflict in the eurozone; in Italy, analysts believe the large, voting population of pensioners may yet resist southern European reforms, and notes that Germany and Ireland had better demographics when they advanced reforms.
“Emerging market experience tells us that just two years of harsh reforms can make a big difference,” says Charles Robertson. “We need those two years. In the short term, we believe the eurozone has no choice but to try reform in southern Europe, backed by IMF/European Central Bank support.”
Renaissance’s favoured markets today are Russia, Nigeria and South Africa. Anglo-Saxon and Nordic countries are pension (and bond) safe havens in the developed market world, but it will surprise few that Renaissance sees emerging markets as the safest haven of all.
There are exceptions, such as Hungary and Argentina, which have taken significant steps backwards; but, the report notes, there are many more positive examples, such as South Africa and Chile, with private pension funds above 60% of GDP.
Zimbabwe has better private pension provision than Japan, Poland is stronger than Brazil and Nigeria is better than South Korea. Renaissance expects Nigerian pension funds to grow by $13bn by 2015, enough to buy the entire stock market outright at 2011 prices.
Sub-Saharan African pension funds are not only larger than we expected, but with 10-15 workers per pensioner, demographics suggest African GDP growth rates will power past Asia in the coming decades, offering the current generation a better retirement than that offered by low Asian public or private pension provision.
The report sees the best Emerging European story in Kazakhstan, where pension funds could own all the country’s debt and equity assets, and where demographics are excellent. Turkey is also in a strong position, but would do better still if it encouraged more cash into local pension funds.
Russia is in a good position today, as pension spending has only recently risen above that of Japan and Belgium, but is on course to follow the Italian model if more savings are not channelled into local pension funds.
Most emerging market countries are, fortunately, following the Anglo-Saxon/Nordic-private-pension model, rather than the bankrupt Southern European public-pension-provision model, concludes the report.
“When I’m 67 may be a statement of optimism in emerging markets, as it could be for all of us if our pension funds shift assets from 2% US treasuries to higher-growth EM economics,” adds Charles Robertson.
***
About Renaissance Capital (www.rencap.com)Renaissance Capital is a leading investment bank focused on the emerging markets of Russia, the CIS, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa.
The Firm also offers its clients access to these markets through financial centres such as London, New York and Hong Kong. Renaissance Capital has market-leading positions in each of its core businesses - M&A, equity and debt capital markets, securities sales and trading, research, and derivatives.
The Firm is building market-leading practices across emerging markets globally in metals & mining, oil & gas and agriculture. Renaissance Capital is part of Renaissance Group.
Monday, 5 December 2011
MILLS REGIME: LISTEN TO GOOD FREE ADVICE - BEFORE IT BECOMES TOO LATE TO SAVE YOUR PARTY FROM DEFEAT IN DECEMBER 2012!
Today, I was saddened to learn that the investment firm, Rubicon, was teaming up with easyGroup (which is controlled by EasyJet's founder, Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou), to work together to see if it would be feasible for them to set up a low-cost, no-frills airline for Africa.
A statement from Rubicon said "easyGroup will become a shareholder in Rubicon and will use the services of Stelios and easyGroup's experienced aviation management team to provide general strategic, management and branding advice on the feasibility of implementing a low cost, point-to-point, no frills, all jet aircraft business model for Africa."
Well, below, dear reader, is part of an article I posted on this blog on Wednesday, September 29, 2010, with the title, "LIQUIDATE GHANA INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES NOW – AS A PRELUDE TO SETTING UP A NEW NATIONAL CARRIER!"
In that article, I pleaded with the present regime (and not for the first time, either!) to contact the easyjet founder, Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou, with the view to setting up a joint-venture, to replace Ghana International Airlines (GIA).
Needless to say, it was ignored. Just as one's humble advice to them to go to China and seek funding for infrastructure projects, was, not too long after they came to power in January 2009.
I actually said then, that I was pretty sure that China would happily give Nkrumah's Ghana as much as some US$20 billions - and told them that that was the best way of building the railway line from Tema to Paga. Below is part of the aforementioned Wednesday, September 29, 2010, article. Please read on:
"Why, dear reader, do so many of our politicians suddenly become hard-of-hearing, when they are offered good free advice - especially by those who seek nothing in return for such advice?
Take the case of that international airline industry equivalent of a Dodo, the so-called Ghana International Airlines (GIA), for example: Why does the present regime not simply liquidate it - and invite Easyjet to partner Ghana in setting up a new national carrier that will dominate Africa’s present mostly-unsafe skies, and make them safe for all Africans across the continent?
Would the outcome of such a bold move not be regarded as one of the best legacies of the administration of the hard-working and honest President Mills?
On the home front, would such a new national carrier, using the low-cost-carrier business model, not quickly come to dominate routes in and out of Ghana along the West African coastline, and to the U.S., Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and elsewhere, I ask?
Easyjet is a well-run and profitable carrier with a much-respected founder (Stelios Haji-loannou) who believes in corporate good governance principles, and is also a socially and environmentally responsible entrepreneur.
Years ago, some of us pleaded with Kufuor & Co., to invite Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Atlantic Airlines to partner Ghana Airways in a joint-venture.
However, self-interest and greed, made them turn a deaf ear to our pleas. Branson, of course, is famous for not ever giving bribes to obtain business, anywhere on the planet Earth - so one can draw one's own conclusions.
Anyway, that massive drain on state resources (some transferred by stealth, and with legal cover, into private pockets!),GIA, is the unfortunate result of their self-serving idiocy.
The question is: Will those powerful individuals surrounding President Mills listen to us this time round – and move to invite leading low-cost carrier, Easyjet, to partner Ghana to set up a new Ghana Airways-Easyjet: and work together with its founder to get the African Union ( AU) to follow Europe’s example, and declare Africa’s skies a single free open-sky, accessible to all African airlines (and outside ones too!) to compete in for freight and passengers?
Surely, dear reader, that must be the best way of making Africa’s present mostly-unsafe skies, safe for us all to fly around the continent: for both business and pleasure?"
End of the quoted part from the Wednesday, September 29, 2010 blog posting.
The question is: Why did no one in this hard-of-hearing regime, not do something about this idea? Why do they never listen to good free advice, offered by patriotic individuals who want nothing in return, I ask?
If they had listened to some of us and publicly published their assets, as well as that of their spouses, for example, today, who would have had the temerity to mention the word corruption, in the same breath, when talking about their regime?
The Mills regime must start listening to those well-meaning individuals who offer them good free advice, before it becomes too late to save their confounded regime, from certain defeat in the December 2012
Elections. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
A statement from Rubicon said "easyGroup will become a shareholder in Rubicon and will use the services of Stelios and easyGroup's experienced aviation management team to provide general strategic, management and branding advice on the feasibility of implementing a low cost, point-to-point, no frills, all jet aircraft business model for Africa."
Well, below, dear reader, is part of an article I posted on this blog on Wednesday, September 29, 2010, with the title, "LIQUIDATE GHANA INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES NOW – AS A PRELUDE TO SETTING UP A NEW NATIONAL CARRIER!"
In that article, I pleaded with the present regime (and not for the first time, either!) to contact the easyjet founder, Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou, with the view to setting up a joint-venture, to replace Ghana International Airlines (GIA).
Needless to say, it was ignored. Just as one's humble advice to them to go to China and seek funding for infrastructure projects, was, not too long after they came to power in January 2009.
I actually said then, that I was pretty sure that China would happily give Nkrumah's Ghana as much as some US$20 billions - and told them that that was the best way of building the railway line from Tema to Paga. Below is part of the aforementioned Wednesday, September 29, 2010, article. Please read on:
"Why, dear reader, do so many of our politicians suddenly become hard-of-hearing, when they are offered good free advice - especially by those who seek nothing in return for such advice?
Take the case of that international airline industry equivalent of a Dodo, the so-called Ghana International Airlines (GIA), for example: Why does the present regime not simply liquidate it - and invite Easyjet to partner Ghana in setting up a new national carrier that will dominate Africa’s present mostly-unsafe skies, and make them safe for all Africans across the continent?
Would the outcome of such a bold move not be regarded as one of the best legacies of the administration of the hard-working and honest President Mills?
On the home front, would such a new national carrier, using the low-cost-carrier business model, not quickly come to dominate routes in and out of Ghana along the West African coastline, and to the U.S., Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and elsewhere, I ask?
Easyjet is a well-run and profitable carrier with a much-respected founder (Stelios Haji-loannou) who believes in corporate good governance principles, and is also a socially and environmentally responsible entrepreneur.
Years ago, some of us pleaded with Kufuor & Co., to invite Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Atlantic Airlines to partner Ghana Airways in a joint-venture.
However, self-interest and greed, made them turn a deaf ear to our pleas. Branson, of course, is famous for not ever giving bribes to obtain business, anywhere on the planet Earth - so one can draw one's own conclusions.
Anyway, that massive drain on state resources (some transferred by stealth, and with legal cover, into private pockets!),GIA, is the unfortunate result of their self-serving idiocy.
The question is: Will those powerful individuals surrounding President Mills listen to us this time round – and move to invite leading low-cost carrier, Easyjet, to partner Ghana to set up a new Ghana Airways-Easyjet: and work together with its founder to get the African Union ( AU) to follow Europe’s example, and declare Africa’s skies a single free open-sky, accessible to all African airlines (and outside ones too!) to compete in for freight and passengers?
Surely, dear reader, that must be the best way of making Africa’s present mostly-unsafe skies, safe for us all to fly around the continent: for both business and pleasure?"
End of the quoted part from the Wednesday, September 29, 2010 blog posting.
The question is: Why did no one in this hard-of-hearing regime, not do something about this idea? Why do they never listen to good free advice, offered by patriotic individuals who want nothing in return, I ask?
If they had listened to some of us and publicly published their assets, as well as that of their spouses, for example, today, who would have had the temerity to mention the word corruption, in the same breath, when talking about their regime?
The Mills regime must start listening to those well-meaning individuals who offer them good free advice, before it becomes too late to save their confounded regime, from certain defeat in the December 2012
Elections. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Global Coalition Calls on Republic of South Sudan to Join the International Criminal Court
Civil Society Says New Government’s Priorities Should Include Accession to Rome Statute
New York, USA — The Coalition for the International Criminal Court today called on the Republic of South Sudan (RSS) to prioritize acceding to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) — the world’s first and only permanent international court able to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.
By acceding to the Rome Statute, the government of RSS would demonstrate its commitment to the global fight against impunity and promoting the rule of law.
In a letter dated 5 December 2011 to RSS President H.E. Gen. Salva Kiir Mayardit, the Coalition — a global network of more than 2,500 civil society organizations in 150 countries advocating for a fair, effective and independent ICC and improved access to justice for victims of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity — urged the government of RSS to begin the accession process of the Rome Statute, the ICC’s founding treaty..
To date, 120 states worldwide have joined the Rome Statute, Cape Verde, the Philippines, Moldova, and Vanuatu being the most recent. As part of its December 2011 Universal Ratification Campaign—a targeted grassroots and civil society-building campaign that focuses national and global advocacy initiatives urging a particular state (or several) each month to join the Rome Statute system — the Coalition’s situations advisor and outreach liaison for Africa Steve Lamony undertook an advocacy mission to Juba, South Sudan.
“Since its independence on 9 July 2011, the RSS has demonstrated and expressed its commitment to adhering to the rule of law and protecting human rights by ratifying certain human rights instruments including the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and Their Destruction,” said Lamony. “Officials should now prioritize acceding to the Rome Statute and the international community is ready to assist.”
In line with the government’s commitments, and given that the Rome Statute is an important tool to advance justice and human rights, the Coalition urged President Salva Kiir to ensure a prompt start to South Sudan’s accession process.
“Joining the Rome Statute system would allow the RSS to incorporate and integrate into its development the principles of the rule of law,” said Edmund Yakani, program coordinator of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization (CEPO). “It would allow for the country to advance efforts in establishing and institutionalizing accountability.”
As a state party, RSS would be able to actively participate in the annual Assembly of States Parties (ASP) — the ICC’s governing body — during which states make important decisions in relation to the administration of the ICC, including the election of judges, prosecutors and other Court officials.
Background:
The ICC is the world's first permanent international court to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Central to the Court's mandate is the principle of complementarity, which holds that the Court will only intervene if national legal systems are unwilling or unable to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
There are currently seven investigations before the Court: the Central African Republic; Cote d’Ivoire; the Democratic Republic of the Congo; Darfur, the Sudan; Uganda; Kenya; and Libya.
The ICC has publicly issued 19 arrest warrants and nine summonses to appear. Three trials are ongoing. The ICC prosecutor has also made public that it is examining eight situations on four continents: Afghanistan, Colombia, Georgia, Guinea, Honduras, Republic of Korea, Nigeria and Palestine.
The Coalition for the International Criminal Court is a global network of civil society organizations in 150 countries working in partnership to strengthen international cooperation with the ICC; ensure that the Court is fair, effective and independent; make justice both visible and universal; and advance stronger national laws that deliver justice to victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. For more information, visit:
www.coalitionfortheicc.org
New York, USA — The Coalition for the International Criminal Court today called on the Republic of South Sudan (RSS) to prioritize acceding to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) — the world’s first and only permanent international court able to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.
By acceding to the Rome Statute, the government of RSS would demonstrate its commitment to the global fight against impunity and promoting the rule of law.
In a letter dated 5 December 2011 to RSS President H.E. Gen. Salva Kiir Mayardit, the Coalition — a global network of more than 2,500 civil society organizations in 150 countries advocating for a fair, effective and independent ICC and improved access to justice for victims of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity — urged the government of RSS to begin the accession process of the Rome Statute, the ICC’s founding treaty..
To date, 120 states worldwide have joined the Rome Statute, Cape Verde, the Philippines, Moldova, and Vanuatu being the most recent. As part of its December 2011 Universal Ratification Campaign—a targeted grassroots and civil society-building campaign that focuses national and global advocacy initiatives urging a particular state (or several) each month to join the Rome Statute system — the Coalition’s situations advisor and outreach liaison for Africa Steve Lamony undertook an advocacy mission to Juba, South Sudan.
“Since its independence on 9 July 2011, the RSS has demonstrated and expressed its commitment to adhering to the rule of law and protecting human rights by ratifying certain human rights instruments including the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and Their Destruction,” said Lamony. “Officials should now prioritize acceding to the Rome Statute and the international community is ready to assist.”
In line with the government’s commitments, and given that the Rome Statute is an important tool to advance justice and human rights, the Coalition urged President Salva Kiir to ensure a prompt start to South Sudan’s accession process.
“Joining the Rome Statute system would allow the RSS to incorporate and integrate into its development the principles of the rule of law,” said Edmund Yakani, program coordinator of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization (CEPO). “It would allow for the country to advance efforts in establishing and institutionalizing accountability.”
As a state party, RSS would be able to actively participate in the annual Assembly of States Parties (ASP) — the ICC’s governing body — during which states make important decisions in relation to the administration of the ICC, including the election of judges, prosecutors and other Court officials.
Background:
The ICC is the world's first permanent international court to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Central to the Court's mandate is the principle of complementarity, which holds that the Court will only intervene if national legal systems are unwilling or unable to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
There are currently seven investigations before the Court: the Central African Republic; Cote d’Ivoire; the Democratic Republic of the Congo; Darfur, the Sudan; Uganda; Kenya; and Libya.
The ICC has publicly issued 19 arrest warrants and nine summonses to appear. Three trials are ongoing. The ICC prosecutor has also made public that it is examining eight situations on four continents: Afghanistan, Colombia, Georgia, Guinea, Honduras, Republic of Korea, Nigeria and Palestine.
The Coalition for the International Criminal Court is a global network of civil society organizations in 150 countries working in partnership to strengthen international cooperation with the ICC; ensure that the Court is fair, effective and independent; make justice both visible and universal; and advance stronger national laws that deliver justice to victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. For more information, visit:
www.coalitionfortheicc.org
Saturday, 3 December 2011
TO FORESTALL REAPING THE WHIRLWIND OF CLIMATE CHANGE: FORBID MINING ALONG GHANA'S ENTIRE COASTLINE!
It is extraordinary that at a time of global climate change, an important part of Ghana's cultural heritage, the historic town of Elmina, can be put at risk in such brazen fashion, by illegal gold miners - and with complete impunity, too.
Elmina is a town blessed with a rich history. Its famous castle has been designated a World Heritage Site. Indeed, Elmina Castle is the centrepiece of what is one of Ghana's foremost community-based eco-tourism destinations.
Luckily, it is an industry that is sustainable - and for many years, has actually helped preserve the rich culture of the people of Elmina. The financial benefits of tourism, has also provided them with an incentive, to preserve the lagoon - an important water body, which is a vital part of the ecology of that coastal environment.
The annual regatta that takes place on the lagoon, is an integral part of the Bakatue festival of the people of Elmina. Indeed it is one of the most spectacular festival sights to behold, in all of sub-Saharan Africa.
Alas, it appears that the curse of gold may end up destroying the very ancient town of Elmina, including its famous castle. If what is happening in Akim Abuakwa is allowed to occur in Elmina too, with officialdom unable to act decisively to halt the illegal gold mining, that historical town, may indeed end up eventually being swept away by the sea - if the madness that has gripped so many of its people isn't halted immediately.
That highly infectious form of quick-money madness, illegal gold mining, is now rumoured to be apparently going on surreptitiously, under cover of darkness, along the beaches of Elmina, and elsewhere in the general area.
Unfortunately, it may very well spread along our nation's entire coastline, if officialdom does not react quickly to this dangerous new development, by stamping it out - with brute force, if necessary: if that is what it takes to stop this unfathomable-greed-virus, from becoming a pandemic.
At a time of global climate change, when tidal waves now occur in places that they had hitherto never been experienced, it will be the height of folly, to allow the destruction that gold mining leaves in its wake, to take place anywhere along our coastline.
A friend once recounted to me, the frightening sight, of part of a cliff being broken up and swallowed by the sea, as he was driving to Takoradi. Our coastline is frequently seeing the impact of global climate in such barely-noticed tragedies - and it is important that we do not allow illegal activities to compound this threat to the survival of the many poor communities along our coast.
One therefore hopes that officialdom will have the wisdom, and above all, the courage, to prohibit all gold mining in Elmina - or, as sure as night follows day, having sown the figurative wind (of severe degradation of nature), we will end up reaping the ferocious (environmental) whirlwind, which global climate change now unleashes with such frequency, right across the globe: and with such tragic consequences. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Elmina is a town blessed with a rich history. Its famous castle has been designated a World Heritage Site. Indeed, Elmina Castle is the centrepiece of what is one of Ghana's foremost community-based eco-tourism destinations.
Luckily, it is an industry that is sustainable - and for many years, has actually helped preserve the rich culture of the people of Elmina. The financial benefits of tourism, has also provided them with an incentive, to preserve the lagoon - an important water body, which is a vital part of the ecology of that coastal environment.
The annual regatta that takes place on the lagoon, is an integral part of the Bakatue festival of the people of Elmina. Indeed it is one of the most spectacular festival sights to behold, in all of sub-Saharan Africa.
Alas, it appears that the curse of gold may end up destroying the very ancient town of Elmina, including its famous castle. If what is happening in Akim Abuakwa is allowed to occur in Elmina too, with officialdom unable to act decisively to halt the illegal gold mining, that historical town, may indeed end up eventually being swept away by the sea - if the madness that has gripped so many of its people isn't halted immediately.
That highly infectious form of quick-money madness, illegal gold mining, is now rumoured to be apparently going on surreptitiously, under cover of darkness, along the beaches of Elmina, and elsewhere in the general area.
Unfortunately, it may very well spread along our nation's entire coastline, if officialdom does not react quickly to this dangerous new development, by stamping it out - with brute force, if necessary: if that is what it takes to stop this unfathomable-greed-virus, from becoming a pandemic.
At a time of global climate change, when tidal waves now occur in places that they had hitherto never been experienced, it will be the height of folly, to allow the destruction that gold mining leaves in its wake, to take place anywhere along our coastline.
A friend once recounted to me, the frightening sight, of part of a cliff being broken up and swallowed by the sea, as he was driving to Takoradi. Our coastline is frequently seeing the impact of global climate in such barely-noticed tragedies - and it is important that we do not allow illegal activities to compound this threat to the survival of the many poor communities along our coast.
One therefore hopes that officialdom will have the wisdom, and above all, the courage, to prohibit all gold mining in Elmina - or, as sure as night follows day, having sown the figurative wind (of severe degradation of nature), we will end up reaping the ferocious (environmental) whirlwind, which global climate change now unleashes with such frequency, right across the globe: and with such tragic consequences. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Friday, 2 December 2011
Kofi Thompson Is Not Beholden To Anyone - Which Is Why He Always Speaks His Mind Freely!
It is typical of the Byzantine nature of the politics of our country, and the low esteem in which most journalists are held in Ghana, that anyone would assume that because I was calling for the Convention Peoples Party (CPP) to expel Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom, it meant that I was acting on behalf of the two individuals I said would make a perfect presidential ticket for a merged CPP/Peoples National Convention (PNC) party, to campaign for the December 2012 elections: Dr. Edward Mahama and Professor Agyemang Badu Akosa.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I simply happen to think that because of the unique individual qualities of the two gentlemen, Dr. Edward Mahama, would be the perfect presidential candidate for a united CPP/PNC ticket - and that Professor Agyemang Badu Akosa would make an excellent foil to Dr. Mahama: as vice presidential candidate.
Well, surprising though it might be for some, the fact of the matter, dear reader, is that I have neither met nor spoken to Dr. Edward Mahama of the Peoples National Convention (PNC) before, in my entire life. Neither have I ever met, nor spoken, to Professor Agyemang Badu Akosa before, too, in all of the 58 years I have lived on the surface of the planet Earth for.
Why anyone would assume that I was acting on behalf of the two distinguished medical doctors, in calling for Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom to be expelled from the party of Nkrumah, beats my imagination. But then, as a wag once said in similar circumstances: "It takes all sorts, I suppose - and there's one born every minute, we mustn't forget."
In any case, I am not one of those unethical journalists who seem to think that journalism practice is an extension of public relations consultancy work - and accept money regularly from politicians and business tycoons to write pieces that are favourable to them, for that reason.
Anyone who has read my writing consistently for the last fifteen or so years, would confirm that I happen to be someone who constantly condemns unprofessional journalists - particularly those mercenary hacks who sell their conscience to the highest bidders in the world of Ghanaian politics: and do the bidding of politicians and their cronies. I am not about to travel down that road-of-shame in my dotage. Period.
More to the point, I have never met or spoken to Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom before. I have nothing against him, personally. Indeed he is a man to be admired in many ways - if there were a thousand gifted businesspeople like him in Ghana, youth unemployment wouldn't be half as worrying, as it is today. I just happen to believe that the CPP would be better off without him - and vice versa. Period.
As it happens, I am just an independent-minded, plain-speaking patriot and nationalist, who loves his country and Mother Africa passionately - and believes that we have reached a juncture in our nation and Africa's history, when the ideals of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah ought to prevail again in Ghanaian and pan-African politics.
Above all, I want the party of Nkrumah, the CPP, to be rebuilt from the ground up, into a solid organisation, so that it can start winning elections, and be returned to power again - to lead the transformation of our country into an African equivalent of the egalitarian societies of Scandinavia.
Finally, let those misguided souls, who think that somehow I am acting for Dr. Edward Mahama and Professor Agyemang Badu Akosa, in calling for Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom to be expelled from the CPP, be clear about one thing: I am not beholden to anyone in Ghana, or elsewhere - for which reason I have always spoken my mind freely: and will continue doing so till I draw my last breath.
I am very much my own man, and have always been (right from my boyhood days at Prempeh College!) - let no one think otherwise. Kofi Thompson is no one's poodle. For their information, I am the human equivalent, of my favourite breed in the canine world, the Doberman Pinscher - so those with ill-intent, who venture unto my lawn, will not be spared. They will be torn apart - completely. Period.
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I simply happen to think that because of the unique individual qualities of the two gentlemen, Dr. Edward Mahama, would be the perfect presidential candidate for a united CPP/PNC ticket - and that Professor Agyemang Badu Akosa would make an excellent foil to Dr. Mahama: as vice presidential candidate.
Well, surprising though it might be for some, the fact of the matter, dear reader, is that I have neither met nor spoken to Dr. Edward Mahama of the Peoples National Convention (PNC) before, in my entire life. Neither have I ever met, nor spoken, to Professor Agyemang Badu Akosa before, too, in all of the 58 years I have lived on the surface of the planet Earth for.
Why anyone would assume that I was acting on behalf of the two distinguished medical doctors, in calling for Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom to be expelled from the party of Nkrumah, beats my imagination. But then, as a wag once said in similar circumstances: "It takes all sorts, I suppose - and there's one born every minute, we mustn't forget."
In any case, I am not one of those unethical journalists who seem to think that journalism practice is an extension of public relations consultancy work - and accept money regularly from politicians and business tycoons to write pieces that are favourable to them, for that reason.
Anyone who has read my writing consistently for the last fifteen or so years, would confirm that I happen to be someone who constantly condemns unprofessional journalists - particularly those mercenary hacks who sell their conscience to the highest bidders in the world of Ghanaian politics: and do the bidding of politicians and their cronies. I am not about to travel down that road-of-shame in my dotage. Period.
More to the point, I have never met or spoken to Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom before. I have nothing against him, personally. Indeed he is a man to be admired in many ways - if there were a thousand gifted businesspeople like him in Ghana, youth unemployment wouldn't be half as worrying, as it is today. I just happen to believe that the CPP would be better off without him - and vice versa. Period.
As it happens, I am just an independent-minded, plain-speaking patriot and nationalist, who loves his country and Mother Africa passionately - and believes that we have reached a juncture in our nation and Africa's history, when the ideals of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah ought to prevail again in Ghanaian and pan-African politics.
Above all, I want the party of Nkrumah, the CPP, to be rebuilt from the ground up, into a solid organisation, so that it can start winning elections, and be returned to power again - to lead the transformation of our country into an African equivalent of the egalitarian societies of Scandinavia.
Finally, let those misguided souls, who think that somehow I am acting for Dr. Edward Mahama and Professor Agyemang Badu Akosa, in calling for Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom to be expelled from the CPP, be clear about one thing: I am not beholden to anyone in Ghana, or elsewhere - for which reason I have always spoken my mind freely: and will continue doing so till I draw my last breath.
I am very much my own man, and have always been (right from my boyhood days at Prempeh College!) - let no one think otherwise. Kofi Thompson is no one's poodle. For their information, I am the human equivalent, of my favourite breed in the canine world, the Doberman Pinscher - so those with ill-intent, who venture unto my lawn, will not be spared. They will be torn apart - completely. Period.
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Thursday, 1 December 2011
Fatou Bensouda in Line to Become Next International Criminal Court Prosecutor
Current ICC Deputy-Prosecutor Formally Nominated as Consensus Candidate for 12 December Election
Today, 1 December 2011, at the conclusion of an informal meeting of International Criminal Court (ICC) states parties in New York, the president of the Assembly of States Parties (ASP) — the ICC’s governing body — announced that an informal agreement had been reached to nominate Ms. Fatou Bensouda as the consensus candidate for election as the next chief prosecutor of the ICC.
This announcement follows informal consultations among ICC states parties to identify one candidate for formal nomination and election by consensus during the tenth annual session of the ASP in December 2011. Bensouda, a Gambian national and currently ICC deputy-prosecutor, now appears almost certain to be the next prosecutor of the ICC.
The Gambia and other governments are expected to now formally nominate her for the position. The formal election will occur on the first day of the ASP meetings, 12 December 2011. The new prosecutor’s term will begin around 16 June 2012 after taking an oath of office.
Bensouda was elected ICC deputy prosecutor on 8 September 2004 and is in charge of the prosecution division of the Office of the Prosecutor. Prior to her election, Bensouda worked as a legal adviser and trial attorney at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in Arusha, Tanzania, then becoming senior legal advisor and head of the ICTY’s legal advisory unit. Before joining the ICTR, Bensouda held a number of high-level positions in the public and private sectors in The Gambia.
On 25 October 2011, the Search Committee for the position of International Criminal Court Prosecutor released the names of the four shortlisted candidates it had recommended to the Bureau of the ASP — the ASP's executive committee. As well as Fatou B. Bensouda, the list included: Andrew T. Cayley, currently international co-prosecutor, Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia; Mohamed Chande Othman, currently chief justice of Tanzania; Robert Petit, currently counsel, crimes against humanity and war crimes section, department of justice, Canada.
The ASP president had subsequently asked UN ambassadors — from Timor Leste, Costa Rica, the Netherlands, Botswana, and Estonia — to poll ICC states parties from their respective regions to identify a consensus candidate.
On 23 November 2011, both Bensouda and Othman emerged as the two-front-runners, precipitating an extension to the deadline — from 25 to 30 November 2011 — for states to achieve consensus on one of the two.
NEXT STEPS:
Although Bensouda will be formally nominated as the consensus candidate for the position of ICC prosecutor, according the Rome Statute — the Court’s founding treaty — she will still need to be formally elected by an absolute (two-thirds) majority of states parties on 12 December 2011.
However, the nomination period remains open until 9 December 2011 and in principle, again in accordance with the Rome Statute, any ICC state party could still formally nominate a different candidate.
WHY:
In accordance with Article 42(4) of the Rome Statute, the term of the first ICC prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, is due to expire in June 2012 and cannot be renewed. Unless a shorter term is decided upon at the time of the election, his successor will be elected for a nine-year term at the tenth session of ASP to be held on December 12-21 at UN Headquarters in New York.
HOW:
Despite being the consensus candidate amongst states parties, Bensouda has to be formally nominated by one or more state parties which is a procedural requirement of the Rome Statute and ASP resolutions for election.
In December 2011, the Bureau of the ASP established the Search Committee for the Prosecutor of the ICC to facilitate the nomination and election by consensus of the next prosecutor.
The Search Committee had received expressions of interest, or otherwise identified, 52 individuals, 8 of whom were interviewed from 10-13 October in New York, from those interviewed, four were shortlisted.
Until the cut-off date of 9 September 2011, the Search Committee received informal ‘expressions of interest’ for the position of ICC prosecutor submitted by candidates themselves or on their behalf by third parties (NGOs, associations, States, individuals and so forth).
In addition to this process, the Search Committee sought to identify highly qualified candidates for the position. By 9 September 2011, the Search Committee had received a total of 42 expressions of interest, of these at least 12 candidates were publicly identified as female, 30 were male; 21 were nationals of the African Group, one from the Eastern European Group, three from GRULAC and 16 from WEOG.
The Search Committee is composed of states parties’ representatives from each UN regional grouping: H.R.H. Prince Zeid Ra’ad Zeid Al-Hussein (Asian Group), H.E. Mr.Baso Sangqu (African Group), H.E. Mr. Miloš Koterec (Eastern Europe Group), Mr. Joel Hernández García (Latin American and Caribbean States (GRULAC)), and Sir Daniel Bethlehem (Western European and Others Group (WEOG)).
BACKGROUND:
The 2011 prosecutorial elections will impact almost every aspect of the ICC for years to come. The new prosecutor will take responsibility for all ongoing and future investigations. This includes the cases currently before the ICC in relation to situations in Central African Republic, Côte d’Ivoire, Darfur, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Libya and Uganda, as well as the numerous preliminary examinations undertaken in Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East.
Two of the ICC’s first trials may be completed shortly after the election, and the appeals and reparations phases for these trials are expected to be ongoing after the election. As part of its global campaign on ICC elections, the Coalition has been actively monitoring the Search Committee process for the next ICC prosecutor.
The Coalition successfully advocated for greater transparency and reporting by the Committee — including on gender and regional statistics — as well as encouraging the identification of potential candidates from all regions. The Coalition also hosted interviews with the four candidates in New York.
The ICC is the world's first permanent international court to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Central to the Court's mandate is the principle of complementarity, which holds that the Court will only intervene if national legal systems are unwilling or unable to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. There are currently seven investigations before the
Court: Central African Republic; Cote d’Ivoire; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Darfur, the Sudan; Uganda; Kenya; and Libya. The ICC has publicly issued 19 arrest warrants and nine summonses to appear.
Three trials are ongoing. The ICC prosecutor has also made public that it is examining eight situations on four continents: Afghanistan,Colombia, Georgia, Guinea, Honduras, Republic of Korea, Nigeria and Palestine.
The Coalition for the International Criminal Court is a global network of civil society organizations in over 150 countries working in partnership to strengthen international cooperation with the ICC; ensure that the Court is fair, effective and independent; make justice both visible and universal; and advance stronger national laws that deliver justice to victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. For more information, visit:
www.coalitionfortheicc.org
Today, 1 December 2011, at the conclusion of an informal meeting of International Criminal Court (ICC) states parties in New York, the president of the Assembly of States Parties (ASP) — the ICC’s governing body — announced that an informal agreement had been reached to nominate Ms. Fatou Bensouda as the consensus candidate for election as the next chief prosecutor of the ICC.
This announcement follows informal consultations among ICC states parties to identify one candidate for formal nomination and election by consensus during the tenth annual session of the ASP in December 2011. Bensouda, a Gambian national and currently ICC deputy-prosecutor, now appears almost certain to be the next prosecutor of the ICC.
The Gambia and other governments are expected to now formally nominate her for the position. The formal election will occur on the first day of the ASP meetings, 12 December 2011. The new prosecutor’s term will begin around 16 June 2012 after taking an oath of office.
Bensouda was elected ICC deputy prosecutor on 8 September 2004 and is in charge of the prosecution division of the Office of the Prosecutor. Prior to her election, Bensouda worked as a legal adviser and trial attorney at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in Arusha, Tanzania, then becoming senior legal advisor and head of the ICTY’s legal advisory unit. Before joining the ICTR, Bensouda held a number of high-level positions in the public and private sectors in The Gambia.
On 25 October 2011, the Search Committee for the position of International Criminal Court Prosecutor released the names of the four shortlisted candidates it had recommended to the Bureau of the ASP — the ASP's executive committee. As well as Fatou B. Bensouda, the list included: Andrew T. Cayley, currently international co-prosecutor, Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia; Mohamed Chande Othman, currently chief justice of Tanzania; Robert Petit, currently counsel, crimes against humanity and war crimes section, department of justice, Canada.
The ASP president had subsequently asked UN ambassadors — from Timor Leste, Costa Rica, the Netherlands, Botswana, and Estonia — to poll ICC states parties from their respective regions to identify a consensus candidate.
On 23 November 2011, both Bensouda and Othman emerged as the two-front-runners, precipitating an extension to the deadline — from 25 to 30 November 2011 — for states to achieve consensus on one of the two.
NEXT STEPS:
Although Bensouda will be formally nominated as the consensus candidate for the position of ICC prosecutor, according the Rome Statute — the Court’s founding treaty — she will still need to be formally elected by an absolute (two-thirds) majority of states parties on 12 December 2011.
However, the nomination period remains open until 9 December 2011 and in principle, again in accordance with the Rome Statute, any ICC state party could still formally nominate a different candidate.
WHY:
In accordance with Article 42(4) of the Rome Statute, the term of the first ICC prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, is due to expire in June 2012 and cannot be renewed. Unless a shorter term is decided upon at the time of the election, his successor will be elected for a nine-year term at the tenth session of ASP to be held on December 12-21 at UN Headquarters in New York.
HOW:
Despite being the consensus candidate amongst states parties, Bensouda has to be formally nominated by one or more state parties which is a procedural requirement of the Rome Statute and ASP resolutions for election.
In December 2011, the Bureau of the ASP established the Search Committee for the Prosecutor of the ICC to facilitate the nomination and election by consensus of the next prosecutor.
The Search Committee had received expressions of interest, or otherwise identified, 52 individuals, 8 of whom were interviewed from 10-13 October in New York, from those interviewed, four were shortlisted.
Until the cut-off date of 9 September 2011, the Search Committee received informal ‘expressions of interest’ for the position of ICC prosecutor submitted by candidates themselves or on their behalf by third parties (NGOs, associations, States, individuals and so forth).
In addition to this process, the Search Committee sought to identify highly qualified candidates for the position. By 9 September 2011, the Search Committee had received a total of 42 expressions of interest, of these at least 12 candidates were publicly identified as female, 30 were male; 21 were nationals of the African Group, one from the Eastern European Group, three from GRULAC and 16 from WEOG.
The Search Committee is composed of states parties’ representatives from each UN regional grouping: H.R.H. Prince Zeid Ra’ad Zeid Al-Hussein (Asian Group), H.E. Mr.Baso Sangqu (African Group), H.E. Mr. Miloš Koterec (Eastern Europe Group), Mr. Joel Hernández García (Latin American and Caribbean States (GRULAC)), and Sir Daniel Bethlehem (Western European and Others Group (WEOG)).
BACKGROUND:
The 2011 prosecutorial elections will impact almost every aspect of the ICC for years to come. The new prosecutor will take responsibility for all ongoing and future investigations. This includes the cases currently before the ICC in relation to situations in Central African Republic, Côte d’Ivoire, Darfur, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Libya and Uganda, as well as the numerous preliminary examinations undertaken in Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East.
Two of the ICC’s first trials may be completed shortly after the election, and the appeals and reparations phases for these trials are expected to be ongoing after the election. As part of its global campaign on ICC elections, the Coalition has been actively monitoring the Search Committee process for the next ICC prosecutor.
The Coalition successfully advocated for greater transparency and reporting by the Committee — including on gender and regional statistics — as well as encouraging the identification of potential candidates from all regions. The Coalition also hosted interviews with the four candidates in New York.
The ICC is the world's first permanent international court to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Central to the Court's mandate is the principle of complementarity, which holds that the Court will only intervene if national legal systems are unwilling or unable to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. There are currently seven investigations before the
Court: Central African Republic; Cote d’Ivoire; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Darfur, the Sudan; Uganda; Kenya; and Libya. The ICC has publicly issued 19 arrest warrants and nine summonses to appear.
Three trials are ongoing. The ICC prosecutor has also made public that it is examining eight situations on four continents: Afghanistan,Colombia, Georgia, Guinea, Honduras, Republic of Korea, Nigeria and Palestine.
The Coalition for the International Criminal Court is a global network of civil society organizations in over 150 countries working in partnership to strengthen international cooperation with the ICC; ensure that the Court is fair, effective and independent; make justice both visible and universal; and advance stronger national laws that deliver justice to victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. For more information, visit:
www.coalitionfortheicc.org
WHY THE CPP MUST NOW PART WAYS WITH THE BRILLIANT DR. PAA KWESI NDUOM
If ever the ideas of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah were needed to guide the future direction of our homeland Ghana, it is now. So, when the party of Nkrumah, the Convention Peoples Party (CPP), once the vanguard of the masses, faces an existentialist crisis, and so many Progressives fail to understand that, it is very worrying indeed.
This is no time to be conciliatory towards the very people formenting trouble in the party of Nkrumah - when others are trying hard to build it into a solid organisation: with a grass-roots, bottom-up approach.
Those who want the CPP to be reorganised into a solid party, must not allow an opportunity to rid the CPP of an irritating megalomaniac, determined to hijack the party of Nkrumah for his own selfish ends, to pass them by.
Why must they permit a dangerous situation to degenerate and morph into some hypocritical Emperor-with-no-clothes drama, in which the audience go along with that pure nonsense on bamboo stilts - using hypocritical and diplomatic language, implying that somehow the Emperor is dressed in gold-threaded silken clothes: instead of pointing out that, frankly, the protagonist is actually stark naked?
True Nkrumaists aren't interested in the farce in which people are opening what in effect are meant to be the branch offices of the holding company of a wealthy tycoon's conglomerate - staffed with yes-men and yes-women: all paid to do his bidding - and pretending that they are CPP offices. We are not all visually-impaired in the party of Nkrumah, luckily - so some of us can see through what is going on.
Let those now vociferously singing the song of appeasement in the CPP and dancing energetically to that discordant tune, and who are completely forgetting the raison d'etre of Nkrumaism, remember that this is a nation in which the ruling elites are content to tolerate the totally unacceptable situation, in which, on a daily basis, one sees thousands of working people struggling to get unto tro-tro minibuses to get to work - rising early in order not to be late for work and returning home late at night, because of the difficulty of getting transport home. What kind of quality of life is that, I ask?
Do such appeasing individuals ever ask themselves, why, when Ghana under Nkrumah pioneered the idea of affordable housing estate projects for the benefit of ordinary people, we now have a society in which huge disparities in wealth exist, and is faced with an acute shortage of well-designed and well-built affordable flats and houses for ordinary people to rent, nationwide?
Yet, more and more exclusive gated-communities are still springing up: many of the posh houses built in them remaining unoccupied and unsold. But, are there not millions in need of decent and affordable accommodation countrywide, in Nkrumah's Ghana - and has there not been a lack of the political will and creative leadership needed to make our nation meet that need, for over a decade now?
Where is the political will to commit resources; revamp the State Housing Company (SHC) by giving the management and workers 25 percent of the company, float a further 25 percent on the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE) to raise interest-free capital, for the company - and if the Ghanaian nation-state were to keep the remaining 50 percent of the shareholding as a strategic investment, enabling it to influence the housing sector through it, would the government of the day, not be able to get private sector real estate companies to partner the SHC to build well-designed and well-built affordable rental accommodation, countrywide: by making rental income from such public private partnerships (PPP's) completely tax free?
How many potentially brilliant future engineers, biochemists, medical doctors, accountants, lawyers, soil analysts, computer programmers and psychologists, are now pounding pavements in cities and towns across Ghana on a daily basis, selling fried plantain and worthless imported bric-a-brac - because their families could not afford to pay for them to continue with their education, I ask?
Yet, it is the brain-power of Ghanaians, which will make our nation a prosperous one, in the knowledge economy of the information age.
So why should we allow Nkrumah's Ghana to continue to be dominated by political parties, which do not understand that a poor developing nation cannot afford not to provide free education, from kindergarten to tertiary level, to all those who have the aptitude to study?
Now an oil-producing nation, this country at last has an opportunity to transform itself into an African equivalent of the egalitarian societies of Scandinavia, within a decade - and it is only the party of Nkrumah, run as a collective, not some one-man-show, that can make that happen.
There is a lot of work for Nkrumaists to do for Mother Ghana's well-being - but we cannot do so with a party in disarray: and beholden to one man and the sycophants that surround him.
Surely, this is no time to be cowardly and hypocritical? We must call a spade a spade. It is indeed nonsensical for any individual to think that he or she can mount a reverse takeover of Nkrumah's party. For his own good, and to secure the future of the CPP, those who have the power to do so, must expel Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom from the party of Nkrumah. Period.
Let him go and form his own New Free Enterprise Party (NFEP) and use it to mount a bid for the presidency - he will be able to dominate it completely and use it for his own purposes: and be master in his own house.
Alas, unfortunately, as is often the case in such matters, he is surrounded mostly by cowardly individuals who depend on him for their 'survival-cash', and will never tell him the bitter truth. If truth be told, he cannot lead the party of Nkrumah - because he is simply not qualified to do so: despite his undoubted brilliance and his success as a world-class individual and a wealthy entrepreneur.
This is the last opportunity the CPP has to rebuild itself. That is why it must not allow itself to be distracted from that all-important task. What has to be done, must be done - and quickly done. Let those who have the power to do so, act quickly, to expel Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom from the party of Nkrumah now. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
This is no time to be conciliatory towards the very people formenting trouble in the party of Nkrumah - when others are trying hard to build it into a solid organisation: with a grass-roots, bottom-up approach.
Those who want the CPP to be reorganised into a solid party, must not allow an opportunity to rid the CPP of an irritating megalomaniac, determined to hijack the party of Nkrumah for his own selfish ends, to pass them by.
Why must they permit a dangerous situation to degenerate and morph into some hypocritical Emperor-with-no-clothes drama, in which the audience go along with that pure nonsense on bamboo stilts - using hypocritical and diplomatic language, implying that somehow the Emperor is dressed in gold-threaded silken clothes: instead of pointing out that, frankly, the protagonist is actually stark naked?
True Nkrumaists aren't interested in the farce in which people are opening what in effect are meant to be the branch offices of the holding company of a wealthy tycoon's conglomerate - staffed with yes-men and yes-women: all paid to do his bidding - and pretending that they are CPP offices. We are not all visually-impaired in the party of Nkrumah, luckily - so some of us can see through what is going on.
Let those now vociferously singing the song of appeasement in the CPP and dancing energetically to that discordant tune, and who are completely forgetting the raison d'etre of Nkrumaism, remember that this is a nation in which the ruling elites are content to tolerate the totally unacceptable situation, in which, on a daily basis, one sees thousands of working people struggling to get unto tro-tro minibuses to get to work - rising early in order not to be late for work and returning home late at night, because of the difficulty of getting transport home. What kind of quality of life is that, I ask?
Do such appeasing individuals ever ask themselves, why, when Ghana under Nkrumah pioneered the idea of affordable housing estate projects for the benefit of ordinary people, we now have a society in which huge disparities in wealth exist, and is faced with an acute shortage of well-designed and well-built affordable flats and houses for ordinary people to rent, nationwide?
Yet, more and more exclusive gated-communities are still springing up: many of the posh houses built in them remaining unoccupied and unsold. But, are there not millions in need of decent and affordable accommodation countrywide, in Nkrumah's Ghana - and has there not been a lack of the political will and creative leadership needed to make our nation meet that need, for over a decade now?
Where is the political will to commit resources; revamp the State Housing Company (SHC) by giving the management and workers 25 percent of the company, float a further 25 percent on the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE) to raise interest-free capital, for the company - and if the Ghanaian nation-state were to keep the remaining 50 percent of the shareholding as a strategic investment, enabling it to influence the housing sector through it, would the government of the day, not be able to get private sector real estate companies to partner the SHC to build well-designed and well-built affordable rental accommodation, countrywide: by making rental income from such public private partnerships (PPP's) completely tax free?
How many potentially brilliant future engineers, biochemists, medical doctors, accountants, lawyers, soil analysts, computer programmers and psychologists, are now pounding pavements in cities and towns across Ghana on a daily basis, selling fried plantain and worthless imported bric-a-brac - because their families could not afford to pay for them to continue with their education, I ask?
Yet, it is the brain-power of Ghanaians, which will make our nation a prosperous one, in the knowledge economy of the information age.
So why should we allow Nkrumah's Ghana to continue to be dominated by political parties, which do not understand that a poor developing nation cannot afford not to provide free education, from kindergarten to tertiary level, to all those who have the aptitude to study?
Now an oil-producing nation, this country at last has an opportunity to transform itself into an African equivalent of the egalitarian societies of Scandinavia, within a decade - and it is only the party of Nkrumah, run as a collective, not some one-man-show, that can make that happen.
There is a lot of work for Nkrumaists to do for Mother Ghana's well-being - but we cannot do so with a party in disarray: and beholden to one man and the sycophants that surround him.
Surely, this is no time to be cowardly and hypocritical? We must call a spade a spade. It is indeed nonsensical for any individual to think that he or she can mount a reverse takeover of Nkrumah's party. For his own good, and to secure the future of the CPP, those who have the power to do so, must expel Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom from the party of Nkrumah. Period.
Let him go and form his own New Free Enterprise Party (NFEP) and use it to mount a bid for the presidency - he will be able to dominate it completely and use it for his own purposes: and be master in his own house.
Alas, unfortunately, as is often the case in such matters, he is surrounded mostly by cowardly individuals who depend on him for their 'survival-cash', and will never tell him the bitter truth. If truth be told, he cannot lead the party of Nkrumah - because he is simply not qualified to do so: despite his undoubted brilliance and his success as a world-class individual and a wealthy entrepreneur.
This is the last opportunity the CPP has to rebuild itself. That is why it must not allow itself to be distracted from that all-important task. What has to be done, must be done - and quickly done. Let those who have the power to do so, act quickly, to expel Dr. Paa Kwesi Nduom from the party of Nkrumah now. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
