The New Patriotic Party's (NPP) presidential candidate, Nana Addo Danquah
Akufo-Addo, succeeded in saving himself from considerable
embarrassment, when he declined to tell the BBC's Stephen
Suker, the source of funding for the implementation of his party's free
secondary education policy proposal, during his appearance on the BBC's
flagship interview programme, Hardtalk, on 5th March,
2012.
He did so by telling Stephen Suker that he preferred to tell the Ghanaian
people first - "the fact that many Ghanaians were actually listening on
radio, and watching the interview on television as well as online,
obviously lost on him" a wag I know said to me after the event.
Perhaps Mr. Suker allowed him to
get away with that gaffe, simply because he thought there had to be
a cultural reason for the unheard of (to a sophisticated Western media
professional's mind) curiosity of a leading African politician vying for the
presidency of his country, being unable and unwilling to reveal
where exactly the money to fund a policy of free secondary education,
promised voters by his party in a presidential election,
would be coming from.
Refusing to let voters
know the full cost of implementing such an important a policy proposal in a
widely watched interview on television, would have immediately
destroyed Nana Addo Danquah Akufo-Addo’s chances of being elected
as president, had he been vying for power in an
election campaign in any of the leading Western democracies.
Surely, the time has now come for the more patriotic, principled
and responsible sections of the Ghanaian media, to insist that all the
nation's political parties promising voters free secondary education in Ghana,
ought to provide Ghanaians with more detailed information
about the implementation of that policy when they win power in the December
polls?
It is important that a policy proposal that clearly resonates with an
overwhelming majority of ordinary Ghanaians, is explained in practical terms,
in all its aspects - otherwise some political party could ride on its
coattails to victory when in fact it would not be able to implement the policy
when in office: without causing irreparable damage to the second-cycle educational
system and dislocating our national economy.
For example, how much and where exactly will the funding
for implementing that policy come from - and will it be sustainable over
the 4-year tenure as president of the candidate promising it?
And at what point exactly, will a parent with two sons in say
Prempeh College and daughters each in St. Louis and Yaa Asantewaa respectively,
for example, stop paying their fees - when the presidential candidate
promising free secondary education assumes office in January 2013?
And, what, dear reader, does "free secondary education"
entail for parents, whose wards are in secondary schools across Ghana,
and currently paying for a plethora of items listed in their wards'
schools' prospectus?
Will they no longer be required to pay for items ranging from
PTA through textbooks to building-funds, for example?
If that will be the case, then at what point exactly ought Ghanaian
parents to expect to be told to cease paying for all the sundry
items listed above - when an NPP, Convention Peoples Party, Peoples
National Convention or Progressive Peoples Party (PPP) presidential
candidate (all of whom are dedicated to offering some form of free secondary
education to Ghanaians ) is sworn into office as Ghana's new
president, after the December 7th presidential poll?
Put simply, dear reader, Ghanaians must be told exactly how much free
secondary education will cost over the 4-year tenure of the presidential candidates
promising it - and from where precisely the money to pay for it will be coming.
Otherwise a gigantic fraud is being perpetrated against the people of Ghana,
simply to enable politicians ride to power mining a rich seam of popular
expectation predicated on an absolute falsehood. A word to the wise...
Tel: 027 745 3109.
Email: peakofi.thompson@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment