Author's note: This piece was written on 6/3/2013. It is being posted today because I was unable to do so on the day.
On what is Ghana's 56th Independence Day anniversary, the point needs to
be made that no nation that lacks a maintenance culture, and whose
people are unable to manage even the relatively simple task of the
disposal of household and industrial waste, should ever contemplate
building nuclear power plants.
The question is: Where exactly do the well-meaning individuals in
Ghana who are advocating nuclear power as the answer to our
power-generating needs, propose to store the radioactive waste
produced by nuclear power plants - waste that will remain a danger
to generations of our people for thousands of years to come: and will
have to be closely-guarded on a round-the-clock basis all that while?
Yet, anecdotal evidence suggests that unfortunately some unpatriotic
public-sector employees in our politically polarised society, have no
qualms about sabotaging the nation-building efforts of governments of
the day to which they are politically opposed.
How can we be sure, for example, that none of the engineers manning
nuclear power plants in Ghana, will not be driven to sabotage them
because they are opposed to a government of the day?
And what will be the apocalyptic outcome resulting from such deliberate
acts of sabotage - in terms of evacuating millions at risk from
contamination and where it will be environmentally suitable to move
them?
Why do the well-meaning individuals promoting nuclear power plants in
Ghana, not rather choose to play an advocacy role for the creation of a
favourable business climate in which renewable energy harnessed from
the sun and the strong winds off our coastline by private-sector
players, supplement energy provided by thermal power plants in Ghana?
And in a society in which corruption is rife, and in which
whistle-blowers are treated like common criminals, who will expose
corrupt procurement deals resulting in shoddy work carried out in
building nuclear power plants and routine maintenance contracts at those
nuclear power plants, for example?
Since it is a world leader in the building of giant wind-power plants,
what stops us from doing a deal with the best-resourced state-owned
wind-power plant builders in China, to build the world's biggest
wind-power farm off our coastline to provide say 10,000 megawatts of
electricity?
Could we not pay for such a world-beating wind-power farm by doing a
batter deal - exchanging the cost of their construction with access
for China to blocs in oilfields off our shores: which in any case will
only end up being given to multinational oil companies for a pittance
in royalty payments to Ghana, because signing the far more lucrative
production-sharing agreements do not serve the interests of the few
powerful individuals with greedy ambitions who dominate Ghanaian
society?
Could a similar deal not be structured with Scottish companies that
lead the world in harnessing the power of ocean waves, to generate
renewable energy from the powerful Atlantic Ocean waves off our
coastline?
We are also blessed with abundant sunshine. Instead of opting for
expensive and potentially dangerous nuclear power plants, why not make
it possible for the owners of buildings in Ghana to be in a position
financially (through dedicated interest-free loans from the banking
system and tax exemptions for example) to afford the initial outlay
enabling them purchase solar power systems for those buildings - to
supplement power supplied them from the national grid?
Will that not help cut down electricity bills for millions in Ghana -
and ensure that they are not inconvenienced when national grid power
outages occur, too?
And will all the above not enable ours to become an energy-efficient
economy - a prerequisite for becoming truly competitive globally?
With such renewable energy alternatives available to Ghana and its
people, we must never allow nuclear power plants to be built in Ghana -
just because it will benefit the privileged few fronting for overseas
nuclear plant builders and those state officials who will approve and
sign contracts for their construction.
That will be a grave error of judgment on the part of civil society -
the consequences of which could turn out to be too dire for one to even
contemplate. A word to the wise...
Tel: 027 745 3109.
Friday, 15 March 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment