For some fair-minded Ghanaians, it was extraordinary that those who
allege that the Electoral Commissioner, Dr. Kwadwo Afari-Djan,
colluded with President Mahama, to rig the December 2012 presidential
election in the President's favour, objected to his being allowed to
give evidence in the presidential election petition being heard by the
Supreme Court.
For such discerning Ghanaians, it was an unfair legal tactic that was
hard to fathom - and in their view was rightly over-ruled by the
panel of judges.
In search of the truth, what did it matter that Dr. Afari-Djan's
deputy, rather than the chairperson of the Electoral Commission
himself, had signed affidavits covering the Electoral Commission's
documents submitted to the Supreme Court?
To those patriotic Ghanaians who despise the extremists amongst our
political class, that aborted legal manoeuvre by the petitioners' legal
team, illustrates perfectly, the cynicism and ruthlessness of the
hardliners who prevailed on the New Patriotic Party (NPP) to agree to
the Supreme Court being petitioned to overturn the declaration by the
Electoral Commissioner, of President Mahama as victor, in the 2013
presidential election.
Clearly, for that small group of NPP the-end-justifies-the-means
hardliners, who remote-control their party from the shadows - and who
are depending on a falsehood to secure the presidency for their
party's defeated candidate - the object of the presidential election
petition before the Supreme Court, is not about seeking the truth as
to what actually occurred during the two days of polling in the 2012
presidential election, but the clever use of arguments and legal
technicalities, to enable them achieve their objective. It is all
"political" - to quote one NPP genius.
There are many fair-minded Ghanaians, for whom it was against natural
justice, and most unfortunate, that those who have openly maligned a
man of great honour, who has served his country diligently as Electoral
Commissioner for many years, and supervised presidential and parliamentary elections, in which there
have twice been transfers of power from one political party to another -
resulting from victories of presidential candidates of opposition
parties in December 2000 and December 2008 - objected to the Supreme
Court allowing Dr. Afari-Djan to give evidence, to ascertain the truth
or otherwise, of their own allegations.
Those NPP hardliners and extremists, for whom the late J. B. Da
Rocha's patriotic principle of a political party putting the national
interest above momentary party advantage, when the country faces an
existential threat, is an alien concept, have brought Ghana to a
dangerous moment in its history.
Those who are making life unbearable for millions of ordinary people,
as they make Ghana "ungovernable", came to the Supreme Court merely to
manipulate the legal system, to enable them obtain what they failed to secure in the
December 2012 presidential election: political power. Alas, they will
fail there too.
To secure its future, when the inevitable happens, one hopes that the
NPP's many decent-minded moderates - whom one is absolutely sure
genuinely believe that the Supreme Court presidential election petition is a principled move
to set a precedent to ensure the sanctity of all future elections -
will move swiftly to seize control of their party, from those
hardliners and extremists, into whose grasping and incompetent hands
their party has fallen. Without them, it could be third-time-lucky for
Nana Addo Danquah Akufo-Addo. A word to the wise...
Tel: 027 745 3109.
Email: peakofi.thompson@gmail.com.
Tel: 027 745 3109.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment