 |
| Epidemic: quarantining real science |
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
|
This article is about fake science and the medical professionals who are hypnotized by it.
32 years ago, just after my first book, AIDS INC.,
was published, I was speaking with a doctor friend, a brilliant man.
He criticized my strategy of showing how NON-VIRUS factors had destroyed
the immune systems of "people with AIDS."
As evidence, he cited a
UCLA study which had looked into the possibility that vast overuse of
antibiotics was shredding the immune systems of gay men. "You see," he
said, "the study found that many gay men who had been diagnosed with
AIDS didn't abuse antibiotics. Therefore, those drugs couldn't be the
cause of AIDS."
I was shocked. I was shocked that this doctor had fallen for absolute nonsense.
First of all, I had never said antibiotics were the cause of AIDS. He was confused at the starting gate.
To
boil it down, my argument, in the book, was: for various specific
reasons, HIV had never been proved to be the cause of what was being
called AIDS. And---this was the key---"AIDS" was a label that had been
placed, like an umbrella, over a whole host of diverse health
conditions. At the root, AIDS was really IMMUNE SYSTEM DESTRUCTION
coming from a number of different causes, depending on which group of
people you were talking about.
And, in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, ONE OF THOSE CAUSES, IN SOME GAY MEN, was vast overuse of antibiotics.
My doctor friend hadn't understood this.
WHY NOT?
Here
is the punch line. Through his training, he had been hypnotized into
thinking that AIDS was one syndrome with one basic cause. "It had to
be." 99 percent-plus of all doctors in the world had also been
hypnotized in exactly the same way.
One label, one basic condition, one germ.
AIDS
couldn't actually be a whole variety of causes, all of which suppress
the immune system. No, no, no. That would be heresy.
The
hypnosis sets up an either-or situation. "Show us the one cause of the
one condition, or go away." And that is called medical science.
Imagine
the following: six men in New Jersey suffer from sudden bleeding. So
do eight women in New Guinea. So do twelve children in Uganda. A team
of virus hunters from the CDC decides that all these occurrences must be
linked by a common cause. Which, of course, will turn out to be a
virus. But they're wrong. Dead wrong. It's not a virus.
In
fact, there is no unifying "it." The six men in New Jersey were working
in a factory where leaking acid fumes were getting into their lungs and
creating hemorrhages. The eight women in New Guinea were farm workers
overcome by highly dangerous pesticides, and they bled. The children in
Uganda had been drinking water directly connected to sewage outlets,
and in the sewage there were industrial poisons, and they bled.
This
was not one condition. It did not have one cause. But too late---the
CDC moves in, declares it's all a virus, and the name of the condition
is X-32f54d. Journal articles are rushed into print. Public health
officials warn that X-32f54d could spread...
You get the idea. The hypnosis works. It has nothing to do with science.
In the current "epidemic," we have the same old story. IT IS NOT ONE CONDITION. IT DOES NOT HAVE ONE CAUSE.
What are some of the causes which can induce the general flu-like and pneumonia-like symptoms being labeled "coronavirus?"
Ordinary
flu. Pneumonia from different bacteria, fungi, toxic air. TB. Common
colds. Allergies. In some places, perhaps the rollout of 5G
technology. Toxic vaccination campaigns. Toxic medical drugs. Highly
toxic and destructive antiviral drugs, given to people who are called
"COV cases." Immobilization, long-term, in nursing homes for the
elderly. Pesticides causing lung problems. Industrial poisons causing
lung problems. People who have slight or serious congestion and are
afraid they might "have the virus" and show up at hospitals. Corporate
chemical dumping. Expired and unrefrigerated medical drugs shipped to
the Third World. (The mere detection of elevated body temperature
during airport screenings. People who had contact with other people who
have been called "coronavirus cases." Overeager and work-harried
doctors diagnosing "suspected cases.")
And so on and so forth.
NOT one condition with one cause.
NOT one condition.
NOT one cause.
Therefore, the "spread and containment of the one virus" is wrongheaded.
"But...but...suppose
the patient tests positive for the coronavirus? Isn't that some kind
of proof? Doesn't a positive test connect all these people with
different conditions, under one banner?"
No. I have covered this
in other articles. Even assuming that researchers actually discovered
COV---the diagnostic test, at best, might indicate the patient has a
tiny, tiny amount of COV in his body. But, in order to cause illness,
he would need to have millions and millions of virus actively
replicating in his body. The test has never been proved to be capable
of detecting that.
And on top of all this, the overwhelming
percentage of "COV cases" in the world have been diagnosed WITHOUT THE
DIAGNOSTIC TEST for the virus.
Therefore, what we're left with
are many people, with all sorts of different conditions, caused by many
different factors---irrationally collected together under one label.
"But...but...what about all these people all over the world suddenly getting sick and dying?"
That's
not a true picture. In many, many cases, these are people who have
been getting sick and dying in the same ways people been getting sick
for a long, long time, down through history For example, TB and
pneumonia. In other cases, the causes could/would be new. For
instance, new pollution, a recent vaccination campaign(s), the new
rollout of 5G, the accelerated use of antiviral drugs. The other new
factors are the re-labeling of all these people with a novel term:
"COV";
And the press coverage, and the pronouncements of governments.
And then the lockdowns. And the economic warfare against the people. |
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment