Stanford Social Innovation Review/Arani Kajenthira & Philippe Sion: Collaboration Collective Impact Without Borders

Collaboration
Collective Impact Without Borders

Successful, multi-national, collective impact efforts require that organizations carefully consider two dimensions of their approach.

By Arani Kajenthira & Philippe Sion Aug. 29, 2017

Since publishing our first article on collective impact—a structured, cross-sector approach to solving complex social problems—in 2011, we have deepened our understanding of what it takes to effectively implement collaborative processes between different sectors. Recently, FSG has been asked to advise on a growing number of efforts that foster funder and grantee collaborations across national borders. Given this increasing interest in using collective impact principles across geographies and cultures, we would like to share what we have learned from launching and advising funder-driven, transnational collaborative efforts. These collaborations are at different stages and aim to address a wide variety of challenges (including social mobility in Israel, fisheries sustainability in Mexico, human trafficking in Brazil, and alternative care in Cambodia).

While collective impact is not always the only or even the most appropriate approach, when conditions are present for a successful, multi-sector collaboration to address a systemic issue in a foreign country, two dimensions require particular consideration.

1. Build relationships and test interest before investing in local capacity.

Over the years, multiple funders have approached us convinced that collective impact principles will deliver transformative impact on a social issue in a foreign context. Typically, these funders are interested in identifying local partners for such an effort, recognizing that they need significant local interest and capacity to successfully move forward.

In Israel, for example, Joel Tauber, chairman of the Tauber Family Foundation, invested in building a relationship with a local funder, the Rashi Foundation, well in advance of launching a collective impact effort called Rise Together Israel. The long-term initiative aims to better integrate investments and services along a cradle-to-career continuum to improve the social mobility of every citizen, particularly young people who have historically struggled to succeed academically and economically. As part of a commitment to engaging all voices from the community, Tauber also spent time in Israel bringing local stakeholders on board by sharing his own experiences with social mobility—in particular, his work mobilizing the Jewish diaspora to support the arrival and integration of Ethiopian Jews in Israel. “I had seen so many other attempts to address this issue fail before,” Tauber recalled, “that I became convinced that a new approach was necessary to achieve the longer-term impact we were seeking.”

Building relationships with stakeholders on the ground is especially important when working in a developing country. Local organizations can be understandably wary of external groups coming in and pitching a new idea as a panacea for the local community. Many of these organizations are also dependent on foreign funds. Consequently, they may feel pressure to indicate tacit acceptance of new ideas to ensure that they receive adequate funding for operations, even if they are not invested in implementation.

Funders should consider these power dynamics, which detract from the more equitable approach that collective impact embraces, and determine how they can play a backseat role as the effort takes off and becomes more sustainable. This involves investing additional time in explaining the new model, and reassuring actors on the ground that they are aiming to make a long-term investment and maximize the value from existing activities and resources, rather than run a short-term pilot. And rather than attempting to measure population-level outcomes of any such investments in the first 24 months, funders should focus on tracking evidence of stronger relationships between partners that lead to shared ownership of strategy.

It is also important to identify local organizations interested in both championing collective impact ideas and providing backbone support (staff that foster cross-sector communication, alignment, and collaboration), and ideally establish partnerships well before launch.

In Mexico, for example, FSG is supporting an initiative funded by the Walton Family Foundation (WFF) to improve the sustainability of local fisheries. FSG first assessed the interest of local WFF grantees, including Comunidad y Biodiversidad A.C. and Smartfish, in taking a structured, collaborative approach. Grantees were enthusiastic about moving forward but also emphasized the importance of having local leadership. Consequently, WFF is investing in building the expertise of a local team to effectively navigate outreach to additional partners and ensure long-term sustainability of any resulting collaborations moving forward.

Finally, funders working internationally should take into account the availability and reliability of data they need to specify a social problem, and measure an initiative’s outputs and outcomes. When there is limited data on the at-risk or target population for a collaborative effort, funders may need to think about how to acquire additional data—for example, by partnering with academic institutions or empowering local organizations to work directly with government to strengthen data collection.

Gathering evidence from workers formerly in slave labor. (Photo by Marcelo Cruz)

In Brazil, Xavier Plassat—a coordinator at Comissão Pastoral da Terra, which fights rural poverty—developed his own comprehensive dataset to record human rights violations. Plassat leveraged his on-the-ground presence to collect claims from enslaved workers, resulting in a dataset far larger than the dataset law enforcement authorities had. With the vision and support from Humanity United and leadership from the Freedom Fund, organizations like Comissão Pastoral da Terra and government agencies are developing a common agenda that can make use of Plassat’s data.

2. Engage early and often with government leaders.

Some countries have a stronger history of reliance on government-run social safety nets than others. In countries like Brazil, Mexico, and Germany, for example, where the government is the primary if not the only provider of social services, there may be an expectation that municipal, regional, or even national government officials will consult with community leaders, nonprofits, philanthropies, and the private sector, develop their own solutions, and manage implementation. These expectations can present challenges for any attempt to implement a more collaborative process. “Please prepare your recommendations and I will decide,” said one city official we met, in front of private foundation, business, and nonprofit leaders asking for his support. This was not surprising to those who had worked with public sector officials before. However, the reason these non-government actors decided to experiment with collective impact principles in the first place was because of its potential to address systemic issues, and its aim to incorporate more inclusive cross-sector dialogue and decision-making.

As mentioned above, finding the right partner in government and engaging with them early is important. Senior government officials may not have time to participate in all the conversations needed to sustain an effective collaboration over time, so it can help to identify their trusted advisors, who have the ability, willingness, and authority to represent the government perspective but also the bandwidth to take on this liaison role.

Village Based Social Workers learn the social work skills they need from Cambodian Children’s Trust's senior social workers. (Photo by Prak Chamnan/Cambodian Children’s Trust)

In our work in Cambodia with Family Care First, for example, a government official who had trusted relationships with the leaders of several government agencies was willing to play a more active role in a collaborative effort to address child protection issues; he was willing to work within and across departments to increase overall support for the effort. In our experience, some government actors may be more accommodating of a collaborative effort if they clearly understand how they can share the credit for any resulting impact or if they receive other incentives to collaborate.

The five elements of collective impact, and the collective impact principles of practice can make an enormous contribution toward systems change in all parts of the world. Both of the points highlighted here, of course, are also worth considering when implementing a collective impact project at home, but they are essential to efforts that cross borders.
Tracker Pixel for Entry



Arani Kajenthira is a former associate director at FSG, where she advised multiple collaborations in different parts of the world. She is now the head of strategic initiatives at the Walton Family Foundation.



Philippe Sion (@SionPhilippe) is a managing director at FSG, and has nearly two decades of experience advising social change leaders in the corporate, nonprofit, foundation, and government sectors. He has led collective impact efforts with a global reach, including cross-sector collaboration to support migrants, refugees, and other disadvantaged populations.

Tags
Asia, Collaboration, Collective Impact, Cross-sector Collaboration, Government Programs, International Development, Middle East, Partnerships, South America
Leave a Comment
COMMENT


Related Stories
Collaboration
Collective Impact

By John Kania & Mark Kramer 109

Large-scale social change requires broad cross-sector coordination, not the isolated intervention of individual organizations.
Advocacy
Channeling Change: Making Collective Impact Work

By Fay Hanleybrown, John Kania, & Mark Kramer 22

This follow-up on the popular "Collective Impact" article provides updated, in-depth guidance.
Collaboration
The Problem with “Help” in Global Development

By Julia Kramer 11

To move beyond good intentions, the development paradigm must shift toward collaboration, community involvement, and empowerment.
Collaboration
Shaping Global Partnerships for a Post-2015 World

By Sonja Patscheke, Angela Barmettler, Laura Herman, Scott Overdyke & Marc Pfitzer 1

The principles of collective impact offer important lessons for architects of global collaborative efforts.
Collaboration
Intragovernmental Collaborations: Pipedreams or the Future of the Public Sector?

By Sarah Worthing

How policy labs can foster greater collaboration and policy co-creation.
Collaboration
Sharing Is Daring

By Kat McGowan

Sage Bionetworks is transforming the culture of biomedical research with open-source methods.
Collaboration
Stretching Toward Solutions

Review By Heather McLeod Grant

Although his advice could at times be more concrete, Kahane offers an effective critique of current approaches to collaboration and shows the need for a different way of working together.

Fall 2017
Collaboration
What Does the Public Think About Cross-sector Collaboration?

By Neil Britto

Insights gleaned from focus groups exploring the public’s views of cross-sector collaboration can help practitioners better communicate their work.
READ MORE »

    Free Weekly eNewsletter
    SSIR on Social Media
        Stanford Social Innovation Review

        By Sarah Worthing of the Hertie School of Governance: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/intragovernmental_collaborations_pipedreams_or_the_future_of_the_public_sec
        @SSIReview

        Policy labs can serve as a tool for successful intragovernmental #collaboration, says @sworthin6 #policymaking… twitter.com/i/web/status/9…
        Stanford Social Innovation Review

        By Eric Cantor of Columbia | SIPA: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/four_pitfalls_in_social_product_innovation
        @SSIReview

        .@ecantor on 4 major pitfalls that occur during social product #innovation & how to avoid them to maximize #socimp:… twitter.com/i/web/status/9…
        Stanford Social Innovation Review

        One of the fastest-growing corporate citizenship programs is skills-based volunteering—in which a team of corporate employees works for an extended period of time to help a nonprofit solve a complex operational problem. The benefits of the program for both parties are clear, but it’s also tougher to implement than many initially think. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_promise_of_skills_based_volunteering
        @SSIReview

        Skills-based #volunteering can be a "game-changing" approach to achieving #socimp, say Christine Letts & @dholly8:… twitter.com/i/web/status/9…
        @SSIReview

        Calling all nonprofits—2 days left to share your video to be included on ssir.org for our Nonprofit… twitter.com/i/web/status/9…
        Stanford Social Innovation Review

        Calling all nonprofit leaders! Watch this video, and then share your video by this Friday, September 1st, telling us what motivated you to go into nonprofit work and what you believe is the greatest challenge facing your nonprofit or the nonprofit sector today. #SSIRInstitute Submit here: bit.ly/forms-SSIR2Q https://www.facebook.com/social.innovation/videos/10156387006128943/
        @SSIReview

        @caribonehealth Yes! Any NGOs and nonprofits around the world can submit a video. Submit at this link: bit.ly/forms-SSIR2Q.
        Stanford Social Innovation Review

        NMI 2017: Join us for an armchair discussion with Anja Manuel; author of "This Brave New World: China, India and the United States." Register now: bit.ly/SSIRInstitute17 https://www.facebook.com/social.innovation/photos/a.189678813942.160883.70363978942/10156386718343943/?type=3
    Related Stories
        Collective Impact

        By John Kania & Mark Kramer 109
        Channeling Change: Making Collective Impact Work

        By Fay Hanleybrown, John Kania, & Mark Kramer 22
        The Problem with “Help” in Global Development

        By Julia Kramer 11
        Shaping Global Partnerships for a Post-2015 World

        By Sonja Patscheke, Angela Barmettler, Laura Herman, Scott Overdyke & Marc Pfitzer 1

    SSIR is published by the
    Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil
    Society, at Stanford University.

    About SSIR
    Stanford PACS
    Contact Us
    Submission Guidelines
    Advertise
    Subscriber Help
    Reprints
    Terms of Use
    Privacy
    Site Map

Copyright © 2017 Stanford University. Designed by Arsenal, developed by Hop Studios