National Review: Guaranteed Bankruptcy

National Review
The Corner

Policy   
Guaranteed Bankruptcy
By The Editors

April 28, 2018 5:30 AM

Sen. Bernie Sanders at a Capitol Hill press conference, September 10, 2015. (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)

Three Democratic senators eyeing the 2020 presidential campaign have in recent weeks floated the idea of a federal “jobs guarantee.” They want to offer dignified, useful, and well-paying jobs for Americans who have fallen on hard economic times. The media are taking them seriously. They shouldn’t. These proposals are deeply incoherent, and the notion of the government’s guaranteeing people a job is anathema to American principles.

The proposals vary in structure. Senator Bernie Sanders wants to enforce the program across the country, while Cory Booker wants to test the idea with a pilot program in 15 localities. But the idea has been gestating in hard-left academic circles for years. Generally, under a jobs-guarantee program, anyone could go to the government and receive a job. Employment would be offered in fields such as infrastructure, child care, health care, and environmental conservation, would include full health benefits, and would pay in some variations $12 an hour, in Sanders’s and Booker’s, $15 an hour. The jobs are supposed to be low-skilled (so anyone can do them), socially useful (so the program is politically palatable), able to grow and shrink with the business cycle (so new employees can easily be integrated when the private sector turns down yet leave when it picks up), and independent from existing government work (so as not to undercut existing public employees).

But there are obvious and ineluctable trade-offs between these desiderata. It is difficult to imagine that a large federal program that provides a socially useful service would be permitted to shrink if its employees want to take higher-paying jobs, for instance.

Right now, 50 million Americans make less than $15 an hour. If Sanders’s proposal were to become law tomorrow, what would happen? Tens of millions of Americans would take government jobs, leaving their former employers in the private sector in the lurch and hampering productivity. Some private employers surely would raise wages to compete with the government. Yet many of the jobs-guarantee plans would index government wages to inflation, potentially causing an inflationary spiral as private employers face pressure to continue paying workers more for their labor. A way out for the private sector would be to invest in automation, a good in itself, but surely an unwelcome unintended consequence for supporters of these proposals.

Then, there is the cost of the program, sure to be outlandishly high. Perhaps that is why no jobs-guarantee advocate has given a credible estimate of the price tag. One group of economists writing for the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says the cost would be hundreds of billions of dollars per year. But their assertion that the program would not crowd out any private employment is so incredible that it verges on academic malpractice. Meanwhile, both Booker and Sanders have demurred on the question of cost.

Comments   

In short, the only thing this program would truly guarantee is an expansion of the power and size of the federal government at the expense of sound economics.

This is not to deny that worklessness in America is still a problem: Unemployment is low, but so is labor-force participation. There are creative policies that might help lower- and middle-income earners, such as beefing up the earned-income tax credit, that deserve consideration. Then, there is the jobs guarantee, a half-baked attempt at dirigisme that, if implemented, would have woeful consequences. We find the credulous media coverage of these plans irresponsible and preposterous — much like the plans themselves.
The Editors — The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.
More in Politics & Policy   
Conservatives Speak of a Speaker Jim Jordan
Social Security Paid Leave: Let’s Have an Honest Discussion of the Trade-offs
What It’s Like to Talk with North Korea
No Freedom from Criticism
Most Popular
Culture   
The End of an Era at RedState
By Dan McLaughlin
I wrote at RedState for 12 years, from shortly after its founding in 2004 to the end of the 2016 primaries, and I continue to value many of its current and former writers as friends, so it is with a lot of sadness that I learned of this morning’s summary firing of its Editor-in-Chief, Caleb Howe, and about ... Read More
Elections   
A Tight Race in West Virginia
By Ramesh Ponnuru
Earlier this week, West Virginia attorney general Patrick Morrisey's Senate campaign released a poll showing him in the lead with 28 percent to Rep. Evan Jenkins's 25 percent and former coal-mining executive and ex-con Don Blankenship's 15 percent. A Fox News poll has Jenkins at 25, Morrisey at 21, and ... Read More
National Security & Defense   
What a Hypersonic-Missile Future Would Mean for National Security
By Reihan Salam
Earlier this month, Russian president Vladimir Putin announced that he had pulled ahead in the latest arms race between his country and the United States. In a speech in Moscow, Matt Stroud reports in The Verge, Putin touted a new hypersonic weapon, the Sarmat, an intercontinental ballistic missile that, he said, ... Read More
Politics & Policy   
Clapper May Have Lied to Congress About Steele Dossier Leak
By Jack Crowe
James Clapper may have misled Congress regarding his contacts with the media during his tenure as the director of national intelligence, according to a report on Russian election meddling released by congressional Republicans Friday. Clapper initially told the House Intelligence Committee, which produced the ... Read More
Politics & Policy   
A Third View on the Activist-Professor Debate
By George Leef
On the last two Fridays, the Martin Center has offered differing points of view on the question whether colleges and universities should permit professorial activism. Fabio Rojas argued that they should put scholarship first but not renounce activism if they are so inclined; to that, Jay Schalin argued against ... Read More
Culture   
Friday Links
By Debby Witt
April 28 is Duke Ellington's birthday. The Literal Meaning of Every Country's Name on a Map (zoomable). Inside the Strange World of Dried Hummingbird Love Charm Trafficking. Because it's time to get the herb gardens planted, here's some advice from the 16th century on avoiding brain scorpions: Take heede ... Read More
Culture   
The Harry Potter Era Begins on Broadway
By Kyle Smith
Decades from now, April 22, 2018, may loom as large in the history of theater as May 25, 1977, does in the history of movies. The latter date marked the opening of Star Wars. The former brought the Broadway opening of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. The stage sequel to the Harry Potter series takes place 20 ... Read More
World   
China’s Xi Jinping, Master Illusionist
By Therese Shaheen
Xi Jinping has maneuvered the Chinese Communist Party into welcoming him as the nation’s undisputed leader with a tenure of unspecified length. Xi achieved that goal with the precision of a watchmaker. Cheered on early in his presidency by political and business leaders around the world, he launched an ... Read More
Culture   
The Times Best-Seller List: Another Reason Americans Don’t Trust the Media
By Dennis Prager
About half the American people do not believe the mainstream media tell the truth. They believe the media are more interested in promoting their left-wing views than reporting the truth. I am, I note with sadness, a member of that half. [jwplayer rm4s8y6L-wKJ9CRQU] Here is but one more example: the New ... Read More

    Login

    Donate
    Subscribe

    Sections
        The Corner
        Bench Memos
        The Morning Jolt
        The G-File
        All Articles
        All Authors
        Podcasts
        Photos
        Videos

    Topics
        Politics & Policy
        Culture
        White House
        Film & TV
        PC Culture
        U.S.
        World
        Immigration
        Economy & Business
        Elections

    Magazine
        Latest Issue
        Archive
        Subscribe
        Customer Care
        NRPLUS
        Magazine FAQ

    About
        Frequently Asked Questions
        The Masthead
        Contact Us
        Privacy Policy
        Terms of Service
        NR Institute

    More
        Advertise
        Donate
        Search
        E-mails & Alerts

Newsletters
Jim Geraghty’s Morning Jolt (M-F)
NR Daily (M-Sa)
Jonah Goldberg’s The G-File (F)

© 2018 National Review
Loading...
:)