National Review
Apr. 26, 2019
Economy & Business
Steve Moore’s Critics Miss the Point
By Deroy Murdock
April 25, 2019 7:30 PM
Stephen Moore at CPAC 2015 (Gage Skidmore)
America’s central bank could use his fresh thinking.
President Donald Trump has tapped veteran supply-side economist and public-policy expert Stephen Moore to join the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Moore is exactly the pro-growth presence the Fed needs. I have attended countless free-market conferences, broadcasts, and banquets with Moore. He is reliably cheerful, informative, dedicated to liberty and prosperity, and generous with his time and attention.
But he has his detractors. Bland, conventional economists don’t like Moore’s kind. So, they have hurled rocks at him since his nomination.
“He’s not an economist!” his critics complain. Then again, what is an economist? Unlike attorneys, who must pass bar exams, or doctors, who wield medical licenses, economists are not thus restricted. Moore’s lack of a Ph.D. in economics supposedly disqualifies him. Tell that to Fed chairman Jerome Powell. He has no Ph.D. According to the Fed’s website, former Fed chairman G. William Miller, former governor Daniel K. Tarullo, and current governors Randal K. Quarles and Michelle W. Bowman are equally Ph.D.-challenged.
Gregory Mankiw, Ph.D., George W. Bush’s chief economist, claims that Moore lacks “intellectual gravitas.” (Too bad Mankiw’s intellectual gravitas did not prevent the 2007-08 financial meltdown.) Senator Sherrod Brown (D., Ohio) said, “I think Moore was selected because Trump read an article or he saw him on TV and he liked him and that was as far as it went.”
Actually, Moore advised both candidate and president Trump and helped craft the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, widespread regulatory relief, and an energy renaissance, all of which have fueled today’s economic boom. Moore explains these policies in his latest book, Trumponomics — one of five he has co-authored with supply-side guru Arthur Laffer, Ph.D. Moore has penned three of his own books, “scores of editorials” while at the Wall Street Journal, he says, and “about 50 policy studies for the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation,” where he is a distinguished visiting fellow.
NOW WATCH: 'Trump's Pressure on the Federal Reserve Poses Economic Risks'
Crucially, Steve Moore is no prosperophobe. Like too few Fed governors — past and present — he does not blame growth for inflation.
It was sad and sickening last year to watch the Fed greet the return of healthy GDP growth (2.9 percent in 2018 under Trump) not with applause but with enfeebling interest-rate hikes. Wages for U.S. workers finally started to rise. (According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, average median weekly earnings have grown from 2.02 percent annually under Obama to 3.01 percent, so far, under Trump.) Then Powell and the Fed hiked interest rates. Many believe that this move decelerated the economy, diluted the benefits of the Trump/GOP tax cuts and deregulation, and triggered a 4Q financial-market sell-off. All this, supposedly, to crush inflation, which averaged a tepid 2.4 percent in 2018.
It was like watching someone with a broken leg finally remove his cast, put aside his crutches, and walk down the street — only to have some bruiser run up from behind, scream, “Slow down!” and then shove him to the ground.
The latest Bloomberg Businessweek also suggests that the Fed’s fear of rampant price rises is deeply misguided. The cover features a completely exhausted dinosaur lying on its side. The magazine asks: “Is Inflation Dead?”
Moore lacks the confounding grimness that has made too many Fed-level economists painfully unfathomable. His clear thinking and years of explaining economics to newspaper readers and TV viewers in plain English should make his pronouncements easy to understand, which is good for markets.
Also in Moore’s favor, he wants to increase transparency at the Fed. The interest-rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee recalls Plato’s Cave Allegory: Twelve wise men and women sitting in front of a fire, studying the shadows that the dancing flames cast upon a stone wall. While less influential federal agencies (e.g., the Federal Communications Commission) meet in public, the Fed’s Albert Speer–style marble palace is a semi-secret cave.
As long as the Fed’s policy decisions affect the price of money, can’t the rest of us at least watch? Moore says Yes. “I favor transparency at the Fed,” he tells me. “The Fed should be audited by outside agencies. And let’s invite C-SPAN’s cameras to cover meetings of the FOMC.”
Brains, a passion for growth, and a belief in openness: Steve Moore is just what the Fed needs — and not a basis point too soon.
Michael Malarkey contributed research for this opinion piece.
10
Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online.
More in Economy & Business
Warren Shows We’re Already Forgiving Too Much Student Debt
What Congress Should Insist On in Trump’s Trade Deal with Mexico and Canada
We Should Be Advising Young People Not to Take Out Loans They Can’t Afford
Elizabeth Warren’s Misguided College Plan
Recommended Articles
Unsurprisingly, Mueller Comes Up Empty
Conrad Black
America’s War in Yemen Is Plainly Unconstitutional
David French
May’s Historic Defeat, and Swift Triumph
Michael Brendan Dougherty
Trump Says North Korea Summit Could Still Happen Soon
Mairead McArdle
PROMOTED POSTS
Dear White People: You Have A Problem
thecollegefix.com
thecollegefix.com
Mother Of Missing Illinois 5-year-old Not Talking To Police
factswanted.com
factswanted.com
Court: Chalking Tires For Parking Enforcement Unconstitutional
thehill.com
thehill.com
Student Whose Family Fled Soviet Russia Confronts Bernie
bizpacreview.com
bizpacreview.com
Most Popular
Religion
Why Clinton and Obama Tweeted about ‘Easter Worshippers’
By Dennis Prager
Politics & Policy
The Democrats Get a Taste of Their Own Medicine
By Conrad Black
Video
Attorney General William Barr Makes First Ruling Against Asylum Seekers
Politics & Policy
Peterson vs. Zizek: Which Antidote to Chaos?
By Madeleine Kearns
Politics & Policy
Andrew Yang Is a New Kind of Democrat
By Alexandra DeSanctis
White House
What Drove the Mueller Investigation?
By Victor Davis Hanson
Education
We Should Be Advising Young People Not to Take Out Loans They Can’t Afford
By Katherine Timpf
...
Donate
Subscribe
Sections
The Corner
Bench Memos
The Morning Jolt
The G-File
News
Books, Arts & Manners
All Articles
All Authors
Podcasts
Photos
Games
Videos
Topics
Politics & Policy
Culture
White House
Film & TV
PC Culture
U.S.
World
Immigration
Economy & Business
Elections
Magazine
Latest Issue
Archive
Subscribe
Gve NR as a Gift
Customer Care
NRPLUS
Magazine FAQ
NRPLUS FAQ
About
Frequently Asked Questions
The Masthead
Contact Us
Careers
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
NR Institute
More
Advertise
Donate
Search
E-mails & Alerts
Newsletters
Morning Jolt (M-F)
NR Daily (M-Sa)
The G-File (F)
Breaking News (M-Su)
© 2019 National Review
Loading...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment