Wednesday 29 May 2019

Investopedia/Shoshanna Delventhal: How the Huawei Ban May Backfire on 10 U.S. Stocks

Investopedia                                                           News                                                            Company News
How the Huawei Ban May Backfire on 10 U.S. Stocks

    FACEBOOK
    TWITTER
    LINKEDIN

By Shoshanna Delventhal
Updated May 29, 2019

The Trump administration has doubled down on its initiative to ban certain Chinese companies from selling to the U.S. or buying components from American firms. This push to slow China’s technological advances threatens to backfire on American companies and their share prices in the long-term, keeping them permanently out of the China supply chain, according to several experts cited in a detailed Bloomberg report. The companies most at risk include chip makers such as Qualcomm (QCOM), Micron Technology Inc. (MU), Intel Corp. (INTC), Nvidia Corp. (NVDA), Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), Broadcom Ltd. (AVGO) and Xilinx Inc. (XLNX), as well as blue chip players General Electric Co. (GE), Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT).
Arbitrary Disruption of Global Supply Chain Bad for U.S.

While 2019 started off strong for U.S. equities, a wave of uncertainty hit the market in May, driven in part by new trade rhetoric from the White House. Now, some market watchers suggest that a full-blown trade war, in which the U.S. would impose levies of 25% on all Chinese goods, and the Trump administration succeeds in keeping major Chinese players out of doing business with U.S. corporations, could wreak havoc on the global economy. First and foremost, such a disruption would completely uproot the current global supply chain, resulting in a painful transition for both the companies involved in these intricate systems, as well as the economies that they represent.

Following the administration's crusade against Huawei Technologies Co., China’s largest telecommunications provider, the White House threatened to ban five Chinese video surveillance companies from buying U.S. components or software.

At the center of Washington’s fears is the proliferation of 5G technology, the new wireless standard set to become the backbone of the modern economy. Up until recently, Huawei looked like the leader in supplying the next-gen infrastructure.

While Trump’s recent blacklisting of Huawei will surely thwart its dominance in 5G, Bloomberg notes that the move should “only slow the expansion,” translating into “bad news for some of the most important U.S. companies, particularly component makers, that were banking on it for a major surge in orders starting this year.”

Without a 5G network in China, consumers in one of the key markets for companies in the smartphone ecosystem will see demand for their products decelerate significantly. As consumers buy fewer new phones containing chips from the likes of Qualcomm and Micron, companies that make processors for those phones, such as Intel and Nvidia, will also see sales fall. The effect will trickle down to companies that make chips for networking gear, like Broadcom and Xilinx.

A war against major Chinese companies is also a net negative for the broader U.S. economy, according to some market experts.

"I don’t think it’s good for the U.S. economy,” said Minyuan Zhao, an associate professor of management at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. “With its strong institutions, the U.S. has long been an assuring force in the global supply chain. People don’t always trust China, but they consider the U.S. a trustworthy partner, if not guardian, of the global economic system.”

Zhao notes that the White House’s crusade against Chinese corporations would cause an arbitrary disruption in the supply chains, leading the longstanding trust in the U.S. supply chain to disappears. As a result, countries will start to develop individual systems, said Zhao.

Meanwhile, companies like GE and Microsoft are worried that Washington’s plans to contain the world’s second-largest economy in areas like AI via export controls could end up impeding them from competing in lucrative markets and reduce their capacity to innovate.
Looking Ahead

Despite his initial promises of an “easy” trade war, Trump’s tough stance towards China doesn’t seem to be eliciting any sign of backing down in Beijing. Per another Bloomberg story, China seems to be preparing for the long-term, doubling down rather than caving to U.S. demands, indicating that this will be a long war versus a short one.
Related Articles

Real Estate
The 10 U.S. Cities With the Most Vacant Homes

Markets & Economy
Why the Huawei Arrest Could Derail Trade Talks

Politics & Money
How September 11 Affected The U.S. Stock Market

Practice Management
How to Create a New Financial Product in 10 Steps

Investing Strategy
These Are the 10 Biggest U.S. Startups by Valuation

Budgeting & Savings
10 U.S. Cities You Don't Need A Car To Visit
Related Terms
Trumponomics
Trumponomics is a term for the economic policies of President Donald Trump.
more
How Mergers and Acquisitions Work
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is a general term that refers to the consolidation of companies or assets through various types of financial transactions.
more
What is a 10-Year Treasury Note?
A 10-year Treasury note is a debt obligation issued by the United States government that matures in 10 years.
more
Brexit
Brexit refers to Britain's leaving the European Union, which is slated to happen in May or April this year.
more
How Timberland Investments Can Diversify Your Stock Portfolio
Investors who want an inflation hedge and to diversify their portfolio of equities and fixed income products can invest in timberland.
more
Trade Act of 1974 Allows for the Reduction of Trade Barriers
The Trade Act of 1974 passed to expand U.S. participation in international trade and reduce trade disputes through the reduction of barriers to trade.
more

    About Us
    Advertise
    Contact
    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Use
    Careers

Investopedia is part of the Dotdash publishing family.

    The Balance
    Lifewire
    TripSavvy
    The Spruce
    and more

No comments: