 |
| Sudden spike in coronavirus cases only means new method of counting |
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
|
"All
right, people, we want to inflate case numbers in the epidemic. How do
we do it? Forget testing for the coronavirus. How about this? We run
a test for 'the epidemic disease', pneumonia. If any kind of pneumonia
turns up positive, we'll just SAY this is a case of coronavirus, with
no proof. Any objections? Good. Get busy."
Mainstream news
outlets are reporting a spike in the number of coronavirus cases in
China. The news stories also mention this sudden rise is the result of a
new method of counting.
NO tests for the presence of the coronavirus are now necessary, in China. Read that sentence again.
The new method of counting? CT scans (computed tomography scans) of the chest.
The scans are used to diagnose standard traditional lung diseases.
For example, pneumonia.
And pneumonia is called THE "coronavirus illness."
There
is only one problem. Deaths from pneumonia, in China, appear to be
300,000 per year -- which comes to 3 million per decade (I'm making a
major downward estimate, based on correcting an error and referring to a
trusted source.) These deaths certainly occurred in time periods
before the purported emergence of the new coronavirus. Pneumonia has
been around forever.
Get it? A test for ordinary pneumonia---CT Scan---now becomes a test that delivers a diagnosis of "new epidemic coronavirus."
ABSURD.
Ordinary
pneumonia has many causes listed in medical literature---bacteria,
fungi, various viruses. You can add in massively polluted air, which
hangs over major Chinese cities, such as Wuhan. No "coronavirus"
needed.
In the rush to diagnose as many people as possible, we have this fake method of counting cases.
In my 1988 book, AIDS INC.,
I published the new 1987 CDC definition of AIDS. It took up 14 pages.
Forcing yourself to plow through it, you would see the CDC was using
every trick in the book to inflate case numbers. A person could even be
diagnosed without a positive HIV test---a bizarre contradiction, since
HIV was supposed to be the hallmark of AIDS. I counted about 25
diseases/infections that could be called indicators of AIDS.
In
every so-called epidemic, there is something called a "surveillance
definition" of the disease. This is used to cast a wide net of
potential symptoms and markers, in order to "identify the possibly
infected and therefore contain the spread." However, quite soon,
"surveillance" and "possibly infected" are forgotten, and medical
officials and reporters simply take the new expanded case numbers,
yielded by the new definition, and report them as real.
More grist for the propaganda mill, for inducing fear, obedience to authorities, and more profits for drug and vaccine makers.
I recall that, during my research for AIDS INC.,
I queried the FDA about the most widely used diagnostic test for HIV,
the ELISA antibody test. A positive-reading test would, of course,
imply "AIDS." Another patient, another case number added to the total.
I
received a letter in the mail from an FDA employee. The one page had
no printed FDA seal or masthead. Obviously, this person did not want to
connect his comment to the Agency. He informed me that the HIV ELISA
test was used for checking stocks of blood supply only, and HAD NEVER
BEEN APPROVED FOR MAKING AN INDIVIDUAL DIAGNOSIS. His meaning was
clear. The FDA refused to certify the test as accurate for
individuals. Yet, again, it was the most widely used tool for labeling
people "HIV positive" and "AIDS-infected." It was also the most widely
used tool for counting (and inflating) overall AIDS case numbers.
Playing games with people's lives.
In AIDS INC.,
I ran this ELISA scam to ground. I found multiple "authoritative
medical sources" who offered various formulas for AIDS testing. For
example, if the ELISA registers positive, take another ELISA. If that
is also positive, then go to the gold standard antibody test, called the
Western Blot. But in the medical literature, there are ample
references which refute the Western Blot as reliable. It, too, has deep
inherent flaws.
Notice that, in both 1987 AIDS, and the latest
coronavirus "epidemic," diagnostic tests which supposedly identify the
presence of a virus can be bypassed. This is quite
astonishing, when you think about it. After all, the presence of the
virus is supposed to be THE sole evidence of an epidemic in the first
place.
This is why I've published my analyses of SARS (2003)
and Swine Flu (2009). In both cases, the virus "disappeared." Many
patients diagnosed with SARS and Swine Flu didn't have any trace of the
virus.
The rabbit hole is deep. |
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment