 |
| Wuhan and the polluted air as a cause of epidemic illness |
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
|
At
the very beginning of my coverage of the "China epidemic," I cited
evidence that the air quality in Wuhan is chronically dangerous.
Among
other sources, I referred to a Yale review which stated that the
mixture of toxic elements in the air is unprecedented in human history.
The synergistic effects of these individual toxins is unknown.
I
also mentioned the large street protests against air quality in Wuhan
that took place last summer. These protests were also carried out in
other Chinese cities. The government was obviously alarmed at the
nascent rebellion.
Those protests are now gone. Because the cities are locked down. It's all about "the virus" as the cause of illness.
Horrific
air quality brings on lung infections of all kinds, including
pneumonia. Pneumonia is THE illness attributed to the coronavirus. How
convenient.
The Chinese government has recently ruled that
testing patients for the coronavirus isn't necessary for a diagnosis of
"epidemic illness." A CT scan of the lungs is sufficient. If the
patient thus shows signs of pneumonia, he is labeled "a coronavirus
case."
Air quality? Brushed aside.
Assessing studies of
annual pneumonia deaths in China---covering years long before the
supposed emergence of the new human coronavirus---I settled on the
estimate of 300,000 deaths a year.
Assuming this death rate is
more or less constant, hundreds of thousands of people could now be
called deceased "coronavirus cases" without a flicker of interest in the
actual cause of their illness. Those CT scans, picking up signs of
pneumonia, and absurdly leading to the label "coronavirus," are a
perfect tool for deception.
Recently, I found an article from cambodiacapital.com, dated February 7, 2020: "'Polluted air' could be an important cause of Wuhan pneumonia".
It makes some interesting comments about Wuhan air quality. The
article also speculates that "the virus" is carried on particulate
pollutants, a claim I find completely unsupported---but the remarks
about pollution are worth repeating:
"...three factors. First,
the increase of static wind in the horizontal direction, which is not
conducive to the diffusion and dilution of atmospheric pollutants.
Second, the emergence of a temperature inversion layer in the vertical
direction, which makes it difficult for pollutants to move upwards and
are blocked at low altitudes and near the ground. Third, the increase of
suspended particulates in the air. These three conditions are all
available during the high incidence period of Wuhan pneumonia."
"According
to data released by the Wuhan Bureau of Ecology and Environment, the
moment when a large number of pneumonia cases emerged in Wuhan was
during the period from Jan 19, 2020, to Jan 23, 2020, and the Wuhan air
during this period was at the stage of serious pollution. The indices
are all higher than 100. This means that the outbreak period of Wuhan
pneumonia coincides with the severe period of air pollution and this is
one of the reasons. The second supporting reason is that the high
incidence areas of Wuhan pneumonia coincide with the severe air
pollution areas. We observed by randomly taking one day as a sample and
found out that the area with the highest level of air pollution in Wuhan
was Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market. This shows that even in 'normal
weather', the air pollution in the seafood market area was the
relatively worst area in Wuhan...Therefore, it is not accidental that
Wuhan Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market has become a high-incidence area
of Wuhan pneumonia..."
You'll recall that, at first, reports
circulated about the coronavirus emerging in that Market and "jumping
species from animals to humans." These reports didn't mention highly
dangerous air pollutants "jumping" into the lungs of humans. |
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment