A leaked 2006 diplomatic cable sent from the US Embassy in Accra, to the State Department in Washington, by the then US Ambassador to Ghana, Her Excellency Pamela Bridgewater, makes very interesting reading, indeed.
The cable is a report of her January 30, 2006 meeting, with the then Canadian High Commissioner to Ghana, His Excellency Donald Bobiash.
H. E. Bobiash's insightful observations (about our educated urban elite's dependency culture; corruption in Ghana and failure by the Kufuor regime to deal effectively with it; the gulf existing between the small but powerful educated urban elite and ordinary Ghanaians, as well as slow decision-making by our leaders!), sums up perfectly, the true state of the Ghanaian nation-state at the time.
Yet, to listen to President Kufuor & Co, and the New Patriotic Party's (NPP) "Enkoyie" propaganda machine, today, one would think that they turned Ghana into an African paradise, during their tenure in office.
To show how hypocritical the opposition NPP's criticisms of the Mills administration are, I am reproducing the aforementioned leaked diplomatic cable posted on the Wikileaks website, below. Readers must remember that they refer to a nation that had been ruled by the NPP for six long years. Please read on:
"Embassy Accra
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ACCRA 000335
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/06/2011
TAGS: EFIN ENRG EINV PGOV GH
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR AND CANADIAN HIGH COMMISSIONER DISCUSS CORRUPTION, BUSINESS CLIMATE, TOGO
REF: A. ACCRA 256
¶B. ACCRA 255
Classified By: EconChief Chris Landberg for Reasons 1.5 (B and D)
Summary
-------
¶1. (C) On January 30, 2006, Ambassador Bridgewater paid a courtesy call on Canadian High Commissioner Donald Bobiash.
They agreed Ghana has been slow to seize the opportunities it has to become a middle-income country, and also agreed the
U.S. and Canada appear to care more about corruption and problems with the investment climate than other donors.
Bobiash was concerned that Ghana's elite was out of touch with the reality of life for most Ghanaians, and also highlighted aid dependency as a growing problem.
Like the U.S., Canada is focusing much of its aid program on the north and Muslim areas.
Canada has demarched Ghana related to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) vote on reporting Iran to the UNSC. Bobiash recently returned from Togo with the impression that while calm has returned, the new President is just a figurehead. End Summary.
¶2. (C) High Commissioner Bobiash compared Ghana to a garden. When you first arrive, you focus on the flowers -- democracy
and stability, respect for human rights, freedom of the
press. The longer you are in Ghana the more weeds you see -- corruption and cronyism, incompetence, slow government decision making, and difficult business environment.
¶3. (C) Bobiash acknowledged that Ghana is moving generally in the right direct with regards to both economic and political
reforms.
He said it was at the "proverbial crossroads,"
where government decisions now can accelerate progress
towards becoming a middle-income state.
However, he said that the President and his cabinet were not showing the
strong leadership necessary to achieve this goal.
He noted this is particularly true on corruption, where the government is not making examples by prosecuting corrupt officials -- what Bobiash called the "litmus test" for a country's willingness to tackle corruption.
¶4. (C) The Ambassador commented that Canada and the U.S. seem to be the only donor countries seriously concerned about corruption and lack of transparency, referring to her recent calls on other Mission head(reftels) who regard these as minor issues.
She added that she has raised her concerns several times with President Kufuor, focusing not only
corruption but on poor treatment of foreign companies, lack of sanctity of contracts, and questionable procurement
practices.
The Ambassador and Bobiash compared notes on the
inordinate amount of effort and time they had each spent
weighing in at high-levels on business deals and breaking
logjams between government ministries.
Bobiash said he thought the fault was not solely with high-level officials, arguing that powerful and entrenched bureaucrats created many of the problems.
¶5. (C) Bobiash criticized the international community for hobnobbing almost exclusively with the Ghanaian elite, based primarily in Accra.
He commented that this elite group, comprised of well-off and highly educated people in government, business, and civil society, is out of touch with the other 95% of Ghanaians.
The elite have little
understanding of or sympathy for the difficult conditions
under which most Ghanaians live, and Bobiash argued they lack a sense of urgency to do much about it.
The donor community should care about this because this has been a historical
problem in Ghana, with out-of-touch, powerful, corrupt elite mismanaging the country, leading to military takeovers.
Although Bobiash does not believe we are near such a point, donors should keep the pressure on Ghana to maintain its reform program, grow the economy and reduce poverty.
¶6. (C) Canada's assistance program is focused primarily on the northern part of the country, which the government has largely neglected. CIDA, the Canadian aid agency, has spent almost half a billion dollars on water projects in the north, and they also have programs supporting predominantly Muslim areas.
Bobiash praised Ghanaian Muslim communities as
relatively tolerant, although he also noted they are quite
divided.
¶7. (C) Bobiash said he is quite concerned about Ghana's growing aid dependency. Assistance levels are at record levels, with donors pledging over $1.2 billion for 2006, or about 30% of the budget.
Nevertheless, Bobiash argued, results have been meager. He complained that an assistance mentality has developed where government officials ask for more assistance in every meeting, and whatever donors agree to give is not enough (Note: an example is the GoG's campaign to get up to $5 billion to pay for projects related to the
NEPAD Peer Review. End Note).
¶8. (C) The Ambassador briefed Bobiash on Post's extensive lobbying effort to gain Ghanaian support for the IAEA to report Iran to the UN Security Council, as well as to get Ghana to clear its arrears with the IAEA. Bobiash said he had also demarched Ghana on the IAEA, most recently in December.
He commented that the IAEA vote on Iran was significant for Canada and they were pushing hard on the nuclear issue. He noted that Canada had reduced bilateral
relations with Iran down to almost zero and had almost pulled its Ambassador following the murder of a Canadian journalist
a few years back.
Canadian HC's Impressions on Togo
---------------------------------
¶9. (C) Bobiash is also accredited as Ambassador to Togo, and recently returned from presenting his credentials. He
commented that Togo had stabilized and it appeared most Togolese were resigned to the current regime.
He noted that the U.S. and Canada were the only two countries to call the
election fixed, and was disappointed by what he termed the "cynical" EU and French reaction to the election results.
During presentation of his credentials, Bobiash found the new leader shy and uninformed, and in his opinion President Faure Gnassingbe was just fronting for the key decision-makers in Togo -- his father's ex-advisors.
Bobiash concluded that he
did not come away from Togo overly optimistic about its
future.
Comment
-------
¶10. (C) The U.S. and Canadian missions are reading from the same script: Ghana is clearly a top performer among developing economies and a rising star in Africa.
However, as Bobiash said in the meeting, a country with Ghana's reputation should be more aggressive at countering corruption and opening itself up to criticism and change.
We need to continue to hold Ghana to a high standard to ensure gains are not lost in harder times.
End Comment.
BRIDGEWATER"
End of the leaked US diplomatic cable from Accra - from the Wikileaks website.
Clearly, dear reader, the opinions of the two diplomats about President Kufuor and his NPP regime, aren't all that flattering. Neither do their observations about our country, paint a picture corresponding to that which former President Kufuor & Co. and their NPP colleagues would have us believe, was more or less a paradise on a patch of African earth, on which the sun shone ever so brightly, compared to the Ghana of today.
The question is: Would the grass be any greener for ordinary Ghanaians, tomorrow, than it is today - under the National Democratic Congress (NDC) regime of the incorruptible and humble President Mills - were the NPP to come to power again, after the December 2012 elections?
One doubts that very much, dear reader - and so should all those who seem to have forgotten so soon, the deprivation suffered by so many ordinary Ghanaian families, during the boom-days for a well-connected few, in the golden age of business, for Kufuor & Co.
To such individuals, let me end this piece by quoting H. E. Donald Bobiash's words of concern in the leaked diplomatic cable, about our divided nation - dominated by a small and wealthy educated urban elite, out of touch with, and unconcerned about, the plight of the other 95% of the Ghanaian population - made up of struggling families and teeming financially-challenged individuals:
"Bobiash criticized the international community for
hobnobbing almost exclusively with the Ghanaian elite, based primarily in Accra.
He commented that this elite group,
comprised of well-off and highly educated people in
government, business, and civil society, is out of touch with
the other 95% of Ghanaians.
The elite have little
understanding of or sympathy for the difficult conditions
under which most Ghanaians live, and Bobiash argued they lack a sense of urgency to do much about it.
The donor community should care about this because this has been a historical
problem in Ghana, with out-of-touch, powerful, corrupt elite mismanaging the country, leading to military takeovers.
Although Donald Bobiash does not believe we are near such a point, donors should keep the pressure on Ghana to maintain its reform program, grow the economy and reduce poverty." End of quote from leaked cable.
Surely, dear reader, that does not look anything like the rosy picture that former President Kufuor & Co and their NPP apologists in the Ghanaian media world, often paint of that period in our history, when the NPP held the reins of power, does it?
So why vote them back into power again, I ask? Ordinary Ghanaians would be far better off, if they gave the honest and principled President Mills - who unlike most of the members of our educated urban elite, actually cares about the plight of ordinary Ghanaians - a second term as Ghana's president. A word to the wise...
Tel (Powered by Tigo - the one mobile phone network in Ghana that actually works!): + 233 (0) 27 745 3109.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment