Monday 11 December 2017

Hernaes.com/Christoffer Hernæs: Bitcoin is useless

Hernaes.com
Innovation – Finance – Technology

Bitcoin is useless
December 11, 2017 7 Comments Bitcoin

15047469432_a999bdf3ab_b

While the recent surge in bitcoin price is good news for many bitcoin investors, it should be seen as a death sentence for the functional value of bitcoin. As the price continues to reach new record levels, it becomes obvious that bitcoin is useless for anything else than speculation.

Looking back at Satoshi Nakamoto’s original White Paper, Bitcoin is presented as “a peer-to-peer electronic cash system”, an “electronic coin” that would replace money transfers that are currently controlled by the financial system, and which would be almost immune to fraud.

The extreme value fluctuations of bitcoin effectively make bitcoin useless for its original purpose. Some may remember the world’s first real-world bitcoin transaction where one bitcoin enthusiast bought 2 large pizzas for 10 000 bitcoins. I hope those were tasty pizzas because with the bitcoin price as of today they would be worth 150 million USD. This level of currency fluctuation is usually associated with failed currencies that exhibit extreme inflation levels. An indication of bitcoins lack of usefulness as a currency is that Steam, announced that it would stop taking payments in Bitcoin. Valve, the service’s owner, said it had become “untenable”, owing both to its extreme volatility and the rising costs of using the network.

The latter is also an area where bitcoin is underperforming as a means of payment. In the early days of bitcoin, processing fees where at such low levels that bitcoin was a promising way to process microtransactions. This quickly changed as bitcoin increased in popularity, and where a bitcoin payment cost approximately 20 cents one year ago, the processing cost has now increased to an average of 7 USD, with peak fees as high as 20 USD.

Compared to government-issued currencies, bitcoins wild ride proves that it lacks the necessary predictability to act as a currency.  If we take off our tinfoil hats for a while we should acknowledge that currencies are regulated for a reason. To provide financial stability.

Also as an asset class, there are reasons to question bitcoins usefulness. One of the characteristics that were emphasized when Coinbase in collaboration with ARK invest argued that bitcoin should be considered an asset class was the decreasing volatility. Until 2017, volatility had decreased each year, and in 2016, average daily volatility decreased from about 10% to about 4% compared to the previous year. After surging past $11,000 on Wednesday, the biggest digital currency has swung between gains and losses of as much as 20 percent on an intraday basis.

Another obstacle for bitcoin as a useful asset class is the recent ban of bitcoin futures made by South Korea.

Even with recent advances in the underlying technology to promote bitcoins functional value such as the bitcoin lightning network to increase scalability, the primary value driver of bitcoin is based on speculation and increase in demand from new bitcoin buyers. As long as there are new buyers, the price continues to increase with the invisible hand of supply and demand. It is estimated that there are 500 000 people buying their first bitcoin every day, moving bitcoin way into greater fool territory when it comes to bitcoins extrinsic value. As long as there are more buyers than sellers, the price continues to increase. It is not difficult to see that this increase in demand will diminish at some point.

While some may argue that the value of bitcoin is in no way different from our collective shared belief that one dollar is worth one dollar, it has one fundamental difference as dollars has an intrinsic value as it is used as an everyday currency.

According to Investopedia bitcoin will derive its intrinsic value both from its use as a medium of exchange and as a store of value.  As a footnote to this assumption, it should be stated that bitcoin’s utility as a store of value is dependent on its utility as a medium of exchange. As bitcoin fails to act as a currency, it is no longer a medium of exchange, and therefore not a store of value either following to Investopedia’s assumptions. In short, if people do not use bitcoin for other purposes than speculation, it has no intrinsic value. On the other hand, bitcoin investor Alex Compton told the Wall Street Journal. “If people use bitcoin as a currency, it will lose value as an investment.” By this logic, bitcoin is only interesting as an investment opportunity as long as there is no intrinsic value.

Limitations in the bitcoin infrastructure also cause some issues regarding bitcoin as a trading asset resulting in a spread in trading prices of 3% between different bitcoin exchanges when the price was at $10,000 and reaching up to $2,000-$2,500 gap between Western exchanges and South Korea as the price reaches $16,000. While some may see this as an arbitrage opportunity, it is off-putting for institutional investors.

Another issue with bitcoin is the energy required to process transactions on bitcoins blockchain. As the chai increase in since the amount of computing power needed to verify each transaction rise exponentially. Bitcoin uses more energy than 19 European countries, and roughly 0.7 percent of total energy demand in the United States, equal to 2.8 million U.S. households. By some estimates, bitcoin would consume as much energy as the entire United States by July 2019 if the growth continues at the same rate as today. Even an optimistic scenario regarding developments in mining hardware states that mining one bitcoin in 2020 would require 5,500 kWh, and generate over 4,000 kg of carbon dioxide if we assume that only half of the energy required originates from fossil fuels. From an environmental perspective, the way bitcoin is mined and processed is highly unsustainable and by no means useful for the environment.

Despite this, bitcoin enthusiasts continue to celebrate the ever-increasing value of bitcoin and see no limits for the potential of bitcoin. Founder of McAfee and data security legend, John McAfee has gone as far as stating that he expects one bitcoin to be worth over a million dollars. If not, he will eat is own dick.

A good sign that the field is overheating is the official warning issued by Coinbase, encouraging its users to invest responsibly as the price leaped from $10,000 to $17,000 before dropping to $15,000. By now it is impossible to predict whether or when the bubble will burst. Saxobank predicts that bitcoin will peak at $18,000 in 2018 and then collapse. This is a fairly bold prediction, and only time will tell when there are no more greater fools out there and the roller coaster ride will come to an end.

The more bitcoin prices surge due to its speculative value and increasing demand, the more useless bitcoin becomes as a currency. And as bitcoin becomes useless as a currency, it loses its intrinsic value as an asset. I still believe that the underlying technology is revolutionary, and there are several use cases where crypto tokens may prove to be useful such as royalty distribution in the music industry or monetizing data and machine-to-machine payments like IOTA just to name a few examples. The future of bitcoin is impossible to predict as the underlying technology is still at an immature stage and there are continuous efforts to fix some of the fundamental issues regarding scalability and energy consumption. But bitcoin in its current state as something that exists almost solely for financial speculation and proves to be harmful to the environment is pretty useless in my book.
Share this:

    Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)2Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)2186Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)186Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Bitcoin is dead - long live bitcoinDecember 15, 2016In "Bitcoin"

Blockchain - hype or reality?April 24, 2017In "Bitcoin"

Is the surge of ICOs an innovative funding source or a bubble waiting to burst?September 4, 2017In "Blockchain"

    ← How to reinvent your core business

7 thoughts on “Bitcoin is useless”

    Svein Ølnes
    December 11, 2017 at 7:45 am
    Permalink

    While I agree with you that the current frenzy regarding the Bitcoin price is not healthy for the currency, I think you, and many with you, overlook some very important aspects which makes Bitcoin useful regardless of the recent price movements. Let me just give you one fresh example of my own:

    My daughter is going to spend her spring semester at the University of California, San Diego. She had to pay a tuition fee of $16 300 and because of slow case handling from Lånekassen I had to cover her her fee. I gave UCSD my credit card details, but got a message from them that the withdrawal was declined. I then had to contact my credit card company and they informed me that my credit limit did not allow this amount to me withdrawn so I had to pay them in advance. It took another day to get the confirmation that my payment was credited my account at the credit card comp. I then had to call the company again to make them raise the withdrawal limit on my card, for 24 h, in order for UCSD to complete their withdrawal. Next thing was to inform UCSD that my card was now open for redrawal of the said amount.

    I also informed them that if they had accepted Bitcoin this would have been so much easier. Using a payment service they would not need to touch bitcoin at all. I think even this kind of use case represents a huge opportunity for Bitcoin (think also remittances) and could very well defend the current price.

    Lastly, remember the dot.com bubble. Did it kill the Internet/the web? No, it laid the ground for a sustainable growth for the next decades. A sound correction in the crypto currency sphere will do the same for these new currencies I think.

    Regarding energy consumption: Don’t just regurgitate numbers you find on the net. Check them against reliable sources (research). In this case, read the paper “Sustainability of bitcoin and blockchains” by Harald Vranken.
    Reply
        Christoffer HernæsPost author
        December 11, 2017 at 7:57 am
        Permalink

        I agree that the crypto currency state has some obvious ues cases such as remittances. Although bitcoin in its current state is quite useless with volatility running out of control. Do you have a link to the research paper? I tried looking for some research that gave an opposing view on the sustainability, but the echo champer known as the internet pointed me in one direction only.
        Reply
        Ulrik Sandvig
        December 11, 2017 at 10:49 am
        Permalink

        why not a normal bank transfer?

        and christoffer, i like the article 🙂
        Reply
    Atle Magnussen
    December 11, 2017 at 10:28 am
    Permalink

    I have to argue on the power consumption critique. There is some misinformation spreading like wild fire these days. It’s not true that Bitcoin _requires_ the levels that are spent mining coins today. It’s solely due to popularity and the profitability of Bitcoin mining. Bitcoin just says everyone can join in mining Bitcoins, in return you might get some of the newly minted coins. It does not demand anything.
    It would be like saying Apple demands enormous amounts of power and backing it by adding together the power consumption of all iPhones.
    As far as the Bitcoin network goes it is true that more miners means a more secure network. But there would be probably no difference if the network only had 10% of the machine power it hastoday.

    You can argue that the proof of work algorithm required for network security and consensus would better be enhanced or replaced by something more efficient
    Reply
        Christoffer HernæsPost author
        December 11, 2017 at 11:26 am
        Permalink

        Like I say in my conclusion, bitcoin in its current state is useless. A switch from proof of work to proof of stake could perhaps change this, as could a successful implementation of the lightning network when it comes to scalability and speed. But again, this introduces a lot of what-ifs that introduce additional unpredictability of bitcoin as a currency.
        Reply
        Joao Bohner
        December 11, 2017 at 11:30 am
        Permalink

        “It does not demand anything.”:

        https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/13/business/bitcoin-mine-china.html
        Reply
    Joao Bohner
    December 11, 2017 at 11:20 am
    Permalink

    I’m with Mr. Friedman: “there’s no such thing as a free lunch”!
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.
Recent Posts

    Bitcoin is useless
    How to reinvent your core business
    Finansbransjens digitale revolusjon har så vidt begynt
    I dag blir Skandiabanken til Sbanken
    Norwegian mining company Intex signs agreement to develop asset backed digital token

Tags
API Artificial Intelligence Banking Bitcoin Blockchain Brexit Business model Compliance Convergence Crowdfunding Digital Digital Ecosystems Digitalization Disruption ecommerce Education Facebook Financial Inclusion Financial Services Fintech Game Development Gaming Google Innovasjon Innovation Insurance Investments IoT Leadership Lending Nintendo Nordics Norway Open banking P2P Lending Payments Politics PSD 2 Sharing economy Startups Tech Transactions Valuation Venture Capital Wealth management
Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,824 other subscribers

Email Address

This is the personal blog of Christoffer O. Hernæs. Passionate about innovation and digital disruption. Currently focusing on digital transformation of financial services and fintech.
Archives

    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015

Copyright © 2017 hernaes.com. All rights reserved.
Theme: ColorMag by ThemeGrill. Powered by WordPress.

No comments: