National Review
Economy & Business
Mark Zuckerberg’s Insufferable Tripe
By Rich Lowry
April 10, 2018 6:20 AM
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in 2013 (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
The Cambridge Analytica blowup is bringing a useful spotlight on the most sanctimoniously self-regarding large company in America.
Once again, Mark Zuckerberg is sorry.
The founder of Facebook, who has apologized for privacy breaches throughout much of his company’s existence, is back at it, on a much larger stage than ever before.
The proximate cause is the Cambridge Analytica controversy. In violation of Facebook’s rules, the Trump-linked political consultancy schemed to get access to the data of 87 million users. This has made Facebook a scapegoat for President Donald Trump’s victory on par with the Russians and James Comey (at least before the FBI director got fired and became a Trump adversary).
In 2012, President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign did a less underhanded version of the same thing as Cambridge. The great chronicler of the Obama digital operation, Sasha Issenberg, wrote of how its “‘targeted sharing’ protocols mined an Obama backer’s Facebook network in search of friends the campaign wanted to register, mobilize, or persuade.” No scandal ensued — rather, the Obama team was hailed as geniuses who changed campaigning forever.
It’s not Zuckerberg’s fault that he has suddenly been deemed on the wrong side of history, but the Cambridge Analytica blowup is bringing a useful spotlight on the most sanctimoniously self-regarding large company in America. Facebook can’t bear to admit that it has garnered the largest collection of data known to man to sell ads against and line the pockets of its founder and investors.
The problem isn’t that Mark Zuckerberg is a businessman, and an exceptionally gifted one, but that he pretends to have stumbled out of the lyrics of John Lennon’s song “Imagine.” To listen to him, Facebook is all about connectivity and openness — he just happens to have made roughly $63 billion as the T-shirt-wearing champion of “the global community,” whatever that means.
It’s this pose that makes him and other Facebook officials sound so shifty. In a rocky interview with Savannah Guthrie of the Today show last week, Sheryl Sandberg was asked what product Facebook sells. “We’re selling the opportunity to connect with people,” she said, before catching herself, “but it’s not for sale.”
Something or other must be for sale, or Facebook is the first company to rocket to the top ranks of corporate America based on having no product or profit motive. Guthrie, persisting, stated that Facebook sweeps up data for the use of advertisers. Sandberg objected: “We are not sweeping data. People are inputting data.”
Uh, yeah. That’s the genius of it. In a reported exchange with a friend while he was a student at Harvard, Zuckerberg boasted of having data on thousands of students because “people just submitted it.”
It’s possible to imagine something like Facebook run as a nonprofit service for the global commons. That’s not what Zuckerberg chose to do to.
Zuckerberg has now managed the same trick on a global scale. On the one hand, Facebook has indeed made efforts to protect the data of its users, knowing that it can’t risk a fundamental breach of trust. On the other, Zuckerberg has repeatedly said he’s sorry for offenses against his users’ privacy because his business model contradicts his self-righteous public posture.
The company is deeply committed to that posture. In the Today interview, Sandberg made a confession as humble brag: “We were very idealistic and not rigorous enough.” In his prepared testimony before a House committee, Zuckerberg declared: “Facebook is an idealistic and optimistic company. For most of our existence, we focused on all the good that connecting people can bring.”
It’s possible to imagine something like Facebook run as a nonprofit service for the global commons. That’s not what Zuckerberg chose to do to. To his credit, he created a compelling — nay, for some people, addicting — product and made a killing for the ages.
Comments
Perhaps the public pressure will force the social network to give its customers even more control over the use of their data. At a minimum, it will have achieved something if it gets Facebook to give up the saccharine one-world rhetoric about its mission and admit that the bottom line is as important to it as to any other profit-making company.
© 2018 by King Features Syndicate
Rich Lowry — Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He can be reached via email: comments.lowry@nationalreview.com. @richlowry
More in Economy & Business
More Burdensome Regulations Are Not What the Freight-Rail Industry Needs
Trump vs. Bezos Shows Why We All Should Be a Little Libertarian
Don’t Subsidize Low-Wage Cities
Leave Amazon Alone
SPONSORED CONTENT
Former Facebook Employee Warned in 2012 About Privacy Threats Former Facebook Employee Warned in 2012 About Privacy…
Consumer Groups Allege Facebook’s Facial-Recognition Feature Violates Privacy Law Consumer Groups Allege Facebook’s Facial-Recognition Feature…
Kevin Williamson and the Twitter Mob Kevin Williamson and the Twitter Mob
Facebook Will Require Political Advertisers to Verify Their Identities Facebook Will Require Political Advertisers to Verify Their Identities
Whatever the Left Touches It Ruins Whatever the Left Touches It Ruins
Trump and His Generals Trump and His Generals
The Ideology of Illegal Immigration The Ideology of Illegal Immigration
FBI Raids Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen’s Office FBI Raids Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen’s Office
Recommended by
Most Popular
Politics & Policy
Sasse Grills Zuckerberg: If You’re Going to Police Hate Speech, Can You Define It?
By Mairead McArdle
A Republican senator challenged Mark Zuckerberg on Facebook’s hate speech policies during his congressional testimony Tuesday, asking the Facebook boss if he could define it. Senator Ben Sasse (R., Neb.) said he worried about policies that are “less than First Amendment full-spirit embracing in my ... Read More
Economy & Business
Remember the Deficit?
By Yuval Levin
On Monday, the Congressional Budget Office released its annual “Budget and Economic Outlook,” which offers projections about spending, revenues, deficits, and debt for the next ten years. Although it’s not about porn stars and hush money, the report is really worth your time. It nicely summarizes what ... Read More
Film & TV
Molly Ringwald Brings Back Detention
By Armond White
Actress Molly Ringwald became the latest celebrity to parade before the court of mainstream media in her one-off “Personal History” column last week for The New Yorker in which she recanted her own legacy as a star of the 1980s John Hughes movies Sixteen Candles and The Breakfast Club. Don’t be fooled. This ... Read More
Culture
Americans Still Aren’t Moving to Canada
By J. J. McCullough
When assessing the motives of migrants, the press can only seem to tell one of two stories: If they’re leaving the Third World, they’re escaping poverty; if they’re leaving the First World, they’re escaping politics. Canada has emerged as a favored backdrop for the latter sort of storytelling as of ... Read More
World
How Should America Respond to Syria’s Use of Chemical Weapons?
By George Will
On April 22, 1915, chlorine gas, wafted by favorable breezes, drifted from German lines toward enemy positions held by French troops near Ypres, Belgium. This was the first significant use of chemical weapons in a war in which 100,000 tons of chemical agents would be used by both sides to kill almost 30,000 ... Read More
Education
No, School Discipline Isn’t Racist
By Gail Heriot
An April 4th headline in the New York Times was eye-catching: “Government Watchdog Finds Racial Bias in School Discipline.” Eye-catching, but highly misleading. The Government Accountability Office report, which was commissioned by congressmen Bobby Scott (D., Va.) and Jerrold Nadler (D., N.Y.), found only ... Read More
Science & Tech
Zuckerberg to Gloss Over Obama Campaign’s Data Scrape in Congressional Testimony
By Jack Crowe
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is set to testify to Congress this week that his company didn't do enough to protect users' personal information from exploitation by Trump-linked consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, but his remarks will completely ignore a similar data breach by the Obama campaign in ... Read More
Login
Donate
Subscribe
Sections
The Corner
Bench Memos
The Morning Jolt
The G-File
All Articles
All Authors
Podcasts
Photos
Videos
Topics
Politics & Policy
Culture
White House
Film & TV
PC Culture
U.S.
World
Immigration
Economy & Business
Elections
Magazine
Latest Issue
Archive
Subscribe
Customer Care
NRPLUS
Magazine FAQ
About
Frequently Asked Questions
The Masthead
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
NR Institute
More
Advertise
Donate
Search
E-mails & Alerts
Newsletters
Jim Geraghty’s Morning Jolt (M-F)
NR Daily (M-Sa)
Jonah Goldberg’s The G-File (F)
© 2018 National Review
Loading...
:)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment