The Conversation
Edition:
Available editions
Africa
Job Board
Become an author
Sign up as a reader
Sign in
The Conversation
Academic rigour, journalistic flair
Arts + Culture
Business + Economy
Education
Environment + Energy
Health + Medicine
Politics + Society
Science + Technology
In French
Why poor people should be involved in designing solutions to poverty
April 10, 2018 3.23pm SAST
Authors
Leila Patel
Professor of Social Development Studies, University of Johannesburg
Marianne Ulriksen
Assistant Professor at the Danish Centre for Welfare Studies, University of Southern Denmark
Disclosure statement
Leila Patel receives funding from the National Research Foundation for her Chair in Welfare and Social Development, CSDA, University of Johannesburg
Marianne Ulriksen does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Partners
University of Southern Denmark
AUF (Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie)
University of Southern Denmark provides funding as a member of The Conversation UK.
AUF (Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie) provides funding as a member of The Conversation FR.
University of Johannesburg
University of Johannesburg provides funding as a partner of The Conversation AFRICA.
The Conversation is funded by Barclays Africa and seven universities, including the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Rhodes University and the Universities of Cape Town, Johannesburg, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pretoria, and South Africa. It is hosted by the Universities of the Witwatersrand and Western Cape, the African Population and Health Research Centre and the Nigerian Academy of Science. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Strategic Partner. more
Republish this article
Republish
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.
Pensioner Katherine Boyi, left, with donated blankets and Agnes Makhubela, with donated maize meal, in Doornkop, Soweto. EPA/Jon Hrusa
Email
Twitter24
Facebook74
LinkedIn
Print
Solutions to poverty and social exclusion tend to focus largely on national social and economic policies and the monitoring of national poverty indicators. Often missing from these conversations, but equally important, is the need for a perspective that privileges the knowledge, experience, capacities, aspirations and efforts of citizens and communities to improve their lives.
Innovative solutions that connect with people’s real life situations, and that take the voices of the poor into account, are critical in shaping such solutions.
In-depth community based research conducted in Doornkop, Soweto, over a decade by researchers from the Centre for Social Development Africa at the University of Johannesburg, has captured these voices. Doornkop is one of the ten poorest wards in Johannesburg, South Africa’s largest city. It is home to 61 000 people, most of whom live in extreme poverty and in stressed circumstances.
The research is published in a newly released book that we co-edited. It provides a vignette of the potential to “learn from below”. It also provides insight into the lives of people who continue to struggle daily to build meaningful lives. It prioritises their actual experiences of and responses to a range of social, financial and health challenges.
It also interrogates the effect that policies designed by the government at national level have on their lives.
Difficult choices
Despite enormous challenges, Doornkop’s residents are motivated to lead better lives. But they have to make difficult choices and trade-offs and have to work actively to achieve their goals. Interventions at the individual, household and community level can support agency, build people’s capabilities and strengthen social networks. But a range of barriers – structural as well as social – can undermine their best efforts.
A range of issues emerged from the participants’ stories. One was how socially prescribed notions of gender affect their lives. For example, some women who received welfare grants reported having to navigate their way around negative assumptions. These included accusations that they were undeserving or lazy or that they get free money for having children, known as “imali yeqolo” (colloquially meaning “money for sex”). These labels made them feel devalued and stigmatised.
As elsewhere in South Africa, Doornkop has a high rate of father absenteeism. Some women who got grants reported that some fathers used the child support grant as an excuse not to pay child maintenance. The grant is a means-tested cash transfer benefit paid to the primary caregiver of a child under 18 years who meets the eligibility requirements. It benefits 12 million children.
This illustrates how gender beliefs and practices about parenting and care can reinforce gender inequality and compromise child well-being. Yet, insufficient attention is paid to finding solutions to these challenges.
In tandem with these negative views, respondents also expressed strong support for the grants distributed by government, and their need for them. They said the child grant buys food, clothing and other necessities. Others said it empowers women by increasing their financial independence and decision-making power over how money is used. The grants also have a positive effect on caregiving for children.
Social solidarity and resilience
Interestingly, the interviews also showed that the child grant has some positive unintended consequences too. For example, they build social solidarity and a sense of a shared fate. This in turn served to protect individuals and their families against risks and shocks, such as a death in the family or the loss of a home, and to build mutually beneficial social networks. These are a vital source of social and economic support. As one respondent said:
We are helping one another, when they don’t have anything, then they are giving [me], [and] we need to help others, and then your community can be a right place.
This suggests that people who receive grants aren’t simply passive recipients of public benefits.
Stories from the ground also highlighted the unmet needs of people who are vulnerable and left behind.
A third of women in the sample were diagnosed with depression, largely associated with the stress of having to cope with poverty. Better mental health screening, treatment and social support is needed in poor communities like Doornkop. In addition, unemployment and struggles to access post-secondary education and training, as well as early motherhood placed young people at risk of long-term poverty.
Despite the challenges, there was also evidence of high levels of resilience. Older women had very good ability to “bounce back” after experiencing adversity. Social and family support, religious faith and participation in burial societies and stokvels mediated depression and built resilience.
The research shows that although social grants make an important contribution in reducing income poverty with positive multiplier effects, other social interventions are needed to build human capabilities, reduce vulnerability and social exclusion. Gender beliefs about care contribute to inequality within and among families. They call for a multidimensional approach to finding accessible community level solutions.
Political significance
Finally, a strong link emerged from the research about the relationship between socio-economic factors and democracy. People know their rights, participate actively in national and local elections and attend ward council meetings to improve their conditions.
In fact, more grant beneficiaries in Doornkop voted or planned to vote in two previous elections than non-beneficiaries. Trust in the party of their choice, and the exercise of their democratic rights, were as important as the ability of a political party to satisfy their needs. This suggests that poor performance in service delivery and social grants are likely to have significant electoral consequences for the incumbent party.
Poverty
Inequality
gender theory
Gender norms
Child Support Grant
Soweto
Women and girls
Tweet
Share
Get newsletter
You might also like
For many US towns and cities, deciding which streets to name after MLK reflects his unfinished work
One in five people in Scotland now live in poverty – here’s what’s being done to tackle it
MLK’s vision matters today for the 43 million Americans living in poverty
India and China: lessons on how not to tackle inequality
Sign in to comment
3 Comments
Oldest Newest
Show all comments
Most popular on The Conversation
How Grace Mugabe poaching claims benefit Zimbabwe’s new president
Ancient DNA changes everything we know about the evolution of elephants
India and China: lessons on how not to tackle inequality
How the law can help change racist minds in South Africa
Obstacles facing a young black farmer in South Africa: a personal story
Steinhoff’s board behaved badly. Why it needs to be held to account
What China’s President Xi’s extended tenure means for Africa
South African business must tackle its deeply rooted prejudice
Ramaphosa’s to do list: seven economic policy areas that will shift the dial
Why Ethiopia’s new leader could be a game changer
Expert Database
Find experts with knowledge in:*
Want to write?
Write an article and join a growing community of more than 65,600 academics and researchers from 2,299 institutions.
Register now
The Conversation
Community
Community standards
Republishing guidelines
Research and Expert Database
Analytics
Job Board
Our feeds
Company
Who we are
Our charter
Our team
Partners and funders
Contributing institutions
Resource for media
Contact us
Stay informed and subscribe to our free daily newsletter and get the latest analysis and commentary directly in your inbox.
Email address
Follow us on social media
Privacy policy Terms and conditions Corrections
Copyright © 2010–2018, The Conversation Africa, Inc.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment