Saturday, 19 May 2018

Inside Climate News/John H. Cushman Jr.: Urgent Climate Action Required to Protect Tens of Thousands of Species Worldwide, New Research Shows

Inside Climate News

Urgent Climate Action Required to Protect Tens of Thousands of Species Worldwide, New Research Shows

Limiting global warming to 2 degrees and not the more ambitious 1.5 degrees would put far more species at risk of extinction. Insects are especially vulnerable.
John H. Cushman Jr.
By John H. Cushman Jr.
Follow @jackcushmanjr
Neela Banerjee
By Neela Banerjee
Follow @neelaeast
May 17, 2018
Tens of Thousands of Species Could Be Protected By Limiting Warming to 1.5 Degrees

A mere half degree of extra global warming could mean profound risks for tens of thousands of the planet's species, scientists have found. Credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Humanity can powerfully improve the survival odds of tens of thousands of species, but only if nations dramatically raise their ambitions in the fight against climate change, according to new research published on Thursday in the journal Science.

One key to salvaging plant and vertebrate habitat and protecting the world's biodiversity is to limit warming to the most challenging benchmark established under the 2015 Paris treaty—1.5 degrees Celsius of warming—not to the treaty's less stringent 2 degree guardrail, the study found.

The study assessed, in more detail than ever before, a key measure of extinction risk: the shrinking size of each species' current geographical range, or natural habitat. It projected that for an alarming number of species, their range size would shrink by at least half as temperatures rise past the Paris goals.

If nations do no more than they have pledged so far to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions—and warming consequently shoots past 3 degrees by the end of this century—6 percent of all vertebrates would be at risk. So would 44 percent of plants and a whopping 49 percent of insects.

Sign up for InsideClimate News Weekly

Our stories. Your inbox. Every weekend.

But the dangers would be greatly reduced if warming can be limited to 1.5 degrees. That might protect the overwhelming majority of the 115,000 species assessed by the researchers. Just 4 percent of vertebrates would lose more than half of their current range. Only 8 percent of plants and 6 percent of insects would face that risk.

Keeping warming to 2 degrees is not nearly as effective, they found. The additional half degree of warming would double the impact on plants and vertebrate species, and triple the impact on insects.
First-of-Its-Kind Biodiversity Study

Conducted by researchers from the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom and James Cook University in Australia, the study builds on their earlier work. For the first time, it examines insects and explores how effectively the extinction risks can be addressed by increasing ambition.

"If warming is limited to 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2100, then more species can keep up or even gain in range," said Rachel Warren, the study's lead researcher, "whereas if warming reached 2 degrees Celsius by 2100, many species cannot keep up and far more species lose large parts of their range."

The new research adds a compelling layer of evidence to the mounting risks of rising temperatures. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is currently revising a comprehensive draft report on the science behind the 1.5 degree target. This new report on endangered species was written in time to be reflected in the IPCC review, to be published in the fall.

A leaked copy of the latest IPCC draft, circulated for expert comment in the winter, noted in its summary that "local extinction (extirpation) risks are higher in a 2 degrees Celsius warmer world, compared to  1.5 degrees Celsius."
Race to Bolster Paris Treaty's Call for Action

At Paris, everyone recognized that the pledges to cut emissions would fall short of meeting the 2 degree target. Even so, the world's nations decided to shoot for 1.5 degrees, where the dangers become pronounced for small island states and other highly vulnerable people. Since then, talks about increasing ambition have made relatively little headway, and President Donald Trump has renounced the pledges of the Obama administration.

Whether the goal is 2 degrees or 1.5 degrees, scientists say it can only be met by bringing net emissions of carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels to zero later in this century. The main difference is that with the more ambitious goal, emissions must be reduced much faster; some say it's already too late.

This urgency has been highlighted by one peer-reviewed study after another, as scientists explore the consequences of falling short. Hundreds of scientists have filed thousands of comments to the IPCC as it races to bolster the treaty's call for rapid action.
115,000 Species Studied; Insects Particularly Vulnerable

Since lost species never come back, and since many species perform vital ecosystem services, the growing risks of extinction are an especially profound aspect of climate change.

Until now, these problems have been studied in relatively few species, notably tropical coral reefs, which are already dying off under the approximately 1 degree of warming that's been observed so far. They may be partly saved if emissions are reduced aggressively enough to stay below 1.5 degrees.

This time, the researchers examined 115,000 species, including 34,000 insects and other invertebrates that previously have not been included in global studies of climate and biodiversity. (Roughly a million species of insects have been named, and there may be many more.)

InsideClimate News
Your donation powers our nonprofit newsroom
Support a more-informed community on climate
Donate Now

Insects, it turned out, are particularly sensitive to temperature increases, and these findings are particularly alarming.

They focus attention on pollinators essential to agriculture and insects that serve as food for birds and animals. The researchers found that three groups of pollinators are especially vulnerable to climate risks—true flies, beetles, and moths and butterflies.

The study's authors concluded that meeting the most aggressive temperature target would most benefit species in Europe, Australia, the Amazon and southern Africa.

The study also looked at the ability of different species to migrate outside their normal ranges.

Birds, mammals and butterflies have better chances of relocating than other species as temperatures rise, the researchers found.
Published Under:
Global Climate Treaty
Climate Science
Climate Change

    Email this page

    Printer-friendly version

About the Author
Jack Cushman
John H. Cushman Jr.

Jack Cushman is an editor and reporter for InsideClimate News. Before joining ICN, he worked for 35 years as a writer and editor in Washington, D.C., principally with the Washington bureau of The New York Times. Cushman has written extensively about energy, the environment, industry and military affairs, also covering financial and transportation beats, and editing articles across the full spectrum of national and international policy. He served on the board of governors of the National Press Club and was its president in the year 2000. He is the author of "Keystone and Beyond: Tar Sands and the National Interest in the Era of Climate Change."

Your donation powers our nonprofit newsroom.

Our stories. Your inbox. Every weekend.
Most Popular
A map of average temperatures in degrees Celsius on May 8, 2018, show a warm spot near freezing over the Arctic. Credit: Climate Reanalyzer/University of Maine
Arctic Heat Surges Again, and Studies Are Finding Climate Change Connections

By Sabrina Shankman
Key currents of the Atlantic ocean's overturning circulation. Credit: NASA
Scientists Say Ocean Circulation Is Slowing. Here’s Why You Should Care.

By Bob Berwyn
An environmental group installed solar panels atop Faith Community Church to sell the church cheap, clean electricity. Credit: NC WARN
How Solar Panels on a Church Rooftop Broke the Law in N.C.

By Dan Gearino
A layer of smog sits over Salt Lake City. Credit: Eltiempo10/CC-BY-SA-4.0
Scott Pruitt Plans to Radically Alter How Clean Air Standards Are Set

By Nicholas Kusnetz
A satellite image captures algae blooms in Lake Erie in 2011. Toledo, Ohio, is at the southwestern tip of the lake. Credit: European Space Agency
Toxic Algae Blooms Occurring More Often, May Be Caught in Climate Change Feedback Loop

By Georgina Gustin
Five of California's largest fire years have been since 2006. Credit: David McNew/Getty Images
In California, Climate Change Is an ‘Immediate and Escalating’ Threat

By Phil McKenna
Installers add solar panels to a home in San Rafael, California. Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
In a First, California Requires Solar Panels for New Homes. Will Other States Follow?

By Dan Gearino
Eric Schneiderman, shown here during a January press conference, announced his resignation as New York's attorney general on May 7 after allegations that he physically assaulted four women during relationships with them. Credit: Spencer Platt/Getty Images
What Does Eric Schneiderman's Resignation Mean for N.Y.'s Exxon Probe and Environment Lawsuits?

By David Hasemyer
Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project. Credit: SolarReserve
24-Hour Solar Energy: Molten Salt Makes It Possible, and Prices Are Falling Fast

By Robert Dieterich
A new study based on EPA documents and interviews found industry influence over the EPA today is stronger than it was during the early Reagan years. Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Pruitt's EPA Is on the Verge of 'Regulatory Capture', Study Says

By Neela Banerjee

Learn more about ICN's environmental journalism institute

Our Sponsors
View all sponsors

A fishing vessel crew unloads its catch off the coast of Virginia. Credit: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty ImagesA fishing vessel crew hauls in a catch off the coast of Virginia. Credit: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images
Fish Species Forecast to Migrate Hundreds of Miles Northward as U.S. Waters Warm

By Bob Berwyn
A Verreaux's sifaka, a type of lemur that lives in Madagascar. Credit: Martina Lippuner/WWF
Climate Change Threatens Thousands of Species in Our Lifetime

By Sabrina Shankman
For farmworkers, the difference between 1.5 and 2 degrees Celsius warming can be the loss or survival of crops and the ability to labor all day in high heat. Credit: Jes Aznar/Getty Images
1.5 Degrees Warming and the Search for Climate Justice for the Poor

By John H. Cushman Jr.
Limit Warming to 2 Degrees or 1.5? Climate Negotiators Wrestle With Dangers of Half a Degree

By John H. Cushman Jr.

Subscribe to Clean Economy Weekly

Want More Stories Like This One?
Contribute To Our Staff
Donate Now
More Global Climate Treaty
UN climate negotiations in Bonn, May 2018. Credit: UN Climate Change
In Shadow of Trump's New Foreign Policy Team, U.S. Climate Negotiators Walk a Fine Line

By Marianne Lavelle
A Verreaux's sifaka, a type of lemur that lives in Madagascar. Credit: Martina Lippuner/WWF
Climate Change Threatens Thousands of Species in Our Lifetime

By Sabrina Shankman
The Chevron oil field near Bakersfield, California. Credit: Frederic J. Brown/AFP/Getty Images
To Meet Climate Goals, California Should Cut Oil Production, Report Says

By Nicholas Kusnetz
More on Global Climate Treaty
Subscribe to InsideClimate News Email Newsletters

    Articles & Investigations
    Today's Climate
    Clean Economy
    Week in Review

More From The Author
Tens of Thousands of Species Could Be Protected By Limiting Warming to 1.5 Degrees
Urgent Climate Action Required to Protect Tens of Thousands of Species Worldwide, New Research Shows

By John H. Cushman Jr., Neela Banerjee
How Federal Giveaways to Big Coal Leave Ranchers and Taxpayers Out in the Cold
How Federal Giveaways to Big Coal Leave Ranchers and Taxpayers Out in the Cold

By Neela Banerjee, Robert McClure
Scientists in the Canadian Arctic. Credit: Jeremy Potter/NOAA
Polar Ice Is Disappearing, Setting Off Climate Alarms


    Whistleblowers Jobs & Freelance Policies & Legal Our E-Books

Keep Environmental Journalism Alive
Donate Now

    News Investigations Topics Today's Climate Clean Economy Middle Ground Infographics

No comments: