Privacy rights are important in all democratic societies. One thus values the right to privacy guaranteed to Ghanaians under our new data protection laws, as much as the person sitting next to one, in a shared-taxi, to the imaginary Accra suburb of #Whereverkrom, from posh Adiepena-Pie-In-The-Sky.
However, if by getting our security agencies to deploy cutting-edge facial recognition technology we can rid Ghanaian society of: lawless elements defrauding the unwary; and those committing armed robberies; felling trees illegally; ditto the brazen and selfish monsters poisoning soils, streams, rivers and groundwater sources across Ghana at sundry gold mining sites (and in the process robbing future generations of their right to enjoy a decent quality of life too), then it would be perfectly OK with one that one would in effect lose the right to privacy at every material time that the security agencies deployed facial recognition technology to catch lawless types, such as the above-mentioned blackguards.
Above all, our nation's usury interest rates would plummet dramatically, if everyone who goes in for a loan in Ghana could be tracked and easily located by banks and other financial services sector entities, which provide credit to their customers. That would boost economic activity and help increase our GDP - and perhaps create jobs galore too in the process.
In the fight against those now terrorising the law-abiding in Ghana, one strongly urges the authorities in our country to disregard the privacy concerns of foreign civil liberties activist groups decrying the growing collaboration between tech companies such as Amazon and Google and military/police forces in the developed world.
Today, to help kickstart a national conversation on the subject, we have culled a blog post entitled: "Facial Recognition Technology" authored by Matt Cagle, who is a Technology and Civil Liberties Attorney for the ACLU of Northern California, and Nicole Ozer, a Technology & Civil Liberties Director, ACLU of California of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), criticising Amazon's collaboration with the police and military in the U.S.
Speaking personally, as a law-abiding resident and citizen of an aspirational African nation terrorised by Tramador-crazed armed robbers, one begs to differ with their well-thought-out views. Amazon's 'Rekognition' facial recognition technology would be perfect for Ghana's security agencies. Cool. We rest our case.
Please read on:
"Facial Recognition Technology
Matt Cagle, Technology and Civil Liberties Attorney, ACLU of Northern California
& Nicole Ozer, Technology & Civil Liberties Director, ACLU of California
May 22, 2018 | 10:00 AM
Tags
Face Recognition Technology Surveillance Technologies Privacy & Technology
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Email
Print
web18-surveillancecameras-1160x768.jpg
Surveillance cameras
Amazon, which got its start selling books and still bills itself as “Earth’s most customer-centric company,” has officially entered the surveillance business.
The company has developed a powerful and dangerous new facial recognition system and is actively helping governments deploy it. Amazon calls the service “Rekognition.”
Marketing materials and documents obtained by ACLU affiliates in three states reveal a product that can be readily used to violate civil liberties and civil rights. Powered by artificial intelligence, Rekognition can identify, track, and analyze people in real time and recognize up to 100 people in a single image. It can quickly scan information it collects against databases featuring tens of millions of faces, according to Amazon.
Amazon is marketing Rekognition for government surveillance. According to its marketing materials, it views deployment by law enforcement agencies as a “common use case” for this technology. Among other features, the company’s materials describe “person tracking” as an “easy and accurate” way to investigate and monitor people. Amazon says Rekognition can be used to identify “people of interest,” raising the possibility that those labeled suspicious by governments — such as undocumented immigrants or Black activists — will be seen as fair game for Rekognition surveillance. It also says Rekognition can monitor “all faces in group photos, crowded events, and public places such as airports,” at a time when Americans are joining public protests at unprecedented levels.
Amazon’s Rekognition raises profound civil liberties and civil rights concerns. Today, the ACLU and a coalition of civil rights organizations demanded that Amazon stop allowing governments to use Rekognition.
mytubethumbplay
Privacy statement. This embed will serve content from youtube.com.
Tell Amazon to get out of the surveillance business
Amazon not only markets Rekognition as a law enforcement service, it is helping governments deploy it. Amazon lists the city of Orlando, Florida, and the Washington County Sheriff’s Office in Oregon among its customers. Upon learning this, the ACLU Foundations of California coordinated with the ACLU of Oregon and the ACLU of Florida on public records requests to learn more.
The documents we obtained indicate that the Washington County sheriff and the city of Orlando became Rekognition customers in 2017. Washington County has since built a database of at least 300,000 mugshot photos to use in coordination with Rekognition. It also built a mobile app for its deputies to quickly scan for a match against the county’s database by submitting images obtained from surveillance or other sources.
Amazon is providing company resources to help government agencies deploy Rekognition. In emails between Amazon and Washington County employees, the company offers the expertise of the Rekognition product team, troubleshoots problems encountered by the county, and provides “best practices” advice on how to deploy the service. In what Orlando’s police chief praises as a “first-of-its-kind public-private partnership,” Amazon promised free consulting services to build a Rekognition “proof of concept” for the city. Rekognition face surveillance is now operating across Orlando in real-time, according to Amazon, allowing the company to search for “people of interest” as footage rolls in from “cameras all over the city.”
In the records, Amazon also solicits feedback and ideas for “potential enhancements” to Rekognition’s capabilities for governments. Washington County even signed a non-disclosure agreement created by Amazon to get “insight into the Rekognition roadmap” and provide additional feedback about the product. The county later cited this NDA to justify withholding documents in response to the ACLU’s public records request.
The documents also revealed that Amazon offered to connect Washington County with other Amazon government customers interested in Rekognition — as well as a body camera manufacturer. Indeed, Amazon’s promotional materials previously recommended that law enforcement use Rekognition to identify people in police body camera footage. The company removed mention of police body cameras from its site after the ACLU raised concerns in discussions with Amazon. That appears to be the extent of its response to our concerns. This and other profoundly troubling surveillance practices are still permissible under the company’s policies.
With Rekognition, a government can now build a system to automate the identification and tracking of anyone. If police body cameras, for example, were outfitted with facial recognition, devices intended for officer transparency and accountability would further transform into surveillance machines aimed at the public. With this technology, police would be able to determine who attends protests. ICE could seek to continuously monitor immigrants as they embark on new lives. Cities might routinely track their own residents, whether they have reason to suspect criminal activity or not. As with other surveillance technologies, these systems are certain to be disproportionately aimed at minority communities.
Because of Rekognition’s capacity for abuse, we asked Washington County and Orlando for any records showing that their communities had been provided an opportunity to discuss the service before its acquisition. We also asked them about rules governing how the powerful surveillance system could be used and ensuring rights would be protected. Neither locality identified such records. In fact, Washington County began using Rekognition even as employees raised questions internally. In one email, a Washington County employee expressed the concern that the “ACLU might consider this the government getting in bed with big data.” That employee’s prediction was correct.
People should be free to walk down the street without being watched by the government. By automating mass surveillance, facial recognition systems like Rekognition threaten this freedom, posing a particular threat to communities already unjustly targeted in the current political climate. Once powerful surveillance systems like these are built and deployed, the harm will be extremely difficult to undo.
If Rekognition is not reined in, its use is also certain to spread. The records we obtained show that law enforcement agencies in California and Arizona have contacted Washington County asking about Rekognition. So have multiple “fusion centers,” which collect information about people for dissemination across agencies at the local and federal level.
Amazon has publicly opposed secretive government surveillance. Its CEO, Jeff Bezos, has himself criticized Trump administration’s discriminatory Muslim ban. But actions speak louder than words, and Amazon’s efforts to deploy this technology run counter to its proclaimed values and risk harm to the company’s customers and their communities.
View comments (25)
Fight for everyone's rights - support the ACLU.
Donate Now
Sign Up For Breaking News Alerts
Close
Email Address *
ZIP Code *
Amazon: Get Out of the Surveillance Business
Take Action Now
Related Stories
Another Federal Court Rules the Fourth Amendment Applies at the Border
May 9, 2018
Hollywood Offers Ominous Visions of Facial Recognition's Future
May 11, 2018
Company That Handles Prison Phone Calls Is Surveilling People Who Aren’t in...
May 11, 2018
A Looming Implication of Face Recognition: Private Photo Blacklists
April 16, 2018
Are Stores You Shop at Secretly Using Face Recognition on You?
March 26, 2018
Stay Informed
Email Address *
ZIP Code *
Publications Multimedia Media Contact Donate
ACLU on Facebook
ACLU on Twitter
ACLU on YouTube
The ACLU RSS Feed
Charity Navigator
BBB Accredited Charity
User agreement Privacy statement Accessibility
This is the website of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about these two components of the ACLU.
© 2018 ACLU."
End of culled content from the ACLU blog posted by Matt Cagle and Nicole Ozer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment