Required Reading For Vice President Bawumia, Senior Minister Hon. Osafo Marfo and Finance Minister Ken Ofori Attah?

That Ghana  faces an  environmental crisis of apocalyptic proportions, is beyond doubt. The evidence is all around us. The harm being done to Mother Nature, is spreading across the entire landmass of our nation's territory.

Egregious poisoning   of soils, streams, rivers, groundwater; and unprecedented  loss of biodiversity (resulting from the massive destruction of  forest-belt ecosystems across vast swathes of the Ghanaian countryside), is occurring before our very eyes.

Across Ghana, powerful, greedy and well-connected individuals, and  private-sector entities, responsible for those environmental crimes (which amount to crimes against humanity), are ruining the very basis for assuring a relatively good quality of life, for both present, and unborn generations of our people. Yet, they continue to act with total impunity.

Meanwhile,  instead of focusing on collaborating to fashion effective initiatives to halt the wanton environmental degradation going on,  feckless,  reckless,  verbally-aggressive, and amoral politicians, are toying with the destiny of our country, busy playing mind-games with each other.  Pity.

For all those who care about our nation's stability,  and constantly seek the welfare of ordinary people, for that reason,  this blog recommends reading, 'Upheaval', the latest book by the brilliant American geographer, Jared Diamond, of UCLA fame.

Luckily, an interview in the New  Yorker Magazine, in which  David Wallace-Wells recently interviewed  Jared Diamond, about Upheaval,  has just been published.

Today, we have culled and are posting  that interview, in the hope that it will spark an interest  in Jared Diamond's work amongst well-educated Ghanaians. Above all, Upheaval ought to be required reading for: Ghana's vice-president, Dr. Bawumia; senior minister  Hon.Osafo Marfo; and finance minister Hon. Ken Ofori  Attah. Hmmmm, Oman Ghana eyeasem o. Asem kesie ebeba debi ankasa.

Please  read on:

"Life after warming May 10, 2019

Jared Diamond: There’s a 49 Percent Chance the World As We Know It Will End by 2050

By David Wallace-Wells
Jared Diamond. Photo: Antonio Olmos/Observer/eyevine/Redux

Jared Diamond’s new book, Upheaval, addresses itself to a world very obviously in crisis, and tries to lift some lessons for what do about it from the distant past. In that way, it’s not so different from all the other books that have made the UCLA geographer a sort of don of “big think” history and a perennial favorite of people like Steven Pinker and Bill Gates.

Diamond’s life as a public intellectual began with his 1991 book The Third Chimpanzee, a work of evolutionary psychology, but really took off with Guns, Germs, and Steel, published in 1997, which offered a three-word explanation for the rise of the West to the status of global empire in the modern era — and, even published right at the “end of history,” got no little flak from critics who saw in it both geographic determinism and what they might today call a whiff of Western supremacy. In 2005, he published Collapse, a series of case studies about what made ancient civilizations fall into disarray in the face of environmental challenges — a doorstopper that has become a kind of touchstone work for understanding the crisis of climate change today. In The World Until Yesterday, published in 2012, he asked what we can learn from traditional societies; and in his new book, he asks what we can learn from ones more like our own that have faced upheaval but nevertheless endured.

I obviously want to talk about your new book, but I thought it might be useful to start by asking you how you saw it in the context of your life’s work.
Sure. Here’s my answer, and I think you’ll find it banal and more disappointing than what you might have hoped for. People often ask me what’s the relation between your books and the answer is there is none. Really, each book is what I was most interested in and felt most at hand when I finished my previous book.

Well, it may be a narrative that suggests itself to me because I’m thinking of Guns, Germs and Steel, Collapse, and this new one, Upheaval, but for me it’s interesting to note that each of them arrived when they did in a particular cultural, intellectual moment. That begins with Guns, Germs and Steel — it’s obviously a quite nuanced historical survey, but it was also read coming out when it did, as a kind of explanation for Western dominance of the planet …
I would say you’re giving me more credit than I deserve. But one-third of the credit that you give me I do deserve. And that’s for Collapse. Guns, Germs and Steel, I don’t see it as triumphalist at all.

No, I don’t either. I don’t mean to say that. But it met the moment of Western triumphalism in our culture, I think.
The fact is that you and I are speaking English. We’re not speaking Algonquin and there are reasons for that. I don’t see that as a triumph of the English language. I see it as the fact of how history turned out, and that’s what Guns, Germs and Steel is about.
Get unlimited access to Intelligencer and everything else New York.
Learn More »

If you don’t mind dwelling on Collapse for a second … Has your view of these issues changed at all over the intervening years? I mean, when you think about how societies have faced environmental challenges, how adaptable they are and how resilient they might be, do you find yourself having the same views that you had a decade and a half ago?
Yes. My views are the same because I think the story that I saw in 2005, it’s still true today. It still is the case that there are many past societies that destroyed themselves by environmental damage. Since I wrote the book, more cases have come out. There have been studies of the environmental collapse of Cahokia, outside St. Louis. Cahokia was the most populous Native American society in North America. And I when I wrote Collapse it wasn’t known why Cahokia had collapsed, but subsequently we’ve learned that there was a very good study about the role of climate changes and flooding on the Mississippi River in ruining Cahokia. So that book, yes, it was related to what was going on. But the story today, nothing has changed. Past societies have destroyed themselves. In the past 14 years it has not been undone that past societies destroyed themselves.

Today, the risk that we’re facing is not of societies collapsing one by one, but because of globalization, the risk we are facing is of the collapse of the whole world.

How likely do you think that is? That the whole network of civilization would collapse?
I would estimate the chances are about 49 percent that the world as we know it will collapse by about 2050. I’ll be dead by then but my kids will be, what? Sixty-three years old in 2050. So this is a subject of much practical interest to me. At the rate we’re going now, resources that are essential for complex societies are being managed unsustainably. Fisheries around the world, most fisheries are being managed unsustainably, and they’re getting depleted. Farms around the world, most farms are being managed unsustainably. Soil, topsoil around the world. Fresh water around the world is being managed unsustainably. With all these things, at the rate we’re going now, we can carry on with our present unsustainable use for a few decades, and by around 2050 we won’t be able to continue it any longer. Which means that by 2050 either we’ve figured out a sustainable course, or it’ll be too late.

So let’s talk about that sustainable course. What are the lessons in the new book that might help us adjust our course in that way?
As far as national crises are concerned, the first step is acknowledge — the country has to acknowledge that it’s in a crisis. If the country denies that it’s in a crisis, of course if you deny you’re in a crisis, you’re not going to solve the crisis, number one. In the United States today, lots of Americans don’t acknowledge that we’re in a crisis.

Number two, once you acknowledge that you’re in a crisis, you have to acknowledge that there’s something you can do about it. You have responsibility. If instead you say that the crisis is the fault of somebody else, then you’re not going to make any progress towards solving it. An example today are those, including our political leaders, who say that the problems of the United States are not caused by the United States, but they’re caused by China and Canada and Mexico. But if we say that our problems are caused by other countries, that implies that it’s not up to us to solve our problems. We’re not causing them. So, that’s an obvious second step.

On climate in particular, there seem to be a lot of countervailing impulses on the environmental left — from those who believe the only solution to addressing climate is through individual action to those who are really focused on the villainy of particular corporate interests, the bad behavior of the Republican Party, et cetera. In that context, what does it mean to accept responsibility?
My understanding is that, in contrast to five years ago, the majority of American citizens and voters recognize the reality of climate change. So there is, I’d say, recognition by the American public as a whole that there is quite a change in that we are responsible for it.

Right.
As for what we can do about it, whether to deal with it by individual action, or at a middle scale by corporate action, or at a top scale by government action — all three of those. Individually we can do things. We can buy different sorts of cars. We can do less driving. We can vote for public transport. That’s one thing. There are also corporate interests because I’m on the board of directors for the World Wildlife Fund and I was on the board of Conservation International, and on our boards are leaders of really big companies like Walmart and Coca-Cola are their heads, their CEOs, have been on our boards.

I see that corporations, big corporations, while some of them do horrible things, some of them also are doing wonderful things which don’t make the front page. When there was the Exxon Valdez spill off Alaska, you can bet that made the front page. When Chevron was managing its oil field in Papua New Guinea in a utterly rigorous way, better than any national park I’ve ever been in, that certainly did not make the front page because it wasn’t a good picture.

And then finally the Republican Party, yes. Government has a role. In short, climate change can be addressed at all these levels. Individual, corporation, and the national level.

In the book, when you write about the present day — you talk about climate, you talk about resources, but you also talk about the threat of nuclear war and nuclear weapons. It may be kind of a foolish question to ask, but … how do you rank those threats?
I’m repressing a chuckle because I know how people react when I answer that. Whenever somebody tells me, “How should we prioritize our efforts?” My answer is, “We should not be prioritizing our efforts.” It’s like someone asking me, “Jared, I’m about to get married. What is the most important factor for a happy marriage?” And my response is, “If you’re asking me what is the most important factor for a happy marriage, I’d predict that you’re going to get divorced within a few years.” Because in order to have a happy marriage you’ve got to get 37 things right. And if you get 36 right but you don’t get sex right, or you don’t get money right, or you don’t get your in-laws right, you will get divorced. You got to get lots of things right.

So for the state of the world today, how do we prioritize what’s going on in the world? We have to avoid a nuclear holocaust. If we have a nuclear holocaust, we’re finished, even if we solve climate change. We have to solve climate change because if we don’t solve climate change but we deal with a nuclear holocaust, we’re finished. If we solve climate change and don’t have a nuclear holocaust but we continue with unsustainable resource use, we’re finished. And if we deal with the nuclear problem and climate change and sustainable use, but we maintain or increase inequality around the world, we’re finished. So, we can’t prioritize. Just as a couple in a marriage have to agree about sex and children and in-laws and money and religion and politics. We got to solve all four of those problems.

What should we do? Are there lessons from history?
To conduct a happy marriage, it’s not enough to sit back and have a whole listed view of a happy marriage. Instead you need to discuss your budget and your in-laws and 36 other things. As far as the world is concerned, solving national crises, the checklist that I came up with in my book is a checklist of a dozen factors. Now, I could make a longer checklist, or I could make a shorter checklist, but if we have a checklist of three factors it would be obvious we’re missing some big things. And if we had a checklist of 72 factors, then nobody would pick up my book and they wouldn’t pay attention to it.

As an example of one of those factors that the United States is really messing up now, it’s the factor of using other countries as models for solving problems. Just as with personal crises, when someone’s marriage breaks down or is at risk of breaking down, one way of dealing with it is to look at other people who have happy marriages and learn from their model of how to conduct a happy marriage. But the United States today believes what’s called American exceptionalism. That phrase, American exceptionalism means the belief that the United States is unique, exceptional, therefore there’s nothing we can learn from other countries. But we’ve got this neighbor, Canada, which is a democracy sharing our continent and there are other democracies throughout Western Europe in Australia and Japan. All of these democracies face problems that we are not doing well with. All of these democracies have problems with their national health system. And they have problems with education. And they have problems with prisons. And they have problems with balancing individual interests with community interests. But the United States, we too have prisons and we’ve got education and we have a national health system, and we are dissatisfied. Most Americans are dissatisfied with our national health system, and most Americans are increasingly dissatisfied with our educational system.

Other countries face these same problems and other countries do reasonably well, better than the United States in solving these problems. So, one thing that we can learn is to look at other countries as models and disabuse ourselves of the idea that the United States is exceptional and so there’s nothing we can learn from any other country, which is nonsense.

Do you think of this as being a sort of book about the path forward for the U.S.? Or do you think of it as having a broader, global audience?
It is a book about the U.S. plus 215 other countries. The United States is one country in the world, and we’ve got our own problems, which we are struggling with. I came back from Italy and Britain. Britain when I was there was at the peak of Brexit, but Britain is still at the peak of Brexit.

They’re not leaving that behind.
They’re making, I would say, zero progress with Brexit. Italy has its own big problems. Papua New Guinea has its own problems. I’m trying to think what country does not have problems …

It’s hard.
Norway is doing pretty well. What else?

Portugal maybe is doing relatively well.
Which one is that?

Portugal, maybe.
Portugal, maybe. Costa Rica, all things considered. Well, Costa Rica has problems because I think all four of Costa Rica’s last four presidents are in jail at the moment. That’s a significant problem.

If there’s hardly a nation in the world that seems to be a good model, a thriving example for other nations of the world to follow behind, how much faith does that give you that we can find our way to a kind of sustainable, prosperous, and fulfilling future?
That’s an interesting question. If I had stopped the book on the chapter about the world without writing the last six pages, it would have been a pessimistic chapter, because at that point I thought the world does not have a track record of solving difficult problems. The U.N., well bless it, but the U.N. isn’t sufficiently powerful, and therefore I feel pessimistic about our chances of solving big world problems.

But then, fortunately, I learned by talking with friends that the world does have a successful track record in the last 40 years about solving really complex, thorny problems. For example, the coastal economics. So many countries have overlapping coastal economic zones. What a horrible challenge that was to get all the countries in the world to agree with delineating their coastal economic zones. But it worked. They’re delineated.

Or smallpox. To eliminate smallpox it had to be eliminated in every country. That included eliminating it in Ethiopia and Somalia. Boy, was it difficult to eliminate smallpox in Somalia, but it was eliminated.

I wonder if I could ask you about California in particular. It’s interesting to me in the sense that when I look at the example of California, I see a lot of reasons for hope in the sense that there’s quite focused attention on climate and resources used there — probably more sustained interested in those subjects than there really is anywhere else in the U.S. And it has policy that’s, by any metric, I think more progressive than the relevant policies elsewhere in the U.S.

And yet, it’s also a state that — maybe it’s an unfortunate phrase — by accident of geography is also facing some of the most intense pressures and dealing with the most intense impacts already, from water issues to wildfire and all the rest of it. As a Californian who’s informed by these concerns looking at the future and thinking about the future, how does the future of California look to you?
California has problems like every other place in the world. But California makes me optimistic. It does have the environmental problems but nevertheless we have, I would say, one of the best state governments, if not the best state government in the United States. And relatively educated citizens. And we have the best system of public education, of public higher education in the United States. Although, I, at the University of California, know very well that we are screaming at the legislature for more money. So we have problems but we’re giving me hope at how we’re dealing with those problems.

I’m a native New Yorker and lived my whole life in this environment on the East Coast. And when I see images of those wildfires and when I hear stories of people I know or people I meet, and the fact that they’ve evacuated, the fact that no matter where you are in Southern California, also in parts of Central California and Northern California, you have an evacuation plan in mind. I just don’t understand how you guys can live like that. It must begin to impose some kind of psychic cost.
Well, I understand psychic costs and I understand getting my head around it because I was born and grew up in Boston. The last straw for me was that in Boston I sang in the Handel and Haydn Society chorus, and we were going to perform in Boston Symphony Hall the last week in May and our concert was canceled by a snowstorm that closed Boston down. And for me that was the last straw. I do not want to live in a city where a concert in Symphony Hall is going to get closed down in the last week of May by a snowstorm.

That’s just one event, but the fact is that Boston is and was miserable for five months of the year in the winter and then it’s nice for two weeks in the spring and then it’s miserable for four months in the summer, then it’s nice for a few weeks in the fall. Similarly with New York. So when I moved here, my reaction is, “Yes, we have the fires and we have the earthquakes and we have the mudslide and we have the risk of flooding. But, thank God for all those things because they saved me from the psychic costs of living in the Northeast.”
More From Life After Warming

    The Green New Deal Isn’t Enough. But Democrats Should Embrace It Anyway.
    The Cautious Case for Climate Optimism (From a Climate Alarmist)
    Parenting the Climate Change Generation

See All
Tags:

    life after warming jared diamond upheaval environment More

72Comments
Promoted links by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
More To Explore
Why Everybody in Ghana is S…EchoBeat
People In Ghana Can’t Believ…WiFi Booster
The App That’s Teaching Mill…Babbel
5/11/2019 obstruction of justice
White House Tried and Failed to Get McGahn to Say Trump Didn’t Obstruct Justice
By Chas Danner
The former White House counsel has declined multiple requests to back the president’s version of events.
5/11/2019 just asking questions
Talking to the Law Student With a Novel Theory About Amazon’s Power
By Benjamin Hart
Shaoul Sussman thinks the company may be breaking antitrust laws in a subtle but damaging way.
5/11/2019

Assad’s war on Syria

As Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad, closes in on victory over an eight-year revolt, a secret, industrial-scale system of arbitrary arrests and torture prisons has been pivotal to his success. While the Syrian military, backed by Russia and Iran, fought armed rebels for territory, the government waged a ruthless war on civilians, throwing hundreds of thousands into filthy dungeons where thousands were tortured and killed.


Nearly 128,000 have never emerged, and are presumed to be either dead or still in custody, according to the Syrian Network for Human Rights, an independent monitoring group that keeps the most rigorous tally. Nearly 14,000 were “killed under torture.” Many prisoners die from conditions so dire that a United Nations investigation labeled the process “extermination.”


Now, even as the war winds down, the world’s attention fades and countries start to normalize relations with Syria, the pace of new arrests, torture and execution is increasing. The numbers peaked in the conflict’s bloodiest early years, but last year the Syrian Network recorded 5,607 new arrests that it classifies as arbitrary — more than 100 per week and nearly 25 percent more than the year before.


Detainees have recently smuggled out warnings that hundreds are being sent to an execution site, Saydnaya Prison, and newly released prisoners report that killings there are accelerating.
Inside Syria’s Secret Torture Prisons: How Assad Crushed Dissent
—The New York Times
Most Popular

    There’s a 49 Percent Chance the World As We Know It Will End by 2050
    By David Wallace-Wells
    David Brooks Has Done the David Brooks Thing Again
    By Jonathan Chait
    Andrew Sullivan: Who Should Be Allowed to Compete in Women’s Sports?
    By Andrew Sullivan
    Trump Is Pressuring Ukraine to Smear Clinton and Biden
    By Jonathan Chait
    Here’s Why Airplane Boarding Got So Ridiculous
    By Josh Barro

5/11/2019

Nothing punctuates a constitutional crisis like coopting the celebration of America’s founding

President Trump has effectively taken charge of the nation’s premier Fourth of July celebration in Washington, moving the gargantuan fireworks display from its usual spot on the Mall to be closer to the Potomac River and making tentative plans to address the nation from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, according to top administration officials. …


The new event, to be called “A Salute to America,” will shift the fireworks launch to West Potomac Park, less than a mile southwest of its usual location near the Washington Monument. In addition to a possible address by Trump, the location may feature a second stage of entertainment apart from the performers at the Capitol, officials said.


The revised Independence Day celebration is the culmination of two years of attempts by Trump to create a major patriotic event centered on him and his supporters, including failed efforts to mount a military parade modeled on the Bastille Day celebration in France.
Trump takes over Fourth of July celebration, changing its location and inserting himself into the program
—The Washington Post
5/11/2019

Climbing down from the counter

A new Monmouth University poll of likely 2020 New Hampshire Democratic primary voters has former vice president Joe Biden leading the pack with 36% and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders in second place with 18%. Former Texas US representative Beto O’Rourke was tied for sixth place with 2%. …


[Beto is also] running sixth in Google searches over the last 30 days behind Biden, Sanders, South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, California Sen. Kamala Harris and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. His fundraising has slowed, reports say. Indeed, his fundraising may not have been as strong as initially thought. Some of the money he raised on day one could only be used for the general election. His average daily fundraising haul was considerably less than Sanders in the March days following day one of his campaign.


You can see O’Rourke’s struggles most clearly in the polls. In an average of national polls taken since Biden entered the race, O’Rourke has fallen to just below 5% support. That’s the lowest he has been since at least December.


But it’s not just that O’Rourke has seen his numbers decline nationally – it’s that his polls look even worse in the early caucus and primary states. I could not find a single poll in Iowa, New Hampshire or South Carolina conducted after Biden entered in which O’Rourke polled above 3%. These, of course, are the states that O’Rourke has been visiting over and over again throughout the last few months. It apparently hasn’t done any good.
Beto O'Rourke is polling worse than ever
—CNN’s Harry Enten
5/10/2019 politics
House Democrats Subpoena Trump’s Tax Returns
By Ed Kilgore
It’s another step toward a conflict in the courts between Congress and Trump — and perhaps impeachment.
5/10/2019 impeachment
Does Congress Need Impeachment Hearings to Investigate Trump?
By Ed Kilgore
An argument for impeachment that’s gaining strength: It’s the only way to force the release of information central to congressional investigations.
5/10/2019

The transit union is getting restless about the MTA’s crackdown on overtime

“The company brought this problem upon themselves and now they’re trying to blame the workers,” John Samuelsen, international president of the Transport Workers Union, told THE CITY on Thursday. “If they don’t want us to work overtime, then hire a few thousand [more] workers and the overtime will disappear.”


Clock Ticking On MTA Overtime Glut as Union Sours on Governor
—The City
5/10/2019 vision 2020
At This Point in the 2016 Election Cycle, Trump Hadn’t Even Entered the Race Yet
By Ed Kilgore
Trump thinks Biden and Bernie have the 2020 Democratic race well in hand. He should know better from his own experience.
5/10/2019

Trends in American baby names
The # of U.S. children born in 2018 who have Game of Thrones character names, per new @SocialSecurity data:
Arya 2545
Tyrion 58
Brienne 33
Jorah 30
Sansa 29
Catelyn 21
Ellaria 17
Oberyn 15
Theon 14
Gregor 11
Sandor 10
Khal 9
Daenarys 8
Bran 8
Beric 8
Bronn 7
Samwell 7
Myrcella 6
—@joemurph
5/10/2019

Is capitalism broken? Can it be fixed?
How to fix capitalism: nine expert solutions for America's broken system
—The Guardian
5/10/2019

The Pentagon finds another $1.5 billion under the couch cushions for Trump’s wall

“I won’t be reprogramming any more money for the border wall,” [acting defense secretary] Shanahan said. “There was a billion and a half dollars that was reprogrammed, some of it did come from money we are underrunning or saving or whatever terminology you want to use from Afghanistan. But we have very smart people here in the department and we found ways to do this without having any impact on readiness.”
Pentagon diverts another $1.5 billion for Trump's border wall
—CNN
5/10/2019

Wow, President Putin must be really good at hockey
Russian President Vladimir Putin took a fall as he waved to the crowd during an ice-hockey game in Sochi. He scored eight goals during the exhibition match in what has become a yearly tradition. https://t.co/x0mN62qQoY pic.twitter.com/l6XCRrwsIB
—@ABC
5/10/2019 mueller time
Will Robert Mueller Testify? Everything We Know
By Adam K. Raymond
Democrats want him to testify. Trump doesn’t. Who will win?
5/10/2019

Mr. Musk, please stop
if dogs could talk - and we cannot stress this enough - they would tell you to drive a Tesla
—@Tesla
5/10/2019 the national interest
David Brooks Has Done the David Brooks Thing Again
By Jonathan Chait
“Trump is far from the only villain in this showdown”: the Brooks worldview in a sentence.
5/10/2019

Adjust your schedule accordingly

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y) said Friday that special counsel Robert Mueller will not be testifying before his panel next week.


Nadler told reporters that the committee is still negotiating over his testimony with the Justice Department and Mueller but expects the special counsel to appear.


“It won’t be next week. We’re negotiating now,” Nadler said. “We’re talking with him and the Justice Department.”
Nadler says Mueller will not testify next week
—The Hill
5/10/2019

Dealmaker-in-chief

Trade talks between China and the United States ended on Friday without a deal as President Trump raised tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports and signaled he was prepared for a prolonged economic fight.


Mr. Trump, who just weeks ago was predicting a signing ceremony for an “epic” trade deal with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, reclaimed his familiar stance of threatening China and insisting his aggressive approach would help the American economy. In a flurry of tweets on Friday, Mr. Trump warned that he would tax nearly all of China’s imports if Beijing continued to backtrack on a trade deal.


“Tariffs will make our Country MUCH STRONGER, not weaker. Just sit back and watch!” Mr. Trump said on Friday morning, adding that the Chinese “should not renegotiate deals with the U.S. at the last minute.”
Trump Renews Trade War as China Talks End Without a Deal
—New York Times
5/10/2019

Another name for the list

Former FBI general counsel Jim Baker said Friday he’s troubled by obstruction allegations outlined in the Mueller report, explaining that even if there isn’t a possibility of charging President Donald Trump, there still appears to be a “pattern of corruption.”


“It’s troubling to say the least. It’s alarming,” said Baker, now the director of national security and cybersecurity at the R Street Institute. “Even if it doesn’t rise to the level of illegality, it sure looks like a pattern of corruption.”
Ex-FBI general counsel says Trump's obstruction attempts look like a 'pattern of corruption'
—Politico
5/10/2019 vision 2020
Democrats May Need a Big Presidential Win to Flip the Senate in 2020
By Ed Kilgore
With a trend toward straight-ticket voting, the best strategy may be focusing on Trump in close states rather than recruiting ideal Senate candidates.
5/10/2019

It’s like a much less fun version of Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego?
How billionaire Jim Justice spends his time as #WestVirginia governor is mostly a mystery. Schedules recently released to @AP show he’s largely absent at the Statehouse and holds few Cabinet meetings, with much of his time unaccounted for. https://t.co/CM1wBXUNve By @_aizaguirre
—@APSouthRegion
5/10/2019

Another cruel effect of the Trump administration’s war on undocumented immigrants

The Department of Housing and Urban Development acknowledged that a Trump administration plan to purge undocumented immigrants from public housing could displace more than 55,000 children who are all legal U.S. residents or citizens.


The proposed rule, published Friday in the Federal Register, would tighten regulations against undocumented immigrantsaccessing federally subsidized housing to “make certain our scarce public resources help those who are legally entitled to it,” HUD Secretary Ben Carson said last month.


But the agency’s analysis of the rule’s regulatory impact concluded that half of current residents living in households potentially facing eviction and homelessness are children who are legally qualified for aid.
HUD says 55,000 children could be displaced under Trump plan to evict undocumented immigrants
—Washington Post
5/10/2019

Suddenly all the kids want to get into farming
“I love farming, but when you’re going back and forth on 200 to 300 acres, that’s a lot of going back and forth with not a lot of change of scenery.” Farmers are watching Netflix on their tractors. https://t.co/tJaGUr8bUH
—@WSJ
5/10/2019

House Democrats are looking into targeting the bank accounts of Trump associates who ignore subpoenas

Much as I like the visual of [throwing people in jail], I think it’s far more practical to consider levying individual fines on the person — not the office — until they comply. You could fine someone $25,000 a day until they comply. You can do that. We’re looking through the history and studying the law to make sure we’re on solid ground.
—House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff
to Axios
5/10/2019

Don’t bother getting to know any of these a, Trump know where we’ll be a year from now
Looks to me like it’s going to be SleepyCreepy Joe over Crazy Bernie. Everyone else is fading fast!
—@realDonaldTrump
5/10/2019 interesting times
Andrew Sullivan: Who Should Be Allowed to Compete in Women’s Sports?
By Andrew Sullivan
The debate is legitimate and important. But some of the arguments being made in major publications are patently false.
5/10/2019 power
What Would Have Changed If Biden Had Stood Up for Anita Hill?
By Amanda Arnold
“The cultural shift we saw after #MeToo might have began in 1991,” Hill writes in an op-ed, if Biden hadn’t mishandled her hearing.
5/10/2019

Solid logic
Mulvaney: “This is just about trying to embarrass the president.”@MajorCBS: “What’s embarrassing about his tax records?”

MM: “That’s what they want to know.”

MG: “But what is it?”

MM: “I have no idea and I don’t care.“ https://t.co/grKHwN3pBF
—@stevenportnoy
5/10/2019

Not the direction Uber was hoping for
This is not the situation Uber wants. The opening price is indicated below the IPO price.

IPO price: $45
Current opening range indication: $43.50 - $44.50
—@EricNewcomer
5/10/2019

Donald Trump, friend of labor
Breaking: A group of 200+ economists, statisticians and other workers at USDA just voted to unionize. Judging from my interviews, Trump and Sonny Perdue deserve a lot of credit for organizing them https://t.co/pCQ8SZu4Dn
—@jamieson

    Newsletters
    About Us
    Contact
    Media Kit
    We’re Hiring
    Press
    Trademark
    Privacy
    Terms
    Ad Choices

© 2019, New York Media LLC. View all trademarks."

End of culled content from  New Yorker Magazine.