Social Europe/Juan Menéndez-Valdés: EU Social Pillar: A (Potential) New Start For Europe

Social Europe

EU Social Pillar: A (Potential) New Start For Europe

by Juan Menéndez-Valdés on 14 November 2017 @JuanMenendezEF
2 Shares
Share
Tweet


When EU Heads of State and Government gather in Gothenburg this week to debate fair jobs and growth, it will be the first such ‘social summit’ in 20 years. At the heart of the agenda will be the formal proclamation of the European Pillar of Social Rights – 20 principles focused on equal opportunities and access to the labour market, fair working conditions and social protection and inclusion. It is to serve as a ‘compass for a renewed process of convergence towards better working and living conditions among Member States’ taking account of the changing realities of Europe’s societies and the world of work.

So far, so laudable.

But let us remind ourselves where we are. This is a time when the United Kingdom’s somewhat shambolic exit grabs the headlines. When populist and anti-EU sentiment is present in many Member States. And also when many are questioning the benefits of an EU which had at its core the promise that we would all advance together towards better quality of life and work.


Why then, at this critical juncture – as it battles to respond effectively to the complex new economic and political parameters – does the European Union focus on ‘feel-good’ phrases in a pillar of social rights?

The answer surely lies in the increasingly manifest need for a stronger link between economic and social developments. For the EU’s story is in fact that of upward economic and social convergence among the soon-to-be 27 Member States – in a way that sees all benefit.

Its social model has always differentiated Europe from the rest of the world by explicitly trying to balance both economic and social needs. But populist sentiment perceives the EU as inherently unbalanced, as the vanguard for austerity, as facilitating unfettered migration and mobility and as spawning over-zealous regulation in all aspects of life. The ensuing ills of society are placed firmly at the EU’s door. In reality however, the EU’s mandate in social affairs is limited, and both successes and failures result from responsibility shared with Member States.

The economy has indeed been the primary vector of the integration process – from the European Economic Community through to the Single Market and Economic and Monetary Union. The logic was that rising prosperity and the intertwining of European economies would make war ‘not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible.’
Rules-based markets

However, pan-European markets require rules and much of the social and employment legislation in the Union is related to this process of market-building. Ensuring a ‘fair playing field’ has motivated European legislation on health and safety at the workplace and the principle of equal treatment, not least as regards gender, led to legislative initiatives on the work-life balance, on part-time and temporary agency work, among others. Furthermore, the Collective Redundancies Directive and legislation concerning information and consultation of workers provided a framework for structural change. These European laws have contributed to significant upward convergence in social and employment standards – not least among new member countries.

But if market-building legislation has consistently had more impact on economic and social outcomes, cohesion has also played a role. It has become the EU’s main investment policy via the various Structural Funds, and in recent times has accounted for over half of public investment in some countries. There is little doubt that the policy has met considerable success.

However, the strong growth seen from the mid-1990s up to the onset of the recession in 2007 masked the fragility of various aspects of employment and social protection in many Member States. For example, the pre-recession decades saw a large increase in the number of temporary contracts. The crisis then saw them largely wiped out. In some Member States insurance schemes were ill-equipped to provide income support and cut-backs in social protection expenditures weakened safety nets further.
Buttressing Europe’s social dimension

This was the catalyst that placed the current social convergence concept at the centre of European policy discourse. On the one hand, the crisis signalled the interruption of a long-standing process of convergence of real standards of living among the Member States. On the other, the recession challenged the stability of the Euro, casting doubts on the existing system of financial governance. As Greece and other countries affected by fiscal consolidation battled to stay afloat against a background of deteriorating employment and living and working conditions, and as other Member States perceived the increased movement of workers, people and services as a growing threat to their standards of working conditions and social protection, political consensus grew that ‘ever closer’ integration – and the euro’s stability – required a strengthened social dimension.

It was against this background that the European Pillar of Social Rights, after a wide consultation process, emerged from the European Commission this April. The Social Pillar makes it clear that economic and social progress are two sides of the same coin. Without social safety nets people do not take risks. Education and training, and other activation policies, are key ingredients to long-term competitive advantage and social protection plays a vital role in stabilising economies in EMU.

This is the significance of the Proclamation – it represents the inextricably linked political, economic and social integration of a continent. As all countries return to growth, this is surely the time to demonstrate that integration can deliver. The Pillar is a first and essential step towards a new start for social Europe. Its implementation will require action not only at European level, but by Member States, social partners and governments at national and regional level. (It will be discussed in depth at today’s Eurofound’s foundation forum.)

This is the story of the European Union. A new chapter opens in Gothenburg this week. After that, it will be in Paris, Madrid, Prague… that the most important pages are penned.
This column is sponsored by Eurofound.
2 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Email

Filed Under: Columns & Interviews, Politics
About Juan Menéndez-Valdés

Juan Menéndez-Valdés is the Director of Eurofound, the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Prior to assuming the position in 2010, he was the Head of Employment, Immigration, Education and Training Policies at the Spanish Confederation of Employers’ Organisation (CEOE) and Programme Manager for Guidance and Training at the Spanish National Institute for Employment (INEM).
Partner Ads
Most Recent Posts
Juan Menéndez-Valdés
EU Social Pillar: A (Potential) New Start For Europe
Juan Menéndez-Valdés
Jean Pisani-Ferry
Germany’s Dangerous Obsession
Jean Pisani-Ferry
Costas Lapavitsas
Reshaping Sovereignty In Catalonia And Spain: A Task For The Left
Costas Lapavitsas
Hilmar Þór Hilmarsson
Baltic Austerity And Euro Area Contagion
Hilmar Þór Hilmarsson
Harassment Is Breaking Twitter’s Free Speech Experiment
Vox Media
Most Popular Posts
Bill Mitchell
Everything You Know About Neoliberalism Is Wrong
William Mitchell and Thomas Fazi
Paul De Grauwe
Catalonia And Brexit: The Same Nationalism
Paul De Grauwe
Germany: What Happens Next?
Claus Offe
Jón Baldvin Hannibalsson
What Can We Learn From The Nordic Model?
Jón Baldvin Hannibalsson
The Human Economy: Creating Decent Livelihoods In Digital Capitalism
Marc Saxer
Other Social Europe Publications
Can Neoliberalism Be Saved From Itself?
OP 13: How To Deal With Poland And Hungary
A Chronicle of Crisis: 2011 – 2016
Saving the Euro: Redesigning Euro Area economic governance
Understanding the Populist Revolt
Join The Conversation
We encourage critical discussions about our posts but don't accept personal attacks or hate speech. Due to editor moderation, there might be a delay before your comment appears online. You can also flag inappropriate contributions in the upper right-hand corner of the comments.

ETUI Advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2017

This 2017 edition of Benchmarking working Europe focuses on the question ‘overcoming cleavages across the EU?’. It analyses in four chapters and with the help of 58 visual graphs latest trends and outcomes of European policies in the areas of macro-economics, wages and collective bargaining, labour markets and, last but not least, social dialogue and workers’ participation. The report demonstrates that the European Union is experiencing increasing social divergences and underlines the need for new policies that can generate higher living standards for all, based on fair integration and upwards convergence.

Eurofound Advertisement

Reactivate: Employment opportunities for economically inactive people

Unemployment in the EU continues to fall, however more than one in four of the EU’s working-age population are economically inactive; meaning they are not working and are either not seeking work or are not available for work. Furthermore, the vast majority of economically inactive people would like to work in some form. Eurofound’s new publication Reactivate: Employment opportunities for economically inactive people looks in detail at what could be Europe’s most important economic resource.

Social Europe Edition Book


Zygmunt Bauman was a towering intellectual who saw and analysed – right up to his death in early 2017 – the great socio-political changes, often convulsive, in modern western society long before his peers. Here we highlight his prescient insights into what he dubbed ‘liquid modernity’ with 24 chapters on topics ranging from online loneliness via precarity/poverty/inequality to migration, fear of the ‘Other’ and the decline of the nation state. Chronicle of Crisis, 2011-16, written by one of the great chroniclers of our times, will be read and re-read for decades and more to come.

MORE INFO

Bertelsmann Stiftung Advertisement

Mixed Migration

The mixing of forced and economic migration, the so-called mixed migration flows, represents a tricky policy-issue. Many (economic) migrants are trying to receive a residence permit in a destination country by filing an (often hopeless) asylum application. One consequence is an additional burden for asylum systems in host countries. This study captures the dynamics of mixed migration with the available data and offers policy recommendations to improve mechanisms for handling the phenomenon. Click here for a video summarizing the findings.

New Social Europe Book


There is increasing evidence of widespread disillusion with the major shift to neoliberal economic policies that has taken place across much of the world. In this account of neoliberalism’s failings, Colin Crouch recognises some of its positive contributions but also notes conflicts within the neoliberal camp – particularly those between ‘market’ and ‘corporate’ forms of the strategy. Finally, he considers to what extent those behind the great experiment are now capable of accepting its reform.


CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO

Social Europe

    Editorial Team & Advisory Board
    Article Submission
    Copyright, Disclaimer & Contact

RSS Feeds
All Content
Columns & Interviews
Blogs
Talks & Events
Search Social Europe
© Social Europe 2017