The San Francisco Examiner
Monday March 26, 2018
Breaking News > Nation & World > California News
California courts paid $500,000 to resolve sex harassment suits against judges and employees
By Tribune News Service on March 24, 2018 1:00 pm
SAN FRANCISCO — California’s court system paid more than $500,000 over seven years to resolve sexual harassment complaints against judges and staff, according to records released Friday.
In response to a public records request, the Judicial Council, the rulemaking body for the court system, said it paid $296,000 to resolve three sexual harassment complaints against judges and $225,000 to settle two lawsuits against court staff.
In addition, the council reported spending $79,750 since 2010 for outside attorney-investigators to look into sexual harassment allegations or other complaints against five judges.
The Judicial Council’s brief response to records request, citing attorney-client privilege and a court rule, did not reveal the names of the courts, judges or employees alleged to have been involved in the sexual harassment.
The response came from the council’s legal services division.
“Your request raises complicated legal and ethical issues, including attorney-client privilege and other legal and ethical obligations,” the response said.
It added that the council was contacting the courts and individuals it represented to determine whether they would waive their privilege to allow the legal records to be released.
In contrast, the California Legislature last month disclosed 18 cases of sexual harassment involving lawmakers and staff, and identified the names of the legislators involved.
The legislative records, released in response to a separate public records request, disclosed details about resolved cases where the allegations were determined to be well-founded.
The more than $500,000 that the Judicial Council reported spending is likely less than the actual cost to taxpayers of resolving sexual harassment complaints against judges and staff.
County courts can resolve such cases themselves without reporting to the statewide council.
One of the settlements paid by the Judicial Council stemmed from a lawsuit against former Tulare County Superior Court Judge Valeriano Saucedo.
He was ordered removed from the bench in late 2015 for inappropriate behavior with his court clerk, who sued him.
Kevin J. Little, who represented Priscilla Tovar, Saucedo’s clerk, said Friday that the terms of the settlement in Tovar’s suit prevented him from disclosing anything about what she might have collected. The suit charged Saucedo with making inappropriate and unwanted sexual overtures.
The Commission on Judicial Performance, the watchdog agency for judges, called for Saucedo’s removal after finding that he pressed his clerk to be his “special friend,” gave her $26,000 in gifts and cash and lied about his behavior to investigators.
The Courthouse News Service also reported that the state paid $100,000 to settle a federal lawsuit brought against Lassen County Superior Court Judge Tony R. Mallery.
A Lassen County court executive had charged Mallery with screaming and yelling at female employees and hugging a defendant in open court.
Neither Mallery nor the court admitted wrongdoing in the settlement.
In December, court officials confirmed that Presiding Justice Conrad Rushing of the San Jose-based Court of Appeal faced allegations of bigotry, sexual harassment and discrimination against women when he retired last year.
Click here or scroll down to comment
Trending Articles
A picture worth a thousand bad words
Small Sites program a major asset to SF housing
SFO terminal to be renamed in honor of Harvey Milk
Genuine solutions for San Francisco’s pension crisis
SF State serves rent increases, eviction notices to faculty and student residents
©2018 The San Francisco Examiner
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment