Friday, 23 March 2018

The Conversation/Bavesh Kana: We’ve come up with a TB test that’s cheaper, quicker and more accurate

The ConversationEdition:

Available editions
Africa

    Job Board

    Become an author
    Sign up as a reader
    Sign in

The Conversation
Academic rigour, journalistic flair

    Arts + Culture
    Business + Economy
    Education
    Environment + Energy
    Health + Medicine
    Politics + Society
    Science + Technology
    In French

We’ve come up with a TB test that’s cheaper, quicker and more accurate
March 22, 2018 5.27pm SAST
Shutterstock.
Author

    Bavesh Kana

    Head of the Centre of Excellence for Biomedical TB Research, University of the Witwatersrand

Disclosure statement

Bavesh Kana receives/received funding from the South African National Research Foundation, South African Medical Research Council, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the US National Institutes of Health.
Partners

University of the Witwatersrand

University of the Witwatersrand provides support as a hosting partner of The Conversation AFRICA.

The Conversation is funded by Barclays Africa and seven universities, including the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Rhodes University and the Universities of Cape Town, Johannesburg, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pretoria, and South Africa. It is hosted by the Universities of the Witwatersrand and Western Cape, the African Population and Health Research Centre and the Nigerian Academy of Science. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Strategic Partner. more
Republish this article

Republish
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.

    Email
    Twitter6
    Facebook5
    LinkedIn
    Print

Tuberculosis (TB) is a disease that kills more people due to a bacterial infection than any other disease in the world.

In 2016, the World Health Organisation reported over 10 million new infections and 1.7 million deaths. In South Africa, TB remains one of the leading causes of death.

Countries with high TB burdens are tackling the problem in two ways: with the BCG vaccine – the most widely administered vaccine in human history – and a chemotherapeutic regimen. Nevertheless, there are still multiple obstacles to getting the disease under control.

To make major strides, the world needs better interventions, vaccines and ways of diagnosing TB. In addition, new drugs are needed to tackle drug resistant strains and reduce treatment duration.

Extensive effort has been put into improving diagnostics. This makes sense for two reasons: diagnosing people earlier and faster means they get onto treatment earlier, and it reduces the risk of transmission.

There are three ways in which TB is diagnosed: through a sputum smear test; by growing bacteria in a lab through a process known as culturing; and by using molecular diagnostics to detect DNA components of the bacteria.

But each has limitations preventing them from being scaled up. We set about bridging this gap.

In our study we’ve identified a way to speed up the age-old sputum smear test by using an invisible ink that lights up when it comes in contact with the TB bacteria. The ink significantly reduces the processing time to get a positive reading on a test. It’s also inexpensive which means our new method paves the way to introducing a test in communities where dozens of diagnostic tests need to be administered each day.
Limitations to existing tests

The current range of TB diagnostic tests have various limitations.

For example, the sputum smear is 100 years old. It’s outdated, clumsy and takes long to process. It’s also not very accurate because each sputum sample must contain more than 10 000 bacteria for an accurate test. This means it doesn’t work with patients who have a low number of bacteria.

The challenge is that people with an HIV and TB co-infection have significantly lower levels of bacteria because HIV remodels the way the disease occurs in the lung.

Diagnosing TB in this cohort of people is problematic, particularly in countries like South Africa with the highest HIV and TB co-infection rate in the world.
A sputum smear after dye has been added and it has been washed. Shutterstock

Another limitation with smear methods are that they can’t distinguish between living and dead bacteria – making it hard to tell if a person is responding well to treatment.

One of the other methods, culturing, also has serious limitations. For one, it’s a lengthy process. Culturing TB in a laboratory can take up to 42 days because TB is a slow growing organism. This is problematic for treatment and care because it is easy to lose people from the health care system during this time.

Culturing is also difficult in situations where resources are stretched. This means it can’t be scaled up and implemented in a community setting.

Finally, there’s the molecular diagnostics test. One such test is the GeneXpert which is being rolled out in South Africa. But its challenge is that it’s expensive and it can’t tell the difference between living and dead organisms.
Invisible ink

Our study focused on ways to improve the sputum smear test because it can be scaled up and implemented in communities.

To improve it, we decided to target a specific part of the TB bacteria – its cell wall. This protects the bacteria from the immune system in the body.

TB bacteria are rod shaped. Similarly to a capsule, the bacterial cell wall forms a protective coat that covers the bacteria. It is incredibly complex. It is thick and has many layers and is the reason why TB treatment takes a long time to take effect: drugs need to penetrate the wall.

But the defence wall in fact delivered the solution we’ve pioneered. It is built with mycolic acids, which is made of a chemical molecule (trehalose) unique to the TB bacteria family. As part of our study, the chemical molecule was fused with another chemical (a fluorophore) to create a stain that’s naturally fluorescent and changes colour (known as solvatochromic). The combination is called DMN-trehalose.

The DMN-trehalose is the brainchild of Dr Carolyn Bertozzi at Stanford University in the US whose lab conceived the idea and generated DMN-trehalose before bringing it to South Africa for tests in clinical samples.

The beauty of DMN-trehalose is that it colourless when it’s outside a TB bacteria. But as soon as it is in the presence of TB-infected sputum, TB bacteria immediately internalise it. Once the DMN-trehalose is inside the bacterial cell, it gets built into the cell wall and lights up the organism.

The advantage of our method is that it promises to reduce the processing time and complexity of the smear test. Another advantage is that it is very specific to TB because trehalose is only found in the TB bacteria family.

Lastly, the DMN-trehalose will only stain living bacteria, meaning it’s possible to tell whether treatment is working or not.
Next steps

Now that our study has shown proof of principle, it’s being tested in a pilot study at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg.

The pilot will take one year and will look at both the sputum smears and oral swabs to assess how well DMN-trehalose works. It will assess sputum samples from people before treatment to establish if accurate diagnosis is possible, and after completing treatment to see if the regimes worked.

The pilot will help us compare it to the current staining method in sputum smear tests. If it produces similar results, the new test could become the preferred method because it requires less processing.

Effective, cheap and scalable diagnostics are urgently required for TB. For this, the new DMN-trehalose stain has great promise. It’s also an excellent research tool to help understand TB transmission and how TB bacteria remodels their cell walls during TB disease.

    Tuberculosis
    TB

    Tweet
    Share
    Get newsletter

You might also like
How to help people with tuberculosis avoid the medical poverty trap
Explainer: How we all benefit from the public health system
Why aren’t we curing the world’s most curable diseases?
Hope rises for a world free of TB
Sign in to comment
2 Comments
Oldest Newest

    Thomas Johnson

    The sputum TB test is rather crude. It seems strange that with advanced diagnostic tools available, it’s still being used. I know a TB sufferer whose sputum test was negative and cleared of TB. Because of this, other symptoms like weight loss, lethargy and night sweats were attributed to something else that was not diagnosed. The patient later developed full-blown TB (coughing up blood), and blamed the pulmonologist who performed the sputum test for getting the diagnosis wrong. A good thing for all concerned it wasn’t the drug-resistant strain.

    As you say, surely doctors cannot still be relying on an inaccurate 100-year-old test. That’s like using steam power to drive our machines today.

    I heard there was a new, relatively simple TB test but thought it was already being used. Anyway, I’m glad it has reached pilot stage. Good luck.
    an hour ago
    Report
    Jon Richfield

    logged in via Facebook

    Congratulations, but as it stands the article does not clearly deal with:

        For example, the sputum smear is … not very accurate because each sputum sample must contain more than 10 000 bacteria for an accurate test. This means it doesn’t work with patients who have a low number of bacteria. 
        The challenge is that people with an HIV and TB co-infection have significantly lower levels of bacteria because HIV remodels the way the disease occurs in the lung.

    How does the new sputum test reduce these difficulties?
    19 minutes ago
    Report

Most popular on The Conversation

    How we recreated a lost African city with laser technology
    Three major mistakes Tiger Brands made in response to the listeriosis crisis
    How investigative journalists helped turn the tide against corruption in South Africa
    How an Ethiopia-backed port is changing power dynamics in the Horn of Africa
    Why the state of emergency in Ethiopia could destabilise the Horn of Africa

    Kenya is paying a heavy human and financial cost for unsafe abortions
    What led to world’s worst listeriosis outbreak in South Africa
    Explainer: what happens when a bank is put into curatorship
    Black people beware: don’t let Black Panther joy mask Hollywood’s racism
    Zuma trial means that his toxic legacy will haunt South Africa for some time

Expert Database

    Find experts with knowledge in:*

Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 64,500 academics and researchers from 2,284 institutions.

Register now
The Conversation
Community

    Community standards
    Republishing guidelines
    Research and Expert Database
    Analytics
    Job Board
    Our feeds

Company

    Who we are
    Our charter
    Our team
    Partners and funders
    Contributing institutions
    Resource for media
    Contact us

Stay informed and subscribe to our free daily newsletter and get the latest analysis and commentary directly in your inbox.
Email address
Follow us on social media

Privacy policy Terms and conditions Corrections

Copyright © 2010–2018, The Conversation Africa, Inc.

No comments: