The Conversation/Anton Harber: How investigative journalists helped turn the tide against corruption in South Africa

The Conversation   

Edition:

Available editions
Africa

    Job Board

    Become an author
    Sign up as a reader
    Sign in

The Conversation
Academic rigour, journalistic flair

    Arts + Culture
    Business + Economy
    Education
    Environment + Energy
    Health + Medicine
    Politics + Society
    Science + Technology
    In French

How investigative journalists helped turn the tide against corruption in South Africa
March 15, 2018 1.44pm SAST
Author

    Anton Harber

    Caxton Professor of Journalism, University of the Witwatersrand

Disclosure statement

Anton Harber chairs the Judging Panel for the Taco Kuiper Awards, funded by the Valley Trust, who also are also funding partners in the Taco Kuiper Chair in Investigative Reporting, the Taco Kuiper Grants and the African Investigative Journalism Conference (AIJC).
Partners

University of the Witwatersrand

University of the Witwatersrand provides support as a hosting partner of The Conversation AFRICA.

The Conversation is funded by Barclays Africa and seven universities, including the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Rhodes University and the Universities of Cape Town, Johannesburg, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pretoria, and South Africa. It is hosted by the Universities of the Witwatersrand and Western Cape, the African Population and Health Research Centre and the Nigerian Academy of Science. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Strategic Partner. more
Republish this article

Republish
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.
Journalists quiz former South African president Jacob Zuma. Relentless pressure led to his resignation. EPA-EFE/Kim Ludbrook

    Email
    Twitter3
    Facebook12
    LinkedIn
    Print

Every year South African investigative journalists are recognised for their hard work when the winners of the Taco Kuiper Award for Investigative Journalism are announced. This year has provided a chance to assess the highs and the lows of our investigative reporting after an extraordinary year.

For the last few years, it seemed that the country was facing an impervious culture of impunity. Many state institutions of accountability faltered, and corruption appeared to be undermining democracy and destroying the economy. But small groups of investigative journalists beavered away. They pieced together the elements of what grew into a remarkable story of a systematic attempt to control the machinery of state for personal gain – what has become known as state capture.

For some time it had been a back-and-forth of allegation and counter-allegation, charge and denial. But in the last few months things turned around with the emergence of a trove of leaked emails. These provided the hard evidence of the depth and breadth of the attempt to take control of elements of the state. Teams of journalists did meticulous and highly skilled work to mine the emails and weave together a full picture.

South Africa now appears to have started – only started, as there is a long way to go – the process of forcing accountability and transparency on those who were responsible, and can appreciate how central journalists have been to this apparent turnaround.

I know of only a few times in the history of a nation when journalists have played such a clear and crucial role in bringing a country back from the brink. South Africa’s journalists were not alone in this. They worked side-by-side with civil society and the judiciary in particular. But never has it been clearer how important a free press, skilled investigative reporters and the support of brave editors is to a democracy, its economy and the people who live in it.
Important trends

Some important trends can be seen from this year’s Taco Kuiper Awards.

The major one was how much of this work has become collaborative. The collaboration has not only been in the form of teams of people working together. What’s different is that the teams have cut across media outlets and types. This is an international pattern, as the scale and complexity of large investigative stories are often too much for one journalist or even one newsroom to handle.

What’s also notable about the South African experience is that journalists from different newsrooms didn’t just cooperate, but helped, promoted and protected each other.

Print and online journalists led the charge with the power of the broadcast media only occasionally being brought to bear. And most of the best work was done with the support of philanthropists and foundations, rather than in commercial newsrooms. This is a major signal of where South Africa’s journalism is headed.

Interesting too is that although there was one big story, there was also a remarkable array of other investigative work. A science writer used mortality data to expose the problem that one in 10 bodies in the country’s mortuaries are unclaimed and get pauper’ burials. Another used sophisticated tools to uncover who lay behind fake news websites. And one journalist went in search of former mineworkers who could not be found to give them their pensions. He showed that they were easily found, and their lives would be radically changed by getting the money owed to them.

This is work that changed the lives of ordinary people.
Rise in harassment

The last year also saw a rise in the intimidation and harassment of journalists in the country. This included violent attacks on reporters at work, threats to those covering contentious issues and the “weaponisation” of social media – the use of robots and fake news to target critical journalists.

Thuggish protesters threatened an editor in his home, and disrupted a public meeting of journalists. Fake news perpetrators targeted editors, and for the first time that I know of journalists took out a restraining order against organisations and individuals that were responsible for some of this activity. Veteran muckraker Jacques Pauw was pursued by authorities who wanted to stop him publishing and get his sources.

The other negative trend was that a few news outlets were accused of promoting or supporting state capture, where journalists allowed themselves to be used by those who wanted to cover up what they were doing. This drives home, the award judges said:

    the need for vigilance and the utmost professionalism to ensure that journalists build trust and credibility and serve the public interest – rather than narrow, personal or factional interests.

Anton Harber is convenor of judges in the Taco Kuiper Awards, hosted by Wits Journalism with the Valley Trust.

    Social media
    Corruption
    Media freedom
    Trust
    Press Freedom
    South African politics
    Investigative journalism
    State capture
    World Press Freedom Day
    Fake news
    #Guptaleaks

    Tweet
    Share
    Get newsletter

You might also like
Europe’s chance to fight ‘fake news’ with soft power
Survey of young people in east Africa shows their values mirror those of adults
Looking for truth in the Facebook age? Seek out views you aren’t going to ‘like’
Technology and regulation must work in concert to combat hate speech online
Sign in to comment
4 Comments
Oldest Newest

    Andrew Slaughter

    Visiting professor, University of Saskatchewan

    It is obvious that particular media organisations follow a liberal or conservative political agenda, and therefore their reporting is often blatantly biased. The obvious international examples include Fox, CNN, BBC and Daily Mail. Media groups in South Africa also seem very biased towards a particular political view, and one newspaper, namely the New Age, is only good for mopping up spills on the floor. My impression is that much of the general public does not trust journalism anymore.
    17 hours ago
    Report
        Anton Harber

        Caxton Professor of Journalism, University of the Witwatersrand
        In reply to Andrew Slaughter

        There is much to criticise in our media, but thankfully we have pockets of excellence, particularly when it comes to investigative work. As I noted, it is significant that most of these are in funded operations or among freelancers rather than the commercial newsrooms.
        16 hours ago
        Report

Show all comments
Most popular on The Conversation

    Survey shows Zuma and ANC’s mutual dance to the bottom
    What ‘blackface’ tells us about China’s patronising attitude towards Africa
    South Africa’s land debate is clouded by misrepresentation and lack of data
    African universities are ignoring a rich, invaluable resource: their alumni
    How Kinshasa’s markets are captured by powerful private interests

    What led to world’s worst listeriosis outbreak in South Africa
    Six challenges that impede entrepreneurs with disabilities in South Africa
    Why China’s removal of term limits is a gift to African despots
    Three major mistakes Tiger Brands made in response to the listeriosis crisis
    Black people beware: don’t let Black Panther joy mask Hollywood’s racism

Expert Database

    Find experts with knowledge in:*

Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 64,200 academics and researchers from 2,278 institutions.

Register now
The Conversation
Community

    Community standards
    Republishing guidelines
    Research and Expert Database
    Analytics
    Job Board
    Our feeds

Company

    Who we are
    Our charter
    Our team
    Partners and funders
    Contributing institutions
    Resource for media
    Contact us

Stay informed and subscribe to our free daily newsletter and get the latest analysis and commentary directly in your inbox.
Email address
Follow us on social media

Privacy policy Terms and conditions Corrections

Copyright © 2010–2018, The Conversation Africa, Inc.