The Conversation/John J Stremlau: Three reasons why Africa should treat Tillerson visit with scepticism

The Conversation   

Edition:

Available editions
Africa

    Job Board

    Become an author
    Sign up as a reader
    Sign in

The Conversation
Academic rigour, journalistic flair

    Arts + Culture
    Business + Economy
    Education
    Environment + Energy
    Health + Medicine
    Politics + Society
    Science + Technology
    In French

US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. EPA-EFE/Andre Pain

Three reasons why Africa should treat Tillerson visit with scepticism
March 5, 2018 12.16pm SAST
Author

    John J Stremlau

    2017 Bradlow Fellow at SA Institute of International Affairs, Visiting Professor of International Relations, University of the Witwatersrand

Disclosure statement

John J Stremlau currently receives no funding. His affiliation e is Visiting Professor, International Relations, Wits University, He was the 2017 Bradlow Fellow, South African Institute of International Affairs; 1989-1994 Deputy Director for Policy Planning US State Department. 2006-2015 Vice President in charge of Peace Programs, The Carter Center.
Partners

University of the Witwatersrand

University of the Witwatersrand provides support as a hosting partner of The Conversation AFRICA.

The Conversation is funded by Barclays Africa and seven universities, including the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Rhodes University and the Universities of Cape Town, Johannesburg, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pretoria, and South Africa. It is hosted by the Universities of the Witwatersrand and Western Cape, the African Population and Health Research Centre and the Nigerian Academy of Science. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Strategic Partner. more
Republish this article

Republish
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.

    Email
    Twitter5
    Facebook13
    LinkedIn
    Print

US President Donald Trump promised in late January that his Secretary of State Rex Tillerson would make an “extended” visit to Africa in March. In a letter to all African leaders, he reportedly described the purpose of the visit as reaffirming “the partnerships and values we share with the African Union, member states and citizens across the continent”.

Similar language was used when the US State Department finally announced Tillerson’s March 6-13 trip. Spokesperson Heather Nauert said he would discuss ways

    (the US) can work with our partners to counter terrorism, advance peace and security, promote good governance, and spur mutually beneficial trade and investment.

If true, Tillerson would be covering the same issues that have motivated similar African tours by every US Secretary of State since the end of the Cold War. Typically, these trips have reiterated or augmented long-running bi-partisan US government programmes welcomed by African partners. These have included public health, agricultural development, alternative energy, and trade. The biggest ticket item on trade is the large unilateral concessionary agreement the US Congress has reaffirmed allowing African products preferential access to US markets.

African leaders would be right to note that unless these few partnership agreements are reaffirmed, America’s declining importance and influence on the continent that has accelerated under the Trump presidency, will continue.
Reasons for scepticism

Realistically, Tillerson’s mission will produce few benefits for Africa, or for US-Africa relations. There are three reasons why Africans should view his trip with scepticism.

One is the trip’s limited nature. Geographically it is restricted to the so-called “arc of instability”. Tillerson is visiting just five of Africa’s 54 countries: Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya and Nigeria. Evidently counter terrorism is America’s main Africa concern.

If Trump and Tillerson were seriously interested in issues of trade, public health, and good governance he would have at least included democratic South Africa on his agenda. On 23 February I queried an official involved in planning the trip whether South Africa would be on the final agenda. He said he doubted it because it was still forming a government and making [cabinet] selections.

Instead, Tillerson has prioritised repressive governments and ones under states of emergency.

The second reason that Tillerson can’t be expected to deliver much is that the US hasn’t shown much appetite for diplomatic engagement with Africa since Trump became president. In contrast, the US military is already deeply engaged in the struggle against counter terrorism. And it’s difficult to see what Tillerson can add. To be fair, Defence Secretary Jim Mattiss, is eloquent in endorsing active diplomacy over military means in preventing and resolving conflicts. Yet neither Trump or Tillerson has announced an overarching Africa policy. No Assistant Secretary for Africa has been named, important embassies, including in South Africa, lack ambassadors.

This is in sharp contrast to the US’s active engagement on the military front. Six months ago General Thomas Walhauser, Commander of US Africa Command, outlined a clear policy for this region. It included forging mutually African partnerships, as well as with China, Japan and the European countries. It also included the establishment of military bases in Djibouti and elsewhere.

Finally, Tillerson has no credibility. He has been publicly criticised and even mocked by his commander-in-chief. Rumours persist that he will resign or be fired. And any claims that the government he represents means what it says is undermined by Trump’s own false or misleading statements. He made an astounding 2436 during his first 406 days as president.
The required response

So how might African leaders respond to Tillerson?

African countries set a dignified precedent earlier this year in their expressions of dismay when Trump reportedly compared African countries to dirty toilets. It would be reasonable for the African Union to reiterate its regret and disappointment over America’s declining relevance and importance as a partner in advancing mutual concerns, beyond counter terrorism.

Africans should also remind Tillerson of their appreciation of China’s increasing importance as their leading development partner. He should be made aware of the fact that the US is missing opportunities for mutually beneficial bilateral development cooperation.

In addition, he should be reminded that there’s room for cooperation between Africa, China and the US. In the past three years The Carter Centre in Atlanta has sponsored a project involving African, Chinese, and US military experts and security officials. The project has made progress in identifying areas of trilateral cooperation in the Horn and Lake Chad Basin – troubled areas Tillerson will visit. But so far neither Trump nor Tillerson has shown any signs of engaging China.

Amid the uncertainties of the Trump era other less prominent Africa-US relations may prove to be more vital to protecting and advancing Africa’s interests than traditional US diplomatic channels, including the office of Secretary of State. After all, Tillerson serves a president whose domestic hold on power appears increasingly vulnerable. And it’s worth recalling that since the 1990s Congress has consistently supported expanding economic and political partnerships with Africa. The reason for this is that congressmen have been pressed to do so by African-Americans as well as other sympathetic elements in America’s diverse civil society, business, and philanthropic sectors.

Networks such as these, as well as close ties at state and local government level that stretch throughout Africa may indeed be more important in the long run.

    China
    War on Terror
    Horn of Africa
    Nigeria
    Kenya
    Chad
    African Union
    Donald Trump
    US diplomacy
    China-Africa
    AGOA
    Djibouti
    Rex Tillerson
    Peace and Security
    Ethiopa

    Tweet
    Share
    Get newsletter

You might also like
Florida school shooting: urgency of gun reform calls for dramatic action from young survivors
Economic history shows why Trump’s ‘America First’ tariff policy is so dangerous
America’s allies will bear the brunt of Trump’s trade protectionism
Justin Trudeau’s India debacle shows the pitfalls of ‘nation branding’
Sign in to comment
2 Comments
Oldest Newest

    Andrew Slaughter

    Visiting professor, University of Saskatchewan

    ‘If Trump and Tillerson were seriously interested in issues of trade, public health, and good governance he would have at least included democratic South Africa on his agenda’.

    South Africans overestimate the international importance of South Africa. South Africa is one of the only Sub-Saharan countries (along with Zimbabwe) that has a stagnating economy. The economies of all the other countries are growing rapidly.
    14 hours ago
    Report
        John J Stremlau

        2017 Bradlow Fellow at SA Institute of International Affairs, Visiting Professor of International Relations, University of the Witwatersrand
        In reply to Andrew Slaughter

        Zimbabwe strikes me as a very weak comparison for many reasons, and the point of mentioning SA was to implicitly contrast Trump and Tillerson’s disinterest in good governance.  Ramaphosa’s election was topic of major editorials in Washington Post and other leading media.  Under a different Administration one can easily imagine a prominent USG visit here by now.  Yes the economy stagnated during the Zuma years, but that renders all the more important the AGOA allowance for duty-free imports of SA produced autos, and other products.  I worry more about South Africans underestimating the importance of their Black-led democratic experiment, especially at a time when Trump rose to power denigrating Obama and appealing to not so latent White ethnic nationalism that has impeded American democratic development since the country’s founding.
        13 hours ago
        Report

Most popular on The Conversation

    China’s media struggles to overcome stereotypes of Africa
    Spike in Listeria infections in South Africa: why it matters
    Cape Town’s plans for what happens after Day Zero just won’t work. Here’s why
    After Somali piracy, is sailing the Western Indian Ocean safe again?
    Kenyan study shines new light on chronic myeloid leukaemia

    Electric vehicles are changing the world. And they’re only just getting started
    A tiny beetle and its deadly fungus is threatening South Africa’s trees
    Ramaphosa has chosen a team that will help him assert his authority
    Nudging the city and residents of Cape Town to save water
    Why there may be a silver lining to Ali Bongo’s power grab in Gabon

Expert Database

    Find experts with knowledge in:*

Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 63,600 academics and researchers from 2,274 institutions.

Register now
The Conversation
Community

    Community standards
    Republishing guidelines
    Research and Expert Database
    Analytics
    Job Board
    Our feeds

Company

    Who we are
    Our charter
    Our team
    Partners and funders
    Contributing institutions
    Resource for media
    Contact us

Stay informed and subscribe to our free daily newsletter and get the latest analysis and commentary directly in your inbox.
Email address
Follow us on social media

Privacy policy Terms and conditions Corrections

Copyright © 2010–2018, The Conversation Africa, Inc.