The Conversation/Nicolas Geeraert: How knowledge about different cultures is shaking the foundations of psychology

The Conversation

    Edition:

Available editions
Africa

    Job Board

    Become an author
    Sign up as a reader
    Sign in

The Conversation
Academic rigour, journalistic flair

    Arts + Culture
    Business + Economy
    Education
    Environment + Energy
    Health + Medicine
    Politics + Society
    Science + Technology
    In French

How knowledge about different cultures is shaking the foundations of psychology
March 9, 2018 1.09pm SAST
Holistic thinking, common in Japan, leads to a certain way of memorising. mackwo7/pixabay
Author

    Nicolas Geeraert

    Senior lecturer, University of Essex

Disclosure statement

Nicolas Geeraert has received funding from the ESRC and the British Academy.
Partners

University of Essex

University of Essex provides funding as a member of The Conversation UK.

The Conversation is funded by Barclays Africa and seven universities, including the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Rhodes University and the Universities of Cape Town, Johannesburg, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pretoria, and South Africa. It is hosted by the Universities of the Witwatersrand and Western Cape, the African Population and Health Research Centre and the Nigerian Academy of Science. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Strategic Partner. more
Republish this article

Republish
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.

    Email
    Twitter113
    Facebook2.5k
    LinkedIn
    Print

The academic discipline of psychology was developed largely in North America and Europe. Some would argue it’s been remarkably successful in understanding what drives human behaviour and mental processes, which have long been thought to be universal. But in recent decades some researchers have started questioning this approach, arguing that many psychological phenomena are shaped by the culture we live in.

Clearly, humans are in many ways very similar – we share the same physiology and have the same basic needs, such as nourishment, safety and sexuality. So what effect can culture really have on the fundamental aspects of our psyche, such as perception, cognition and personality? Let’s take a look at the evidence so far.

Experimental psychologists typically study behaviour in a small group of people, with the assumption that this can be generalised to the wider human population. If the population is considered to be homogeneous, then such inferences can indeed be made from a random sample.

However, this isn’t the case. Psychologists have long disproportionately relied on undergraduate students to carry out their studies, simply because they are readily available to researchers at universities. More dramatically still, more than 90% of participants in psychological studies come from countries that are Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, and Democratic (W.E.I.R.D). Clearly, these countries are neither a random sample nor representative for the human population.
Thinking styles

Consider which two of these objects go together: a panda, a monkey and a banana. Respondents from Western countries routinely select the monkey and the panda, because both objects are animals. This is indicative of an analytic thinking style, in which objects are largely perceived independently from their context.

In contrast, participants from Eastern countries will often select the monkey and the banana, because these objects belong in the same environment and share a relationship (monkeys eat bananas). This is a holistic thinking style, in which object and context are perceived to be interrelated.
Holistic thinking is prevalent in Asian cultures, such as India. Biswarup Ganguly/wikipedia, CC BY-SA

In a classic demonstration of cultural differences in thinking styles, participants from Japan and the USA were presented with a series of animated scenes. Lasting about 20 seconds, each scene showed various aquatic creatures, vegetation and rocks in an underwater setting. In a subsequent recall task, both groups of participants were equally likely to remember salient objects, the larger fish. But the Japanese participants were better than American participants at recalling background information, such as the colour of the water. This is because holistic thinking focuses on background and context just as much as foreground.

This clearly demonstrates how cultural differences can affect something as fundamental as memory – any theory describing it should take that into account. Subsequent studies have shown that cultural differences in thinking styles are pervasive in cognition – affecting memory, attention, perception, reasoning and how we talk and think.
The self

If you were asked to describe yourself, what would you say? Would you describe yourself in terms of personal characteristics – being intelligent or funny – or would you use preferences, such as “I love pizza”? Or perhaps you would instead base it on social relationships, such as “I am a parent”? Social psychologists have long maintained that people are much more likely to describe themselves and others in terms of stable personal characteristics.

However, the way people describe themselves seems to be culturally bound. Individuals in the western world are indeed more likely to view themselves as free, autonomous and unique individuals, possessing a set of fixed characteristics. But in many other parts of the world, people describe themselves primarily as a part of different social relationships and strongly connected with others. This is more prevalent in Asia, Africa and Latin America. These differences are pervasive, and have been linked to differences in social relationships, motivation and upbringing.
Zulu people are more likely to think of themselves in terms of social relationships. South African Tourism/Flickr, CC BY-SA

This difference in self-construal has even been demonstrated at the brain level. In a brain-scanning study (fMRI), Chinese and American participants were shown different adjectives and were asked how well these traits represented themselves. They were also asked to think about how well they represented their mother (the mothers were not in the study), while being scanned.

In American participants, there was a clear difference in brain responses between thinking about the self and the mother in the “medial prefrontal cortex”, which is a region of the brain typically associated with self presentations. However, in Chinese participants there was little or no difference between self and mother, suggesting that the self-presentation shared a large overlap with the presentation of the close relative.
Mental health

Another domain that was originally dominated by studies on W.E.I.R.D. samples is mental health. However, culture can affect our understanding of mental health in different ways. Because of the existence of cultural differences in behaviour, the framework – based on detecting deviant or non-normative behaviours – isn’t complete. What may be seen as normal in one culture (modesty) could be seen as deviating from the norm in another (social phobia).

In addition, a number of culture-specific syndromes have been identified. Koro sufferers (mostly in Asia), are men which have the mistaken belief that their genitalia are retracting and will disappear. Hikikomori (mostly Japan) is a condition that describes reclusive individuals who withdraw from social life. Meanwhile, the evil eye syndrome (mostly in Mediterranean countries) is the belief that envy or other forms of malevolent glare will cause misfortune on the receiver.

The existence of such culture-bound syndromes has been acknowledged by both the World Health Organization and the American Psychiatry Association recently, as some of these syndromes have been included their respective classifications of mental illnesses.

Clearly culture has a massive effect on how we view ourselves and how we are perceived by others – we are only just scratching the surface. The field, now known as “cross-cultural psychology”, is increasingly being taught at universities across the world. The question is to what extent it will inform psychology as a discipline going forward – some see it as an extra dimension of it while others view it as an integral and central part of theory making.

With more research, we may well find that cultural differences pervade into even more areas where human behaviour was previously thought of as universal. But only by knowing about these effects will we ever be able to identify the core foundations of the human mind that we all share.

    Psychology
    Memory
    Cultures
    Cognition

    Tweet
    Share
    Get newsletter

You might also like
When can you buy a gun, vote or be sentenced to death? Science suggests US should revise legal age limits
Analysing Stan: what Eminem’s ill-fated fictional superfan can tell us about the brain and mental health
Why some conservatives are blind to climate change
It’s not just sex: why people have affairs, and how to deal with them
Sign in to comment
21 Comments
Oldest Newest

    Tom Bateman

    logged in via Twitter

    Not surprised at this proposition When we accept so many behavioral differences in social mammals such as dogs, why wouldn’t we accept so many incompatible differences between the human societies cultural norms ?I used to believe the virttue flag waving from progressive elites that I must be a raciacist xenophobic white, before reflecting that I was a cultrurist and merely was repulsed by cultures that had unacceptable values and behavioural traits including those from my cultural background such as pedophilia,  fraud, violence and hate
    3 days ago
    Report
    Nino Carlotta

    logged in via Google

    I don’t agree that the academic discipline of psychology has been remarkable successful. At what? A recent analysis found that the majority of psychological research falls well below the basic standards of science. Less than 40% of studies can be reproduced. Most psychologists work in the advertising and marketing areas anyway, manipulating society for the benefit of vested interests and devising how to sell us stuff we don’t need. We would be better off without them. Psychologists have been remarkable unsuccessful in curing any known psychological disorder. CBT is nearly always a co-treatment alongside drugs. In the long term it may be actually harmful. They now embrace Eastern mythology in the form of mindfulness, and “positive psychology” which are both further steps towards losing touch with reality. You just imagine whatever you want to be true is, rather like that Seinfeld episode where they chant “serenity now serenity serenity now”  until they go mad. The world, sadly, is mad, and psychologists are either useless to help or have contributed to it.
    Read more
    3 days ago
    Report

Show all comments
Most popular on The Conversation

    What ‘blackface’ tells us about China’s patronising attitude towards Africa
    Spike in Listeria infections in South Africa: why it matters
    Land debate in South Africa is about dignity and equality - not the constitution
    South Africa returns to apartheid-era censorship with the “banning” of Inxeba
    South Africa’s land debate is clouded by misrepresentation and lack of data

    African universities are ignoring a rich, invaluable resource: their alumni
    Six challenges that impede entrepreneurs with disabilities in South Africa
    Electric vehicles are changing the world. And they’re only just getting started
    What’s stopping Zimbabwe’s young people from participating in elections?
    Three reasons why Africa should treat Tillerson visit with scepticism

Expert Database

    Find experts with knowledge in:*

Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 63,900 academics and researchers from 2,278 institutions.

Register now
The Conversation
Community

    Community standards
    Republishing guidelines
    Research and Expert Database
    Analytics
    Job Board
    Our feeds

Company

    Who we are
    Our charter
    Our team
    Partners and funders
    Contributing institutions
    Resource for media
    Contact us

Stay informed and subscribe to our free daily newsletter and get the latest analysis and commentary directly in your inbox.
Email address
Follow us on social media

Privacy policy Terms and conditions Corrections

Copyright © 2010–2018, The Conversation Africa, Inc.