Lannisters from Game of Thrones
HBO
Not you guys, either.
AGREE TO DISAGREE
- The best employees are not the agreeable ones, according to Adam Grant
Cheerful and helpful workers are beloved by their bosses, and just about everyone else, really. Enthusiastic optimists make for great colleagues, rarely cause problems, and can always be counted on.
But they may not necessarily make the best employees, says Adam Grant, the organizational psychologist and Wharton professor.
Speaking in Chicago at the annual conference of the Society for Human Resource Management, Grant said he separates workers along two axes: givers and takers, and agreeable and disagreeable. Givers share of themselves and make their colleagues better, while takers are selfish and focused only on their own interests. The agreeable/disagreeable spectrum is what it sounds like: some workers are friendly, some are grouchy.
Grant has found there’s no correlation between being friendly and being a giver, nor being a grump and a taker. Givers and takers both can be either agreeable or disagreeable.
While the worst employees are disagreeable takers— in a slide, Grant compared them to the vicious Lannisters on Game of Thrones—the agreeable takers are deceptively terrible, fooling colleagues into thinking they’re generous while secretly undermining the organization.
Givers Takers
Agreeable Agreeable givers Agreeable takers
Disagreeable Disagreeable givers Disagreeable takers
The agreeable giver may seem like the ideal employee, but Grant says their sunny disposition can make them averse to conflict and too eager to agree. Disagreeable givers, on the other hand, can be a pain in the ass, but valuable to an organization, Grant says.
They’re more likely to fight for what they believe in, challenge the status quo, and push the organization to make painful but necessary changes, he says. And because they’re stingy with praise, when it’s offered, it generally can be trusted.
Disagreeable givers “can get more joy out of an argument than a friendly conversation” and be tough to work with, Grant says. But for organizations eager to avoid complacency and determined to improve, they also can be invaluable.
Business, management, work, careers, human behavior
Read This Next
The way we treat pregnancy at work isn’t just wrong—it could be dangerous
I hate that I have to wonder if a toxic work environment impacted our son’s life.
More from Managing
United’s CEO admits the airline had an unhealthy obsession with rules
June 18, 2018
The wrong kind of individual contributor will kill your company
June 15, 2018
Sunk costs make us feel chained to other people’s bad decisions too
June 14, 2018
The most violent chimp war of all time was about the same stuff humans fight over
June 13, 2018
The biggest problem the world’s workforce faces is a classic management issue
June 12, 2018
What makes a great leader, explained in eight counterintuitive charts
June 5, 2018
Latest Stories
One of the sharpest critics of the US healthcare system will try to fix it for Amazon, JPMorgan, and Berkshire Hathaway
June 20, 2018
Opting out of a career doesn’t make you less ambitious
June 20, 2018
The top misconception about leadership, according to a UK CEO rated best by employees
June 20, 2018
The real reason Randi Zuckerberg is interested in blockchain, crypto, and cannabis
June 19, 2018
Why American CEOs have been so quiet about separating families at the border
June 19, 2018
American CEOs are beginning to speak out against separating families at the border
June 19, 2018
Latest
Obsessions
Contributors
Guides
No comments:
Post a Comment