Saturday, 30 June 2018

The Washington Post/Justin Jouvenal: Police used facial-recognition software to identify suspect in newspaper shooting

The Washington Post
Democracy Dies in Darkness

    Sections

    Try 1 month for $1
    Sign In
        Newsletters & Alerts
        Gift Subscriptions
        Contact Us
        Help Desk

    Accessibility for screenreader

Public Safety
Y

Jarrod Ramos, suspected of killing five people at the offices of the Capital Gazette in Annapolis, is seen in this 2013 Anne Arundel Police Department booking photo obtained from social media. (Reuters)
by Justin Jouvenal June 29 at 4:46 PM Email the author

When the suspect in the mass shooting at the Capital Gazette in Annapolis was taken into custody Tuesday, he had no identification and said little, so police turned to a sophisticated facial-recognition system, officials said.

Police fed the man’s photo into the Maryland Image Repository System (MIRS), which matched it against tens of millions of photos from state driver’s licenses, offender photos and an FBI mug shot database.

It apparently returned a hit: Jarrod Ramos.

The case is the most high-profile use to date of MIRS, a cutting-edge and controversial tool that has been used by the Maryland State Police and other law enforcement agencies across the state since it launched in 2011.

“The facial recognition system performed as designed,” said Stephen T. Moyer, secretary of Maryland’s Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS), in a statement. “It has been and continues to be a valuable tool for fighting crime in our state.”

[Suspect made threats against newspaper, authorities say]

The system uses algorithms to compare a suspect’s distinctive facial features against at least 7 million Maryland driver’s license photos, 3 million state offender images and nearly 25 million FBI mug shots, according to a 2016 report by the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy and Technology. DPSCS did not respond to a request for updated figures.

MIRS initially drew little attention, but became a focus for privacy and civil liberties advocates after documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union revealed that it was used to identify protesters in Baltimore after the death of Freddie Gray in 2015.

“Maryland’s use is on the more aggressive end for how we see the use of this technology,” said Clare Garvie, an associate at the Georgetown center.

But it is hardly alone. Garvie said 31 states permit the FBI to search their driver’s license photos for facial matches.

“Over 50 percent of all adult Americans are in biometric databases that are accessible for criminal investigations,” Garvie added.

A 2017 audit said Maryland did not track how often the system was used but noted that it costs about $185,000 a year to maintain. The Georgetown Law report said it was unclear whether Maryland’s Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services scrubs the database to eliminate people who were never charged, had charges dropped or dismissed, or were found innocent.

Officials acknowledge in materials about the system that it can misidentify individuals.

Civil liberties advocates are particularly concerned about the impact on minorities, given that research has shown some facial-recognition software has a harder time identifying the faces of African Americans. They are also concerned that the system might eventually be used in conjunction with surveillance cameras to provide real-time scanning of streets.

[Amazon is selling facial recognition software to police — for a fistful of dollars]

The use of facial-recognition software by law enforcement has been a hot topic in recent months. In May, a coalition of groups called on Amazon.com to stop selling low-cost facial-recognition software called Rekognition to police because of concerns about surveillance of vulnerable communities. (Amazon founder and CEO Jeffrey P. Bezos owns The Washington Post.)

“People should be free to walk down the street without being watched by the government,” the ACLU wrote in a blog item. “By automating mass surveillance, facial recognition systems like Rekognition threaten this freedom, posing a particular threat to communities already unjustly targeted in the current political climate.”
73
Comments

     Share on FacebookShare
      Share on TwitterTweet
    Share via Email

Justin Jouvenal
Justin Jouvenal covers courts and policing in Fairfax County and across the nation. He joined The Post in 2009. Follow
subscribe
The story must be told.
Your subscription supports journalism that matters.
Try 1 month for $1
Most Read Local

    1
    It started with your shoes, then your water. Now the TSA wants your snacks.
    2
    Capital Gazette shooting suspect held without bond on 5 counts of murder
    3
    Everyone thought he was killed by a giant rock at Pompeii. Then, they found his skull.
    4
    White supremacist propaganda is inundating college campuses, civil rights group says
    5
    Tens of thousands expected to protest Trump’s immigration policy during Washington rally

    washingtonpost.com
    © 1996-2018 The Washington Post
   
    Help and Contact Us
    Policies and Standards
    Terms of Service
    Privacy Policy
    Print Products Terms of Sale
    Digital Products Terms of Sale
    Submissions and Discussion Policy
    RSS Terms of Service
    Ad Choices

Post a Comment