The Conversation/Leif Wenar: Blood oil: more than half of the oil traded across the world has been stolen

    Edition:

Available editions
Africa

    Job Board

    Become an author
    Sign up as a reader
    Sign in

The Conversation
Academic rigour, journalistic flair

    Arts + Culture
    Business + Economy
    Education
    Environment + Energy
    Health + Medicine
    Politics + Society
    Science + Technology
    In French

Blood oil: more than half of the oil traded across the world has been stolen
January 26, 2018 6.46pm SAST
Dmitry Pichugin / shutterstock
Author

    Leif Wenar

    Chair of Philosophy & Law, King's College London

Disclosure statement

Leif Wenar has received research funding from The Leverhulme Trust. He is the founder of the NGO Clean Trade.
Partners

King's College London

King's College London provides funding as a member of The Conversation UK.

The Conversation is funded by Barclays Africa and seven universities, including the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Rhodes University and the Universities of Cape Town, Johannesburg, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pretoria, and South Africa. It is hosted by the Universities of the Witwatersrand and Western Cape, the African Population and Health Research Centre and the Nigerian Academy of Science. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Strategic Partner. more
Republish this article

Republish
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.

    Email
    Twitter27
    Facebook97
    LinkedIn3
    Print

Donald Trump tweeted something true recently. Responding to the protests in Iran, the US president stated that “The people are finally getting wise as to how their money and wealth is being stolen and squandered.” Trump’s point is correct: what vice-president Mike Pence called Iran’s “unelected dictators” really have been stealing the oil that belongs to the people and spending the money for their own purposes, including (as Trump also said) “to fund terrorism abroad”.

Though right about Iran, Trump’s tweets have been too selective. In neighbouring Saudi Arabia, an ally of America’s, the elite spends public money gained from selling off the country’s oil. There, as in Iran and elsewhere, the people’s wealth is being “stolen and squandered” by the few who enrich themselves on its profits.

This is the biggest story that almost no one is reporting. In dozens of countries around the world, authoritarian regimes and armed groups are selling off the oil that belongs to the people, and using the money to fund repression, corruption, conflict and terrorism.

Oil is the world’s largest traded commodity by far, so the amounts going to these autocrats and militias are gigantic: hundreds of billions of dollars a year. Many of the crises in the headlines over the past few years – coming from Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Russia and more – have been powered by money from selling oil stolen from citizens.
Black smoke rises over Tripoli, Libya, after an oil depot was hit by a rocket in 2014. EPA
Oil belongs to the people

The odd thing about this story is that nearly everyone agrees that a country’s oil belongs ultimately to its citizens. In America, this is a bipartisan idea, declared by both George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. And it is easy to find leaders of many other countries saying, “the oil belongs to the people” – the leaders of Britain, Australia, Mexico, Ghana, and even Iran, for example, have declared just this. The principle is also enshrined in dozens of national laws and constitutions. And 98% of the people in the world live in a country that has signed one of the main human rights treaties, which say that all peoples have the right to control their country’s natural resources.

If the oil belongs to the people, then no one should be able to sell it off without their possible consent. But that’s just what the world’s autocrats and armed groups are doing. When I investigated this issue for my book Blood Oil I found that oil sold off beyond any possible consent of the people accounts for more than 50% of the world’s trade. Over half of the oil in global trade is literally stolen goods.

This oil is being stolen not only from headline countries, but also from places like Equatorial Guinea where the president has allegedly had his political opponents tortured in one of the world’s worst prisons, and Angola where the elite live in luxury while the country’s children die from poverty at one of the highest rates in the world.
Luanda, Angola. Who owns the oil? Not the people who live in the foreground. Fabian Plock / shutterstock
Leftover laws

The source of the problem is an archaic law left over from the days of the Atlantic slave trade. This is the law, versions of which exist in every country, that makes it legal to buy the natural resources of other countries from whoever there can control them by force. So, to take one example, when Saddam Hussein’s junta took over Iraq in a coup years ago, America’s law made it legal to buy Iraq’s oil from them. And then in 2014 when Islamic State (IS) took over some of those same wells, all countries’ laws made it legal to buy oil from IS (that’s why sanctions had to be imposed: to block legal purchases from IS).

This law is so ancient we take it for granted. But it makes no common sense. If an armed gang takes over a gas station, after all, no one thinks it should be legal for us to buy the gas from the gang. But our laws do put us into legal business with whichever foreigners can control oil by force. Over recent years the average American family has sent up to US$250 annually to foreign authoritarians and armed groups, just by filling up their cars.

The obvious solution would be to make it illegal to buy oil from anyone who is not at least minimally accountable to the citizens of their country.

That might sound difficult. But in fact the movement has already started. A senator in Brazil has just introduced legislation which would make it illegal to import oil from authoritarian or failed states – and would prevent its national oil company from signing any new contracts with autocratic regimes.

Brazil is the fifth largest country in the world. It’s a lot poorer than Western countries, and in the midst of a financial crisis and corruption scandal much worse than anything in the UK. If Brazil can discuss a ban on stolen oil, why can’t Europe? Why can’t Britain? Why can’t the US?

Leif Wenar will be discussing his work at the event Blood Oil taking place at Second Home, London on January 31.

    Oil
    Resource curse
    Resource conflict

    Tweet
    Share
    Get newsletter

You might also like
Why Americans will never agree on oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Signaling more independence from the US, the World Bank phases out its support for fossil fuels
A red alert for the future Arctic
The Kinder Morgan pipeline and Pacific salmon: Red fish, black gold
Sign in to comment
5 Comments
Oldest Newest

    Steph Soltesz

    logged in via Google

    And yet collectively, from all Nations, the Oil & Gas Industries get just a hair under $1 Trillion Dollars in Subsidies, Perks and Tax Breaks and wars are being fought over it… 

    Shake your heads people and seriously ask yourselves why do we allow this continue ?  WHILE it’s also harming every living thing on our little blue planet, that includes you and your progeny down the line too remember, nothing & no one is immune to the results of fossil fuel use, from it’s extraction to final combustion.
    2 days ago
    Report
    Fernando Leanme

    logged in via Google

    What applies to oil also applies to other commodities, as well as manufactured products, even tourism. In some nations, say Cuba, the tourism industry is run largely via joint ventures between a dictatorship military enterprise (Gamesa), and corporate investors, mostly European. The law forces these joint ventures to hire Cuban labor via Gamesa, which extracts about 90-95% of the worker’s billings, leaving Cuban labor with about 5 to 10 % of what the joint venture pays.

    This structure is imposed by an illegitimate dictatorship which has ruled Cuba using brute force and violates human rights with the connivance of the European Union, Canada, and other nations.
    15 hours ago
    Report

Show all comments
Most popular on The Conversation

    Is the net about to close on Zuma and his Gupta patronage network?
    West Africa: empirehood and colonialism offer lessons in integration
    Remembering Hugh Masekela: the horn player with a shrewd ear for music of the day
    Ten priorities for getting agriculture moving in Zimbabwe
    Free higher education in South Africa: cutting through the lies and statistics

    Why shaking up South Africa’s power utility matters for the economy
    Why it’s taken so long to prosecute state capture cases in South Africa
    Cape Town water crisis: 7 myths that must be bust
    Cape Town’s water crisis: driven by politics more than drought
    Why countries should break the crippling cycle of hosting big sporting events

Expert Database

    Find experts with knowledge in:*

Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 61,700 academics and researchers from 2,268 institutions.

Register now
The Conversation
Community

    Community standards
    Republishing guidelines
    Research and Expert Database
    Analytics
    Job Board
    Our feeds

Company

    Who we are
    Our charter
    Our team
    Partners and funders
    Contributing institutions
    Resource for media
    Contact us

Stay informed
Subscribe to our Newsletters
Follow us on social media

Privacy policy Terms and conditions Corrections

Copyright © 2010–2018, The Conversation Africa, Inc.