Monday, 29 October 2018
InsideCimate News/Nicholas Kusnetz: Children's Climate Lawsuit Trial Delayed Until U.S. Supreme Court Rules
InsideCimate News
Hot Topics:
Climate Science EPA Arctic Clean Energy Extreme Weather Exxon Investigation
Middle Ground
Choke Hold
•••
Children's Climate Lawsuit Trial Delayed Until U.S. Supreme Court Rules
The Trump administration wants the high court, now with Brett Kavanaugh as a justice, to throw the case out. The trial had been scheduled to start on Monday.
Nicholas Kusnetz
By Nicholas Kusnetz
Oct 26, 2018
Plaintiffs in the children's climate lawsuit want the federal government to act on climate change. Credit: Robin Loznak
The young plaintiffs in the children's climate lawsuit are suing to force the federal government to take action on climate change. Credit: Robin Loznak
A federal judge in Oregon has delayed a lawsuit brought by 21 children and young adults to force government action on climate change, pending a decision by the Supreme Court on whether to dismiss the case before trial. Opening arguments had been set for Monday.
The government has repeatedly tried to halt the case. Last week, the Supreme Court agreed to a temporary stay while it considers the Justice Department's argument that a trial would cause the government "irreparable harm." The decision to delay the case at this early stage was highly unusual.
The plaintiffs and their lawyers say the government is trying to deprive them of their right to a fair hearing.
"Since the early days of the Republic, our judiciary has grown to be the last line of defense against governance that threatens the public good and destroys the lives of our people," Julia Olson, co-counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. "These young people deserve that chance to present their case against those who govern and let the light fall where it may."
Sign up for InsideClimate News Weekly
Our stories. Your inbox. Every weekend.
I agree to InsideClimate News' Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
If successful, the lawsuit could result in a court order that the federal government develop and implement a plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions. If the plaintiffs ultimately lose, a trial would still present a public forum on climate change and the grave risks it poses to the nation. A trial could also force the Trump administration into the embarrassing position of publicly admitting the facts about climate change while arguing that it need not address the problem.
The government's lawyers haven't contested the children's central claims—that climate change is real and is causing them harm. Instead, the lawyers have argued that the federal government is not responsible and that the court has no place ordering political branches what to do.
The Supreme Court is now considering those questions. In July, the court denied an earlier attempt by government lawyers to halt the case. It's unclear why the court changed its position now.
David Bookbinder, chief counsel for the libertarian Niskanen Center, which filed a brief supporting the youths' case, said the only thing that has changed is the replacement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who retired, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's controversial pick whose record as a federal judge includes ruling against some environmental regulations.
"They're willing to step in and look at this earlier than the court normally would because it's a climate case," he said. One of the few other cases in which justices have issued such a ruling at this stage, he said, was when they halted implementation of President Barack Obama's proposal to limit emissions from the electricity sector. "Climate is just different."
Like Brown v. Board of Education with school integration or Obergefell v. Hodges, which established a right to marriage for same-sex couples, the case is pushing a novel claim for constitutional rights, legal experts say. It will also test core questions about the separations of powers. The plaintiffs argue that, as in Brown, the Constitution's checks and balances require the courts to step in because the political branches are failing citizens, in this case by neglecting to protect them from climate harm. The government has argued that existing laws and environmental regulations take precedence and any action by the court would overstep its authority.
"For three years, my co-plaintiffs and I have been waiting for our voices to be heard in court," Hazel V., a 14-year-old plaintiff in the case, said in a statement. "But the U.S. government is doing everything it can to silence us, all while we watch it continue to make the climate crisis worse.
Published Under:
Activism
Children's Climate Lawsuit
Climate Change
Donald Trump
Email this page
Printer-friendly version
About the Author
Nicholas Kusnetz
Nicholas Kusnetz is a reporter for InsideClimate News. Before joining ICN, he ran the Center for Public Integrity's State Integrity Investigation, which won a New York Press Club Award for Political Coverage. He also covered fracking as a reporting fellow at ProPublica and was a 2011 Middlebury Fellow in Environmental Journalism. His work has appeared in more than a dozen publications, including Slate, The Washington Post, Businessweek, Mother Jones, The Nation, Fast Company and The New York Times.
Nicholas can be reached at: nicholas.kusnetz@insideclimatenews.org. PGP key: http://bit.ly/2k5fncn
Your donation powers our nonprofit newsroom.
Our stories. Your inbox. Every weekend.
I agree to InsideClimate News' Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
ICN Videos
Most Popular
Harvesting Peril: Extreme weather and climate change on the American farm. An ICN series.
How the Farm Bureau’s Climate Agenda Is Failing Its Farmers
By Georgina Gustin, Neela Banerjee, John H. Cushman Jr.
Infographic: How farmers and soils are uniquely positioned to fight climate change
Infographic: Why Farmers Are Ideally Positioned to Fight Climate Change
By Paul Horn
Backlash to the Trump administration's anti-science comments and political appointees sparked a March for Science in dozens of cities on Earth Day in 2017. Credit: Jessica Kourkounis/Getty Images
A Record Number of Scientists Are Running for Congress, and They Get Climate Change
By Marianne Lavelle
A nor'easter floods coastal areas of Cape Cod. Credit: Meera Subramanian
They Know Seas Are Rising, but They’re Not Abandoning Their Beloved Cape Cod
By Meera Subramanian
New York AG Sues Exxon, Says Oil Giant Defrauded Investors Over Climate Change
By David Hasemyer
Plaintiffs in the children's climate lawsuit want the federal government to act on climate change. Credit: Robin Loznak
Children's Climate Lawsuit Trial Delayed Until U.S. Supreme Court Rules
By Nicholas Kusnetz
A solar installer on a rooftop. Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
High-Stakes Fight Over Rooftop Solar Spreads to Michigan
By Dan Gearino
Tree in a field. Credit: Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images
Capturing CO2 From Air: To Keep Global Warming Under 1.5°C, Emissions Must Go Negative, IPCC Says
By Sabrina Shankman
IPCC: Radical Energy Transformation Needed to Avoid 1.5 Degrees Global Warming
By Bob Berwyn
A lifeguard wearing a protective mask asks a surfer to leave the ocean after Palm Beach County officials closed all area beaches due to red tide earlier this month. Credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
With Hurricanes and Toxic Algae, Florida Candidates Can’t Ignore the Environment
By James Bruggers
Follow
Our Sponsors
View all sponsors
Related
Nobel-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz. Credit: Win McNamee/Getty Images
Nobel-Winning Economist to Testify in Children’s Climate Lawsuit
By Georgina Gustin
Fighting Climate Change Can Be a Lonely Battle in Oil Country, Especially for a Kid
By Neela Banerjee, Zahra Hirji
Richmond, California, home to a Chevron refinery near San Francisco Bay, in one of several cities suing fossil fuel companies over climate change. Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Fossil Fuels on Trial: Where the Major Climate Change Lawsuits Stand Today
By David Hasemyer
Subscribe to Clean Economy Weekly
Want More Stories Like This One?
Contribute To Our Staff
Donate Now
More Activism
Native American protestors are confronted by security during a demonstration in 2016 against the Dakota Access oil pipeline, which they will pollute water supplies for the Standing Rock Reservation just downstream. Credit: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Im
ACLU Fears Protest Crackdowns, Surveillance Already Being Planned for Keystone XL
By Nicholas Kusnetz
Pipeline Protest Arrests Raise Questions About Controversial Louisiana Law
By Nicholas Kusnetz
Credit: Paul Horn/InsideClimate News
How Energy Companies and Allies Are Turning the Law Against Protesters
By Nicholas Kusnetz
More on Activism
Subscribe to InsideClimate News Email Newsletters
Articles & Investigations
Today's Climate
Clean Economy
Week in Review
Subscribe
More From The Author
Plaintiffs in the children's climate lawsuit want the federal government to act on climate change. Credit: Robin Loznak
Children's Climate Lawsuit Trial Delayed Until U.S. Supreme Court Rules
By Nicholas Kusnetz
U.S. President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, shown here at a G7 meeting in June, have clashed in recent months. Credit: Leon Neal/Getty Images
How Trump's New Trade Deal Could Prolong His Pollution Legacy
By Nicholas Kusnetz
Native American protestors are confronted by security during a demonstration in 2016 against the Dakota Access oil pipeline, which they will pollute water supplies for the Standing Rock Reservation just downstream. Credit: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Im
ACLU Fears Protest Crackdowns, Surveillance Already Being Planned for Keystone XL
By Nicholas Kusnetz
More by Nicholas Kusnetz
Whistleblowers Jobs & Freelance Privacy Policy & Legal Our E-Books
Keep Environmental Journalism Alive
Donate Now
News Investigations Topics Today's Climate Clean Economy Videos Infographics EBooks
Close this popin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment