The Week UK
UK News
How parliamentary privilege undid Philip Green
Oct 26, 2018
British businessman named in the House of Lords as man behind #MeToo injunction
whatsapp
facebook
Mark Thompson/Getty Images
Sir Phillip Green
Sir Philip Green has been named as the businessman at the centre of the British #MeToo scandal, three days after a judge granted an injunction to keep his identity secret.
See related
What is an injunction?
Is India having its #MeToo moment?
The Daily Telegraph revealed on Tuesday that it had spent the past eight months investigating allegations of bullying, racial abuse and sexual harassment against the businessman, but was prevented from revealing details of five non-disclosure agreements.
The injunction, granted by Sir Terence Etherton, the second most senior judge in England and Wales, made it illegal for outlets in England and Wales to publish “the businessman’s identity or to identify the companies, as well as what he is accused of doing or how much he paid his alleged victims”, the paper reported.
The Telegraph, The Sun and iNews all reported the growing outrage at the use of use of gagging clauses to silence accusations of misconduct on their front pages yesterday, and called on MPs to invoke parliamentary privilege and reveal the name in Parliament.
In the end in was a Labour peer, Lord Hain, the former Leader of the House of Commons, who stepped forward.
Having been “contacted by an individual intimately involved in the case”, Hain told the House of Lords: “I feel it’s my duty under parliamentary privilege to name Philip Green as the individual in question given that the media have been subject to an injunction preventing publication of the full details of this story which is clearly in the public interest.”
What is parliamentary privilege?
Parliamentary privilege grants “certain legal immunities for Members of both Houses to allow them to perform their duties without interference from outside of the House”, according to the Houses of Parliament website.
Originally intended as a bulwark against interfering monarchs, it was enshrined in the 1689 Bill of Rights, which described it as a guarantee “that the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court of place out of parliament”.
More significant than monarchical meddling in the modern era, The Guardian says parliamentary privilege basically “enables politicians to speak freely in the houses of parliament without fear of being sued for defamation”.
Crucially, the media has the right to report what is said in parliament, allowing newspapers to circumnavigate the injunction.
Has parlimentary privilege been used this way before?
The most recent parallel to Hain’s decision to name Green happened in May 2011, when Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming identified footballer Ryan Giggs as the anonymous celebrity who had prevented the media from reporting details of an alleged affair using an injunction.
That year, Hemming also named former RBS boss Sir Fred Goodwin as having secured an injunction to prevent the publication of details of an alleged sexual relationship he had with a senior colleague.
The Independent says the Giggs scandal and a wave of other privacy controversies in 2011 “sparked calls for legal reform, with MPs and campaigners saying practices barring the media in England and Wales publishing matters reported freely in Scotland, other countries and on social media were outdated and unfair”.
Advertisement
Read more: UK News
Philip Green
super injunction
House of Lords
Parliament
Advertisement
Advertisement
You are here:
HomeHow parliamentary privilege undid Philip Green
Related Articles
One-Minute Read
How parliamentary privilege undid Philip Green
One-Minute Read
Could police cuts could swing the next election?
One-Minute Read
Austerity ‘squarely to blame’ for rise in prison violence
One-Minute Read
The UK’s ten cheapest towns to rent a home
One-Minute Read
Is Strictly Come Dancing fixed?
In Depth
Budget 2018 predictions: what is Philip Hammond planning?
White Poppy, Remembrance, World War One
In Depth
Why white poppies are causing controversy
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg denies website is biased against Trump
Cambridge Analytica
Facebook fined £500,000 over Cambridge Analytica scandal
Advertisement
The Week Wines
FREE UK delivery
VIEW
Portfolio
The experts' guide to good living
Top properties on the market for £600,000
La Dama: a mind-blowingly sensual Spanish red
Around the world in 245 days on the Ultimate World Cruise
Read more
Popular
Who is mystery businessman at heart of Telegraph’s #MeToo expose?
UK News
Making a Murderer: where are Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey now?
TV & Radio
What are NPCs and why has Twitter banned them?
US
Is Strictly Come Dancing fixed?
UK News
Apple and Samsung fined for slowing down older phones
Technology
Trending Topics
Donald Trump
Brexit
House prices
Cultural appropriation
Kensington Palace
Islamic State
Daily Briefing
Ten things you need to know today
In partnership with Rolex
Sir Philip Green denies racist and sexist abuse
FBI search for bombs after De Niro targeted
Controversial removal of graves starts for HS2
Read more
Our Latest Offers, Competitions and Events
Our latest offers and competitions
Latest offers and events
Outstanding wines that won't break the bank
FIND OUT MORE
Back to top
FacebookTwitter
NewsSportBusinessTechnologyCars MoneyPortfolioPodcastSubscriptionsOffers
The Week US
Email newsletter
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
RSS
Sitemap
Contact us
Authors
About us
© Copyright The Week Ltd which is a subsidiary of Dennis Publishing Limited.
The Week incorporates The First Post. The Week™ and The First Post™ are trademarks of Felix Dennis.
Felix DennisJobsMedia InformationSubscription EnquiresBooksAppsYour Online Choices
Sign up for our daily newsletter
Newsletter
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment