Must President Akufo-Addo Reject Mining Bauxite In The Atewa Forest Reserve - And Declare It A National Park: If We Are To Achieve Most Of The 17 UN SDGs By 2030?

There was a point in time in our history when a coal-fired power plant was going be foisted on our homeland Ghana. A local independent power producer(IPP), Sunon Asogli - a partnership between the Ghanaian tycoon,Torgbe  Afede, and  China's  Shenzhen Energy Group (SEG) - announced that it would build 700MW coal-fired power plant in Ghana.

The question is: How did Sunon Asogli come so close to achieving their aim, when Ghanaian officialdom was aware of the egregious  environmental pollution, caused by coal-fired power plants worldwide?

Luckily for our younger generations, and their children's unborn  offspring, good sense prevailed in the end, and the Chinese  company and its local partners, were forced to  ditch the idea - after protests  by Ghanaian environmental activists got the then National Democratic Congress (NDC) government to reject the idea.
Our country and its people were saved from an apocalyptic nightmare that would have ruined many lives till the very end of time - a nightmare similar to that which communities in areas that  coal-fired power plants were sited,  across the U.S., are experiencing today, even as we speak.

To understand why those who we elect to govern our nation, must reject the blind pursuit of GDP growth, without examining  what actually constitutes that growth, today,  we have culled an article from the UK newspaper,  The Guardian, written by Oliver Milman. It is entitled: "Most US coal plants are contaminating groundwater with toxins, analysis finds".

The planned destruction of part of the Atewa Range to mine the rather poor-quality  bauxite deposits there, is an example of the blind pursuit of GDP growth, without taking into account the horrific downside negatively  impacting  human well-being,  and affecting the long-term stability of Ghanaian  society,  which results from such economic development.

Finally, it is said that water is life.  The question we must ponder over as a sensible people is:  Is there a substitute for water? Haaba. For the sake of today's generational-demographic  groups in Ghana, and that of future generations, President Akufo-Addo  must be bold, and reject the idea of mining bauxite in the Atewa Range, and go on to announce a ban on all mining in the Atewa Forest Reserve. He must then  declare it a national park - to save us from an existence akin to life in a  hell-on-earth that will result from the destruction of a large part of the Atewa Forest Reserve.

Please read on:
"The Guardian
    Energy
    Pollution

Coal
Most US coal plants are contaminating groundwater with toxins, analysis finds

Of 265 US power plants that monitor groundwater, 242 report unsafe levels of at least one pollutant derived from coal ash

Oliver Milman in New York
@olliemilman

Mon 4 Mar 2019 05.01 GMT
Last modified on Mon 4 Mar 2019 15.21 GMT

Shares
10,265
10k
Nine out of every 10 coal plants with reportable data have tainted nearby groundwater with at least one coal ash pollutant, with a majority having unsafe levels of at least four different toxins.

Almost every coal-fired power plant in the US is contaminating groundwater with unsafe levels of toxic pollution, according to the first comprehensive analysis of the consequences of coal ash waste disposal.

Of the 265 US power plants that monitor groundwater, 242 have reported unsafe levels of at least one pollutant derived from coal ash, which is the remnants of coal after it is burned for energy. More than half such facilities report unsafe levels of arsenic, a carcinogen linked to multiple types of cancer, with 60% finding elevated lithium, which is associated with neurological damage.

In all, nine out of every 10 coal plants with reportable data have tainted nearby groundwater with at least one coal ash pollutant, with a majority having unsafe levels of at least four different toxins.

“The pollution is basically everywhere you look,” said Abel Russ, attorney at the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), which compiled the analysis based on reports issued by individual power plants. “The major concern is that this could be a problem for decades or centuries because once the pollutants leach from the coal ash into the water, they are hard to get out.”

The coal plants included in the analysis represent roughly three-quarters of all coal facilities in the US, with the remainder either having shut down their coal ash dumps or been exempted from reporting requirements.

American coal plants produce about 100m tons of coal ash each year, with at least 2bn tons stored in pits of varying quality. Most coal ash pits are ageing and not lined with a protective substance that would prevent the ash seeping into streams and rivers.

Spurred by disasters such as that at the TVA Kingston Fossil Plant in Tennessee, where a containment dike ruptured in 2008 and spilled ash that smothered a huge area resulting in several hundred dead or sickened people, the Obama administration moved to tighten the regulations around the disposal of coal ash.

The so-called Coal Ash Rule, introduced in 2015, required power companies to monitor groundwater from wells near ash dumps and make the data public. Since May 2018, information from more than 550 individual coal ash ponds has been made available.

These regulations were eased, however, by the Trump administration. In July, the Environmental Protection Agency extended by 18 months the time that industry can use unlined coal ash ponds for dumping. The move would “provide states and utilities much-needed flexibility in the management of coal ash” and save utility companies as much as $31m a year, according to Andrew Wheeler, confirmed as EPA administrator this week.

Widespread pollution spread by coal ash dumps should act as “a wake-up call for the nation”, said Lisa Evans, senior counsel with Earthjustice, which assisted with the report.

“Using industry’s own data, our report proves that coal plants are poisoning groundwater nearly everywhere they operate,” Evans said. “The Trump administration insists on hurting communities across the US by gutting federal protections. They are making a dire situation much worse.”

People who draw their water directly from backyard wells are most at risk from any groundwater pollution, although environmentalists argue that allowable levels of certain toxins in treated drinking water are too lax and also pose a risk.

A stew of pollutants emanate from coal ash, including cadmium, cobalt, chromium and lead, as well as arsenic and lithium. These toxins are linked to a range of health conditions, including cancers, kidney damage and developmental problems.

According to the EIP report, the site with the worst contamination is found next to the San Miguel power plant near San Antonio, Texas. Coal plants in North Carolina, Wyoming, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Maryland, Mississippi and Kentucky round out a list of the 10 worst polluters.

Some states, such as Georgia and Missouri, have acted to eliminate leaky coal ash dumps but Ross said the EPA should act much more quickly to ensure they are fully phased out.

“We’ve never really been happy with the EPA’s approach to this but now it is run by a coal lobbyist we are even more skeptical,” Russ said, referring to Wheeler’s former employment. “Over the long term it’s going to become clear the EPA needs to be stronger and do something, but that probably won’t happen under this administration.”

The EPA was contacted for comment.
Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading and supporting our independent, investigative reporting than ever before. And unlike many news organisations, we have chosen an approach that allows us to keep our journalism accessible to all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford.

The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important as it enables us to give a voice to those less heard, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.

Every contribution we receive from readers like you, big or small, goes directly into funding our journalism. This support enables us to keep working as we do – but we must maintain and build on it for every year to come. Support The Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
Support The Guardian
Paypal and credit card
Topics

    Coal

    Pollution
    Energy
    US Environmental Protection Agency
    news

    Share on LinkedIn
    Share on Pinterest
    Share on WhatsApp
    Share on Messenger

    Reuse this content

Most popular

    Environment
    Climate change
    Wildlife
    Energy
    Pollution

    Contact us
    Complaints & corrections
    SecureDrop
    Work for us
    Privacy policy
    Cookie policy
    Terms & conditions
    Help

    All topics
    All writers
    Digital newspaper archive
    Facebook
    Twitter

    Advertise with us
    Search UK jobs
    Dating
    Discount Codes

Support The Guardian
Available for everyone, funded by readers
Contribute
Subscribe
Back to top
© 2019 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved."

End of culled content from the website of the Guardian.