Debt relief
Economics viewpoint
Are we heading for another developing world debt crisis?
By Larry Elliott
Western bank loans for projects in Africa were to be paid off via rising commodity prices. At least that was the theory
Sun 14 Jan 2018 11.30 GMT
Last modified on Mon 15 Jan 2018 10.53 GMT
Shares
657
Newly built fishing vessels dock at Maputo harbour in Mozambique
Global interest rates are rising. Poor countries are finding it tough to pay back money borrowed from banks in anticipation of a commodity windfall that never materialised. Stir in some dirty dealing that has seen funds stolen and what do you have? That’s right: the makings of another debt crisis.
Poor country debt was supposed to have been sorted back in 2005, the year the Guardian changed from a broadsheet to its Berliner format. Now, 13 years later, we are changing format again and debt is back albeit in a different form. Last time, the focus was on public debt, money that poor-country governments owed to the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and individual rich nations – and which was mostly forgiven as a result of the Gleneagles G8 agreement in 2005. These days, the issue is private-sector debt and while as yet only a handful of countries – mostly in sub-Saharan Africa – are in serious trouble, the warning signs are there. The IMF and the World Bank both know it.
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> Why should Somalia’s children starve to pay for a debt crisis they didn't create?
Kevin Watkins
Read more
Africa needs more private-sector investment because debt relief and western aid have not been enough on their own to bring about economic modernisation. And in the years immediately after the 2008 financial crisis investing in Africa was attractive.
Debt relief and better financial management meant African countries looked more stable. The money creation process known as quantitative easing meant western banks and other financial institutions were awash with funds. Ultra-low interest rates in the developed world meant investors were scouring the world for higher yields than they could obtain at home. Many African countries were also exporters of commodities that were in high demand due to China’s rapid growth. Deals were done in which western banks lent money for projects in African countries, with the debt to be paid off by the proceeds of rising commodity prices.
Advertisement
That was the theory. In practice, some ropey deals were done, of which a prime example is the one made in London five years ago between Credit Suisse and Russia’s VTB bank to lend $2bn to two companies in Mozambique backed by the government in Maputo.
The money was supposed to be for a tuna fishing fleet and for a navy to protect the boats operating in Mozambique’s territorial waters. Credit Suisse and VTB trousered $200m between them in fees, but the loans were never revealed to the Mozambique parliament, the IMF, the financial markets or the Mozambique people.
A report into the deal by the corporate investigations company Kroll concluded that the two companies were inadequately managed and had generated no meaningful revenue. At least a quarter of the money is unaccounted for, with some suspicion that it was spent on military equipment. Jamie Drummond, the director of the development campaign group One says that it is not clear the money ever turned up in Mozambique after being sent to two offshore companies in Abu Dhabi. For sure, though, not a single tuna has been landed. Mozambique has paid a heavy price for defaulting on the debt, which has been sold on to vulture funds. The IMF, miffed at being lied to, has suspended its programme and the loss of financial support has meant public services are being cut. The scandal has rightly attracted the attention of the FBI, which is investigating whether the banks facilitated corruption.
Although this is a particularly egregious example of a deal that has gone badly wrong, Mozambique is not the only country in difficulty. The Jubilee Debt Campaign said that at the end of 2017, 28 countries were rated as in debt distress or at high risk of debt distress, up from 22 at the end of 2016, and 15 in 2013. The number of countries classified as low risk has more than halved – from 24 in 2013 to 11 currently.
This is not yet a full-blown debt crisis but it could easily become one. The commodity boom is over, China is growing less rapidly and the cost of servicing loans taken out in foreign currencies is becoming more expensive as interest rates rise in the developed world.
Advertisement
To lessen the threat of a rerun of what happened during the debt crisis of the early 1980s (when the windfall gains from oil producing countries were recycled into loans to Latin America) action should be taken now.
At the international level, there needs to be better monitoring of how vulnerable countries are to rising debt. There is a certain complacency about the fact that most of the current debt is owed to the private sector; history shows that ultimately it will end up as public debt.
For years, there has been a campaign for a bankruptcy system that would treat countries like companies. This, though, has been relentlessly opposed by countries such as the US and the UK, where the powerful financial sectors make money out of bad debts.
Not only should western governments back a sovereign debt bankruptcy scheme, the should also insist that all new debt include clauses that offer protection from vulture funds, companies that seek to make a profit on debt they have bought on the cheap.
Developing countries need to do more – a lot more in some cases – to tackle corruption, but so do the banks. One idea is a Transparent Lending Covenant, under which banks would make the full details of loans public. Interestingly, the idea is being pushed by Tidjane Thiam, who took over as chief executive of Credit Suisse after the Mozambique loan was agreed. It’s not hard to see why. The tuna deal stank in every way. It was bad for Mozambique, bad for the City and bad for Credit Suisse.
• Follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk, or sign up to the daily Business Today email here.
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information.
Thomasine F-R.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support the Guardian – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
Become a supporter
Make a contribution
Paypal and credit card
Topics
Debt relief
Economics viewpoint
Global economy
Economics
Africa
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
World Bank
comment
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
more on this story
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> Heretics welcome! Economics needs a new Reformation
Larry Elliott
17 Dec 2017
725
Heretics welcome! Economics needs a new Reformation
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> Missing pay rises: the ever deepening economics mystery
Larry Elliott
5 Nov 2017
596
Missing pay rises: the ever deepening economics mystery
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> Is the growth in living standards worse now than in the Great Depression?
Larry Elliott
22 Oct 2017
311
Is the growth in living standards worse now than in the Great Depression?
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> Slow economic growth is not the new normal, it's the old norm
Larry Elliott
30 Jul 2017
424
Slow economic growth is not the new normal, it's the old norm
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> Can Emmanuel Macron solve France's economic riddle?
Larry Elliott
30 Apr 2017
691
Can Emmanuel Macron solve France's economic riddle?
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> Populism is the result of global economic failure
Larry Elliott
26 Mar 2017
1,632
Populism is the result of global economic failure
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> Labour must learn to win if it wants to shape the UK's economic future
Larry Elliott
12 Mar 2017
1,250
Labour must learn to win if it wants to shape the UK's economic future
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> Keynesian economics: is it time for the theory to rise from the dead?
Larry Elliott
11 Dec 2016
746
Keynesian economics: is it time for the theory to rise from the dead?
ESG Report: Automation… Intel Security -
9 Finger Movements… Dummies.com
Hotel Prices You're Not… www.tripsinsider.com
30 cleaning tips that… Life Tonik
About this Content
most viewed
Business
Economics
Banking
Money
Markets
Project syndicate
B2B
back to top
become a supporter
make a contribution
securedrop
ask for help
advertise with us
work for us
contact us
complaints & corrections
terms & conditions
privacy policy
cookie policy
digital newspaper archive
all topics
all contributors
Facebook
Twitter
© 2018 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment