National Review/Chris Pope: Liberal Think Tank Refutes Case against Trump’s Health-Insurance Deregulation

National Review
Health Care   

Liberal Think Tank Refutes Case against Trump’s Health-Insurance Deregulation
By Chris Pope

February 27, 2018 1:39 PM

(Eric Thayer/Reuters)
Per the Urban Institute, the proposal will increase the number of Americans insured by 1.7 million while reducing costs to taxpayers.

On February 20, the Trump administration released a proposed rule that would make it much easier for Americans to escape the inflated costs of Obamacare’s health-insurance exchanges. It would repeal an October 2016 regulation with which the departing Obama administration had sought to restrict the availability of “short term, limited duration” (STLD) insurance — a market exempt from the Affordable Care Act’s regulations, on which health insurance could be purchased for around $124 per month, compared with $393 on the exchanges. Obama’s regulation stipulated that these plans could last only three months, while the previous rule had allowed them to last a year and permitted guaranteed renewal of enrollment beyond then.

Congressional Democrats have denounced the Trump administration’s attempt to restore the STLD market to health as an attempt to sabotage the ACA. They have argued that the availability of affordable plans outside of the ACA’s risk pool could deprive the exchanges of essential revenues from healthy enrollees, and thus increase premiums for those who remain.

But when premiums on the exchanges rise, public subsidies automatically expand to guarantee that insurance will be available to enrollees at a limited cost as a share of their income, regardless of their medical risks. There is no need to force unwilling healthy individuals to pay hugely inflated premiums for this to be the case. Punishing them with an individual-mandate tax was unnecessary and unfair, while seeking to prohibit cost-effective alternatives that actually did meet their needs was similarly senseless.

Yesterday’s study from the Urban Institute demonstrates with unprecedented clarity just how small a trade-off would be associated with the substantial gains from the policy.

The report bears a dispassionate title, and the executive summary picks out several statistics related to the combined effects of the mandate and the STLD deregulation. But as was made clear during last year’s legislative attempts to replace the ACA, estimates of the mandate’s impact are so speculative and likely exaggerated that they serve to obscure less ambiguous and more important statistics.

More interesting, and unmentioned in the introduction to the Urban Institute’s report, are some remarkable findings that can be observed directly in the report’s Table 1. From this table it is clear that:

    7.4 million on the exchanges eligible for tax credits would see no change in premiums.
    4.2 million would enroll in STLD plans, whose premiums would be far below those for plans currently available. (STLD premiums in the fourth quarter of 2016 were 68.4 percent lower than those on the exchanges.)
    4.5 million on the exchanges without tax credits would see premiums rise somewhat (by an average of 18.2 percent, compared with 8.3 percent in states prohibiting STLD plans, according to Table 4 on page 16).

While there are roughly similar numbers of winners and losers, the scale of benefits far exceeds the costs. Furthermore, while the modest premium increases would be felt only by unsubsidized high-income enrollees, the savings would be enjoyed across the income distribution — including by large numbers of low- and moderate-income households.

On balance, the Urban Institute also estimates that Trump’s proposal would reduce the number of uninsured Americans by 1.7 million — a finding the report buries by grouping those enrolled in STLD plans together with the truly uninsured.

In other words, restricting the sale of attractive, affordably priced health insurance isn’t necessary to forestall the collapse of the exchanges, but it has needlessly concentrated enormous costs on millions seeking health insurance and forced many to go entirely without.

The Urban Institute’s study is also enlightening with respect to the net fiscal impact of STLD deregulation. As a cheaper alternative to the exchanges becomes available, low-risk subsidized individuals may disenroll, and hence the government may save money. But as the risk pool on the exchanges becomes sicker, subsidies expand, costing the government money. The net impact of these effects has as yet been unclear.
0   

The Urban Institute finds that the number of people on unsubsidized ACA-compliant plans would fall by 1.5 million, while the number on subsidized plans would fall by 600,000. As a result, the reform would slightly reduce federal spending on health care for the nonelderly — by $686 million, or 0.2 percent — and should allay whatever federal budgetary concerns may have impeded the proposal’s more thorough implementation.

These empirical findings (from authors who had expressed opposition to STLD insurance) suggest that the deregulation of STLD plans overall substantially reduces the cost of health insurance, covers more people, and slightly reduces the burden on taxpayers. States should embrace it — and give their residents a real chance to purchase affordable insurance coverage for themselves and their families.
Chris Pope — Chris Pope is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
More in Health Care   
New School Policy: Even Talk About Guns Will Result in a District Attorney Investigation
It’s Time for Real Talk about the Assault-Weapons ‘Ban’
Pence Predicts Legal Abortion Will End in U.S. ‘in Our Time’
Wheaton College Wins an Exemption from the Contraception Mandate

SPONSORED CONTENT

    D.C.’s Graduation-Rate Scandal D.C.’s Graduation-Rate Scandal
    Preterm labor: how will this affect future deliveries? Preterm labor: how will this affect future deliveries? Bundoo
    Your Preterm Birth Resource Your Preterm Birth Resource Bundoo
    11 things that can cause preterm labor 11 things that can cause preterm labor Bundoo

    New Indictments in Manafort Case New Indictments in Manafort Case
    An Injustice to Winston Churchill An Injustice to Winston Churchill
    Down with Dullness Down with Dullness
    The Pathetic Journey of ‘Mattress Girl’ Emma Sulkowicz The Pathetic Journey of ‘Mattress Girl’ Emma Sulkowicz

Recommended by
Most Popular
U.S.   
What about the Children?
By Jonah Goldberg
I agree with everything Charlie says about David Hogg. But I also hate this entire spectacle. I don’t like the use of traumatized children to advance a political agenda, and I don’t like nasty attacks on them either. We’ve heard a lot about all that already though. What we haven’t heard much about ... Read More
White House   
Trump 2020
By Jonah Goldberg
There’s a lot of Twitter-mockery of Trump’s Drudge-splashed decision that he will run for reelection in 2020 and that he’s appointed his “digital guru” Brad Parscale as his campaign manager. In one sense, the mockery is valid because we knew Trump was running already. He literally filed the paperwork to ... Read More
U.S.   
Why the Left Opposes Arming Teachers
By Dennis Prager
Why does the Left oppose allowing a small number of highly trained teachers and other adults who work at schools to arm themselves? When asked, their response is consistent: "It's a crazy idea." And "we need fewer guns, not more guns." A New York Times editorial offered the following argument against having ... Read More
Politics & Policy   
FedEx Goes Against Current of Companies Cutting Ties with NRA
By Mairead McArdle
Companies that provide special rates to members of the National Rifle Association have fallen like dominoes under the pressure of recent social media campaigns urging them to cut ties with the group. FedEx, however, has cited nondiscrimination in defense of its business with the NRA. [jwplayer ... Read More
National Review   
Remembering WFB on the Tenth Anniversary of His Death — A Symposium
By NR Symposium
Alvin S. Felzenberg One hundred years hence, or for as long a “this last best hope on earth” endures, William F. Buckley Jr. will be remembered as the father of postwar American conservatism, the founder of National Review, and — as Ronald Reagan observed — the person who did more than any other to ... Read More
Religion   
To Be a Pilgrim: A Visit to Lourdes
By William F. Buckley Jr.
Editor’s Note: Ten years ago this week, National Review’s founder, William F. Buckley Jr., passed away. To commemorate the anniversary of Buckley’s passing, NRO will be reprinting a number of his pieces over the next few days. For more information about the National Review Institute’s efforts to preserve ... Read More
Law & the Courts   
Janus v. AFSCME at the Supreme Court: What’s at Stake?
By Jibran Khan
A curious fiction in American political life is the tendency to treat coerced behavior as equivalent to voluntary action. The most prominent example of this might be the recent repeal of the Obamacare mandate to buy health insurance. When the mandate was in place, people faced financial penalties for not buying ... Read More
Law & the Courts   
Hey SCOTUS: Don’t Tread on Voters’ T-shirts
By George Will
Andrew Cilek might be -- this is just a hunch -- unaware that 2018 is Brooks Brothers' bicentennial. Judging by what he wore when he went out to vote in Minneapolis on Nov. 2, 2010, his preferences in shirts run less to button-down Oxford cloth than to chatty T-shirts. The question the U.S. Supreme Court will ... Read More
Law & the Courts   
The Curious Michael Flynn Guilty Plea
By Andrew C. McCarthy
Back in early December, Trump fans started throwing stuff at me for suggesting that we await more information about FBI agent Peter Strzok before demanding that he be drawn and quartered. Yes, it was clear that Strzok engaged in serious misconduct: The married G-man’s reported extramarital affair with his ... Read More

    Login

    Donate
    Subscribe

    Sections
        The Corner
        Bench Memos
        The Morning Jolt
        The G-File
        All Articles
        All Authors
        Podcasts
        Photos
        Videos

    Topics
        Politics & Policy
        Culture
        White House
        Film & TV
        PC Culture
        U.S.
        World
        Immigration
        Economy & Business

    Magazine
        Latest Issue
        Archive
        Subscribe
        Customer Care
        NRPLUS
        Magazine FAQ

    About
        Frequently Asked Questions
        The Masthead
        Contact Us
        Privacy Policy
        Terms of Service
        NR Institute

    More
        Advertise
        Donate
        Store
        Search
        E-mails & Alerts

Newsletters
Jim Geraghty’s Morning Jolt (M-F)
NR Daily (M-Sa)
Jonah Goldberg’s The G-File (F)

© 2018 National Review
Loading...
:)