Saturday, 24 February 2018
The Guardian/Adam Vaughan: Big six energy companies routinely overcharging customers – exclusive
The Guardian
Energy industry
Big six energy companies routinely overcharging customers – exclusive
Analysis for the Guardian shows most companies charging customers the same after switching them to ‘cheaper’ tariffs
Adam Vaughan @adamvaughan_uk
Fri 23 Feb 2018 17.19 GMT
First published on Fri 23 Feb 2018 15.39 GMT
Shares
474
Comments
1,092
electricity pylons
The UK’s big six energy companies have been accused of dirty tricks after analysis for the Guardian revealed that they are routinely charging customers almost exactly the same amount after switching them off controversial default tariffs.
In the face of Theresa May’s plans to impose a price cap on standard variable tariffs (SVTs), which more than half of energy customers are on despite their steep prices, companies such as British Gas, E.ON and SSE have pledged to phase out such tariffs and shift billpayers onto better value fixed deals.
Sign up to the daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk
The chief of energy regulator Ofgem has welcomed such moves as a sign of progress in the energy market.
But data compiled for the Guardian shows that in the case of market leader British Gas, the most expensive fixed deal – that many customers are being moved on to – is identical to its SVT, at £1,099.84.
British Gas owner to cut 4,000 jobs blaming price cap and competition
Read more
It is understood that when customers contact their supplier to change their tariff, most are moved to the most expensive fix that the company offers. Each company’s cheapest fixed deals are often only available through comparison sites.
E.ON charged £1093.35 for both its SVT and most costly fix, while the gap for ScottishPower was just £8.49 and npower’s was £37, the figures obtained by challenger supplier Octopus show. SSE was slightly better, with a £54.73 gap, and EDF’s gap was £82.83.
The data suggests the companies are engaged in what is largely a rebadging process rather than a genuine effort to cut customers’ bills by switching them to more competitive products.
John Penrose, the Tory MP who pressured Theresa May to confirm a cap last October, said: “The big six need to do more than just a cosmetic exercise. No one should be fooled if they’re just moving customers from one rip-off tariff to another, with a different label on the tin.
“The only way we’ll put a stop to these dirty tricks is with an energy price cap, so I’m delighted the government is about to bring one in.”
British Gas on Thursday cited the price cap as one reason it is shedding 4,000 jobs, although its consumer energy arm’s profits only dropped 1% despite losing 750,000 customers to more competitively priced rivals.
More than half of British Gas customers are on SVTs, with similar shares for E.ON, EDF and npower. SSE has the highest proportion, and Scottish Power the lowest.
The data compiled by Octopus on big six pricing tactics is a snapshot taken of tariffs offered on 18 February in the London region. It excludes fixed tariffs with extras, such as boiler cover.
While the gap is small or non-existent in most cases between the SVT and the most expensive fixed tariff, the big six do offer cheaper fixes to lure in new customers. For example, British Gas’s cheapest fix is £200 below its SVT.
Although the figures are taken on a single day, an examination of the companies’ tariffs over a 90-day period ending on 18 February showed the pricing behaviour is not an anomaly.
Greg Jackson, the founder and chief executive of Octopus, calling the pricing cynical and said: “Time and time again we see the big six ducking and diving to find new ways of covertly ripping off their loyal customers. This latest is a cynical move as now even the experts – press, regulators and politicians – won’t be able to hold them to account, and it shows why the energy price cap is so vital.”
Sign up to the Green Light email to get the planet's most important stories
Read more
British Gas declined to comment but SSE said: “We work hard to keep prices down and our fixed deals give customers the security of knowing their prices are locked in for a set period of time.”
E.ON said it was still working out the detail of ending SVTs but: “Our new model of offering customers a one-year tariff as the default option … [will] be cheaper than their current standard variable product.”
Npower said its tariff was cheaper and “also protects customers from any price increase for the next three years”. It added: “It is also worth noting that our cheapest generally available tariff is now £92 less than our SVT product.”
EDF said: “We don’t agree that moving customers on to a deal which is almost identical to their existing standard tariff is in their best interests and we don’t do it.”
Asked what percentage of customers were moved off an SVT on to the company’s most expensive fix, none of the big six responded.
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.
I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information.
Thomasine F-R.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support the Guardian – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
Become a supporter
Make a contribution
Paypal and credit card
Topics
Energy industry
Energy bills
Consumer affairs
Household bills
Energy
news
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
comments (1090)
Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
1 2 3 4 … next
Due to the large number of comments, they are being shown 100 per page.
Pharaoh9
8m ago
0 1
Is this news?
Reply Share
Report
hithereyou
21m ago
1 2
Go for a Government run system.
and see your costs double.
Reply Share
Report
lochinverboy hithereyou
17m ago
2 3
Of course, you can evidence that drivel? I could switch to EDF and save a bit. Isn't EDF government owned? Not our government though, they flogged it off.
Reply Share
Report
Most viewed
Environment
Climate change
Wildlife
Energy
Pollution
back to top
become a supporter
make a contribution
securedrop
ask for help
advertise with us
work for us
contact us
complaints & corrections
terms & conditions
privacy policy
cookie policy
digital newspaper archive
all topics
all contributors
© 2018 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment