The Conversation/Tracey J Dickson: As the Pyeongchang Olympics comes to a close, what legacy will it leave?

The Conversation

Edition:

Available editions
Africa

    Job Board

    Become an author
    Sign up as a reader
    Sign in

The Conversation
Academic rigour, journalistic flair

    Arts + Culture
    Business + Economy
    Education
    Environment + Energy
    Health + Medicine
    Politics + Society
    Science + Technology
    In French

As the Pyeongchang Olympics comes to a close, what legacy will it leave?
February 23, 2018 1.52am SAST
The main objective for most sporting event organising committees is to deliver an efficient and safe event. AAP/Dan Himbrechts
Author

    Tracey J Dickson

    Associate Professor, Centre for Tourism Research, Faculty of Business, Government and Law, University of Canberra

Disclosure statement

Tracey J Dickson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Partners

University of Canberra

University of Canberra provides funding as a member of The Conversation AU.

View current jobs from University of Canberra

The Conversation is funded by Barclays Africa and seven universities, including the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Rhodes University and the Universities of Cape Town, Johannesburg, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pretoria, and South Africa. It is hosted by the Universities of the Witwatersrand and Western Cape, the African Population and Health Research Centre and the Nigerian Academy of Science. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Strategic Partner. more
Republish this article

Republish
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.

    Email
    Twitter2
    Facebook4
    LinkedIn
    Print

When major sporting events like the Olympics come to a close, the focus often shifts to the question: “so what?” For all the costs, the planning, and the efforts of athletes, officials, volunteers and staff, what will be the legacy? What will remain?

In his keynote address to the International Sport Business Symposium held in Pyeongchang to coincide with this year’s Winter Olympics, veteran sports official Dick Pound said of legacy:

    No-one promoting an Olympic bid would dream about not including the word in virtually every public statement made in support of the bid.

Yet, as he further noted, there is little research supporting legacy. Much of it is anecdotal, rather than empirical, which may have resulted in “decisions that are not based on reliable data”.
The importance of ‘legacy’

The increasing importance of legacy for the International Olympic Committee (IOC) is reflected in the launch in December 2017 of a document, Legacy Strategic Approach: Moving Forward.

The key elements of this document may be new for the IOC. But for those versed in managing mega sporting events, what it suggests isn’t new: have a vision, plan for it, put the structures and finance in place, evaluate, learn, and celebrate.

But why did the IOC feel the need to put this on the public record now, when they note that in the document that legacy has been in Olympic discourse since the 1956 Melbourne Olympics?

Maybe the drop-off in countries bidding to host the Olympics is part of it. Maybe, too, the rise of BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) as hosts of mega sporting events highlights the need for a demonstrated return on investment – not just more hype.

The main objective for most sporting event organising committees is to deliver an efficient and safe event. But is this the most important objective? For those outside the “fence” like the general public, the question becomes: what did we get for our multi-billion-dollar investment?

In some ways, the offer of legacy beyond the event helps organisers achieve a social licence to operate: that is, they obtain support to go ahead with the project. Policymakers and politicians need to clearly demonstrate that hosting sporting events is a better investment than spending in other public goods like education and health.
What for Pyeongchang?

The Pyeongchang Olympics’ proposed legacies include purpose-built venues, sports legacies, and promoting the Olympic movement.

But, in contrast to many previous host cities, Pyeongchang did not offer a volunteer legacy. Rather, it aimed to draw upon the legacy of hosting a series, or portfolio, of previous events like the athletics World Championships in Daegu in 2011, the Asian Games in Incheon in 2014, and the World University Games in Gwangju in 2015.

Hosting the Olympics may have accelerated the delivery of some of these legacies, such as roads and railways. It may have also initiated others, like new venues.

The budget for Pyeongchang is in the vicinity of US$13 billion, up 50% from initial estimates. Before gasping at the amount of money involved, it is worth noting that the bulk of these costs are allocated to capital investments, such as new stadiums and infrastructure.

This includes the cost of building a 35,000-seat temporary stadium that will be used just four times: for the opening and closing ceremonies for both the Olympics and Paralympics.

It might seem strange to pull it down, but Pyeongchang is a poor rural community with a population of just 45,000. There is no obvious need for it to have such a stadium. And new stadiums are not cost-neutral: it has been suggested that a stadium’s maintenance costs alone could be in the vicinity of $20 million per year.
A temporary stadium used for the Olympic ceremonies in Pyeongchang will be pulled down after the Games. Tracey Dickson

Future Olympics will be required to report on their legacies for up to five years after the event under the IOC’s new framework. This will include analysis of relevant data and the production of case studies to highlight how they achieved their positive legacies, so future organising committees may learn from them.

This will hopefully result in better planning for and delivery of not just a great event, but a legacy for host communities that is economically, socially and environmentally positive and sustainable.

Mega sport events can deliver legacies, but most examples to date have been about infrastructure. An era could soon be upon us when they can deliver on the other legacies like sport participation, volunteer legacies, tourism, and sustainability.

    Olympics
    Sports legacy
    Olympic legacy
    Sports history
    Sporting events
    Winter Olympics 2018

    Tweet
    Share
    Get newsletter

You might also like
Mythbusting Ancient Rome: did Christians ban the ancient Olympics?
The Winter Olympics reminds us of the value of learning a second language
Explainer: the doping case against Russian curler Aleksandr Krushelnitckii
How Olympians train their brains to become mentally tough
Sign in to comment
3 Comments
Oldest Newest

    Cameron Karlsson

    logged in via Twitter

    I have two conflicting perspectives on this issue. The first is that this article treats the Olympics almost as if it’s forced on nations, giving them a few minutes of glory but eventually leaving them penniless in the gutter. I don’t think the article is unfair or anything, but my point is that the host nations voluntarily bid to hold the Olympics.

    The second is that, short of cancelling the Olympics, the only real solution to this is to spread out the events, either across countries or over time (or, more likely, both). Eg, instead of having a Winter Olympics event and a Summer Olympics event, we have hundreds of small Olympics events. Australia can hold the rugby 7s in 2019, Norway the cross-country skiing in 2020, China the figure skating in 2021, Brazil the shotput in 2022, etc (though obviously with more than one event per year).
    2 days ago
    Report
    Henry GRAY
    Henry GRAY is a Friend of The Conversation

    It will leave me applauding the capacities of snow making machines.
    9 hours ago
    Report

Show all comments
Most popular on The Conversation

    The real reason why cities in sub-Saharan Africa aren’t issuing municipal bonds
    Africa waves some leaders goodbye: but is the democratic deficit any narrower?
    Zuma finally falls on his sword: but not before threatening to take the house down with him
    White men’s privilege in emerging economies isn’t measured. It should be
    Zimbabwe’s Morgan Tsvangirai: heroic herald of an epoch foretold

    The five priorities South Africa’s new administration should focus on
    Zuma’s removal was a masterstroke: can it be repeated for the economy?
    South Africa’s democracy stood up to the test: but some things need to change
    The Ramaphosa moment: how many Messiahs can one country take?
    Thinking of taking a walk everyday? Six reasons why it’s good for you

Expert Database

    Find experts with knowledge in:*

Want to write?

Write an article and join a growing community of more than 63,100 academics and researchers from 2,261 institutions.

Register now
The Conversation
Community

    Community standards
    Republishing guidelines
    Research and Expert Database
    Analytics
    Job Board
    Our feeds

Company

    Who we are
    Our charter
    Our team
    Partners and funders
    Contributing institutions
    Resource for media
    Contact us

Stay informed and subscribe to our free daily newsletter and get the latest analysis and commentary directly in your inbox.
Email address
Follow us on social media

Privacy policy Terms and conditions Corrections

Copyright © 2010–2018, The Conversation Africa, Inc.