The advice half of working women need to hear
Self-advocacy is difficult for many people, but for women in the workplace, it’s particularly complicated. That’s why more women need support from their peers.
In August, my company, InHerSight, asked women visiting our site whether they’d ever negotiated their salary. Almost half of the 1,041 respondents said no.
As
a company ratings platform that helps women match with companies on
factors like salary satisfaction, the nearly 50-50 split should have
been a surprise. I expected more women who visited our platform to have
advocated for themselves and their careers because I know they care
about pay.
Personal experience told me otherwise.
The first time I negotiated my salary, it wasn’t my idea. When I was applying for a new job and got an offer, one of my colleagues (I’d call her a friend) said to me, “That’s great, but what are you going to go back to them with?”
The thought hadn’t crossed my mind, and I was frankly scared that asking for more was going to make them take back the offer or have a negative opinion of me going into the new job. But she said to me, “They are expecting you to ask for more. If you don’t, they’ll be disappointed and wonder if they made the right choice.”
I don’t know if that’s true, but her words gave me the courage to ask. It was the easiest pay increase I’ve ever gotten, and when I look back, it’s clear now that her encouragement was one of the most pivotal moments in my career.
Self-advocacy is difficult for many people, but for women in the workplace, it’s particularly complicated. A host of cultural biases affect how women are perceived and perceive themselves.
Personal experience told me otherwise.
The first time I negotiated my salary, it wasn’t my idea. When I was applying for a new job and got an offer, one of my colleagues (I’d call her a friend) said to me, “That’s great, but what are you going to go back to them with?”
The thought hadn’t crossed my mind, and I was frankly scared that asking for more was going to make them take back the offer or have a negative opinion of me going into the new job. But she said to me, “They are expecting you to ask for more. If you don’t, they’ll be disappointed and wonder if they made the right choice.”
I don’t know if that’s true, but her words gave me the courage to ask. It was the easiest pay increase I’ve ever gotten, and when I look back, it’s clear now that her encouragement was one of the most pivotal moments in my career.
Self-advocacy is difficult for many people, but for women in the workplace, it’s particularly complicated. A host of cultural biases affect how women are perceived and perceive themselves.
Assertive women leaders are deemed less likable, and actions of “aggressive” women are judged more harshly than those of like-minded men. Women are also equally more likely to undervalue themselves and to see and celebrate the value in others over themselves.
That’s a lot to unpack in one salary negotiation. And not all women are as lucky as I was—to have a guardian angel of sorts sitting on their shoulders, putting those fears into perspective. Yet that direct, woman-to-woman advocacy is exactly what I think we need more of in our workforce in order to make sure more women are paid what they’re worth.
Recent data tells us that women with a network of other professional women are more successful. I believe those professional relationships are the key to encouraging more women to take their first awkward steps in discussing pay and worth. We need more women to tell other women when, how, and why they asked for more and to encourage them to do so as well.
It’s not that women are less confident than men. I know that’s not true. But we do all harbor those reality-based worries that if we ask for what we want, we’ll lose something else. A job offer, the respect of our peers, our dream salary.
While a little more than half of women are able to set aside those fears, far too many hesitate like I did. The more women who step forward to reassure a peer, to tell her, “I negotiated my salary. I asked for a raise. You need to as well,” the more successful we’ll be at helping women climb the ladder at companies they’re excited about.
As I said, my colleague’s advice shaped my career in ways I never expected. Not only did I learn how to advocate for myself, but I also learned how to set expectations with my employer of what I hoped to achieve. From the moment I countered, I meant business.
That’s a lot to unpack in one salary negotiation. And not all women are as lucky as I was—to have a guardian angel of sorts sitting on their shoulders, putting those fears into perspective. Yet that direct, woman-to-woman advocacy is exactly what I think we need more of in our workforce in order to make sure more women are paid what they’re worth.
Recent data tells us that women with a network of other professional women are more successful. I believe those professional relationships are the key to encouraging more women to take their first awkward steps in discussing pay and worth. We need more women to tell other women when, how, and why they asked for more and to encourage them to do so as well.
It’s not that women are less confident than men. I know that’s not true. But we do all harbor those reality-based worries that if we ask for what we want, we’ll lose something else. A job offer, the respect of our peers, our dream salary.
While a little more than half of women are able to set aside those fears, far too many hesitate like I did. The more women who step forward to reassure a peer, to tell her, “I negotiated my salary. I asked for a raise. You need to as well,” the more successful we’ll be at helping women climb the ladder at companies they’re excited about.
As I said, my colleague’s advice shaped my career in ways I never expected. Not only did I learn how to advocate for myself, but I also learned how to set expectations with my employer of what I hoped to achieve. From the moment I countered, I meant business.
Ursula Mead is the CEO and co-founder of InHerSight.
Research suggests taking up baking can help you feel better
Creative hobbies like baking, cooking, and gardening may be just what the doctor ordered.
If you’ve been trying to get a little more mindfulness in your life, whipping up a fresh batch of chocolate chip cookies might be exactly what you need.
Several studies suggest that creative activities like baking can deliver mindfulness benefits. For example:
Celebrity chef and cake designer Marina Sousa says she experiences this feeling in her work but was reluctant to identify it as such at first. “I think it’s very trendy to go with terms like ‘meditation,’ and ‘going within’ . . . That was always something that I kind of shied away from, because I was afraid of doing it wrong and not being perfect at it,” she says.
But, what she realized through conversations with others was that mindfulness was simply slowing down and paying attention to what’s in front of you, “which ultimately creates the space for new thoughts, and feelings, and creativity to emerge,” she says. She realized that she often did that during her work as a pastry chef and even when she baked nonprofessionally when she was younger.
Giving away the fruits—or, perhaps, muffins—of your labor can also be beneficial, Sousa says. The act of creating something and giving it as a gift or providing it as sustenance for others feels good. “It made me incredibly popular in high school with the basketball team,” she says. “When you’re doing something nice for other people, the effects just kind of compound and get bigger,” she says.
Sousa is featured in the new Better Your Bake campaign created by Nielsen-Massey Vanillas, which teaches home baking enthusiasts how to advance their skills and benefit from the meditative practice of baking. But there are plenty of easy ways to get started with baking.
- A 2016 study in the Journal of Positive Psychology found that practicing simple creative acts on a regular basis can lead to more positive psychological functioning.
- An April 2018 study published in the Journal of Happiness Studies found that young adults who engaged in “Maker activities,” such as cooking, baking, and gardening, was linked to positive subjective well-being. Participants said the most important reasons for engaging in such activities were mood repair, socializing, and staying present-focused.
- Another study in the Journal of Palliative Medicine found that “culinary therapy” can even be an effective tool in grief management.
Celebrity chef and cake designer Marina Sousa says she experiences this feeling in her work but was reluctant to identify it as such at first. “I think it’s very trendy to go with terms like ‘meditation,’ and ‘going within’ . . . That was always something that I kind of shied away from, because I was afraid of doing it wrong and not being perfect at it,” she says.
But, what she realized through conversations with others was that mindfulness was simply slowing down and paying attention to what’s in front of you, “which ultimately creates the space for new thoughts, and feelings, and creativity to emerge,” she says. She realized that she often did that during her work as a pastry chef and even when she baked nonprofessionally when she was younger.
Giving away the fruits—or, perhaps, muffins—of your labor can also be beneficial, Sousa says. The act of creating something and giving it as a gift or providing it as sustenance for others feels good. “It made me incredibly popular in high school with the basketball team,” she says. “When you’re doing something nice for other people, the effects just kind of compound and get bigger,” she says.
Sousa is featured in the new Better Your Bake campaign created by Nielsen-Massey Vanillas, which teaches home baking enthusiasts how to advance their skills and benefit from the meditative practice of baking. But there are plenty of easy ways to get started with baking.
For
people who find themselves overwhelmed in a kitchen, baking is a good
place to start. Unlike some other forms of cooking, measuring and order
are important to get the right results, Sousa says. The ratio of flour,
sugar, salt, and other ingredients is critical, so you need to take the
time to measure and focus, she says. “My whole method in general is just
try until you get it right. Practice makes perfect,” Sousa says. “And
the ripple effect of it is that you get to make people happy.”
A team of 1,000 major brands are fighting back against Amazon counterfeits
A trade group that represents Adidas, Gap, and Target accused Amazon of creating a black market of counterfeit goods.
If
you type “Gucci Bag” into Amazon’s search bar, you can see a selection
of handbags that look an awful lot like what you might find at a Gucci
store, but at $40 or less. Some are adorned with bees and beetles, which
Gucci is famous for. One features Gucci’s interlocked double G logo. Of
course, if you take a closer look, you’ll realize they’re fakes. One
bag has misspelled the name: Gugci. And the bags are made of plastic,
rather than leather.
Counterfeiting
is so rampant on the site that it can be hard to tell what is real and
what is fake. If you’re looking for a more modestly priced bag, for
instance, like one by Kate Spade, you can’t tell whether an $80
cross-body tote is the real deal or a knockoff.
When I reached out to Amazon, a spokesperson said, “Amazon strictly prohibits the sale of counterfeit products. We invest heavily in prevention and take proactive steps to drive counterfeits in our stores to zero. In 2018 alone, we invested over $400 million in personnel and tools built on machine learning and data science to protect our customers from fraud and abuse in our stores.” The spokesperson added that the company stopped a million suspected bad actors from opening Amazon selling accounts and blocked more than 3 billion suspected bad listings.
But these measures may not be enough, at least according to many brands whose products have been counterfeited and posted on Amazon. And from a quick search of the Amazon website, it’s easy to see why.
A fashion industry trade group called the American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA), which represents 1,000 brands, including Gap, Adidas, and Target, has recommended that five Amazon sites be added to the U.S. government’s annual list of Notorious Markets. This list lays out all the online and physical markets outside the United States where large-scale copyright infringement takes place. This could lead to trade sanctions for countries with weak copyright protection enforcement. The five sites included Amazon’s U.K., Canadian, German, French, and Indian websites.
In a letter to the U.S. Trade Representative (the agency in the government responsible for developing and recommending U.S. trade policy), the AAFA said, “Anyone can become a seller with too much ease, and it is often misleading and difficult to interpret who the seller is. Members emphasize that from a consumer standpoint, it is hard to decipher from whom the purchase is being made. Amazon needs to go further, by demonstrating the commitment to the resources and leadership necessary to make its brand protection programs scalable, transparent, and most importantly, effective.”
It’s unclear whether the U.S. government will put these websites on the Notorious Markets list. If it does, it may use trade sanctions or other legal means to induce Amazon to take stricter measures to curb counterfeiting. Last year, the AAFA recommended that the U.K., Canada, and German sites be added, but the government ultimately decided not to include them in the final list.
When I reached out to Amazon, a spokesperson said, “Amazon strictly prohibits the sale of counterfeit products. We invest heavily in prevention and take proactive steps to drive counterfeits in our stores to zero. In 2018 alone, we invested over $400 million in personnel and tools built on machine learning and data science to protect our customers from fraud and abuse in our stores.” The spokesperson added that the company stopped a million suspected bad actors from opening Amazon selling accounts and blocked more than 3 billion suspected bad listings.
But these measures may not be enough, at least according to many brands whose products have been counterfeited and posted on Amazon. And from a quick search of the Amazon website, it’s easy to see why.
A fashion industry trade group called the American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA), which represents 1,000 brands, including Gap, Adidas, and Target, has recommended that five Amazon sites be added to the U.S. government’s annual list of Notorious Markets. This list lays out all the online and physical markets outside the United States where large-scale copyright infringement takes place. This could lead to trade sanctions for countries with weak copyright protection enforcement. The five sites included Amazon’s U.K., Canadian, German, French, and Indian websites.
In a letter to the U.S. Trade Representative (the agency in the government responsible for developing and recommending U.S. trade policy), the AAFA said, “Anyone can become a seller with too much ease, and it is often misleading and difficult to interpret who the seller is. Members emphasize that from a consumer standpoint, it is hard to decipher from whom the purchase is being made. Amazon needs to go further, by demonstrating the commitment to the resources and leadership necessary to make its brand protection programs scalable, transparent, and most importantly, effective.”
It’s unclear whether the U.S. government will put these websites on the Notorious Markets list. If it does, it may use trade sanctions or other legal means to induce Amazon to take stricter measures to curb counterfeiting. Last year, the AAFA recommended that the U.K., Canada, and German sites be added, but the government ultimately decided not to include them in the final list.
Amazon’s
listings are ultimately controlled by Amazon itself, rather than
sellers. If a third-party brand, like Gucci, identifies a fake product,
they can only take it down by reporting it to Amazon and waiting for
Amazon to take action. And an in-depth Yahoo Finance investigation found
that Amazon tends to be reactive, rather than proactive, toward
counterfeiting issues. It relies heavily on algorithms and machine
learning to flag issues. This “leaves it vulnerable to bad actors, who
can game the system,” according to Yahoo Finance’s Krystal Hu.
(The Amazon spokesperson said that Hu’s characterization is not entirely accurate, since the brands themselves have tools like Project Zero, which allows them to identify suspicious, counterfeit listings and remove them. The spokesperson also said that on average, Amazon’s automated protections proactively stop 100 times more suspected counterfeit products compared to what Amazon removes based on reports from brands.)
But there are many ways to rip off design. With this letter, the AAFA was specifically reacting to third-party sellers on Amazon’s platform that are creating replicas of other brands’ products, sometimes even using their brand names. However, Amazon itself has become notorious for allegedly copying brands that are top sellers on the site. In 2016, Bloomberg reported that Amazon manufactured and sold an aluminum laptop stand in 2015 through its AmazonBasics line that looked very similar to one created by Rain Design, which had been popular on Amazon for a decade before. However, while Rain’s stand was $42, Amazon’s was $20. AmazonBasics now sells thousands of products, from coffee makers to colored kitchen knives to dinnerware sets that seem inspired by other sellers on the site. Amazon is even creating fashion items inspired by popular brands that don’t even sell products on the Amazon platform. Most recently, I reported that they created a wool shoe that looks suspiciously close to Allbirds’ Wool Runner.
Part of Amazon’s business is to be a marketplace for other brands, and yet within the fashion industry, the platform seems to be alienating companies at every turn. It’s not a good look.
(The Amazon spokesperson said that Hu’s characterization is not entirely accurate, since the brands themselves have tools like Project Zero, which allows them to identify suspicious, counterfeit listings and remove them. The spokesperson also said that on average, Amazon’s automated protections proactively stop 100 times more suspected counterfeit products compared to what Amazon removes based on reports from brands.)
But there are many ways to rip off design. With this letter, the AAFA was specifically reacting to third-party sellers on Amazon’s platform that are creating replicas of other brands’ products, sometimes even using their brand names. However, Amazon itself has become notorious for allegedly copying brands that are top sellers on the site. In 2016, Bloomberg reported that Amazon manufactured and sold an aluminum laptop stand in 2015 through its AmazonBasics line that looked very similar to one created by Rain Design, which had been popular on Amazon for a decade before. However, while Rain’s stand was $42, Amazon’s was $20. AmazonBasics now sells thousands of products, from coffee makers to colored kitchen knives to dinnerware sets that seem inspired by other sellers on the site. Amazon is even creating fashion items inspired by popular brands that don’t even sell products on the Amazon platform. Most recently, I reported that they created a wool shoe that looks suspiciously close to Allbirds’ Wool Runner.
Part of Amazon’s business is to be a marketplace for other brands, and yet within the fashion industry, the platform seems to be alienating companies at every turn. It’s not a good look.
Everything the movie ‘Joker’ is not, despite what you may have heard
‘Joker’ hits theaters today on intersecting waves of hype, backlash, and fear. Here’s a little clarity on some misconceptions about it.
This is why we can’t have nice things. Following last week’s Emmy Awards, a photo emerged of
an exultant Phoebe Waller-Bridge nursing a victory margarita in one
hand and a Marlboro in the other, surrounded by glinting golden
trophies. It was almost subjectively a pretty cool image, especially for
those long enamored with the artist. But nothing gold can stay. First,
Phoebe-fanatics went a little overboard yas kween-ing, run me over with a car-ing, and, of course, this is everything-ing. Then came the media coverage, complete with reporting on how the photo came together and how it almost fell apart.
Finally, there was the backlash from people upset that the photo
dangerously glamorized cigarettes and margaritas, and from people sick
of seeing this same image on their feeds again and again.
This is how we ruin everything: over-amplifying adulation, stratifying into tribes—and being utterly exhausting.
The latest victim of that same insidious cycle is the new film Joker, out in theaters Friday.
At first, it sounded like, well, a joke. Just one year after Jared Leto scuzzed up the screen with his dud gangster take on Gotham’s Clown Prince of Crime, the director of The Hangover and Old School announced that he was making a stand-alone Joker movie. Here we go again. How far Batman’s most worthy adversary had fallen from the cinematic heights of yore, presumably.
A few months later, though, the casting of soulful-eyed Joaquin Phoenix piqued fan interest. As did the first trailer a year later. Finally, Joker premiered at the Venice Film Festival in late August, which is how cineastes entered the broken house of mirrors in which we now find ourselves.
Much like the Waller-Bridge photo, it started with applause: an eight-minute standing ovation, followed by a Golden Lion win, the most prestigious award at the festival. Ecstatic takes pinged rapidly around Movie Twitter, echoed by the most corrosive kind of fans in the world.
Since every action inspires an equal and opposite reaction, then came the preemptive backlash. “Just what the world needs—another story of a sad white dude taking his hostility out on everyone else,” et cetera et cetera. In response came a different wave of backlash, citing the film as dangerous in its potential activation of an incel uprising. This line of criticism was then elevated in the past week, when the U.S. military issued a warning about potential violence at Joker screenings after picking up some chatter about it on the dark web. Now, undercover cops will be stationed in select screenings throughout Gotham, er, I mean New York City.
The latest victim of that same insidious cycle is the new film Joker, out in theaters Friday.
At first, it sounded like, well, a joke. Just one year after Jared Leto scuzzed up the screen with his dud gangster take on Gotham’s Clown Prince of Crime, the director of The Hangover and Old School announced that he was making a stand-alone Joker movie. Here we go again. How far Batman’s most worthy adversary had fallen from the cinematic heights of yore, presumably.
A few months later, though, the casting of soulful-eyed Joaquin Phoenix piqued fan interest. As did the first trailer a year later. Finally, Joker premiered at the Venice Film Festival in late August, which is how cineastes entered the broken house of mirrors in which we now find ourselves.
Much like the Waller-Bridge photo, it started with applause: an eight-minute standing ovation, followed by a Golden Lion win, the most prestigious award at the festival. Ecstatic takes pinged rapidly around Movie Twitter, echoed by the most corrosive kind of fans in the world.
Since every action inspires an equal and opposite reaction, then came the preemptive backlash. “Just what the world needs—another story of a sad white dude taking his hostility out on everyone else,” et cetera et cetera. In response came a different wave of backlash, citing the film as dangerous in its potential activation of an incel uprising. This line of criticism was then elevated in the past week, when the U.S. military issued a warning about potential violence at Joker screenings after picking up some chatter about it on the dark web. Now, undercover cops will be stationed in select screenings throughout Gotham, er, I mean New York City.
So, depending on whom you ask, Joker is either the best movie ever, the least necessary movie ever, or irresponsible agitprop.
After attending a screening and Q&A last night, however, my opinion is that it’s none of those things.
Anyone who thinks they’re not going to like it probably won’t—and shouldn’t waste any time on it. For anyone else uncertain based on what various factions of the internet claim the movie is, here are some things Joker is not.
After attending a screening and Q&A last night, however, my opinion is that it’s none of those things.
Anyone who thinks they’re not going to like it probably won’t—and shouldn’t waste any time on it. For anyone else uncertain based on what various factions of the internet claim the movie is, here are some things Joker is not.
A straight-up remake of ‘The King of Comedy’
No sooner was it revealed that this version of the Joker was a failed comedian and Robert De Niro would play the talk show host he idolized did the King of Comedy discourse begin. Joker was either an homage to Martin Scorsese’s 1983 film or an outright remake. What’s clear from the actual movie, though, is that director Todd Phillips has a lot of affection for Scorsese and De Niro’s late ’70s/early ’80s collaborations, and decided to nod to one of them in particular while emulating their aura altogether. Because the Joker’s attempts at being a comedian are comic-book canon, and the new film doesn’t lean on King of Comedy quite as heavily as the trailer implies, the inspiration makes sense in context.A sympathetic portrait of a supervillain
Pitiable is not the same thing as sympathetic. It’s sad that Arthur Fleck was born into the life we find him in. What he does once we meet him does not require us to be on his side, though, nor does it particularly demand that we do so. At least not any more than TV shows like Breaking Bad or The Sopranos ask us to relate to their antihero leads. Personally, I felt more uncomfortable being asked to consider Dick Cheney’s humanity in Vice than I did contemplating the societal and neurological circumstances that lead to Joker’s rampage.An incel call to arms
There is indeed some political commentary baked into the movie. This take on the iconic character is emblematic of empathy-devoid MAGA hats. Phoenix’s Arthur Fleck has a Tourette’s-like mental condition where he laughs at inappropriate moments. He also has a tendency to target elites, and his rampage threatens to inspire a populist revolution. What could be a better metaphor for the disaffected sociopaths who memed Trump into office, the people who celebrate his constant cruelty as though it were all just Twitter trollage?
However, the movie does not
seem designed to appeal specifically to the incel set. Arthur is a bit
obsessed with a woman who pays him a brief kindness, but he is never
driven by spiteful horniness. Nor does he want to kill all the chads. If
this increasingly dangerous community adopts this character as its
newest hero, it would be a stretch to argue that they’ve been courted.
“Take away the Joker and this movie couldn’t get made,” Phillips told the crowd at the screening I attended earlier this week. It’s a comment about the sorry state of cinema these days, where only superhero movies and remakes can flourish at the box office. No matter how many movies like The Big Sick, The Favourite, and The Farewell rack up awards and deliver a significant return-on-investment, some people always pretend as though original ideas are verboten. They’re not. I’m glad Phillips experimented with superhero movies by grafting one onto a different, gritty genre and removing the franchise drive, but the idea that this was the only way Hollywood would greenlight a violent character study now is garbage.
Worse still, Phillips has tilted the conversation around Joker this week toward an interview in which he claimed he’d moved away from making comedies because the culture would no longer permit his brand of humor. “Go try to be funny nowadays with this woke culture,” he says in the piece. “There were articles written about why comedies don’t work anymore—I’ll tell you why, because all the fucking funny guys are like, ‘Fuck this shit, because I don’t want to offend you.’ It’s hard to argue with 30 million people on Twitter. You just can’t do it, right? So you just go, ‘I’m out.'” It should be noted that Phillips’s last three movies were The Hangover II (2011), The Hangover III (2013), and War Dogs (2016), none of which were well received, although the first two made tons of money. Politically correct audiences aren’t standing in the way of anyone being funny these days, but lord knows that they’ve become a popular punching bag among middle-aged funnymen. I’m almost convinced that Phillips’s comments were designed to be used as stealth marketing for a film in which someone who can’t make people laugh goes for a very different kind of reaction.
Either that, or he wanted the Joker to seem more sympathetic by turning himself into a villain.
One long distillation of its director’s opinion
The argument around separating the art from the artist has come up a lot more in the past couple of years—and in some wildly unpleasant ways—so it’s a nice change of pace just to caution that one need not love everything Todd Phillips says in order to enjoy Joker.“Take away the Joker and this movie couldn’t get made,” Phillips told the crowd at the screening I attended earlier this week. It’s a comment about the sorry state of cinema these days, where only superhero movies and remakes can flourish at the box office. No matter how many movies like The Big Sick, The Favourite, and The Farewell rack up awards and deliver a significant return-on-investment, some people always pretend as though original ideas are verboten. They’re not. I’m glad Phillips experimented with superhero movies by grafting one onto a different, gritty genre and removing the franchise drive, but the idea that this was the only way Hollywood would greenlight a violent character study now is garbage.
Worse still, Phillips has tilted the conversation around Joker this week toward an interview in which he claimed he’d moved away from making comedies because the culture would no longer permit his brand of humor. “Go try to be funny nowadays with this woke culture,” he says in the piece. “There were articles written about why comedies don’t work anymore—I’ll tell you why, because all the fucking funny guys are like, ‘Fuck this shit, because I don’t want to offend you.’ It’s hard to argue with 30 million people on Twitter. You just can’t do it, right? So you just go, ‘I’m out.'” It should be noted that Phillips’s last three movies were The Hangover II (2011), The Hangover III (2013), and War Dogs (2016), none of which were well received, although the first two made tons of money. Politically correct audiences aren’t standing in the way of anyone being funny these days, but lord knows that they’ve become a popular punching bag among middle-aged funnymen. I’m almost convinced that Phillips’s comments were designed to be used as stealth marketing for a film in which someone who can’t make people laugh goes for a very different kind of reaction.
Either that, or he wanted the Joker to seem more sympathetic by turning himself into a villain.
This treetop bike path takes you 30 feet up into the canopy of a forest
Belgium wants more people to go biking—and it’s making the proposition irresistible by creating some unforgettable experiences.
When
you ride down this bike path in a woods in rural Belgium, the path
gradually rises in the air—and at its highest point, around 32 feet
above the ground, propels you through the canopy of pine trees. The
path, called Cycling through the Trees,
is one of a handful of breathtakingly unique experiences that the
Belgian government has created to draw people to the countryside and get
them on bikes. “With these projects, we want to increase the
interaction even more with the natural beauty of our landscapes while
cycling,” says Igor Philtjens, the regional minister of tourism and
chairman of the tourism agency Visit Limburg, who led the creation of the new path through the forest.
In
a region that was once known for coal mining, the trees in this forest
were originally planted for use in the mines. By clearing away some of
the coniferous trees—not native to this area—the new bike path helps
make room for some native trees to come back. But the construction
process also avoided any unnecessary impacts on the trees, with a design
that could be built from pieces made in an off-site workshop and then
assembled, Lego-like, in the woods. “All phases of the project, from
design to construction and use, happen in harmony with nature,”
Philtjens says. The Belgium-based landscape architecture firm Burolandschap led the design, collaborating with architects from De Gregorio & Partners.
The ride down the path is “magical,” says Philtjens. “You can smell, hear, and feel the forest . . . The experience between the trees is really special. It allows you to gradually observe the different stages of the forest, each with its unique characteristics. If you listen carefully, you can even hear special bird species that you would never otherwise encounter.”
The region first built its “cycle node” network, where riders bike from point to point on sprawling recreational bike paths, nearly 25 years ago. But more recently, the government started adding new destinations to draw more visitors. First was Cycling through Water, a path that cuts through the middle of a pond, making it possible to ride next to a swan at eye level. The forest path was completed this summer, and another new path in a national park is now under construction. (Both Cycling through Water and Cycling through the Trees were among the 15 projects chosen in this year’s Bike Architecture Biennale, a selection of the best places to ride a bike in the world.)
Belgium, like the neighboring Netherlands, already has high cycling rates, and the Belgian city of Antwerp is rated as one of the world’s best cities for biking. But the new projects are designed to encourage even more people to ride more often. “It is extremely important for the well-being of our own inhabitants,” says Philtjens. “We want to give them the opportunity to relax and unwind close to home in their spare time, and encourage them to take their bike as often as possible in everyday life.” Since its opening in mid-June, more than 180,000 people have visited the new forest path.
The ride down the path is “magical,” says Philtjens. “You can smell, hear, and feel the forest . . . The experience between the trees is really special. It allows you to gradually observe the different stages of the forest, each with its unique characteristics. If you listen carefully, you can even hear special bird species that you would never otherwise encounter.”
The region first built its “cycle node” network, where riders bike from point to point on sprawling recreational bike paths, nearly 25 years ago. But more recently, the government started adding new destinations to draw more visitors. First was Cycling through Water, a path that cuts through the middle of a pond, making it possible to ride next to a swan at eye level. The forest path was completed this summer, and another new path in a national park is now under construction. (Both Cycling through Water and Cycling through the Trees were among the 15 projects chosen in this year’s Bike Architecture Biennale, a selection of the best places to ride a bike in the world.)
Belgium, like the neighboring Netherlands, already has high cycling rates, and the Belgian city of Antwerp is rated as one of the world’s best cities for biking. But the new projects are designed to encourage even more people to ride more often. “It is extremely important for the well-being of our own inhabitants,” says Philtjens. “We want to give them the opportunity to relax and unwind close to home in their spare time, and encourage them to take their bike as often as possible in everyday life.” Since its opening in mid-June, more than 180,000 people have visited the new forest path.
Frank Lloyd Wright’s last home is being sold at auction with no minimum
Wright built hundreds of houses over the course of his long career, but the Lykes home was the final home he designed.
Throughout
the late 19th and 20th centuries, Frank Lloyd Wright’s architectural
designs came to define the American landscape, a distinction that still
holds true today. Over the course of his storied career, the architect
built everything from private homes to public pavilions; in total,
Wright designed approximately 425 structures.
On
October 16, the Norman Lykes House, Wright’s last residential design,
will be on sale at auction. The Phoenix, Arizona, home is being sold
without reserve by Heritage Auctions and will have no minimum starting bid.
“A late Frank Lloyd Wright house in such impeccable condition is truly a treasure,” Nate Schar, director of Luxury Real Estate for Heritage Auctions, said in a statement. “Bidders will have the opportunity to not only buy this incredibly livable mid-century modern home, but also to own the final masterpiece from the most iconic American architect.”
The 3,095-square foot, 3-bedroom, 3-bathroom contemporary estate is located on over 1.3 acres near the Phoenix Mountains Preserve in Palm Canyon. The curvilinear house—one of only 14 circular dwellings designed by Wright—blends into its mountainside location, thanks to the use of hand-carried concrete blocks. “The Norman Lykes house was greatly influenced by Wright’s fascination with geometry in his later years. Curved lines in the home playoff the curves of the Phoenix Mountains, and the cantilevered roof line provides natural shade on the south facing façade. The windows never see direct sun, yet the house is light and bright,” Brent Lewis, director of Design for Heritage Auctions, said in a statement.The single-family residence, also known as the Circular Sun House, was designed in 1959 and completed in 1967 by architect and Wright apprentice John Rattenbury after Wright’s death. The two-story home has only been on the market once before, and still holds all of its original, custom-built furniture. “Hallmark design elements of Wright can be seen in the extensive Philippine mahogany woodworking and built-in furniture, and in the fine details like the ventilated staircase and the show stopping circular fireplace,” Lewis said.
The house also boasts a crescent-shaped swimming pool (luxuriously lined with mother of pearl), carport, and central heating and air-conditioning.
When the Lykes family sold the house in 1994, it featured five bedrooms and three bathrooms. But the following buyer commissioned Rattenbury to renovate the interior by collapsing the five bedrooms to three larger ones. Other updates, like turning the original workshop into a media room, were made as well, in cooperation with the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation.
“A late Frank Lloyd Wright house in such impeccable condition is truly a treasure,” Nate Schar, director of Luxury Real Estate for Heritage Auctions, said in a statement. “Bidders will have the opportunity to not only buy this incredibly livable mid-century modern home, but also to own the final masterpiece from the most iconic American architect.”
The 3,095-square foot, 3-bedroom, 3-bathroom contemporary estate is located on over 1.3 acres near the Phoenix Mountains Preserve in Palm Canyon. The curvilinear house—one of only 14 circular dwellings designed by Wright—blends into its mountainside location, thanks to the use of hand-carried concrete blocks. “The Norman Lykes house was greatly influenced by Wright’s fascination with geometry in his later years. Curved lines in the home playoff the curves of the Phoenix Mountains, and the cantilevered roof line provides natural shade on the south facing façade. The windows never see direct sun, yet the house is light and bright,” Brent Lewis, director of Design for Heritage Auctions, said in a statement.The single-family residence, also known as the Circular Sun House, was designed in 1959 and completed in 1967 by architect and Wright apprentice John Rattenbury after Wright’s death. The two-story home has only been on the market once before, and still holds all of its original, custom-built furniture. “Hallmark design elements of Wright can be seen in the extensive Philippine mahogany woodworking and built-in furniture, and in the fine details like the ventilated staircase and the show stopping circular fireplace,” Lewis said.
The house also boasts a crescent-shaped swimming pool (luxuriously lined with mother of pearl), carport, and central heating and air-conditioning.
When the Lykes family sold the house in 1994, it featured five bedrooms and three bathrooms. But the following buyer commissioned Rattenbury to renovate the interior by collapsing the five bedrooms to three larger ones. Other updates, like turning the original workshop into a media room, were made as well, in cooperation with the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation.
Not all Wright homes have received that level of attention. Buying a Wright home can be a complex, long-term project, as the Wall Street Journal
reported; as these homes pass from owner to owner, it’s inevitable that
they’ll need to be renovated and updated to withstand the passage of
time. Bidding begins on October 16, and you can follow online here.
These are some of the best side hustles for introverts
If the thought of interacting with even more people at the end of the workday doesn’t appeal, here are some excellent options.
Despite historically low unemployment, side hustles are still very much a thing. According to the most recent survey from Bankrate, nearly half of working Americans (45%) report having a gig outside of their primary job, 43% of whom have full-time jobs.
The
reasons why people juggle the extra work vary, but the Bankrate survey
found that the average monthly income from side hustles is about $1,100.
No wonder people are eagerly taking on gigs that draw on their
strengths, interests, or available time like driving for Uber or Lyft,
party planning, coaching, offering fitness instruction, or home repair.
However, plenty of side hustles require a measure of personal interaction that may be making the introverted reader start to sweat. Although there’s a wide continuum between introversion and extroversion, the emotional cost of additional face-to-face interaction may make some side jobs more challenging than others.
“Even extroverts need time to themselves,” says Chris Guillebeau, author of 100 Side Hustles. But if you’re an introvert who works around people for your day job, it’s especially important to choose something where you can do most of the work on your own terms, Guillebeau says. “People tend to be much more successful with their projects when they’re excited to work on them,” he adds, “If they’re worn out at the end of the day, the last thing an introvert wants to do is make sales calls. But if they can spend time creating an online course or finding items for resale, it can actually bring energy instead of drain it.”
So when Guillebeau’s book by was delivered to our office recently, we decided to look at the gigs best suited to those who are more introverted. Here’s what we found:
While tutoring is often touted as a potentially lucrative side hustle, it does require a person to spend scheduled time with others. Expert courses like Bansal’s are available for anyone to take online, so there’s no need to be present to earn the money. Courses can be priced anywhere from $10 to over $100 depending on the subject matter and how deeply its explored. The key is to draw from your personal expertise and interests.
However, plenty of side hustles require a measure of personal interaction that may be making the introverted reader start to sweat. Although there’s a wide continuum between introversion and extroversion, the emotional cost of additional face-to-face interaction may make some side jobs more challenging than others.
“Even extroverts need time to themselves,” says Chris Guillebeau, author of 100 Side Hustles. But if you’re an introvert who works around people for your day job, it’s especially important to choose something where you can do most of the work on your own terms, Guillebeau says. “People tend to be much more successful with their projects when they’re excited to work on them,” he adds, “If they’re worn out at the end of the day, the last thing an introvert wants to do is make sales calls. But if they can spend time creating an online course or finding items for resale, it can actually bring energy instead of drain it.”
So when Guillebeau’s book by was delivered to our office recently, we decided to look at the gigs best suited to those who are more introverted. Here’s what we found:
Resource expert
The best ideas often come from the things we use every day and get really good at. Take Sumit Bansal, a former marketing manager at IBM in India. Bansal used Excel on the regular and was often fielding questions from his coworkers about the finer points of spreadsheets. He started a blog to serve as a repository for FAQs, and before long, he was monetizing it. However, it wasn’t until he began offering a full online course in Excel basics that the money started rolling in. It’s been so successful, Bansal’s side gig is now his full-time job.While tutoring is often touted as a potentially lucrative side hustle, it does require a person to spend scheduled time with others. Expert courses like Bansal’s are available for anyone to take online, so there’s no need to be present to earn the money. Courses can be priced anywhere from $10 to over $100 depending on the subject matter and how deeply its explored. The key is to draw from your personal expertise and interests.
Cleanup crew
James Hookway, a full-time accountant from Australia, stumbled on a great side gig after throwing a holiday party. “Hangover Helpers” aimed to do what no one felt like tackling the morning after a big bash—clean up. Hookway created a Facebook page and got his first booking that week. All he had to do was show up to the trashed venue in the morning (after everyone had left) and bring a lot of cleaning supplies and elbow grease. Although he hasn’t quit his day job yet, the company earned $45,000 in its first two years.The thing about cleaning that may appeal to introverts is that for both offices and homes, it’s a pretty solitary job. And for those who are neatniks, nothing beats the satisfaction of setting everything to right, all while earning a little extra dough.
Creative on demand
Architect Gerald Lau decided to try a print on demand business. Essentially he’d create a t-shirt design, and when he’d get an order for one, he’d have it printed and shipped to the buyer. The cost to set up shop was minimal: he bought a domain name for his website and a Shopify subscription to take and fulfill orders. He also contracted with a third-party service to print and ship his orders.This meant that Lau didn’t have to do any actual selling. Most of the creative work fulfilled his passion for creating designs, which he’d add to the website. If someone ordered, great; if not, Lau didn’t have to worry about getting rid of overstock. On-demand printing means that you don’t have to carry inventory and you can experiment with different designs to see which ones resonate with customers. Those that don’t can simply be taken down.
The caveat is that because startup costs are so low, there’s a lot of competition. But there’s only one you, and you should be able to mine your expertise and imagination to create a concept that no one else will have. The first time Lau hit revenue of over $1,000 was because he’d hit on a unique offering for kids.
Delivery service
Of course, you could always get a part-time job delivering pizza or UberEats orders. But Julia Baldwin and her husband decided to take control of the entire business. The two happened on an idea to offer to bake and deliver cookies during the night. Their After Dark Cookies took off in Portland, Oregon, thanks to the fact that not many places in that city are open and up for late-night deliveries.
It
also helps that there are plenty of college students around, but some
of their orders actually came from people out of town who wanted to send
a local a gift. Their startup costs were $3,000, but their income is
now $8,000 a month.
This could be a great side hustle for an introvert with a passion for cooking. As the Baldwins have seen, their interactions with customers have proved to be positive—hugs were exchanged—but minimal. And the opportunity to be creative both with the product and the marketing could offer the kind of intellectual fulfillment a day job doesn’t always provide. You do have to be sure to comply with local laws regarding food preparation and sales.
But he didn’t have the technical chops to create an app himself, so he outsourced that part. The app went on to make money and he added an audiobook version. When he got to generating around $8,000 per month, he sold the app to a larger company. He’s now looking for another opportunity.
It’s easy to see how someone with a tech background could duplicate his success without the overhead of hiring another person to take care of the development. And for those who are looking to break into the tech market but don’t have the work experience to land a full-time job as an established professional, this side gig could be just the ticket. In the meantime, it’s a low-stress hustle that requires minimal outside interaction.
Of course, introverts can successfully build side hustles that do require working with people. You just need to be honest about how much interaction you want to have, especially after work hours. As Harvard Business School behavioral scientist Francesca Gino told Fast Company, just “knowing your type when it comes to personality is important because by increasing our awareness of where we stand in terms of introversion and extroversion, we can develop a better sense of our tendencies, manage our weak spots, and play to our strengths.” And knowing your strengths will also help you find the best side hustle for you.
This could be a great side hustle for an introvert with a passion for cooking. As the Baldwins have seen, their interactions with customers have proved to be positive—hugs were exchanged—but minimal. And the opportunity to be creative both with the product and the marketing could offer the kind of intellectual fulfillment a day job doesn’t always provide. You do have to be sure to comply with local laws regarding food preparation and sales.
App creator
An accountant found a clever way to make money in a side hustle by combing the App Store. Trevor McKendrick was working part-time and accidentally hit on a way to earn more by finding high ranking apps with poor user reviews. He used his Spanish language expertise to land on an app for Spanish speakers.But he didn’t have the technical chops to create an app himself, so he outsourced that part. The app went on to make money and he added an audiobook version. When he got to generating around $8,000 per month, he sold the app to a larger company. He’s now looking for another opportunity.
It’s easy to see how someone with a tech background could duplicate his success without the overhead of hiring another person to take care of the development. And for those who are looking to break into the tech market but don’t have the work experience to land a full-time job as an established professional, this side gig could be just the ticket. In the meantime, it’s a low-stress hustle that requires minimal outside interaction.
Of course, introverts can successfully build side hustles that do require working with people. You just need to be honest about how much interaction you want to have, especially after work hours. As Harvard Business School behavioral scientist Francesca Gino told Fast Company, just “knowing your type when it comes to personality is important because by increasing our awareness of where we stand in terms of introversion and extroversion, we can develop a better sense of our tendencies, manage our weak spots, and play to our strengths.” And knowing your strengths will also help you find the best side hustle for you.
One
thing to keep in mind, regardless of your personality type, is to know
when to persist and when to call it quits. Guillebeau says if you’re
running out of steam (and money) it’s important to ask yourself if you
still believe in the overall project. “If you do, maybe you just need to
change something about it—a different market, product, or outreach
strategy, for example,” he suggests. But if it’s not working and you’re
no longer thrilled about it, you might as well move on and try something
different, he advises. “Life is short, and there’s a lot of power in
giving up,” says Guillebeau, “Besides, with most side hustles, the
stakes are low, so don’t be afraid to experiment.”
A new repository of the web’s best portfolios helps you design yours like a pro
Does your personal website look worse than MySpace circa 2007? Click over to Humans, a crowdsourced project that showcases the web’s best personal websites.
For
today’s creative professionals, your online portfolio is arguably now
more important than your résumé. In our era of peak personal branding,
professionals are making themselves hyper-visible through the use of
social media and slick personal website design. More and more,
networking is taking the place
of traditional credentials; as a result, people are creating platforms
for themselves that turn on the axis of connectivity and pleasing
aesthetics.
Koby
Ofek, a Tel Aviv-based entrepreneur and former technology journalist,
noticed this trend and has created a new website that speaks to the need
for design inspiration when building a brand. Humans
is like a carefully curated Pinterest board that offers insight into
what the best personal websites look like, which services are used to
create them, and the technology necessary to build them. “It started
with a personal journey to find inspiration to create my place on the
web. I wanted to raise my profile a bit and was thinking, ‘What would be
the best way to go about it?'” Ofek says. “It’s hard to decide what to
show and how. I wanted to see some examples of other people’s work
before I designed my own project.”
When it comes time to choose a platform to host and design a website, users have options: WordPress, Wix, and Squarespace, just to name a few. All of these approaches, coupled with the option to code from the ground up, make it overwhelming for people to know which one will best suit their needs. For each website covered on the site, you can check out the design, technology, platform, color palette, awards given, and characteristics of the person who built it. You can also filter through the featured portfolios by color, industry, location, and more.
The websites seen on Humans were sourced from a huge swath of the web—via Twitter accounts belonging to web designers and developers, web-design award sites, and social-media platforms dedicated to design. His criteria for inclusion wasn’t to only add the best-looking websites, but to have a variety of styles, services, and technologies to see what’s already out there. There are minimalist websites with blank backgrounds, and flashy sites with all the design bells and whistles. “It’s up to the community to upvote what’s interesting and bubble up the better designs,” Ofek says.
Ofek launched Humans with 500 websites and has received roughly 1,200 submissions for inclusion since. Early on, reviews were mostly for professionals with some role in building the web—developers, designers, illustrators, writers, and so on. But over time, Ofek received requests to cover many other types of “offline” professions such as activists, hairdressers, authors, baristas, and more. Those categories are all coming soon to Humans. In the future, Ofek hopes to incorporate additional features to his crowdsourced inspo site. For instance, he wants to make it possible for users to view version changes, so they can track how a portfolio looked in the past and how it improved as web design evolved.
Since Humans launched about a month ago, Ofek’s been busy curating and updating it, so if you’re looking for his personal website online, you won’t find it. He’s been so focused on his passion project that he hasn’t had time to complete his own.
When it comes time to choose a platform to host and design a website, users have options: WordPress, Wix, and Squarespace, just to name a few. All of these approaches, coupled with the option to code from the ground up, make it overwhelming for people to know which one will best suit their needs. For each website covered on the site, you can check out the design, technology, platform, color palette, awards given, and characteristics of the person who built it. You can also filter through the featured portfolios by color, industry, location, and more.
The websites seen on Humans were sourced from a huge swath of the web—via Twitter accounts belonging to web designers and developers, web-design award sites, and social-media platforms dedicated to design. His criteria for inclusion wasn’t to only add the best-looking websites, but to have a variety of styles, services, and technologies to see what’s already out there. There are minimalist websites with blank backgrounds, and flashy sites with all the design bells and whistles. “It’s up to the community to upvote what’s interesting and bubble up the better designs,” Ofek says.
Ofek launched Humans with 500 websites and has received roughly 1,200 submissions for inclusion since. Early on, reviews were mostly for professionals with some role in building the web—developers, designers, illustrators, writers, and so on. But over time, Ofek received requests to cover many other types of “offline” professions such as activists, hairdressers, authors, baristas, and more. Those categories are all coming soon to Humans. In the future, Ofek hopes to incorporate additional features to his crowdsourced inspo site. For instance, he wants to make it possible for users to view version changes, so they can track how a portfolio looked in the past and how it improved as web design evolved.
Since Humans launched about a month ago, Ofek’s been busy curating and updating it, so if you’re looking for his personal website online, you won’t find it. He’s been so focused on his passion project that he hasn’t had time to complete his own.
Ikea’s most-hyped collaboration yet is finally here
Prepare your credit card: Ikea’s Virgil Abloh collaboration will drop more than a year after the designer and artist first gave fans a sneak peek.
As
a designer, Virgil Abloh is fascinated with taking things out of
context, prompting his audience to rethink everyday objects. That’s
exactly what he does with his much-anticipated 15-piece collection he
designed for Ikea, which drops in stores on November 1, 2019.
Take,
for instance, the Ikea receipt, which is instantly recognizable to
anybody who has ever set foot in the Swedish furniture store.
The piece of paper has the brand’s logo in bold print on top, a bar code, and frayed edges from where the paper is torn off the roll. Most of us don’t really pay attention to the design of our receipts: We stuff them in our wallet, in case we ever need to return something. But Abloh transforms the humble Ikea receipt into a work of art in the form of a low-pile 3-by-7-foot rug that costs $99. And in an even more meta twist, the receipt lists the rug as the item purchased.
“The receipt is a trademark in itself that has been transformed into art,” Abloh explains in a statement. “I think that this rug can just as easily be on a floor or hung on the wall—in both scenarios, the rug highlights the entire story which Ikea embodies.”
This Ikea line will be called Markerad, which means “clear-cut,” “crisp,” or “pronounced” in Swedish, hinting at Abloh’s approach to design. In contrast to Abloh’s luxury streetwear brand Off-White, the Ikea partnership will be an opportunity for fans to get their hands on products designed by Abloh at an affordable price point.
Many are emblazoned with Abloh’s instantly recognizable graphic application of all-caps type with quotation marks: There’s a shopping bag that comes in two sizes ($19.99 for the medium and $24.99 for the large) emblazoned with the words “SCULPTURE” on it, a $249 dark green rug that sports the words “WET GRASS” and happens to look an awful lot like wet grass. The quotes are designed to challenge the meaning of those words. “There’s always an underlying message in my creations,” Abloh says in the item description of the green rug. “A little bit of irony—and a human connection.”
Other items in the collection offer Abloh’s take on conventional, everyday furniture items. There’s a simple $399 table and $149 chair made of light beech wood. There’s a $199 glass door cabinet and a $199 day bed with a $130 cover. All of these pieces are inspired by 1950s Scandinavian modernism and are designed to be simple to assemble. For instance, you can click the legs into the table in just one step using a wedge-dowel fitting, without needing to use any tools. (This will come as a relief to people like me who find complex assembly of Ikea products terrifying.)
The piece of paper has the brand’s logo in bold print on top, a bar code, and frayed edges from where the paper is torn off the roll. Most of us don’t really pay attention to the design of our receipts: We stuff them in our wallet, in case we ever need to return something. But Abloh transforms the humble Ikea receipt into a work of art in the form of a low-pile 3-by-7-foot rug that costs $99. And in an even more meta twist, the receipt lists the rug as the item purchased.
“The receipt is a trademark in itself that has been transformed into art,” Abloh explains in a statement. “I think that this rug can just as easily be on a floor or hung on the wall—in both scenarios, the rug highlights the entire story which Ikea embodies.”
This Ikea line will be called Markerad, which means “clear-cut,” “crisp,” or “pronounced” in Swedish, hinting at Abloh’s approach to design. In contrast to Abloh’s luxury streetwear brand Off-White, the Ikea partnership will be an opportunity for fans to get their hands on products designed by Abloh at an affordable price point.
Many are emblazoned with Abloh’s instantly recognizable graphic application of all-caps type with quotation marks: There’s a shopping bag that comes in two sizes ($19.99 for the medium and $24.99 for the large) emblazoned with the words “SCULPTURE” on it, a $249 dark green rug that sports the words “WET GRASS” and happens to look an awful lot like wet grass. The quotes are designed to challenge the meaning of those words. “There’s always an underlying message in my creations,” Abloh says in the item description of the green rug. “A little bit of irony—and a human connection.”
Other items in the collection offer Abloh’s take on conventional, everyday furniture items. There’s a simple $399 table and $149 chair made of light beech wood. There’s a $199 glass door cabinet and a $199 day bed with a $130 cover. All of these pieces are inspired by 1950s Scandinavian modernism and are designed to be simple to assemble. For instance, you can click the legs into the table in just one step using a wedge-dowel fitting, without needing to use any tools. (This will come as a relief to people like me who find complex assembly of Ikea products terrifying.)
This
partnership with Abloh was designed specifically with millennial
homeowners in mind, according to the official Ikea announcement. Abloh
is, after all, one of the best known designers among this particular
generation. Last year, he was named the artistic director of Louis
Vuitton’s menswear line, while continuing to collaborate with many other
brands through his Off-White label.
In keeping with Abloh’s genius for drumming up hype, he’s been teasing this collaboration for months. In late April of 2018, he gave fans a sneak peek of the new line by live-streaming product prototypes on social media from an undisclosed location in New York. In May 2019, Ikea dropped one limited-edition item from the line, a $499 rug that looked like a Persian carpet, except that it had the words “Keep Off” on it.
Ikea clearly expects droves of Abloh fans to show up to purchase these limited-edition products: The company says that stores will begin selling these items at 10 a.m. on November 1 in each store’s respective time zone, and it will allow customers to line up in front of the store beginning at 7 a.m. (camping or overnight parking, it notes, will not be permitted).
If lining up for three hours to get your hands on affordably priced Abloh-designed products seems like a long time, consider the statement that Abloh makes with a round white $49.99 clock he made for the collection. It features the word “TEMPORARY” on the glass, casting a shadow on the clock that moves around depending on where sunlight appears on it. Those waiting in line can ponder the fleeting nature of time before they get their hands on the clock of their dreams.
In keeping with Abloh’s genius for drumming up hype, he’s been teasing this collaboration for months. In late April of 2018, he gave fans a sneak peek of the new line by live-streaming product prototypes on social media from an undisclosed location in New York. In May 2019, Ikea dropped one limited-edition item from the line, a $499 rug that looked like a Persian carpet, except that it had the words “Keep Off” on it.
Ikea clearly expects droves of Abloh fans to show up to purchase these limited-edition products: The company says that stores will begin selling these items at 10 a.m. on November 1 in each store’s respective time zone, and it will allow customers to line up in front of the store beginning at 7 a.m. (camping or overnight parking, it notes, will not be permitted).
If lining up for three hours to get your hands on affordably priced Abloh-designed products seems like a long time, consider the statement that Abloh makes with a round white $49.99 clock he made for the collection. It features the word “TEMPORARY” on the glass, casting a shadow on the clock that moves around depending on where sunlight appears on it. Those waiting in line can ponder the fleeting nature of time before they get their hands on the clock of their dreams.
Impact
How Facebook is fundamentally changing how nonprofits get money
These are the 10 most energy efficient states in the U.S.
Oil industry money fuels opponents of California’s auto emissions standards
Creativity
Why Tinder really needs you to swipe right on its first original series ‘Swipe Night’
How Gary Gulman found the funny in clinical depression for his new HBO special
In latest streaming wars move, Disney bans Netflix ads from its entertainment networks
Fa
No comments:
Post a Comment